Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [Openstack] Rescinding the M name decision

2015-07-11 Thread Neo Liu
+1 for this. On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 5:20 PM Thierry Carrez wrote: > Adam Lawson wrote: > > The alternative of course is to just number the releases since names > > ultimately don't mean anything but it seems there are problems with that > > level of simplicity. I personally prefer Tristan's sug

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone]Why not common definition about normal HTTP status code like 2xx and 3xx?

2015-06-03 Thread Neo Liu
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:43 AM Brant Knudson wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Chenhong Liu > wrote: > >> There is keystone/exception.py which contains Exceptions defined and used >> inside keystone provide 4xx and 5xx status code. And we can use it like: >> exception.Forbidden.co

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone]Why not common definition about normal HTTP status code like 2xx and 3xx?

2015-06-02 Thread Neo Liu
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 7:24 PM samuel wrote: > Hi Chenhong Liu, > > In addition, I think creating a common file to place non-error HTTP > status code > is a good idea and can be discussed with the Keystone cores. > > Feel free to add a point to our weekly meeting, Tuesdays 18:00 UTC. [1] > > Than

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone]Why not common definition about normal HTTP status code like 2xx and 3xx?

2015-06-02 Thread Neo Liu
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:46 PM Boris Bobrov wrote: > On Tuesday 02 June 2015 09:32:45 Chenhong Liu wrote: > > There is keystone/exception.py which contains Exceptions defined and used > > inside keystone provide 4xx and 5xx status code. And we can use it like: > > exception.Forbidden.code, ex