On 10/28/14 2:50 PM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Rohit Agarwalla (roagarwa)
roaga...@cisco.com wrote:
Agreed. The way I'm thinking about this is that tenants shouldn't care
what
the underlying implementation is - L2 or L3. As long as the connectivity
I have also started to capture some of our discussions here.
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RoutedNetworking
Thanks
Rohit
On 10/29/14 1:32 AM, Cory Benfield cory.benfi...@metaswitch.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 20:01:40, Kevin Benton wrote:
I think the simplest use case is just that a
interested.
Thanks
Rohit
On 10/27/14 2:20 AM, Cory Benfield cory.benfi...@metaswitch.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 19:05:43, Rohit Agarwalla (roagarwa) wrote:
Hi
I'm interested as well in this model. Curious to understand the routing
filters and their implementation that will enable
Agreed. The way I'm thinking about this is that tenants shouldn't care what the
underlying implementation is - L2 or L3. As long as the connectivity
requirements are met using the model/API, end users should be fine.
The data center network design should be an administrators decision based on
Hi
I'm interested as well in this model. Curious to understand the routing filters
and their implementation that will enable isolation between tenant networks.
Also, having a BoF session on Virtual Networking using L3 may be useful to
get all interested folks together at the Summit.
Thanks
