We are very interested in spinning out BGP Dynamic Routing into a separate
stadium project. We are ready and willing to help make this happen soon.
Mickey
-Vikram Choudhary wrote: -
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
From: Vikram Choudhary
Date: 03/21
I agree that the timing is good for FWaaS to look at the possibility of using a
common traffic classifier in the new FWaaS 2.0 API. If we can agree on a
definition and get moving on an implementation in the Mitaka time frame, we
could avoid a painful API migration later on. Sean has started movi
d discussions at the summit.
Carl
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Mickey Spiegel wrote:
> Resending, forgot the [neutron] tag
>
> -Mickey Spiegel/San Jose/IBM wrote: -
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> From: Mickey Spiegel/San Jose/IBM
> Date: 08/19/2015 09:45AM
Bump
The FWaaS team would really like some feedback from the DVR side.
Mickey
-Mickey Spiegel/San Jose/IBM wrote: -
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
From: Mickey Spiegel/San Jose/IBM
Date: 08/19/2015 09:45AM
Subject: [fwaas][dvr] FWaaS with DVR
Currently, FWaaS behaves differently
Resending, forgot the [neutron] tag-Mickey Spiegel/San Jose/IBM wrote: -To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgFrom: Mickey Spiegel/San Jose/IBMDate: 08/19/2015 09:45AMSubject: [fwaas][dvr] FWaaS with DVRCurrently, FWaaS behaves differently with DVR, applying to only north/south traffic
Currently, FWaaS behaves differently with DVR, applying to only north/south traffic, whereas FWaaS on routers in network nodes applies to both north/south and east/west traffic. There is a compatibility issue due to the asymmetric design of L3 forwarding in DVR, which breaks the connection tracking