Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] about filter the flavor

2018-11-20 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/19/2018 9:32 PM, Rambo wrote:       I have an idea.Now we can't filter the special flavor according to the property.Can we achieve it?If we achieved this,we can filter the flavor according the property's key and value to filter the flavor. What do you think of the idea?Can you tell me

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Stein forum session notes

2018-11-19 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/19/2018 3:17 AM, melanie witt wrote: - Not directly related to the session, but CERN (hallway track) and NeCTAR (dev ML) have both given feedback and asked that the policy-driven idea for handling quota for down cells be avoided. Revived the "propose counting quota in placement" spec to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Can we deprecate the server backup API please?

2018-11-19 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/18/2018 6:51 AM, Alex Xu wrote: Sounds make sense to me, and then we needn't fix this strange behaviour also https://review.openstack.org/#/c/409644/ The same discussion was had in the spec for that change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/511825/ Ultimately it amounted to a big "meh,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] boot server with more than one subnet selection question

2018-11-13 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/13/2018 4:45 AM, Chen CH Ji wrote: Got it, this is what I am looking for .. thank you Regarding that you can do with server create, I believe it's: 1. don't specify anything for networking, you get a port on the network available to you; if there are multiple networks, it's a failure

[openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Week R-22 Update

2018-11-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
No major updates this week, but there is some decent progress in more projects getting their framework patch merged [1]. Thanks again to Rajat and Akhil for their persistent effort. There are more open reviews available for adding the framework to projects [2]. Some projects, like cloudkitty

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][neutron] Cross-cell cold migration

2018-11-06 Thread Matt Riedemann
After hacking on the PoC for awhile [1] I have finally pushed up a spec [2]. Behold it in all its dark glory! [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/603930/ [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/616037/ On 8/22/2018 8:23 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Hi everyone, I have started an etherpad

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [Openstack-sigs] Dropping lazy translation support

2018-11-06 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/6/2018 5:24 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote: Maybe the fastest way to get info would be to turn it off and see where the code barfs in a long run (to catch as many projects as possible)? There is zero integration testing for lazy translation, so "turning it off and seeing what breaks"

Re: [openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] FYI on "TypeError: Message objects do not support addition." errors

2018-11-06 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/5/2018 10:43 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: If you are seeing this error when implementing and running the upgrade check command in your project: Traceback (most recent call last):   File "/home/osboxes/git/searchlight/.tox/venv/lib/python3.5/site-packages/oslo_upgradecheck/upgradeche

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] Dropping lazy translation support

2018-11-05 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/5/2018 1:36 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: I think the lazy stuff was all about the API responses. The log translations worked a completely different way. Yeah maybe. And if so, I came across this in one of the blueprints: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/disable-lazy-translation Which says

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][placement] Placement requests and caching in the resource tracker

2018-11-05 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/5/2018 1:17 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: I'm thinking of a case like, resize and instance but rather than confirm/revert it, the user deletes the instance. That would cleanup the allocations from the target node but potentially not from the source node. Well this case is at least

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][placement] Placement requests and caching in the resource tracker

2018-11-05 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/5/2018 12:28 PM, Mohammed Naser wrote: Have you dug into any of the operations around these instances to determine what might have gone wrong? For example, was a live migration performed recently on these instances and if so, did it fail? How about evacuations (rebuild from a down host).

[openstack-dev] Dropping lazy translation support

2018-11-05 Thread Matt Riedemann
This is a follow up to a dev ML email [1] where I noticed that some implementations of the upgrade-checkers goal were failing because some projects still use the oslo_i18n.enable_lazy() hook for lazy log message translation (and maybe API responses?). The very old blueprints related to this

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Announcing new Focal Point for s390x libvirt/kvm Nova

2018-11-05 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/2/2018 3:47 AM, Andreas Scheuring wrote: Dear Nova Community, I want to announce the new focal point for Nova s390x libvirt/kvm. Please welcome "Cathy Zhang” to the Nova team. She and her team will be responsible for maintaining the s390x libvirt/kvm Thirdparty CI [1] and any s390x

