Since we took a break for two weeks and the meeting channel has changed, I
figured I send a reminder.
Please update the page for any agenda items you may have,
Regards,
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL …..…. p...@cisco.com
IRC ……..… pc_m (irc.freenode.com)
TW ………... @pmichali
GPG Key …
Downs e...@egon.ccmailto:e...@egon.cc
wrote:
On Jan 2, 2015, at 4:53 AM, Paul Michali (pcm)
p...@cisco.commailto:p...@cisco.com wrote:
I don’t see what the difference is between a working and non-working setup. :(
One other time I’ve seen this happen is if the compute node is low (or out
a note
linking to bug 1097806.[1] The VM is paused when Nova didn't expect it
to be. Do you have any other tools running that might be affecting
kvm?
1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1097806
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Paul Michali (pcm) p...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi Kevin
, Paul Michali (pcm)
p...@cisco.commailto:p...@cisco.com wrote:
Just more data…
I keep consistently seeing that on private subnet, the VM can only access
router (as expected), but on privateB subnet, the VM can access the private I/F
of router1 on private subnet. From the router’s namespace, I
.
-Ben
On 12/31/2014 09:41 AM, Paul Michali (pcm) wrote:
Not sure if I’m going crazy or what. I’m using DevStack and, after
stacking I tried booting a Cirros 3.2, 3.3, and Ubuntu cloud 14.04
image. Each time, the image ends up in PAUSED power state:
ubuntu@juno:/opt/stack/neutron
Michali (pcm) p...@cisco.com wrote:
Not sure if I’m going crazy or what. I’m using DevStack and, after stacking
I tried booting a Cirros 3.2, 3.3, and Ubuntu cloud 14.04 image. Each time,
the image ends up in PAUSED power state:
ubuntu@juno:/opt/stack/neutron$ nova show peter
I’ve been playing a bit with trying to get VPNaaS working post-repo split, and
haven’t been successful. I’m trying it a few ways with DevStack, and I’m not
sure whether I have a config error, setup issue, or there is something due to
the split.
In the past (and it’s been a few months since I
Not sure if I’m going crazy or what. I’m using DevStack and, after stacking I
tried booting a Cirros 3.2, 3.3, and Ubuntu cloud 14.04 image. Each time, the
image ends up in PAUSED power state:
ubuntu@juno:/opt/stack/neutron$ nova show peter
(irc.freenode.com)
TW ………... @pmichali
GPG Key … 4525ECC253E31A83
Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525 ECC2 53E3 1A83
On Dec 31, 2014, at 10:33 AM, Paul Michali (pcm) p...@cisco.com wrote:
I’ve been playing a bit with trying to get VPNaaS working post-repo split,
and haven’t been successful
… 4525ECC253E31A83
Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525 ECC2 53E3 1A83
On Dec 19, 2014, at 2:01 PM, Paul Michali (pcm) p...@cisco.com wrote:
Does anyone have agenda items to discuss for the next two meetings during the
holidays?
If so, please let me know (and add them to the Wiki page
Does anyone have agenda items to discuss for the next two meetings during the
holidays?
If so, please let me know (and add them to the Wiki page), and we’ll hold the
meeting. Otherwise, we can continue on Jan 6th, and any pop-up items can be
addressed on the mailing list or Neutron IRC.
Sorry, I had checked when I set up the VPN meeting and thought that meeting-3
was available on the wiki, but apparently not. I moved VPNaaS to meeting-4,
which is not in use and updated the Wiki.
Nachi, let me know what your thoughts about skipping or holding meetings next
week.
Regards,
PCM
Curious…
This has a FirewallDriver and NoopFirewallDriver. Should this be moved into the
neutron_fwaas repo?
Regards,
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL …..…. p...@cisco.com
IRC ……..… pc_m (irc.freenode.com)
TW ………... @pmichali
GPG Key … 4525ECC253E31A83
Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D
+, Paul Michali (pcm) wrote:
For the new VPNaaS repo, I have
created https://review.openstack.org/#/c/141532/ to move the tests
from tests.skip and modify the imports. This has Brandon’s change to
setup policy.json, and Ihar’s one-liner for moving get_admin_context()
in one test (should we
I put a link in the Etherpad, to some photos I took from the mid-cycle sprint
in Utah. Here’s the direct link… http://media.michali.net/21/198/
That gallery doesn’t correctly scale portrait oriented photos initially, but
you can select a size and it’ll resize it. I’ve got to get to that some
For the new VPNaaS repo, I have created
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/141532/ to move the tests from tests.skip and
modify the imports. This has Brandon’s change to setup policy.json, and Ihar’s
one-liner for moving get_admin_context() in one test (should we upstream his,
and I rebase
I created a Wiki page entry and reserved the IRC openstack-meeting-3 channel
for Tuesday’s 1500 UTC. I’ll flesh out the meeting page with info on Friday,
when I return from the Neutron mid-cycle sprint.
