Make sense, Dan.
Thanks so much for your help.
Sergio
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:01 PM Dan Smith wrote:
> > I tested a code change that essentially reverts
> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/276861/1/nova/api/metadata/base.py
> >
> > In other words, with this change metadata tables are not
with this change.
Do you guys see any other impact this change could have? Anything that it
could potentially break?
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 10:05 PM Sergio A. de Carvalho Jr. <
scarvalh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1799298
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 9:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1799298
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 9:15 PM Sergio A. de Carvalho Jr. <
scarvalh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Cool, I'll open a bug then.
>
> I was wondering if, before joining the metadata tables with the rest of
> instance data, we could do a UNION,
Cool, I'll open a bug then.
I was wondering if, before joining the metadata tables with the rest of
instance data, we could do a UNION, since both tables are structurally
identical.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 9:04 PM Dan Smith wrote:
> > Do you guys see an easy fix here?
> >
> > Should I open a
Thanks so much for the replies, guys.
> Have you debugged to the point of knowing where the initial DB query is
starting from?
>
> Looking at history, my guess is this is the change which introduced it
for all requests:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/276861/
That is my understanding too.
Hi,
While troubleshooting a production issue we identified that the Nova
metadata API is fetching a lot more raw data from the database than seems
necessary. The problem appears to be caused by the SQL query used to fetch
instance data that joins the "instance" table with, among others, two
Hi everyone,
A while ago I reported some issues with Glance where image files went
missing from the file system. Since then we implemented a monitoring script
that regularly verifies the state of every active image in the Glance
database, checking that:
1) it has a corresponding record in the
Hi everyone,
A while ago I reported some issues with Glance where image files went
missing from the file system. Since then we implemented a monitoring script
that regularly verifies the state of every active image in the Glance
database, checking that:
1) it has a corresponding record in the
any gaps
> in Glance.
>
> P.S. Please use the tag "[glance]" in the subject line to help us get to
> your email faster.
>
> On 9/12/16 12:48 PM, Sergio A. de Carvalho Jr. wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Is there (or was there ever) any plans to implement
Hi all,
Is there (or was there ever) any plans to implement in Glance a service
that would periodically check that the image files are still available on
the file system (or in whatever storage system being used) and have the
correct checksum?
We had a few issues where an image file was removed
10 matches
Mail list logo
