Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Default scheduler filters survey

2018-05-01 Thread Simon Leinen
[Resending for a colleague who's not on openstack-dev-- SL.] Yeap, because of the bug [#1677217] in the standard AggregateImagePropertiesIsolation filter, we have written a custom Nova scheduler filter. The filter AggregateImageOsDistroIsolation is a simplified version the

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] Meeting Times - change to office hours?

2018-04-28 Thread Simon Leinen
Graham Hayes writes: > I would like to suggest we have an office hours style meeting, with > one in the UTC evening and one in the UTC morning. > If this seems reasonable - when and what frequency should we do > them? What times suit the current set of contributors? In general, I prefer

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Default scheduler filters survey

2018-04-18 Thread Simon Leinen
Artom Lifshitz writes: > To that end, we'd like to know what filters operators are enabling in > their deployment. If you can, please reply to this email with your > [filter_scheduler]/enabled_filters (or > [DEFAULT]/scheduler_default_filters if you're using an older version) > option from

Re: [openstack-dev] [k8s][octavia][lbaas] Experiences on using the LB APIs with K8s

2018-03-16 Thread Simon Leinen
Joe Topjian writes: > Terraform hat! I want to slightly nit-pick this one since the words > "leak" and "admin-priv" can sound scary: Terraform technically wasn't > doing anything wrong. The problem was that Octavia was creating > resources but not setting ownership to the tenant. When it came time

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Policy regarding template customisation

2018-01-30 Thread Simon Leinen
Paul Bourke writes: > So I think everyone is in agreement that it should be option 2. I'm > leaning towards this also but I'm wondering how much of this makes > things easier for us as developers rather than operators. > How committed this are we in practice? For example, if we take >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching gate testing to use Ubuntu Cloud Archive

2017-04-17 Thread Simon Leinen
Ihar Hrachyshka writes: > I just saw the plan merged in master: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/451492/ That's cool! Can we also > backport the change to Ocata and maybe Newton so that we don't hit the > same bug there? The backport is already up: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/456506/ For

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][nova] Config drive claims ipv6_dhcp, neutron api says slaac

2017-03-24 Thread Simon Leinen
Clark Boylan writes: [...] > { > "id": "network1", > "link": "tap14b906ba-8c", > "network_id": "7ee08c00-7323-4f18-94bb-67e081520e70", > "type": "ipv6_dhcp" > } > ], > "services": [] > } > You'll notice that the network1

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][diskimage-builder] Status of diskimage-builder

2017-03-03 Thread Simon Leinen
Emilien Macchi writes: > DIB folks: please confirm on this thread that you're ok to move out > DIB from TripleO and be an independent project. As a DIB user (and occasional contributor of patches in the past) and TripleO non-user, I'm in favor of the separation. > Also please decide if we want

Re: [openstack-dev] [DIB] [TripleO] Should we have a DIB meeting?

2016-07-21 Thread Simon Leinen
Stephane Miller writes: > I'm proposing that we have a regular, IRC-based meeting for the > project. This could be done on its own, or as part of the TripleO > meeting. I don't think we necessarily need to do this every week, but > a fortnightly chance to get together to chat about big changes, >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Ubuntu PPA with IPv6 enabled, need help to achieve it

2014-04-03 Thread Simon Leinen
Martinx writes: 1- Create and maintain a Ubuntu PPA Archive to host Neutron with IPv6 patches (from Nephos6 / Shixiong?). [...] Let me know if there are interest on this... Great initiative! We're building a new Icehouse cluster soon and are very interested in trying these packages, because

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Meeting time - change to 1300 UTC or 1500 UTC?

2014-01-06 Thread Simon Leinen
Collins, Sean writes: Looking at the calendar, our options for 1500 UTC require us to change the day that we meet. The following days are available: * Tuesdays * Fridays Thoughts? For what it's worth (I haven't been contributing so far but I'm very interested in the topic and would