Let me know if you have any agenda topics (or edit the page directly).
Regards,
PCM (Paul
Way to go Kevin and Henry!
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL …..…. p...@cisco.com
IRC ……..… pc_m (irc.freenode.com)
TW ………... @pmichali
GPG Key … 4525ECC253E31A83
Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525 ECC2 53E3 1A83
On Dec 8, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
Hi,
I talked to Carl today to discuss the L3 agent restructuring and the change set
I had published (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/135392/), which was trying to
identify/exposing what is needed for the loading of device drivers and the
variation therein. I wasn’t sure how we’d do the
.
What do people think?
Thanks,
—Hanif.
From: Paul Michali (pcm) p...@cisco.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 at 4:08 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
On Nov 18, 2014, at 6:36 PM, Armando M. arma...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark, Kyle,
What is the strategy for tracking the progress and all the details about this
initiative? Blueprint spec, wiki page, or something else?
One thing I personally found useful about the spec approach adopted in [1],
I have two bare metal machines, in a lab, behind a firewall, with a proxy to
access HTTPS. With the latest neutron code, I’m trying to run TOX and keep
hitting an issue…
Downloading/unpacking requests-mock=0.4.0 (from -r
/opt/stack/neutron/test-requirements.txt (line 13))
Using download
I’m assuming you’ve verified that your proxy server settings are correct. Try
setting GIT_BASE to https://github.com
You should be able to manually try the commands. For example, set your proxy
env variables and then do:
curl -o /home/shruti/devstack/files/get-pip.py
I had a system with devstack, which I restack with reclone, with the intention
of then patching in my review diffs to update and test. Well, the stack is
failing in n-nonvc, with this message:
openstack@devstack-33:~/devstack$ /usr/local/bin/nova-novncproxy --config-file
/etc/nova/nova.conf
On Oct 10, 2014, at 8:46 PM, Paul Michali (pcm) p...@cisco.com wrote:
I had a system with devstack, which I restack with reclone, with the
intention of then patching in my review diffs to update and test. Well, the
stack is failing in n-nonvc, with this message:
openstack@devstack-33
See in-line @PCM
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL …..…. p...@cisco.com
IRC ……..… pcm_ (irc.freenode.com)
TW ………... @pmichali
GPG Key … 4525ECC253E31A83
Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525 ECC2 53E3 1A83
On Sep 30, 2014, at 11:31 PM, masoom alam masoom.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Paul,
See inline at #PCM
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL …..…. p...@cisco.com
IRC ……..… pcm_ (irc.freenode.com)
TW ………... @pmichali
GPG Key … 4525ECC253E31A83
Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525 ECC2 53E3 1A83
On Oct 1, 2014, at 8:35 AM, masoom alam masoom.a...@gmail.com wrote:
In line.
masoom alam,
It’s been a little while since I’ve used the reference VPN implementation, but
here are some suggestions/questions…
Can you show the ipsec-site-connection-create command used on each end?
Can you show the topology with IP addresses used (and indicate how the two
clouds are
Comments in-line @PCM
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL …..…. p...@cisco.com
IRC ……..… pcm_ (irc.freenode.com)
TW ………... @pmichali
GPG Key … 4525ECC253E31A83
Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525 ECC2 53E3 1A83
On Aug 28, 2014, at 11:57 AM, Sridhar Ramaswamy sric...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi! Need to get the community to weigh in on this…
In Neutron there currently is no mock library for the Requests package. During
Icehouse, I created unit tests that used the httmock package (a context-library
based Requests mock). However, the community did not want me to add this to
global
+1
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL …..…. p...@cisco.com
IRC ……..… pcm_ (irc.freenode.com)
TW ………... @pmichali
GPG Key … 4525ECC253E31A83
Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525 ECC2 53E3 1A83
On Aug 13, 2014, at 10:05 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
Per this week's Neutron
Area (DANA)
i2CAT Foundation, Barcelona
On 24 July 2014 20:34, Paul Michali (pcm) p...@cisco.com wrote:
Check /etc/neutron/neutron.conf and see if your service driver is correctly
specified for VPN. You can also check the q-svc and q-vpn logs at the
beginning to see if the service
(DANA)
i2CAT Foundation, Barcelona
On 18 July 2014 12:56, Paul Michali (pcm) p...@cisco.com wrote:
No docs, it’s an internal API between service and device driver (so you can
implement it however you desire. You can look at the reference and Cisco ones
for examples (they are currently both
.
