Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Undercloud backup and restore

2017-06-01 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Carlos, Since I thought that that is a kind of documentation bug, I filed a bug on this as Doc bug. Now I'm seeing that you were assigned... Regards, Shinobu Kinjo On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Carlos Camacho Gonzalez <ccama...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Shinobu, > > It's

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Undercloud backup and restore

2017-05-29 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Here is feedback from the customer. Following the guide [1], undercloud restoration was not succeeded. Swift objects could haven't been downloaded after restoration even though they followed all procedures during backing up / restoring their system described in [1]. Since that, I'm not 100%

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tricircle][neutron]Tricircle now is one of OpenStack Big-Tent project

2016-11-16 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
> 2016-November/013661.html > > Or you can directly find it here: http://artifacts.opnfv. > org/netready/docs/requirements/index.html#georedundancy > > > Best Regards > Chaoyi Huang (joehuang) > -- > *From:* Shinobu Kinjo [shinobu...@gmai

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tricircle][neutron]Tricircle now is one of OpenStack Big-Tent project

2016-11-15 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Great! - Shinobu On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:39 PM, joehuang wrote: > Hi all, > > Tricircle was officially accepted yesterday as a big-tent project. > > The purpose of the Tricircle project is to provide networking automation > across Neutron in multi-region OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Default the HA scenario to Ceph

2016-10-13 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote: > On 10/12/2016 02:29 PM, Thiago da Silva wrote: > >> >> >> On 10/12/2016 07:10 AM, Giulio Fidente wrote: >> >>> hi, >>> >>> we introduced support for the deployment of Ceph in the liberty >>> release so that it could

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]freeze date and patches to be merged for Newton release

2016-09-22 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Please add 1 line above description of each patch. MUST TO HAVE or GOOD TO HAVE e.g., https://review.openstack.org/#/c/356187/ MUST TO HAVE The framework of dynamic pod binding. So that we can prioritize clearly and easily. Ideally we should have made priority for each *MUST* case.

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Browser Support

2016-09-20 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
sn't updated currently. The current >> > browsers >> > supported are listed here: >> > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/horizon/faq.html (Stable Firefox and >> > Chrome, and IE 11+) >> > >> > Rob >> > >> > On 20 September 2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]freeze date and tricircle splitting

2016-09-20 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
ng ip deletion: https://review.openstack.org/354604 > Subnet cleaning: https://review.openstack.org/355847 > Router cleaning: https://review.openstack.org/360848 > > Shinobu Kinjo <shinobu...@gmail.com>于2016年9月20日周二 下午12:04写道: >> >> This announcement should have been first

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Browser Support

2016-09-20 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
There are ambiguous definitions like: IE 11 Good? Can we define this description as specific as possible? On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:53 AM, Jason Rist wrote: >> >> This page hasn't been

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]freeze date and tricircle splitting

2016-09-19 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
This announcement should have been first to avoid any unnecessary work -; On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:51 PM, joehuang wrote: > Hello, as the Trio2o repository has been established, it's time for us to > discuss the freeze date and tagging(newton branch) for the last release

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc]a chance to meet all TCs for Tricircle big-tent application in Barcelona summit?

2016-09-19 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:22 PM, joehuang wrote: > Hello, all TCs, > > Understand that you will be quite busy in Barcelona summit, all TCs will be > shown in the Barcelona summit, and meet together(usually, I assumed). So is > it possible to have a chance to meet all TCs

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]PTL candidacy

2016-09-18 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
No objection. I really appreciate your great leadership. Cheers, Shinobu On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 6:26 PM, joehuang wrote: > Hello, > > This is Chaoyi Huang(nick: joehuang), I would like to nominate myself as > Tricircle PTL in Ocata release. > > Before look forward to what

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] your proposal for the name of networking and gateway sub-projects

2016-09-07 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
I prefer this. 4. Trio2o, 3 votes But I would like to make sure what this actually means more specifically. How can we define this word? openstack-to-openstack Cheers, Shinobu On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 9:01 PM, liukun wrote: > Triangel +1 > > At 2016-09-06 16:27:22,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]your proposal for the name of networking and gateway sub-projects