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] about live-resize the instance

2018-11-05 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/4/2018 10:17 PM, Chen CH Ji wrote: Yes, this has been discussed for long time and If I remember this correctly seems S PTG also had some discussion on it (maybe public Cloud WG ? ), Claudiu has been pushing this for several cycles and he actually had some code at [1] but no additional

[openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] FYI on "TypeError: Message objects do not support addition." errors

2018-11-05 Thread Matt Riedemann
If you are seeing this error when implementing and running the upgrade check command in your project: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/osboxes/git/searchlight/.tox/venv/lib/python3.5/site-packages/oslo_upgradecheck/upgradecheck.py", line 184, in main return

[openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Week R-23 Update

2018-11-05 Thread Matt Riedemann
There is not much news this week. There are several open changes which add the base command framework to projects [1]. Those need reviews from the related core teams. gmann and I have been trying to go through them first to make sure they are ready for core review. There is one neutron change

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][placement] Placement requests and caching in the resource tracker

2018-11-05 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/5/2018 5:52 AM, Chris Dent wrote: * We need to have further discussion and investigation on   allocations getting out of sync. Volunteers? This is something I've already spent a lot of time on with the heal_allocations CLI, and have already started asking mnaser questions about this

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][placement] Placement requests and caching in the resource tracker

2018-11-05 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/4/2018 4:22 AM, Mohammed Naser wrote: Just for information sake, a clean state cloud which had no reported issues over maybe a period of 2-3 months already has 4 allocations which are incorrect and 12 allocations pointing to the wrong resource provider, so I think this comes does to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][placement] Placement requests and caching in the resource tracker

2018-11-02 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/2/2018 2:22 PM, Eric Fried wrote: Based on a (long) discussion yesterday [1] I have put up a patch [2] whereby you can set [compute]resource_provider_association_refresh to zero and the resource tracker will never* refresh the report client's provider cache. Philosophically, we're removing

Re: [openstack-dev] StoryBoard Forum Session: Remaining Blockers

2018-11-02 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/1/2018 7:22 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote: We've made a lot of progress in StoryBoard-land over the last couple of releases cleaning up bugs, fixing UI annoyances, and adding features that people have requested. All along we've also continued to migrate projects as they've become unblocked.

[openstack-dev] [nova] Is anyone running their own script to purge old instance_faults table entries?

2018-11-01 Thread Matt Riedemann
I came across this bug [1] in triage today and I thought this was fixed already [2] but either something regressed or there is more to do here. I'm mostly just wondering, are operators already running any kind of script which purges old instance_faults table records before an instance is

Re: [openstack-dev] Zuul Queue backlogs and resource usage

2018-10-30 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/30/2018 11:03 AM, Clark Boylan wrote: If you find any of this interesting and would like to help feel free to reach out to myself or the infra team. I find this interesting and thanks for providing the update to the mailing list. That's mostly what I wanted to say. FWIW I've still

[openstack-dev] [nova] FYI: change in semantics for virt driver update_provider_tree()

2018-10-29 Thread Matt Riedemann
This is a notice to any out of tree virt driver implementors of the ComputeDriver.update_provider_tree() interface that they now need to set the allocation_ratio and reserved amounts for VCPU, MEMORY_MB and DISK_GB inventory from the update_provider_tree() method assuming [1] merges. The patch

[openstack-dev] [nova] Volunteer needed to write reshaper FFU hook

2018-10-29 Thread Matt Riedemann
Given the outstanding results of my recruiting job last week [1] I have been tasked with recruiting one of our glorious and most talented contributors to work on the fast-forward-upgrade script changes needed for the reshape-provider-tree blueprint. The work item is nicely detailed in the

[openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Week R-24 Update

2018-10-26 Thread Matt Riedemann
There isn't much news this week except some of the base framework changes being proposed to projects are getting merged which is nice to see. https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2003657 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:upgrade-checkers+status:merged And there are a lot of patches

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][limits] Does ANYONE at all use the quota class functionality in Nova?

