Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kolla-ansible] Proposing Surya (spsurya) for core

2017-07-10 Thread Mauricio Lima
+1 2017-06-28 13:07 GMT-03:00 Swapnil Kulkarni : > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Michał Jastrzębski > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > With great pleasure I'm kicking off another core voting to > > kolla-ansible and kolla teams:) this one is about spsurya.

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kolla-ansible] Proposing Bertrand Lallau for kolla and kolla-ansible core

2017-05-03 Thread Mauricio Lima
+1 2017-05-03 1:43 GMT-03:00 Christian Berendt : > +1 > > > On 2. May 2017, at 17:30, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > It's my pleasure to start another core reviewer vote. Today it's > > Bertrand (blallau). Consider this mail

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposing duonghq for core

2017-03-08 Thread Mauricio Lima
+1 2017-03-08 7:34 GMT-03:00 Christian Berendt : > +1 > > > On 8 Mar 2017, at 07:41, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I'd like to start voting to include Duong (duonghq) in Kolla and > > Kolla-ansible core teams. Voting will be

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for Debian distro support

2017-01-19 Thread Mauricio Lima
2 2017-01-19 8:50 GMT-03:00 Steven Dake (stdake) : > My vote is for option 2 to deprecate Debian as there has been very little > activity and operators seem uninterested in Debian as a platform. > > We could always add it back in at a later date if operators were to > request

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Vote to add zhubingbing to core team

2016-11-29 Thread Mauricio Lima
+1 2016-11-29 13:21 GMT-03:00 Michał Jastrzębski : > Hello team! > > I'd like to propose to add zhubingbing to kolla (and kolla-ansible) > core teams. He did great job reviewing code during last couple of > months. > > Consider this proposal +1 from me, voting will be open for

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Source build gates are now voting

2016-11-18 Thread Mauricio Lima
great! 2016-11-18 14:51 GMT-03:00 Michał Jastrzębski : > Hello, > > Since we split ansible, we can now afford to have some voting gates, > for start - source build gates for 3 major distros are now voting. > > Cheers, > Michal > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kolla-ansible][kolla-kubernetes] Kolla core election policy change - vote

2016-11-16 Thread Mauricio Lima
+1 2016-11-16 16:55 GMT-03:00 Ryan Hallisey : > +1 > > -Ryan > > - Original Message - > From: "Michał Jastrzębski" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Sent: Wednesday,

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Propose removal of TrivialFix requirement

2016-11-03 Thread Mauricio Lima
I Agree. +1 2016-11-03 10:21 GMT-03:00 Paul Bourke : > Kolleagues, > > How do people feel above removing the requirement of having TrivialFix in > commit messages where a bug/bp is not required? > > I'm seeing a lot of valid and important commits being held up because of

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for fedora distro support

2016-09-19 Thread Mauricio Lima
Option 2 2016-09-19 14:56 GMT-03:00 Christian Berendt : > Thanks for moving this forward. > > > On 19 Sep 2016, at 19:40, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > > > > 1. Kolla needs support fedora( if so, we need some guys to set up the > > gate and fix

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] deprecation for debian distro support

2016-09-19 Thread Mauricio Lima
Option 2 2016-09-19 14:55 GMT-03:00 Christian Berendt : > Thanks for moving this forward. > > > On 19 Sep 2016, at 19:44, Jeffrey Zhang wrote: > > > > Please vote: > > > > 1. Kolla needs support Debian( if so, we need some guys to set up

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] Splitting out Ansible into a separate deliverable

2016-09-15 Thread Mauricio Lima
Option c. 2016-09-15 8:25 GMT-03:00 Eduardo Gonzalez : > Option C > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016, 1:23 PM Dave Walker wrote: > >> Option C >> >> Thanks >> >> On 15 September 2016 at 12:10, Ryan Hallisey wrote: >> >>> Option c. >>> >>> - Ryan

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] Core Nomination for Christian Berendt (berendt on irc)