2016-09-04 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
ry.com/define.php?term=Triangel, so I don't know it's > a good candidate or not. O.k, interesting enough. Cheers, Shinobu > > Please vote or recommend a new candidate. Thanks > > Best Regards > Chaoyi Huang(joehuang) > > ____ > From:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]your proposal for the name of networking and gateway sub-projects

2016-09-04 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Be more careful before emailing the list. Triangel is not true. Triangle is true. If there is a word expressed by Triangel, please point it out to me. Cheers, Shinobu On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Vega Cai wrote: > +1 for Triangel > > On 2 September 2016 at

[openstack-dev] [tricircle] A new contributor

2016-07-20 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Team, Please welcome a new contributor (CCed) for the Tricircle project. Cheers, Shinobu -- Email: shin...@linux.com shin...@redhat.com __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]Mascot/logo for Tricircle

2016-07-17 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > Mascot does not necessarily need to reflect the team name, although would > definitely be better if it does. > O.k, I am now pretty much wondering - Which is *true* - What is *necessary* and - What are

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]

2016-07-05 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
# This email is true to reply. Would you attach local.conf you're using? On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Luck Dog wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I am trying to run DevStack on Ubuntu 14.04 in a single VirtualBox. An > error turns up before it successfully starts. Yesterday I

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] About registering and loading a plugin

2016-06-29 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
It may be better to attach setup.cfg you using, and paste traceback (if there). Cheers, Shinobu On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Yipei Niu wrote: > Hi all, > > I have succeed in registering a config option and obtaining it. So how to > load an option from a customized file?

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [Infra][tricircle] patch not able to be merged

2016-06-04 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Thank you for investigation and some manual operations to fix out the problem. If there would be anything to prevent such as unexpected behaviour, please let us know. Cheers, Shinobu On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:04 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-06-03 03:45:31 +

[openstack-dev] [tricircle] reviewed by multiple eyes

2016-06-03 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Team, There are some patch sets reviewed by only myself. >From my point of view, any patch set needs to be reviewed by multiple eyes. It's because anyone is not perfect. And there should be anything missing. Please take a look, if you get notification to review. Cheers, Shinobu -- Email:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Launch work group for cross-pod L2 networking feature

2016-05-25 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Team, Reading today's discussion log, I would encourage you to refer to each documentation as much as you can. [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kZZ1snMOCD9IQvUKI5NVDzSASpw-QKj7l2zNqMEd3g/edit#heading=h.fx4zy2u9se10 [2]

[openstack-dev] [tricircle] Cross OpenStac L2 Networking Specification

2016-05-20 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Team, Probably we would not be able to make any progress without completing ${subject} which is under review right now. [1] It's because: 1.Blueprint of the Tricircle is almost based on this feature at the moment. 2.Further implementation will be mostly based on this feature. 3.Our

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Coding style guidelines

2016-05-19 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
ob/master/tricircle/db/core.py > > Best Regards > Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) > > > -Original Message- > From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 11:54 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Su

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Coding style guidelines

2016-05-19 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
ation to fit the guideline ? > > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Shinobu Kinjo <shinobu...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi Team, >> >> Please make sure that your coding style follows OpenStack style >> guidelines. [1] >> >> I understand that it's re

[openstack-dev] [tricircle] Coding style guidelines

2016-05-19 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Team, Please make sure that your coding style follows OpenStack style guidelines. [1] I understand that it's really painful but readability, and maintenanceability point of view, it is very important to follow standard. Working through code bases, some of them do not follow the guidelines.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]PTL election conclusion

2016-05-18 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
dates/newton/Kuryr/Gal_Sagie.txt > [2]http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/election/plain//candidates/newton/Glance/Nikhil_Komawar.txt > [3]http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/election/plain//candidates/newton/Neutron/Armando_Migliaccio.txt > [4]https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PTL_El

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] [Blueprint] Stateless design definition

2016-05-14 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Team, Sorry for this spam -; Please ignore previous message. I will file that as a doc bug. Cheers, S On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Shinobu Kinjo <shinobu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Team, > > In page1, we define "stateless design" as follows: > > Note