2018-10-25 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/25/2018 2:55 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: 2) The main benefit (as I see it) of the quota class API is to allow dynamic adjustment of the default quotas without restarting services. I could be making this up, but I want to say back at the Pike PTG people were also complaining that not having

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][openstack-ansible][nova][placement] Owners needed for placement extraction upgrade deployment tooling

2018-10-25 Thread Matt Riedemann
Hello OSA/TripleO people, A plan/checklist was put in place at the Stein PTG for extracting placement from nova [1]. The first item in that list is done in grenade [2], which is the devstack-based upgrade project in the integrated gate. That should serve as a template for the necessary

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] nova cellsv2 and DBs / down cells / quotas

2018-10-25 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/24/2018 6:55 PM, Sam Morrison wrote: I’ve been thinking of some hybrid cellsv1/v2 thing where we’d still have the top level api cell DB but the API would only ever read from it. Nova-api would only write to the compute cell DBs. Then keep the nova-cells processes just doing

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][limits] Does ANYONE at all use the quota class functionality in Nova?

2018-10-24 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/24/2018 10:10 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: I'd like to propose deprecating this API and getting rid of this functionality since it conflicts with the new Keystone /limits endpoint, is highly coupled with RAX's turnstile middleware and I can't seem to find anyone who has ever used it. Deprecating

Re: [openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Week R-25 Update

2018-10-23 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/23/2018 1:41 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: Yeah, but part of the reason for placeholders was consistency across all of the services. I guess if there are never going to be upgrade checks in adjutant then I could see skipping it, but otherwise I would prefer to at least get the framework in

Re: [openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Week R-25 Update

2018-10-23 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/23/2018 8:09 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: Can't we just add a noop command like we are for the services that don't currently need upgrade checks? We could, but I was also hoping that for most projects we will actually be able to replace the noop / placeholder check with *something* useful in

Re: [openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Week R-25 Update

2018-10-22 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/22/2018 4:35 PM, Adrian Turjak wrote: The one other open question I have is about the Adjutant change [2]. I know Adjutant is very new and I'm not sure what upgrades look like for that project, so I don't really know how valuable adding the upgrade check framework is to that project. Is it

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Metadata API cross joining "instance_metadata" and "instance_system_metadata"

2018-10-22 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/22/2018 11:59 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Thanks for this. Have you debugged to the point of knowing where the initial DB query is starting from? Looking at history, my guess is this is the change which introduced it for all requests: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/276861/ From

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Metadata API cross joining "instance_metadata" and "instance_system_metadata"

2018-10-22 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/22/2018 11:25 AM, Sergio A. de Carvalho Jr. wrote: Hi, While troubleshooting a production issue we identified that the Nova metadata API is fetching a lot more raw data from the database than seems necessary. The problem appears to be caused by the SQL query used to fetch instance data

[openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Week R-25 Update

2018-10-19 Thread Matt Riedemann
The big news this week is we have a couple of volunteer developers from NEC (Akhil Jain and Rajat Dhasmana) who are pushing the base framework changes across a lot of the projects [1]. I'm trying to review as many of these as I can. The request now is for the core teams on these projects to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Week R-26 Update

2018-10-19 Thread Matt Riedemann
/15/2018 3:29 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 10/15/18 3:27 AM, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote: On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 17:05 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: The big update this week is version 0.1.0 of oslo.upgradecheck was released. The documentation along with usage examples can be found here [1]. A big

Re: [openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Call for Volunteers to work on upgrade-checkers stein goal

2018-10-17 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/16/2018 9:43 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: I was discussing with mriedem [1] about idea of building a volunteer team which can work with him on upgrade-checkers goal [2]. There are lot of work needed for this goal[3], few projects which does not have upgrade impact yet needs CLI framework

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][cinder][keystone][glance][neutron][swift] Horizon feature gaps

2018-10-17 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/17/2018 9:24 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: As you may know, unfortunately, Horizon doesn't support all features provided by APIs. That's why we created feature gaps list [1]. I'd got a lot of great conversations with projects teams during the PTG and we tried to figure out what should