2016-09-08 Thread Mauricio Lima
+1 2016-09-08 5:52 GMT-03:00 Dave Walker : > +1 > > Great stuff Christian > > On 8 September 2016 at 03:59, Steven Dake (stdake) > wrote: > >> Kolla core reviewer team, >> >> >> >> It is my pleasure to nominate Christian Berendt for the Kolla core team. >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] which footer format we need

2016-09-02 Thread Mauricio Lima
I agree with Jeffrey. 2016-09-02 11:52 GMT-03:00 Michał Jastrzębski : > +1 to Jeffrey's points. We should deprecate old footer mechanism and > remove it alltogether in Ocata timeframe. > > On 1 September 2016 at 23:51, Jeffrey Zhang > wrote: > > 1. so

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Core nomination for Dave Walker (Daviey on irc)

2016-08-24 Thread Mauricio Lima
+1 2016-08-24 9:15 GMT-03:00 Kwasniewska, Alicja : > +1 > > > > *From:* Eduardo Gonzalez [mailto:dabar...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 24, 2016 1:42 PM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < >

Re: [openstack-dev] [vote][kolla] Core nomination proposal for Eduardo Gonzalez Gutierrez (egonzales90 on irc)

2016-08-19 Thread Mauricio Lima
+1 Em 19/08/2016 14:14, "Jeffrey Zhang" escreveu: > +1 > > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Swapnil Kulkarni > wrote: > > Thanks sdake. > > > > +1 :) > > > > On Aug 19, 2016 10:35 PM, "Steven Dake (stdake)" > wrote: > >> > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Applying for stable-follows tag

2016-07-19 Thread Mauricio Lima
+1 2016-07-19 12:23 GMT-03:00 Vikram Hosakote (vhosakot) : > +1 sure. > > Regards, > Vikram Hosakote > IRC: vhosakot > > From: Michał Jastrzębski > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < >

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] New specs process - a dicussion

2016-07-12 Thread Mauricio Lima
+1 I agree 2016-07-12 13:55 GMT-03:00 Paul Bourke : > Sounds reasonable +1 > > > On 12/07/16 15:32, Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > >> Hey guys, >> >> Since our project matured, we decided that we should have a discussion >> regarding our spec process. >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Request for changing the meeting time to 1600 UTC for all meetings

2016-06-08 Thread Mauricio Lima
+1 2016-06-08 10:29 GMT-03:00 Jeffrey Zhang : > it will be mid-night (0:00) in my local time. But i think i am OK with it. > so +1 for this. > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Paul Bourke > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On 08/06/16 13:54, Swapnil

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposing Mauricio Lima for core reviewer

2016-05-24 Thread Mauricio Lima
Date: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 12:00 PM > To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Proposing Mauricio Lima for core reviewer > > Hello core reviewers, > > I am proposing Mauricio (mlima on irc)

[openstack-dev] [kolla] xenial or trusty

2016-05-04 Thread Mauricio Lima
Which will be the default when kolla begin to support xenial? Xenial or Trusty? One proposal is to support both, at least in this beginning and just do some checks to get which version that the user is using. Regards, __

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] better solution for the non-ini format configure file

2016-05-04 Thread Mauricio Lima
I agree with your approach Jeffrey, although this is not ideal, this is an approach already used in kolla. 2016-05-04 12:01 GMT-03:00 Jeffrey Zhang : > Recently, Jack Ning pushed a PS[0], which export the `WEBROOT` to the > globals.yml file. > Because there is no chance

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote][kubernetes][infra] kolla-kubernetes repository management proposal up for vote

2016-05-02 Thread Mauricio Lima
Just to clarify my vote. +1 for single repository 2016-05-02 14:11 GMT-03:00 Jeff Peeler : > Also +1 for working on kolla-kubernetes. (Please read this thread if > you haven't yet): > > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-May/093575.html > > On Mon, May

[openstack-dev] [kolla][vote][kubernetes][infra] kolla-kubernetes repository management proposal up for vote

2016-05-02 Thread Mauricio Lima
Hello guys, Reading the conversation and analyzing a few trouble that happened with kolla-mesos and nothing can guarantee that will not happen the same with the K8S, as well as ensuring that the history will not lost. So, don't split the repo.