[openstack-dev] [tricircle] [Blueprint] Stateless design definition

2016-05-14 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Team, In page1, we define "stateless design" as follows: Note: Stateless proposal is working on the “experiment” branch: https://github.com/openstack/tricircle/tree/experiment But, in section 7, we define this design as follows: A PoC was done to verify the feasibility of stateless

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] [document] Experimental design

2016-05-11 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
hink we need to remove this link? and freeze this old documentation? Best Regards Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) -Original Message- From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 4:17 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Sub

[openstack-dev] [tricircle] [document] Experimental design

2016-05-11 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Team, There is a link pointing to old documentation called "The experimental design" in blueprint. [1] Since I would really like to focus on only blueprint, I would like to freeze this old documentation. That means that there is no comment expected, and required on that documentation. What

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] About the dynamic pod binding

2016-05-09 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
om/document/d/18kZZ1snMOCD9IQvUKI5NVDzSASpw-QKj7l2zNqMEd3g/edit# Chees, Shinobu > > Best regards, > Yipei > > On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Shinobu Kinjo <shinobu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Yipei, >> >> According to Chaoyi, you have a bunch of expe

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L2gw

2016-05-09 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Good catch! Cheers, S On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Hi, > Are there plans to cut a a stable/mitaka version for the l2gw? > https://github.com/openstack/networking-l2gw > Thanks > Gary > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]Welcome Shinobu Kinjo to be the core reviewer of Tricircle

2016-05-08 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Team, On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:03 AM, joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote: > Hello, Team, > > After the nomination and one week vote, all current core reviewers has voted > +1, and no -1 vote. So let's welcome Shinobu Kinjo to be the core reviewer of > Tricircle ! \o/

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] cross-OpenStack L2 Networking spec review

2016-05-08 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
ers, Shinobu > > Best Regards > Chaoyi Huang ( joehuang ) > > ________ > From: Shinobu Kinjo [shinobu...@gmail.com] > Sent: 08 May 2016 10:12 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: [openstack-dev] [tr

[openstack-dev] [tricircle] cross-OpenStack L2 Networking spec review

2016-05-07 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Team, Since there was no tag [tricircle] in subject, I'm emailing you again. Sorry for spam -; We are trying to describe specification [1] regarding to ""cross OpenStack L2 networking"" [0] as Chaoyi mentioned in previous message. Honestly that description [0] does not accurately describe

Re: [openstack-dev] cross-OpenStack L2 Networking spec review

2016-05-07 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
If I've been missing anything, please point it out to me. Cheers, Shinobu On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 7:25 AM, Shinobu Kinjo <shinobu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Joe, > > Thank you for your message. > I've CCed dev list since we are still seeking more awesome > contributors to acc

[openstack-dev] [tricircle] [blueprint] Definition of strategies

2016-05-06 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Chaoyi, In the Tricircle's blueprint, there is a section: 7.3 Resource Create Request Dispatch In this section, strategy for each resource is described. It would be better to elaborate on *WHEN* more: *before* or *during* or *after* e.g., security group's strategy is defined as follows:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] About the dynamic pod binding

2016-05-06 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Yipei, Probably you may be interested in the following section in Blueprint [1]. 7.1 AZ and Pod Binding ... 7.x [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kZZ1snMOCD9IQvUKI5NVDzSASpw-QKj7l2zNqMEd3g/edit#heading=h.x14kdooqhai1 Cheers, S On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Shinobu Kinjo <shin

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] About the dynamic pod binding

2016-05-06 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
t;> one field called resource_affinity_tag is proposed to be added into the pod >> table, it could be used for scheduling purpose. But this is only one >> proposal, you may have better idea to do that, after the spec is reviewed >> and approved, the doc can be update to reflect

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Easy Way to Test Tricircle North-South L3 Networking

2016-05-05 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
.com> wrote: > Hi, Shinobu, > > Correct, this is not the normal deployment scenario and the way of testbed > setup. > > Cheers > > BR > Chaoyi Huang ( joehuang ) > > > From: Shinobu Kinjo [shinobu...@gmail.com] &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] About the dynamic pod binding