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] devstack, grenade, database management

2018-10-16 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/16/2018 5:48 AM, Chris Dent wrote: * We need to address database creation scripts and database migrations.   There's a general consensus that we should use alembic, and start   things from a collapsed state. That is, we don't need to represent   already existing migrations in the new

Re: [openstack-dev] Forum Schedule - Seeking Community Review

2018-10-15 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/15/2018 3:01 PM, Jimmy McArthur wrote: The Forum schedule is now up (https://www.openstack.org/summit/berlin-2018/summit-schedule/#track=262). If you see a glaring content conflict within the Forum itself, please let me know. Not a conflict, but it looks like there is a duplicate for

[openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Week R-26 Update

2018-10-12 Thread Matt Riedemann
The big update this week is version 0.1.0 of oslo.upgradecheck was released. The documentation along with usage examples can be found here [1]. A big thanks to Ben Nemec for getting that done since a few projects were waiting for it. In other updates, some changes were proposed in other

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Supporting force live-migrate and force evacuate with nested allocations

2018-10-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/10/2018 7:46 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: 2) in the old microversions change the blind allocation copy to gather every resource from a nested source RPs too and try to allocate that from the destination root RP. In nested allocation cases putting this allocation to placement will fail and nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Supporting force live-migrate and force evacuate with nested allocations

2018-10-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/9/2018 10:08 AM, Balázs Gibizer wrote: Question for you as well: if we remove (or change) the force flag in a new microversion then how should the old microversions behave when nested allocations would be required? Fail fast if we can detect we have nested. We don't support forcing

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Rocky RC time regression analysis

2018-10-09 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/5/2018 6:59 PM, melanie witt wrote: 5) when live migration fails due to a internal error rollback is not handled correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1788014 - Bug was reported on 2018-08-20 - The change that caused the regression landed on 2018-07-26, FF day

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] Stable Core Team Update

2018-10-09 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/9/2018 11:08 AM, Miguel Lavalle wrote: Since it has been more than a week since this nomination was posted and we have received only positive feedback, can we move ahead and add Bernard Cafarelli to Neutron Stable core team? Done: https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/539,members

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] Do we need a "force" parameter in cinder "re-image" API?

2018-10-09 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/9/2018 8:04 AM, Erlon Cruz wrote: If you are planning to re-image an image on a bootable volume then yes you should use a force parameter. I have lost the discussion about this on PTG. What is the main use cases? This seems to me something that could be leveraged with the current

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][octavia] Backport patch adding new configuration options

2018-10-08 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/8/2018 11:05 AM, Carlos Goncalves wrote: The Octavia team merged a patch in master [1] that fixed an issue where load balancers could be deleted whenever queue_event_streamer driver is enabled and RabbitMQ goes down [2]. As this is a critical bug, we would like to backport as much back

Re: [openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Oslo library status

2018-10-08 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/7/2018 4:10 AM, Slawomir Kaplonski wrote: I start working on „neutron-status upgrade check” tool with noop operation for now. Patch is in [1] I started using this new oslo_upgradecheck library in version 0.0.1.dev15 which is available on pypi.org but I see that in master there are some

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][stable] Preparing for ocata-em (extended maintenance)

2018-10-05 Thread Matt Riedemann
The ocata-em tag request is up for review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/608296/ On 9/28/2018 11:21 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Per the other thread on this [1] I've created an etherpad [2] to track what needs to happen to get nova's stable/ocata branch ready for Extended Maintenance [3

Re: [openstack-dev] [goals][python3][heat][stable] how should we proceed with ocata branch

2018-10-03 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/3/2018 11:21 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: That patch is the only thing blocking the cleanup patch in project-config, so I would like to get a definitive answer about what to do. Should we close the branch, or does someone want to try to fix things up? I think we agreed on closing the branch,

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Proposing Gorka Eguileor to Stable Core ...

