Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Should we drop kafka driver ?

2016-11-30 Thread Nadya Shakhat
Hi all, This one [1] is used very intensively actually :) It is not merged because we cannot just upgrade python-kafka version because of Monasca. We had some talks in their channel, but no results still. I suggest the following: 1. On our side we will update this change 2. I will ping Monasca

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer][panko] ElasticSearch support is broken

2016-07-29 Thread Nadya Shakhat
Hi Julien, Thank you for notifying! I've assigned this bug to me. Will work on that today. Nadya On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: > Hi there, > > This is a reminder that ElasticSearch support for event in Ceilometer > (now Panko) is broken for more

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [Ceilometer][Architecture] Transformers in Kilo vs Liberty(and Mitaka)

2016-04-14 Thread Nadya Shakhat
Hi Gordon, I'd like to add some clarifications and comments. this is not entirely accurate pre-polling change, the polling agents > publish one message per sample. not the polling agents publish one > message per interval (multiple samples). Looks like there is some misunderstanding here. In

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] stepping down as PTL

2016-03-14 Thread Nadya Shakhat
Gordon, Thank you very much for your work! I was always amazed by your patience and proficiency. It seems to me that you answered billion questions during working on Telemetry. I wish you all the best in the future, you are awesome :)! Thanks, Nadya On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Julien

Re: [openstack-dev] [aodh] HBase gate job

2015-11-17 Thread Nadya Shakhat
Hi folks, Sorry I missed the letter. I'll take a look on this. As I understand, it's enough just to run functional tests to see the issue, right? Nadya On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:48 PM, gord chung wrote: > let's change this gate to experimental for now. > > On 17/11/15 05:10 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Aodh has been imported, next steps

2015-06-29 Thread Nadya Shakhat
I'm afraid user experience will change because of API. Do we have a plan about it? Will we interact with Aodh through ceilometer-api first? Or make user to go to aodh-api service? So I agree with Gordon that code-cleanup is more preferred option because we can't maintain two version

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] virtual mid-cycle planning

2015-06-28 Thread Nadya Shakhat
Chris, What is the workflow of adding a new topic? I suggest to add it to both [1] and [2]. Also it may be useful to add more items for each topic like description, open questions, leader. It may help to understand what should be discussed and who is an initiator. What do you think? [1]