2016-05-05 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Yipei, On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Yipei Niu wrote: > Hi, all, > > For dynamic pod binding, I have some questions. > [snip] > 3. How is Tricircle aware of what type of resource wanted by tenants? For > example, a tenant wants to boot VMs for CAD modelling with

Re: [openstack-dev] cross-OpenStack L2 Networking spec review

2016-05-05 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
@openstack.org] > Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 9:08 PM > To: Zhiyuan Cai; Shinobu KINJO; Liuhaixia; joehuang; lige; Ronghui Cao > Cc: Shinobu Kinjo; Khayam Gondal; tangzhuo; Yipei Niu; shiyangkai > Subject: Change in openstack/tricircle[master]: Add cross-pod L2 Networking > sp

Re: [openstack-dev] Requirements for becoming approved official project

2016-05-05 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Thank you for suggestions. At this stage, we are just trying to become an official project. Cheers, S On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 2:50 AM, Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Mike Perez's message of 2016-05-05 09:59:58 -0700: >> On 14:40 Apr 30, Shinobu Kinjo

[openstack-dev] [tricircle] A number of dummy functions

2016-05-04 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Team, How many dummy, fake function does the Tricircle have? I understood that we are now in pre-production, and will be in production hopefully soon! But I don't need surprise any more -; e.g., # ./tricircle/cinder_apigw/controllers/volume.py 337 def _convert_header(self, t_release,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

2016-05-04 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
- Could we kindly stop discussing radosgw at this moment? + Could we kindly stop discussing any particular application at this moment? On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Shinobu Kinjo <shinobu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Could we kindly stop discussing radosgw at this moment? > > On Wed, M

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

2016-05-04 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Could we kindly stop discussing radosgw at this moment? On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Fox, Kevin M wrote: >> >> RadosGW has been excluded from joining the OpenStack community in part due >> to its use of c++. > > > I'm not sure I'd use the word

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Requirements for becoming approved official project

2016-05-04 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
tion. glad to know that we are close to OpenStack > offical project criteria. > > Let's discuss the initial PTL election in weekly meeting, and start initial > PTL election after that if needed. > > Best Regards > Chaoyi Huang ( joehuang ) > _________

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Easy Way to Test Tricircle North-South L3 Networking

2016-05-03 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Shinobu Kinjo <shinobu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Chaoyi, > > I didn't consider Ronghui's environment which I have no idea about. Anyhow this is my bad -; Sorry for that! Cheers, S > >> That's why Zhiyuan proposed hacking way t

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Easy Way to Test Tricircle North-South L3 Networking

2016-05-03 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
ut Ronghui's machine also have very > limited vCPU and memory, so booting serveral VMs to establish the tricircle > and two bottom pods test bed also not possible. That's why Zhiyuan proposed > hacking way to do it. > > Best Regards > Chaoyi Huang ( joehuang ) > > ____

Re: [openstack-dev] [stackalytics]many projects missing in the "others" category

2016-05-03 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
AFAIK the Tricircle is one of them. [1] How can we fix it out? [1] http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/tricircle/90 Cheers, S On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:11 PM, joehuang wrote: > Hello, > > Very sad to know that some projects are missing again in the "others" >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Easy Way to Test Tricircle North-South L3 Networking

2016-05-03 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Vega, On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Vega Cai wrote: > Hi all, > > Just would like to share a way to test Tricircle north-south L3 networking > without requiring the third interface. > > In the Tricircle readme, it is said that you need to add an interface in > your host

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] - suggested development workflow without ./rejoin-stack.sh ?