2018-10-03 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/3/2018 9:45 AM, Jay S. Bryant wrote: Team, We had discussed the possibility of adding Gorka to the stable core team during the PTG.  He does review a number of our backport patches and is active in that area. If there are no objections in the next week I will add him to the list.

[openstack-dev] [nova] We should fail to boot a server if PF passthrough is requested and we don't honor it, right?

2018-10-03 Thread Matt Riedemann
I came across [1] today while triaging a bug [2]. Unless I'm mistaken, the user has requested SR-IOV PF passthrough for their server and for whatever reason we can't find the PCI device for the PF passthrough port so we don't reflect the actual device MAC address on the port. Is that worth

Re: [openstack-dev] [goals][python3][heat][stable] how should we proceed with ocata branch

2018-10-03 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/3/2018 7:58 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: There is one more patch to import the zuul configuration for the heat-agents repository's stable/ocata branch. That branch is apparently broken, and Zane suggested on the review [1] that we abandon the patch and close the branch. That patch is the only

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] Stable Core Team Update

2018-10-02 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/2/2018 10:41 AM, Miguel Lavalle wrote: Hi Stable Team, I want to nominate Bernard Cafarrelli as a stable core reviewer for Neutron and related projects. Bernard has been increasing the number of stable reviews he is doing for the project [1]. Besides that, he is a stable maintainer

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][qa] Should we enable multiattach in tempest-full?

2018-10-01 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 10/1/2018 8:37 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: +1 on adding multiattach on integrated job. It is always good to cover more features in integrate-gate instead of separate jobs. These tests does not take much time, it should be ok to add in tempest-full [1]. We should make only really slow test as

Re: [openstack-dev] Placement extraction update

2018-09-30 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/30/2018 11:02 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Maybe that's some conditional branch logic we can hack into devstack-gate [7] like we do for neutron? [8] I'm hoping this works: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/606853/ -- Thanks, Matt

[openstack-dev] Placement extraction update

2018-09-30 Thread Matt Riedemann
I finally got a passing neutron-grenade run in change [1]. That's the grenade change which populates the placement DB in Stein from the placement-related table contents of the nova_api DB from Rocky. It also writes out the placement.conf file for Stein before starting the Stein services. As

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][python-novaclient] A Test issue in python-novaclient.

2018-09-30 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/29/2018 10:01 PM, Tao Li wrote: I found this test is added about ten days ago in this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/599276/, I checked it and don’t know why it failed. I think my commit shouldn’t cause this issue. So do you any suggestion to me? Yes it must be an

[openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][qa] Should we enable multiattach in tempest-full?

2018-09-29 Thread Matt Riedemann
Nova, cinder and tempest run the nova-multiattach job in their check and gate queues. The job was added in Queens and was a specific job because we had to change the ubuntu cloud archive we used in Queens to get multiattach working. Since Rocky, devstack defaults to a version of the UCA that

[openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Week R-28 Update

2018-09-28 Thread Matt Riedemann
There isn't really anything to report this week. There are no new changes up for review that I'm aware of. If your team has posted changes for your project, please update the related task in the story [1]. I'm also waiting for some feedback from glance-minded people about [2]. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul job backlog

2018-09-28 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/28/2018 3:12 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: I was asked to write a followup to this as the long Zuul queues have persisted through this week. Largely because the situation from last week hasn't changed much. We were down the upgraded cloud region while we worked around a network configuration

Re: [openstack-dev] Are we ready to put stable/ocata into extended maintenance mode?