Julio C. Barrera Juez
Office phone: (+34) 93 357 99 27 (ext. 527)
Office mobile phone: (+34) 625 66 77 26
Distributed Applications and Networks Area (DANA)
i2CAT Foundation, Barcelona
On 16 July 2014 20:59, Paul Michali (pcm) p...@cisco.com wrote:
Do you have a repo with the code
phone: (+34) 625 66 77 26
Distributed Applications and Networks Area (DANA)
i2CAT Foundation, Barcelona
On 17 July 2014 14:18, Paul Michali (pcm) p...@cisco.com wrote:
See line @PCM
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL …..…. p...@cisco.com
IRC ……..… pcm_ (irc.freenode.com)
TW ………... @pmichali
GPG
Do you have a repo with the code that is visible to the public?
What does the /etc/neutron/vpn_agent.ini look like?
Can you put the log output of the actual error messages seen?
Regards,
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL …..…. p...@cisco.com
IRC ……..… pcm_ (irc.freenode.com)
TW ………... @pmichali
GPG Key
Mark,
What is the status of adding the newer oslo.messaging releases to global
requirements? I had tried to get 1.4.0.0a2 added to requirements
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103536/), but it was failing Jenkins.
Wondering how we get that version (or newer) into global requirements (some
931D 8D2D 4525 ECC2 53E3 1A83
On Jul 1, 2014, at 11:46 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 06/30/2014 02:28 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 16:52 +, Paul Michali (pcm) wrote:
I have out for review 103536 to add this version to global
requirements, so
I have out for review 103536 to add this version to global requirements, so
that Neutron has an oslo fix (review 102909) for encoding failure, which
affects some gate runs. This review for global requirements is failing
requirements check
28, 2014, at 5:15 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 13:28 +, Paul Michali (pcm) wrote:
Mark,
When would we be able to get a release of Oslo with 102909 fix in?
It’s preventing Jenkins passing for some commits in Neutron.
I've just pushed 1.4.0.0a2
Mark,
When would we be able to get a release of Oslo with 102909 fix in? It’s
preventing Jenkins passing for some commits in Neutron.
Thanks!
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL …..…. p...@cisco.com
IRC ……..… pcm_ (irc.freenode.com)
TW ………... @pmichali
GPG Key … 4525ECC253E31A83
Fingerprint .. 307A
I can’t make the meeting today, but have updated the agenda for L3 vendor
stuff. Please request team to review the WIP code I have out.
Thanks!
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL …..…. p...@cisco.com
IRC ……..… pcm_ (irc.freenode.com)
TW ………... @pmichali
GPG Key … 4525ECC253E31A83
Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88406/
Thanks!
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL …..…. p...@cisco.com
IRC ……..… pcm_ (irc.freenode.com)
TW ………... @pmichali
GPG Key … 4525ECC253E31A83
Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525 ECC2 53E3 1A83
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with
I booked through our company travel and got a comparable rate ($111 or $114, I
can’t recall the exact price).
Regards,
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL …..…. p...@cisco.com
IRC ……..… pcm_ (irc.freenode.com)
TW ………... @pmichali
GPG Key … 4525ECC253E31A83
Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525
to give something for concrete
commenting…
Regards,
PCM
Regards,
Mandeep
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Paul Michali (pcm) p...@cisco.com wrote:
Thanks for the comment Carl. See @PCM inline
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL …..…. p...@cisco.com
IRC ……..… pcm_ (irc.freenode.com)
TW
… 4525ECC253E31A83
Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525 ECC2 53E3 1A83
On May 27, 2014, at 7:37 AM, Paul Michali (pcm) p...@cisco.com wrote:
Thanks for the comments Mandeep! Responses in-line #PCM
On May 23, 2014, at 8:57 PM, Mandeep Dhami dh...@noironetworks.com wrote:
My
Hi,
I’m working on a task for a BP to separate validation from persistence logic in
L3 services code (VPN currently), so that providers can override/extend the
validation logic (before persistence).
So I’ve separated the code for one of the create APIs, placed the default
validation into an
Michali (pcm) p...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi,
I’m working on a task for a BP to separate validation from persistence logic
in L3 services code (VPN currently), so that providers can override/extend
the validation logic (before persistence).
So I’ve separated the code for one of the create APIs
On May 23, 2014, at 3:35 PM, Robert Kukura kuk...@noironetworks.com wrote:
On 5/23/14, 3:07 PM, Paul Michali (pcm) wrote:
Thanks for the comments Gary!
Typically, the device driver (backend) and service driver, for a provider
won’t have any database requirements (at least for VPN
...@ecbaldwin.net wrote:
Paul,
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Paul Michali (pcm) p...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi,
I’m working on a task for a BP to separate validation from persistence logic
in L3 services code (VPN currently), so that providers can override/extend
the validation logic (before persistence
(irc.freenode.com)
TW ………... @pmichali
GPG Key … 4525ECC253E31A83
Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525 ECC2 53E3 1A83
On May 1, 2014, at 3:09 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com
wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 18:41 +, Paul Michali (pcm) wrote:
So, I tried to reproduce, but I
2014 07:09, Kevin L. Mitchell kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 18:41 +, Paul Michali (pcm) wrote:
So, I tried to reproduce, but I actually see the same results with
both of these. However, they both show the issue I was hitting,
namely, I got no information on where
On May 1, 2014, at 1:23 PM, Yuriy Taraday yorik@gmail.com wrote:
Coming back to topic, I'd prefer using standard library call because it can
be mocked for testing.
Yeah that’s probably the open question I still have. Does the community prefer
raising a SystemError exception or use the
AM, Paul Michali (pcm) p...@cisco.com wrote:
On May 1, 2014, at 1:23 PM, Yuriy Taraday yorik@gmail.com wrote:
Coming back to topic, I'd prefer using standard library call because it can
be mocked for testing.
Yeah that’s probably the open question I still have. Does the community
Please take a gander and let me know your thoughts!
Prototype: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/91437/
Blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/l3-svcs-vendor-validation
Spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88406/
Thanks!
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL …..….
So, I tried to reproduce, but I actually see the same results with both of
these. However, they both show the issue I was hitting, namely, I got no
information on where the failure was located:
root@devstack-32:/opt/stack/neutron# tox -e py27 -v --
neutron.tests.unit.pcm.test_pcm
using
Hi,
In Neutron I see SystemExit() being raised in some cases. Is this preferred
over calling sys.exit()?
I ask, because I recall having a TOX failure where all I was getting was the
return code, with no traceback or indication at all of where the failure
occurred. In that case, I changed from
, Spain
http://dana.i2cat.nethttp://dana.i2cat.net/
On 24 April 2014 16:14, Paul Michali (pcm)
p...@cisco.commailto:p...@cisco.com wrote:
Not sure I quite understand the question, but to configuring VPNaaS in single
provider mode, from a user’s perspective is the same (see
api.openstack.orghttp
board, we can find how to solve it :).
Thanks!
---Bo
From: Paul Michali (pcm) p...@cisco.commailto:p...@cisco.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Friday
Could use one more core to approve this so it can go upstream. Enables easier
setup of VPN for DevStack, and allows vendor based customizing of .ini files
for agent, until a more comprehensive solution is defined.
Thanks in advance!
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL …..…. p...@cisco.com
IRC ……..… pcm_
By not “working” do you mean you cannot get the plugin to work in a
multi-provider environment? Multi-provider solutions have been tabled until
Juno, where more discussion is occurring on what is the best way to support
different service providers.
However, you should be able to get the plugin
.. 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525 ECC2 53E3 1A83
On Apr 4, 2014, at 10:44 AM, Paul Michali (pcm)
p...@cisco.commailto:p...@cisco.com wrote:
I’d like to get this added to the test-requirements for Neutron. It is a very
flexible HTTP mock module that works with the Requests package
On Apr 8, 2014, at 3:04 PM, Jamie Lennox
jamielen...@redhat.commailto:jamielen...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Paul Michali (pcm) p...@cisco.commailto:p...@cisco.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev
...@cisco.com
IRC ……..… pcm_ (irc.freenode.comhttp://irc.freenode.com)
TW ………... @pmichali
GPG Key … 4525ECC253E31A83
Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525 ECC2 53E3 1A83
Thanks,
Gary
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Paul Michali (pcm)
p...@cisco.commailto:p...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi,
I
it helps,
Irena
From: Paul Michali (pcm) [mailto:p...@cisco.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2014 1:17 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Problem plugging I/F into Neutron...
Hi,
I have a VM that I start up outside
Hi Darragh,
Can you elaborate on what the “set interface” arguments do in OVS? Just trying
to understand why it is not desired, when plugging into this interface (note I
have a management interface on the br-int and it works fine…this one, which is
also on br-int, but needs to tie to the
/openstack/nova/blob/304df046eaaad6d64ee16898b1eaa76918e98878/nova/virt/libvirt/vif.py#L420-L423
Regards, Darragh.
On Monday, 31 March 2014, 12:36, Paul Michali (pcm)
p...@cisco.commailto:p...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi Darragh,
Can you elaborate on what the “set interface” arguments do in OVS? Just trying
… 4525ECC253E31A83
Fingerprint .. 307A 96BB 1A4C D2C7 931D 8D2D 4525 ECC2 53E3 1A83
On Mar 31, 2014, at 9:56 AM, Paul Michali (pcm)
p...@cisco.commailto:p...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi Darragh,
Yes (I should included more background), I have a VM started in KVM, and it has
I/Fs associated with scripts
Hi,
I have a VM that I start up outside of OpenStack (as a short term solution,
until we get it working inside a Nova VM), using KVM. It has scrips associated
with the three interfaces that are created, to hook this VM into Neutron. One
I/F is on br-ex (connected to the “public network for
69 matches
Mail list logo