2016-05-02 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Honestly those kind of major changes have to be discussed very carefully. On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Kevin Benton wrote: > This patch removed the ./rejoin-stack.sh script: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/291453/ > > I relied on this heavily in my development VM which

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Requirements for becoming approved official project

2016-05-02 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Thierry, On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > Shinobu Kinjo wrote: >> >> I guess, it's usable. [1] [2] [3], probably and more... >> >> The reason why still I can just guess is that there is a bunch of >> docu

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Requirements for becoming approved official project

2016-05-02 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/NewProjectTeams Cheers, Shinobu On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Zhipeng Huang <zhipengh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thx shinobu, > > This is a great checklist ! Re PTL election, could we use community tools > for that ? > > On May 2, 2016 1:09 PM,

[openstack-dev] [tricircle] Requirements for becoming approved official project

2016-05-01 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Team, According to Documentation team, the Tricircle project seems to close to be official (but not really official kind of) since we have standard directory structure. [1] What we need to do from here is to submit a project-config patch to publish the documentation to [2]. Once we finish

Re: [openstack-dev] Requirements for becoming approved official project

2016-04-30 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
astructure up, and hope to also have a > template and some other guides for you to help you do this. If you have > questions about getting started on this, please email the docs mailing list: > openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org > > Thanks, > Lana > > On 29/04/16 22:40, Shinobu

[openstack-dev] Requirements for becoming approved official project

2016-04-29 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Tom, First sorry for bothering you -; We are trying to make the tricircle project [1] one of the opnestack official projects. And we are referring to project team guide to make sure what are requirements. [2]. Reading this guide, what we need to consider right now is open development, I think

Re: [openstack-dev] [all]call for contributors for Tricircle project - for massive distributed edge clouds and large scale cloud.

2016-04-29 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Chaoyi, At a meeting today, we had a great update from you. I don't write any details here but I'm quite happy with that. I believe that we will have awesome contributors and the Tricircle become one of important projects soon. Cheers, Shinobu On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 1:59 PM, joehuang

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] virtual design summit for Newton

2016-04-28 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Team, There was no enough time to discuss all topics in the meeting today. I wrote up what we discussed. Please make sure what need to be done and add anything if I've missed. Cheers, Shinobu - Original Message - From: "joehuang" To: "OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [TC][tricircle] ask help from TC and other guru in the OpenStack community

2016-04-26 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Flavio, On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 26/04/16 20:39 +0900, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:47 PM, joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, TCs and guru, >>&

Re: [openstack-dev] [TC][tricircle] ask help from TC and other guru in the OpenStack community

2016-04-26 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:47 PM, joehuang wrote: > Hi, TCs and guru, > > > > If tricircle planned to apply being TC approved big tent project, would > someone help to guide our project? I also would like to know what we should do for that so that we focus on specific

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Change 247669: Ceph Puppet: implement per-pool parameters:

2016-04-24 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
8 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Change 247669: Ceph Puppet: implement per-pool parameters: On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 08:00:02AM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Shinobu Kinjo <shinobu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi TripleO Team, > > >

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Change 247669: Ceph Puppet: implement per-pool parameters:

2016-04-22 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi TripleO Team, If you could take care of ${subject}, it would be nice. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/247669 Cheers, S __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] http response code

2016-04-20 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
This might be answer for your question. https://github.com/openstack/tricircle/blob/master/tricircle/api/controllers/pod.py Cheers, S On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:37 PM, 李戈 wrote: > Hi > I read api source code recently and have a question. Do we uniform the > "http

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][kilo] - vxlan's max bandwidth

2016-04-14 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
How did you test it out? Would you elaborate on this more? Cheers, Shinobu On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Kenny Ji-work wrote: > Hi all, > > In the environment of openstack kilo, I test the bandwidth in the scene > which VxLan being used. The result show that the vxlan

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] RPC Communication Errors Might Lead to a Bad State

2016-04-13 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi, Just coming from my curiosity (inline). On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Dan Smith wrote: >> * nova-api should receive an acknowledgement from nova-compute. It is >> unclear to me why today it uses a non-reply mechanism - probably to >> free the worker as fast

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][ceph] Puppet-ceph is now a formal member of puppet-openstack

2016-04-12 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Great! On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Andrew Woodward wrote: > It's been a while since we started the puppet-ceph module on stackforge as a > friend of OpenStack. Since then Ceph's usage in OpenStack has increased > greatly and we have both the puppet-openstack deployment

Re: [openstack-dev] Constant attempts from Matthew Kassawara to remove Debian from the install-guide