2018-09-28 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/21/2018 9:08 AM, Elõd Illés wrote: Hi, Here is an etherpad with the teams that have stable:follow-policy tag on their repos: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-final-release-before-em On the links you can find reports about the open and unreleased changes, that could be a useful

[openstack-dev] [nova][stable] Preparing for ocata-em (extended maintenance)

2018-09-28 Thread Matt Riedemann
Per the other thread on this [1] I've created an etherpad [2] to track what needs to happen to get nova's stable/ocata branch ready for Extended Maintenance [3] which means we need to flush our existing Ocata backports that we want in the final Ocata release before tagging the branch as

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [ironic] [nova] [tripleo] Deprecation of Nova's integration with Ironic Capabilities and ComputeCapabilitiesFilter

2018-09-27 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/27/2018 3:02 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: A great example of this would be the proposed "deploy template" from [2]. This is nothing more than abusing the placement traits API in order to allow passthrough of instance configuration data from the nova flavor extra spec directly into the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [goals][tc][ptl][uc] starting goal selection for T series

2018-09-27 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/27/2018 2:33 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: If the project plugins were maintained by the OSC project still, maybe there would be incentive for the various other projects to join the OSC project, scaling things up? Sure, I don't really care about governance. But I also don't really care about

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [goals][tc][ptl][uc] starting goal selection for T series

2018-09-27 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/27/2018 10:13 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Monty Taylor writes: Main difference is making sure these new deconstructed plugin teams understand the client support lifecycle - which is that we don't drop support for old versions of services

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Stein PTG summary

2018-09-27 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/27/2018 5:23 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 2:46 AM Matt Riedemann <mailto:mriede...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 9/26/2018 5:30 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: > So, during this day, we also discussed about NUMA affinity and we said > that we cou

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Stein PTG summary

2018-09-26 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/26/2018 5:30 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: So, during this day, we also discussed about NUMA affinity and we said that we could possibly use nested resource providers for NUMA cells in Stein, but given we don't have yet a specific Placement API query, NUMA affinity should still be using the

Re: [openstack-dev] [goals][tc][ptl][uc] starting goal selection for T series

2018-09-26 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/26/2018 3:01 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Monty Taylor writes: On 09/26/2018 01:55 PM, Tim Bell wrote: Doug, Thanks for raising this. I'd like to highlight the goal "Finish moving legacy python-*client CLIs to python-openstackclient" from the etherpad and propose this for a T/U series

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [nova] [tripleo] Deprecation of Nova's integration with Ironic Capabilities and ComputeCapabilitiesFilter

2018-09-25 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/25/2018 8:36 AM, John Garbutt wrote: Another thing is about existing flavors configured for these capabilities-scoped specs. Are you saying during the deprecation we'd continue to use those even if the filter is disabled? In the review I had suggested that we add a

Re: [openstack-dev] [penstack-dev]Discussion about the future of OpenStack in China

2018-09-24 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/24/2018 12:12 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: There were a couple points that I did manage to decipher, though. One thing that both articles seemed to say was that OpenStack doesn't meet public (AWS-ish) cloud use cases and OpenStack doesn't compare favorably to VMWare either. Yeah I picked up on

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][upgrade-checkers] Question about glance rocky upgrade release note

2018-09-24 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/24/2018 2:06 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Are there more specific docs about how to configure the 'image import' feature so that I can be sure I'm careful? In other words, are there specific things a "glance-status upgrade check" check could look at and say, "your image impor

[openstack-dev] [glance][upgrade-checkers] Question about glance rocky upgrade release note

2018-09-24 Thread Matt Riedemann
Looking at the upgrade-checkers goal [1] for glance and the Rocky upgrade release notes [2], one upgrade note says: "As Image Import will be always enabled, care needs to be taken that it is configured properly from this release forward. The ‘enable_image_import’ option is silently ignored."

Re: [openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Week R-29 Update

2018-09-22 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/21/2018 4:19 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: * The only two projects that I'm aware of with patches up at this point are monasca [2] and designate [3]. The monasca one is tricky because as I've found going through release notes for some projects, they don't really have any major upgrade impacts so

Re: [openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Week R-29 Update

2018-09-21 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/21/2018 3:53 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: * The reference docs I wrote for writing upgrade checks is published now [4]. As I've been answering some questions in storyboard and IRC, it's obvious that I need to add some FAQs into those docs because I've taken some of this for granted on how

[openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Week R-29 Update

2018-09-21 Thread Matt Riedemann
Updates for this week: * As bnemec noted in the last update [1], he's making some progress with the oslo.upgradecheck library. He's retrofitting the nova-status upgrade check code to use the library and has a patch up for designate to use it. * The only two projects that I'm aware of with

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack Project Navigator

2018-09-21 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/21/2018 1:11 PM, Michael Johnson wrote: Thank you Jimmy for making this available for updates. I was unable to find the code backing the project tags section of the Project Navigator pages. Our page is missing some upgrade tags and is showing duplicate "Stable branch policy" tags.

