On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Giulio Fidente wrote:
> On 03/04/2016 03:23 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>
>> That's not the name of any Summit's talk, it's just an e-mail I wanted
>> to write for a long time.
>>
>> It is an attempt to expose facts or things I've heard a lot; and bring
>> construct
I'd like to propose we just use numbers for versioning our software. Both
random words and the year.cadence scheme are irritating in their own
special way.
Why not make it Openstack 13.0 and let the downstream distributions play in
the minefield that is naming software projects.
- Michael
On We
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> I'm sorry about my slow responses. For some reason, gmail didn't think
> this was an important e-mail :(
>
> 2014-09-30 18:41 GMT+02:00 Jay Pipes :
> > On 09/30/2014 08:03 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> >> 2014-09-12 1:05 GMT+02:00 Jay Pipes :
> >
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 08/22/2014 01:30 AM, Michael Chapman wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Jay Pipes > <mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On 08/19/2014 11:28 PM, Robert Col
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 08/19/2014 11:28 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
>
>> On 20 August 2014 02:37, Jay Pipes wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> I'd like to see more unification of implementations in TripleO - but I
still believe our basic principle of using OpenStack technolo
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> On 27 March 2014 17:30, Tom Fifield wrote:
>
> >> Does anyone disagree?
> >
> > /me raises hand
> >
> > When I was an operator, I regularly referred to the sample config files
> > in the git repository.
> >
> > If there weren't generated ve
>Have the folks creating our puppet modules and install recommendations
taken a >close look at all the options and determined
>that the defaults are appropriate for deploying RHEL OSP in the
configurations we >are recommending?
If by our puppet modules you mean the ones in stackforge, in the vast