2016-04-09 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Tom, Would you elaborate more? - Original Message - From: "Tom Fifield" To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Saturday, April 9, 2016 6:20:31 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Constant attempts from Matthew Kassawara to remove Debian from the install-guide On

Re: [openstack-dev] [jacket] Introduction to jacket, a new project

2016-04-07 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Kevin, Quick question. Does one OpenStack infrastructure have to be dedicated for one Jacket instance? Cheers, Shinobu On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Kevin.ZhangSen wrote: > Hi Ghanshyam, > > Thank you for your sugesstions, and I agree with your opinion that the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Original Blueprint

2016-04-07 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
t Regards > Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) > > > -Original Message- > From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 4:16 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Trici

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Original Blueprint

2016-04-07 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
w > patches. I'm now expecting that *blueprint* is always master; meaning that anyone who would contribute to the Tricircle need to refer, follow *blueprint*. Is it same of what you are thinking of? Cheers, Shinobu > > Best Regards > Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) > > > -----Orig

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] UUID Mapping

2016-04-07 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
ed there, but read the "7.2 > Resource Routing Table". > > Best Regards > Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) > > > -Original Message- > From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 2:35 PM > To: OpenStack Development Ma

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle] UUID Mapping

2016-04-07 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Team, Can we elaborate on uuid mapping more? As described in blueprint, it's expected to be a solution for one of challenges. > The object UUID in the top layer is different from the UUIDs in the bottom > layers. There should theoretical logic, mechanism. But I've not been able to find any

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Original Blueprint

2016-04-06 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Chaoyi, In blueprint you described for PoC, there are information of tables. [1] They seem to out-to-date. Do you think that those information need to be up-to-date in your blueprint? If it's not necessary, it's better to move those information to different sheet or put some comment like

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FYI: Removing default flavors from nova

2016-04-06 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 04/06/2016 04:19 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: >> >> >> Le 06/04/2016 06:44, Qiming Teng a écrit : >>> Not an expert of Nova but I am really shocked by such a change. Because >>> I'm not a Nova expert, I don't have a say on the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]weekly meeting of Apr. 6

2016-04-06 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
: > Hi, Shinobu, > > Do you have some ideas on trust relationship between top and bottoms over BGP > across Ass? > > Best Regards > Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) > > > -Original Message- > From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesd

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FYI: Removing default flavors from nova

2016-04-05 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Qiming Teng wrote: > Not an expert of Nova but I am really shocked by such a change. Because > I'm not a Nova expert, I don't have a say on the *huge* efforts in > maintaining some builtin/default flavors. As a user I don't care where >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]weekly meeting of Apr. 6

2016-04-05 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Chaoyi, Thank you for team mtg every week. One day, we may need to discuss about trust relationship considering secure connection and no-latency issue between top and bottoms over BGP across ASs, in short between DCs. Any thought would be appreciated as usual. Cheers, Shinobu On Tue, Apr 5,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Naming convention

2016-04-04 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
How do you think about this? Best Regards Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) -Original Message- From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 9:46 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Nam

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Naming convention

2016-04-04 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
ang ) > > > -Original Message- > From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2016 7:40 AM > To: joehuang; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Naming convention

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Naming convention

2016-04-01 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
One of examples is: """ tricircle/db/api.py """ authorize_quota_class_context(context, class_name): # This could become: auth_quota_class_ctx(ctx, class_name): # If we put some comment for this, this also could become: """ Function: Ensure a request has right permission to given the

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Naming convention

2016-04-01 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Team, Probably it's worth thinking of naming convention for classes, methods or whatever we define in source codes. Some names are lengthy and there might be no consistency. At the moment it's fine. But once this project gets growing, situation would become chaotic and could cause bugs. What

Re: [openstack-dev] [All][Neutron] Improving development and review velocity - Is it time for a drastic change?