Re: [openstack-dev] Are we ready to put stable/ocata into extended maintenance mode?

2018-09-20 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/20/2018 12:08 PM, Elõd Illés wrote: Hi Matt, About 1.: I think it is a good idea to cut a final release (especially as some vendor/operator would be glad even if there would be some release in Extended Maintenance, too, what most probably won't happen...) -- saying that without knowing

Re: [openstack-dev] Forum Topic Submission Period

2018-09-20 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/20/2018 10:23 AM, Jimmy McArthur wrote: This is basically the CFP equivalent: https://www.openstack.org/summit/berlin-2018/vote-for-speakers  Voting isn't necessary, of course, but it should allow you to see submissions as they roll in. Does this work for your purposes? Yup, that

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [nova] [tripleo] Deprecation of Nova's integration with Ironic Capabilities and ComputeCapabilitiesFilter

2018-09-20 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/20/2018 4:16 AM, John Garbutt wrote: Following on from the PTG discussions, I wanted to bring everyone's attention to Nova's plans to deprecate ComputeCapabilitiesFilter, including most of the the integration with Ironic Capabilities. To be specific, this is my proposal in code form:

Re: [openstack-dev] Forum Topic Submission Period

2018-09-20 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/17/2018 11:13 AM, Jimmy McArthur wrote: The Forum Topic Submission session started September 12 and will run through September 26th.  Now is the time to wrangle the topics you gathered during your Brainstorming Phase and start pushing forum topics through. Don't rely only on a PTL to make

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul job backlog

2018-09-19 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/19/2018 2:45 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Another one we need to make a decision on is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1783405 Which I'm suggesting we need to mark more slow tests with the actual "slow" tag in Tempest so they move to only be run in the tempest-slow

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul job backlog

2018-09-19 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/19/2018 2:11 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: Unfortunately, right now our classification rate is very poor (only 15%), which makes it difficult to know what exactly is causing these failures. Mriedem and I have quickly scanned the unclassified list, and it appears there is a db migration testing

Re: [openstack-dev] Nominating Tetsuro Nakamura for placement-core

2018-09-19 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/19/2018 10:25 AM, Chris Dent wrote: I'd like to nominate Tetsuro Nakamura for membership in the placement-core team. Throughout placement's development Tetsuro has provided quality reviews; done the hard work of creating rigorous functional tests, making them fail, and fixing them; and

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Super fun unshelve image_ref bugs

2018-09-19 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 12/1/2017 2:47 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Andrew Laski also mentioned in IRC that we didn't replace the original instance.image_ref with the shelved image id because the shelve operation should be transparent to the end user, they have the same image (not really), same volumes, same IPs, etc

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] When can/should we change additionalProperties=False in GET /servers(/detail)?

2018-09-19 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/18/2018 12:26 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 9/17/2018 9:41 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote:   On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 09:33:30 +0900 Alex Xu wrote   > That only means after 599276 we only have servers API and os-instance-action API stopped accepting the undefined query parameter.   >

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] tempest and grenade conversion to python 3.6

2018-09-18 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/18/2018 9:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 9/18/2018 12:28 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: What's probably missing is a version of the grenade job that allows us to control that USE_PYTHON3 variable before and after the upgrade. I see a few different grenade jobs (neutron-grenade, neutron-grenade

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] tempest and grenade conversion to python 3.6

2018-09-18 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/18/2018 12:28 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: What's probably missing is a version of the grenade job that allows us to control that USE_PYTHON3 variable before and after the upgrade. I see a few different grenade jobs (neutron-grenade, neutron-grenade-multinode,

Re: [openstack-dev] Forum Topic Submission Period

2018-09-18 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/17/2018 11:13 AM, Jimmy McArthur wrote: Hello Everyone! The Forum Topic Submission session started September 12 and will run through September 26th.  Now is the time to wrangle the topics you gathered during your Brainstorming Phase and start pushing forum topics through. Don't rely

[openstack-dev] Are we ready to put stable/ocata into extended maintenance mode?

