On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Aaron Rosen aaronoro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote:
Web tier can communicate with anything except for the DB.
App tier can only communicate with Web and DB.
DB can communicate with App.
These
Hi Kyle,
I also agree with Mandeep's suggestion of putting a time frame on the
lingering -2 if the addressed concerns have been taken care of. In my
experience also a sticky -2 detracts other reviewers from reviewing an
updated patch.
Either a time-frame or a possible override by PTL (move to
gateway, VPN, NAT etc) was
not added to the blueprint as that was dependent on VPNaas, FWaaS, NATaas.
Comments inline:
On Feb 19, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Martin, JC
jch.mar...@gmail.commailto:jch.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Comments in line.
JC
On Feb 18, 2014, at 5:21 PM, Rudra Rugge
rru
Please see inline:
On Feb 18, 2014, at 2:57 PM, Martin, JC jch.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I should explain this one a bit.
Shared network: If a user has defined a shared network, and they used your
API to create a VPC, the instances within the VPC will automatically get an
interface
JC,
BP has been updated with the correct links. I have removed the abandoned
review #3.
Please review #1 and #2.
1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40071/
This is the active review.
There is one comment by Sean regarding
adding a knob when Neutron is not used.
That will be
, jc Martin jch.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks,
Do you have the links for the discussions ?
Thanks,
JC
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 17, 2014, at 11:29 AM, Rudra Rugge rru...@juniper.net wrote:
JC,
BP has been updated with the correct links. I have removed the abandoned
review #3.
Please
Hi JC,
We agree with your proposed model of a VPC resource object. Proposal you are
making makes sense to us and we would like to collaborate further on this.
After reading your blueprint two things come to mind.
1. VPC vision for Openstack? (Your blueprint is proposing this vision)
2.
+1 for the meeting time.
On Dec 10, 2013, at 10:16 AM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
+1 ! I'll join.
I'm also working on investigating how to use openstack gating system.
(This document is still draft version)
Here are the blueprints (mentioned by Harshad below) to add complete AWS
VPC compatibility in Openstack. AWS EC2 compatibility already exists in
Openstack.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ipam-extensions-for-neutron
Hi All,
Is the extra route extension always tied to the router extension or
can it live in a separate route-table container. If extra-route routes
are available in separate container then sharing of such
containers across networks is possible.
Another reason to remove the dependency would be
Updated the subject [neutron]
Hi All,
Is the extra route extension always tied to the router extension or
can it live in a separate route-table container. If extra-route routes
are available in separate container then sharing of such
containers across networks is possible.
Another reason to
on the service/use-case where you would need to plug
the VM into different networks?
Thanks,
~Sumit.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Rudra Rugge
rru...@juniper.netmailto:rru...@juniper.net wrote:
Hi Greg,
Is there any discussion so far on the scaling of VMs as in launching multiple
VMs
for the same
Hi Sumit,
Please see inline.
On Oct 9, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Sumit Naiksatam
sumitnaiksa...@gmail.commailto:sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Harshad,
I agree with you that the service instance terminology might be a little
confusing here. The way it was phrased in the original email, I
,
Rudra
Best
Nachi
2013/10/7 Rudra Rugge rru...@juniper.net:
Hi Nachi,
I have split the spec for policy and VPN wiki served as a good reference
point. Please review and provide comments:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprint-policy-extensions-for-neutron
Thanks,
Rudra
-for-neutron
IPAM
Blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ipam-extensions-for-neutron
Spec: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprint-ipam-extensions-for-neutron
Thanks,
Rudra
On Oct 3, 2013, at 11:38 AM, Rudra Rugge
rru...@juniper.netmailto:rru...@juniper.net wrote:
Hi All
Hi Greg,
Is there any discussion so far on the scaling of VMs as in launching multiple
VMs
for the same service. It would also have impact on the VIF scheme.
How can we plug these services into different networks - is that still being
worked
on?
Thanks,
Rudra
On Oct 8, 2013, at 2:48 PM,
Rugge rru...@juniper.net:
Hi Nachi,
Inline response
On 10/4/13 12:54 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
Hi Rudra
inline responded
2013/10/4 Rudra Rugge rru...@juniper.net:
Hi Nachi,
Thanks for reviewing the BP. Please see inline:
On 10/4/13 11:30 AM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3
Hi All,
The link in the email was incorrect. Please follow the following link:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ipam-policy-extensions-for-neutron
Thanks,
Rudra
On Oct 3, 2013, at 11:38 AM, Rudra Rugge
rru...@juniper.netmailto:rru...@juniper.net wrote:
Hi All,
A blueprint has
Hi Nachi,
Inline response
On 10/4/13 12:54 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
Hi Rudra
inline responded
2013/10/4 Rudra Rugge rru...@juniper.net:
Hi Nachi,
Thanks for reviewing the BP. Please see inline:
On 10/4/13 11:30 AM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
Hi Rudra
Two comment
Hi All,
A blueprint has been registered to add IPAM and Policy
extensions to Neutron. Please review the blueprint and
the attached specification.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/juniper-contrail-ipam-policy-extensions-for-neutron
All comments are welcome.
Thanks,
Rudra
20 matches
Mail list logo