2016-03-31 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Assaf Muller wrote: > Have you been negatively impacted by slow development and review > velocity? Read on. > > OpenStack has had a slow review velocity for as long as I can > remember. This has a cascading effect where people take up multiple >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

2016-03-31 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
to fix it. Best regards, Yipei On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 2:25 PM, joehuang <joehu...@huawei.com<mailto:joehu...@huawei.com>> wrote: I think we can do it later. It's still a little bit strange that if nova-network in the Local.conf is disabled at first before devstack installation, the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

2016-03-29 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
dme[1] and pengfei's experience[2] to install Tricircle. >> >> [1] https://github.com/openstack/tricircle/blob/master/README.md >> [2] http://shipengfei92.cn/play_tricircle_with_virtualbox >> >> Best Regards >> Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) >> >> >&g

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

2016-03-29 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
E.md > [2] http://shipengfei92.cn/play_tricircle_with_virtualbox > > Best Regards > Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) > > > -Original Message- > From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 10:48 AM > To: OpenStack Development Maili

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

2016-03-28 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
n local.conf, n-net is disabled, which is the same as the sample file of >> tricircle. >> >> [1] http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/sample_config.html >> >> Best regards, >> Yipei >> >> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Shinobu Kinjo <shinobu...@gma

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

2016-03-28 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
_ > > self.invoke_controller(controller, args, kwargs, state) > > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pecan/core.py", line 572, in > invoke_controller > > result = controller(*args, **kwargs) > > File "/opt/stack/tricircle/tricircle/

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name

2016-03-26 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
ways and Xjobs > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Shinobu Kinjo <shinobu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Yes, that's one of possibilities. >> >> Cheers, >> Shinobu >> >> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Zhipeng Huang <zhipengh...@gmail.com> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name

2016-03-26 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Yes, that's one of possibilities. Cheers, Shinobu On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Zhipeng Huang <zhipengh...@gmail.com> wrote: > any possible that we use gRPC for Tricircle ? > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Shinobu Kinjo <shinobu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name

2016-03-26 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
ec/implement-stateless >> >> Best Regards >> Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 2:39 PM >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for u

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name

2016-03-26 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
ement-stateless > > Best Regards > Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) > > > -Original Message- > From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:shinobu...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 2:39 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: [

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Using the reserved keywords reserved as field name

2016-03-26 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Team, In the Tricircle database, there are three tables having a field name which the MySQL (MariaDB) has as one of the reserved keywords. [1] Table Name: aggregate_metadata instance_type_extra_specs quality_of_service_specs Field Name: key I think it would not be best practice to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Using in-memory database for unit tests

2016-03-23 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Vega Cai <luckyveg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 22 March 2016 at 12:09, Shinobu Kinjo <shinobu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Thank you for your comment (inline for my message). >> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Veg

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

2016-03-22 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:41 PM, joehuang wrote: > Hi, Yipei, > > > > When you play Tricircle, it’s important to know that Tricircle is the > OpenStack API gateway to other OpenStack instances. In the Readme, Pod1, > Pod2 are two OpenStack instances, before trying Tricircle,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Using in-memory database for unit tests

2016-03-21 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Thank you for your comment (inline for my message). On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Vega Cai <luckyveg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Let me try to explain some. > > On 22 March 2016 at 10:09, Shinobu Kinjo <shinobu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 22,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] Using in-memory database for unit tests

2016-03-21 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
mail-list) > > Best Regards > Chaoyi Huang ( joehuang ) > > -Original Message- > From: Shinobu Kinjo [mailto:ski...@redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 7:43 AM > To: joehuang; khayam.gondal; zhangbinsjtu; shipengfei92; newypei; Liuhaixia; > caizhiyuan (A); h

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Mitaka RC1 done

2016-03-19 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Ben Swartzlander wrote: > Thanks everyone for the hard work getting RC1 done. We had record high > number of bugs at feature freeze this cycle, and we ended up pushing a few > out, but there were SIXTY bugs fixed in the last 2 weeks which I

Re: [openstack-dev] [jacket] Introduction to jacket, a new project

2016-03-19 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
more differences of clouds' behaviour and function. Jacket's > target is to shield these differences and let users feel that they are using > just one cloud. Cheers, Shinobu > Thanks. > > Best Regards, > Kevin (Sen Zhang) > > > At 2016-03-17 05:47:35, "Shino

  1   2   >