2018-09-18 Thread Matt Riedemann
The release page says Ocata is planned to go into extended maintenance mode on Aug 27 [1]. There really isn't much to this except it means we don't do releases for Ocata anymore [2]. There is a caveat that project teams that do not wish to maintain stable/ocata after this point can immediately

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] When can/should we change additionalProperties=False in GET /servers(/detail)?

2018-09-18 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/17/2018 9:41 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 09:33:30 +0900 Alex Xu wrote > That only means after 599276 we only have servers API and os-instance-action API stopped accepting the undefined query parameter. > What I'm thinking about is checking all the APIs,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] When can/should we change additionalProperties=False in GET /servers(/detail)?

2018-09-17 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/17/2018 3:06 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: My vote would be just change additionalProperties to False in the 599276 patch and be done with it. Well, it would be on a microversion boundary so the user would be opting into this stricter validation, but that's the point of microversions. So my

[openstack-dev] [nova] When can/should we change additionalProperties=False in GET /servers(/detail)?

2018-09-17 Thread Matt Riedemann
This is a question from a change [1] which adds a new changes-before filter to the servers, os-instance-actions and os-migrations APIs. For context, the os-instance-actions API stopped accepting undefined query parameters in 2.58 when we added paging support. The os-migrations API stopped

Re: [openstack-dev] [election][tc]Question for candidates about global reachout

2018-09-16 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/15/2018 9:50 PM, Fred Li wrote: As a non-native English speaker, it is nice-to-have that some TC or BoD can stay in the local social media, like wechat group in China. But it is also very difficult for non-native Chinese speakers to stay find useful information in ton of Chinese chats.

Re: [openstack-dev] [election][tc]Question for candidates about global reachout

2018-09-15 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/14/2018 1:52 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: This is a joint question from mnaser and me :) For the candidates who are running for tc seats, please reply to this email to indicate if you are open to use certain social media app in certain region (like Wechat in China, Line in Japan, etc.), in

[openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Week R-30 update

2018-09-15 Thread Matt Riedemann
Just a couple of updates this week. * I have assigned PTLs (for projects that have PTLs [1]) to their respective tasks in StoryBoard [2]. If someone else on your team is planning on working on the pre-upgrade check goal then please just reassign ownership of the task. * I have started going

[openstack-dev] [nova][publiccloud-wg] Proposal to shelve on stop/suspend

2018-09-14 Thread Matt Riedemann
tl;dr: I'm proposing a new parameter to the server stop (and suspend?) APIs to control if nova shelve offloads the server. Long form: This came up during the public cloud WG session this week based on a couple of feature requests [1][2]. When a user stops/suspends a server, the hypervisor

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Hard fail if you try to rename an AZ with instances in it?

2018-09-14 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 3/28/2018 4:35 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 03/28/2018 03:35 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 3/27/2018 10:37 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: If we want to actually fix the issue once and for all, we need to make availability zones a real thing that has a permanent identifier (UUID) and store that permanent

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] Open letter/request to TC candidates (and existing elected officials)

2018-09-12 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/12/2018 5:32 PM, Melvin Hillsman wrote: We basically spent the day focusing on two things specific to what you bring up and are in agreement with you regarding action not just talk around feedback and outreach. [1] We wiped the agenda clean, discussed our availability (set reasonable

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] Open letter/request to TC candidates (and existing elected officials)

2018-09-12 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 9/12/2018 5:13 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: Sure, and I'm saying that instead I think the influence of TC members_can_ be more valuable in finding and helping additional people to do these things rather than doing it all themselves, and it's not just about the limited number of available hours

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >