Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Tungsten Fabric (formally OpenContrail) at Denver PTG

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 6:36 PM Sukhdev Kapur wrote: > The Tungsten Fabric community invites you to join us at the OpenStack > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.openstack.org_ptg_=DwMFaQ=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI=Y9QaEJ2cs4La8kQDqQ-N2rBJnxrPyFqAIO

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Tungsten Fabric (formally OpenContrail) at Denver PTG

link=DwMFaQ=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI=Y9QaEJ2cs4La8kQDqQ-N2rBJnxrPyFqAIO8efLhSqZ0=HGRXthlMxhSQNArAgnxrtePz2KWyiVUqa5MsLQyEL84=ED015IjOfPhiKlH0QxBCKTRWqO5Zou8mKei8In4cpEo=> Sukhdev Kapur and TF Networking T

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Stepping down from core

Hey Armando, Your leadership will be sorely missed. Cheers.. -Sukhdev On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Armando M. wrote: > Hi neutrinos, > > To some of you this email may not come as a surprise. > > During the past few months my upstream community engagements have been >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Denver Team Dinner

+1 On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Miguel Lavalle wrote: > Dear Neutrinos, > > Our social event will take place on Thursday September 12th at 7:30pm. The > venue is going to be https://www.famousdaves.com/Denver-Stapleton. It is > located 0.4 miles from the Renaissance

[openstack-dev] [neutron] - Summit "Making Neutron easy for people who want basic Networking" summary

Folks, I moderated the above referenced session at Boston Summit (sorry for posting the summary a bit late - because of personal reason). The etherpad of the session [1] gives you the details of the discussion. Based upon the discussions, there were two critical take aways from this session:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - are you attending the Boston summit?

017 at 7:57 AM, Kevin Benton <ke...@benton.pub> wrote: >> >>> Let's plan for a social Wednesday night. I'll update this with a >>> location once we find a place. >>> >>> On May 8, 2017 08:50, "MCCASLAND, TREVOR" <tm2...@att.com> wrote: >&g

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - are you attending the Boston summit?

Hey Neutron Folks, Following our past tradition, we should have Neutron dinner while we are all in Boston. Miguel has few places in mind. I would propose that we nominate him as the dinner organizer lieutenant. Miguel, I hope you will take us to some cool place. Thanks -Sukhdev On Thu, Apr

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] stepping down from core

Rossella, It has been nothing but pleasure working with you. Wish you best of luck in your new endeavors. regards.. -Sukhdev On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Rossella Sblendido wrote: > Hi all, > > I've moved to a new position recently and despite my best intentions I >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Forum] Moderators needed!

If no body has claimed it yet, I will be happy to moderate Making Neutron easy session - https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/events/18800/making-neutron-easy-for-people-who-want-basic-networking I am already presenter into two sessions. Let me know if you want me to do

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] ocata release?

Gary, Thank you - you da man... -Sukhdev On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: > Done - https://review.openstack.org/gitweb?p=openstack/networking- > l2gw.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/stable/ocata > A luta continua > > On 2/6/17, 8:51 AM, "Gary Kotton"

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] PTL candidacy

/neutron_plugin_contr > ail/extensions/contrail.py#L9-L22 > > Cheers, > Kevin Benton > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Sukhdev Kapur <sukhdevka...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> Ihar and Kevin, >> >> As our potential future PTLs, I wo

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] PTL candidacy

Folks, This thread has gotten too long and hard to follow. It is clear that we should discuss/address this. My suggestion is that we organize a session in Atlanta PTG meeting and discuss this. I am going to add this on the Neutron etherpad - should this be included in any other session as well?

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] PTL candidacy

Folks, this is a great discussion. I hope this leads us to some good consensus and direction :-) I would suggest that we discuss this in upcoming PTG meeting as well. On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 5:20 AM, Kevin Benton wrote: > >So I'm not sure that Kevin and Thierry's answers

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] PTL Candidacy

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Edgar Magana <edgar.mag...@workday.com> wrote: > You just made me remember my time as police man for Neutron plugins! ☺ > Now we can have distributed police men :-) -Sukhdev > > > Edgar > > > > *From: *Sukhdev Kapur

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] PTL Candidacy

I remember good old days when CI was introduced in Neutron (during Icehouse time frame). There was excellent momentum behind it. We did not know some of the enforcement details, which created lots of confusion/havoc. Now that we have a better understanding of the past issues, and lots of good

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] PTL candidacy

Ihar and Kevin, As our potential future PTLs, I would like to draw your attention to one of the critical issue regarding Neutron as "the" networking service in OpenStack. I keep hearing off and on that Neutron is not flexible to address many networking use cases and hence a new (or additional)

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] PTL Candidacy

In deed, excellent and well qualified candidates. Best of Luck to both -Sukhdev On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Armando M. wrote: > Hi neutrinos, > > No, it's not what you might be thinking...I am just delighted to see two > excellent candidates willing to take the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] PTL nominations deadline and non-candidacy

Hey Armando, Too bad we can't pick on you anymore :-) On a serious note, thanks for the leadership you brought to the Neutron team and the project. Your contributions will always be appreciated. Look forward to continue to work with you. regards.. -Sukhdev On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 6:11 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Mechanism drivers ! OpenvSwich or Linuxbridge or both of them?

Zhi, Selection of driver is deployment dependent. You could run or more ML2 drivers simultaneous depending upon your deployment. Hierarchical Port Binding (HPB) facilitates multi-segmented L2 networks where the scope of the Segmentation ID is local to a given segment. For example - if you want

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Ironic] Ironic-Neutron Integration meeting termination notification

Folks, As you know we started out the charter to bring multi-tenancy for Bare metal Service (Ironic) using Neutron networking in Liberty Cycle. We have been meeting weekly to discuss this Ironic/ Neutron integration and make it a reality. We successfully completed the charter - thanks to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron team social event in Barcelona

+1 Count me in... -Sukhdev On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Miguel Lavalle wrote: > Dear Neutrinos, > > I am organizing a social event for the team on Thursday 27th at 19:30. > After doing some Google research, I am proposing Raco de la Vila, which is > located in

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW] New core member

Folks, I am pleased to announce the addition of Ofer Ben-Yakov as new core team member of L2 Gateway team. Ofer has been working hard and contributing to solidify L2GW framework as well adding new features to the L2GW. The team welcomes Ofer on board and look forward to work with him. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] why do we need setting network driver per node?

Hi Devananda, This is a good summary. I think the proposal makes a lot of sense. We need to agree to this as soon as possible so that we can get the Ironic patches merged by this Friday - to meet the timelines. Can you set up the number for the voice call so that we can all dial in, discuss, if

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2 Gateway] No meeting on July 4th

Folks, Due the US holiday on 4th of July, there will be no meeting for L2 Gateway. The channel will be available for anybody to use, should you need to discuss anything during the meeting's time slot. Happy 4th.. -Sukhdev

[openstack-dev] [Ironic][Neutron] No Ironic-Neutron Integration meeting on July 4th

Folks, Due the US holiday on 4th of July, there will be no meeting on Ironic-Neutron Integration. The channel will be available for anybody to use, should you need to discuss anything during the meeting's time slot. Happy 4th.. -Sukhdev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW] Mitaka release of L2 Gateway now available

Hi Martinx, L2GW is designed to bridge neutron networks with non-neutron networks to form a L2 broadcast domain - not two neutron networks. regards.. -Sukhdev On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmarti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 11 May 2016 at 16:05

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW] Mitaka release of L2 Gateway now available

Operators do not deploy on DevStack. > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Sukhdev Kapur <sukhdevka...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Matt, >> >> >> Here is the wiki - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/L2-GW >> >> This should provide you all the in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW] Mitaka release of L2 Gateway now available

y 11, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Sukhdev Kapur <sukhdevka...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> Folks, >> >> I am happy to announce that Mitaka release for L2 Gateway is released and >> now available at https://pypi.python.org/pypi/networking-l2gw. >> >> You can

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2GW] Mitaka release of L2 Gateway now available

ty release. Thanks Sukhdev Kapur __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L2gw

Yes, I am on it. I was waiting for a Green Light from few folks, which I got this morning. So, I will be working on releasing it sometime tomorrow. Hope that is OK with everybody. -Sukhdev On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Armando M. wrote: > > > On 9 May 2016 at 18:03, Gary

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Re: [stable] Requesting exception for stable/kilo

ble/kilo/neutron/plugins/ml2/drivers/arista/requirements.txt > > 2016-05-10 4:46 GMT+09:00 Dave Walker <em...@daviey.com>: > > > > > > On 4 May 2016 at 17:55, Sukhdev Kapur <sukhdevka...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Stable Maintainers, &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Re: [stable] Requesting exception for stable/kilo

Hi Dave, I will get on it right away. Let me find Neutron Cores to review it. Please stand by -Sukhdev On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Dave Walker <em...@daviey.com> wrote: > > > On 4 May 2016 at 17:55, Sukhdev Kapur <sukhdevka...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Sta

[openstack-dev] [stable] Requesting exception for stable/kilo

Hi Stable Maintainers, We have a critical bug impacting customers production network. This is a minor fix. I would like to request an exception so that the customers do not have to baby sit this patch. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/309653/ Please allow this to be merged. Thanks -Sukhdev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Newton blueprints call for action

Hi Rossella, Good to hear that you will follow through with this. Ironic is looking for this API as well for bare metal deployments. We would love to work with you to make sure that this API/Implementation works for all servers ( VMs as well BMs) Thanks -Sukhdev On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:32 AM,

[openstack-dev] Somebody posted this on #openstack-meetng-4

I just noticed that somebody posted this on the above meeting channel. [23:22:31] Allah is doing [23:22:42] sun is not doing Allah is doing [23:22:42] *yamamoto* (~yamam...@i118-21-144-234.s30.a048.ap.plala.or.jp) left IRC (Remote host closed the connection) [23:22:54] moon is not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][ml2][Manila] API to query segments used during port binding

Hi Marc, I am driving the ironic-ml2 integration and introduced baremetal type for vmic_type. You can very much use the same integration here - however, I am not completely clear about your use case. Do you want neutron/ML2 to plumb the network for Manila or do you want to find out what VLAN

[openstack-dev] [neutron][L2 Gateway]

Folks, Due to holiday on Monday in USA, there will be no L2 Gateway meeting on February 15. Feel free to use the channel for any discussions that you would want to carry during that hour. Thanks -Sukhdev __ OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [neutron][ironic] - no meeting on Feb 15

Folks, Due to holiday on Monday in USA, there will be no Ironic-Neutron integration meeting on February 15. Feel free to use the channel for any discussions that you would want to carry during that hour. Thanks Sukhdev __

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Liberty release for L2GW

Folks, This is to let everybody know that Liberty release for L2GW project is released and is available at - https://pypi.python.org/pypi/networking-l2gw Feel free to download it and use it. Please let us know if you see any issue with it. Authors of outstanding or new patches, please use your

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Neutron] Testing of Ironic/Neutron integration on devstack

Hi Vasyl, This is great. Kevin and I was working on the similar thing. I just finished testing his patch and gave a +1. This is a missing (and needed) functionality for getting the Ironic/Neutron integration completed. As Kevin suggests, it will be best if we can combine these approaches and

[openstack-dev] [neutron][ironic] Ironic-Neutron meeting cancellation notice

Folks, We are canceling this week's Ironic-neutron integration meeting. I have a family obligation to take care of and I have not been able to find a replacement person who can chair this meeting. Therefore, we will cancel this week's meeting. Next meeting will take place on Monday, January 23

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Nova][Neutron] Multi-tenancy support

Hi Vasyl, I have not cross checked every patch in your list, but, the list looks about right. >From the Ironic, Nova, and Neutron point of the code is pretty much in place with these patches. In this week's meeting we discussed the plan for merging these patches. Couple of things are holding us

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] HenryG addition to the Neutron Drivers team

Hey Kevin, It was always Henry's fault - now we can formally blame him :-):-) Excellent move!! Well deserved addition!!! Congratulations Henry!!! -Sukhdev On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Kevin Benton wrote: > Excellent addition! Remember everyone, if the feature you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Neutron Social Meetup in Tokyo

Hey Akihiro, Thanks for arranging this. I did not see any link to RSVP. I would love to attend this event - please add me to the list. Thanks -Sukhdev On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > Hi Neutron folks, > > We are pleased to announce Neutron social

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Ironic] Testing Ironic multi-tenancy feature

Hi Pavlo, This feature spans three projects; Neutron, Nova, and Ironic. The code for neutron modification was merged in Liberty, but, because of the timeline/logistics, we missed the deadline to merge the Nova and Ironic code in Liberty. Most of the patches are ready and the functionality is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L2 gateway project

Hey Kyle, We are down to couple of patches that are awaiting approval/merge. As soon as it is done, I will let you know. Thanks -Sukhdev On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote: > On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] pypi packages for networking sub-projects

Hey Kyle, I am bit confused by this. I just checked networking-arista and see that the co-owner of the project is openstackci I also checked the [1] and [2] and the settings for networking-arista are correct as well. What else is missing which make you put networking-arista in the second

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] pypi packages for networking sub-projects

Hey Kyle, I have updated the ownership of networking-l2gw. I have +1'd your patch. As soon as it merges the ACLs for the L2GW project will be fine as well. Thanks for confirming about the networking-arista. With this both of these packages should be good to go. Thanks -Sukhdev On Wed, Sep

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] PTL Non-Candidacy

Hi Kyle, You have done wonders for the Neutron project. I hate to see you go, but, fully understand your posiiton. We will miss you. Best of luck -Sukhdev On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: > I'm writing to let everyone know that I do not plan to run

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][ML2] ML2 late/early-cycle sprint announcement

> time now. > I think its a very good idea and would love if i could participate in the > talks (and hopefully the implementation as well) > > Thanks > Gal. > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Sukhdev Kapur <sukhdevka...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Folks, >&

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][ML2] ML2 late/early-cycle sprint announcement

Folks, We are planning on having ML2 coding sprint on October 6 through 8, 2015. Some are calling it Liberty late-cycle sprint, others are calling it Mitaka early-cycle sprint. ML2 team has been discussing the issues related to synchronization of the Neutron DB resources with the back-end

[openstack-dev] [Ironic][Neutron] Ironic-Neutron Integration meeting cancelled for Sept 7th

Folks, On account of Labor day holiday on Monday (9/7/15) in U.S.A, we will not be holding Ironic-Neutron integration meeting. On a separate note, Ironic core team is planning for Liberty-RC1 sometime in third week of Sept. This means we need to test and complete all our patches ASAP so that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Common Base class for agents

(IRC: scheuran) On Di, 2015-08-04 at 22:42 -0700, Sukhdev Kapur wrote: We discussed this in ML2 sub-team meeting last week and felt the best approach is to implement this agent in a separate repo. There is already an on-going effort/plan for modular L2 agent. This agent would

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Common Base class for agents

to get a common agent or at least common code. But any other suggestions are highly welcome! [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/208666/ Andreas (IRC: scheuran) On Di, 2015-08-04 at 22:42 -0700, Sukhdev Kapur wrote: We discussed this in ML2 sub-team meeting last week and felt

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Common Base class for agents

We discussed this in ML2 sub-team meeting last week and felt the best approach is to implement this agent in a separate repo. There is already an on-going effort/plan for modular L2 agent. This agent would be a perfect candidate to take on that effort and implement it for macvtap agent. Once

[openstack-dev] [Ironic][Neutron] Ironic/Neutron Integration weekly meeting kick off

Folks, Starting next monday (June 1, 2015), we are kicking off weekly meeting to discuss and track the integration of Ironic and Neutron (ML2). We are hoping to implement the Networking support within Liberty cycle. Come join and help us achieve this goal. Anybody who is interested in this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Stepping down from Neutron core team

Hey Salvatore, Best of luck and thanks for all the hard work. -Sukhdev On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: After putting the whole OpenStack networking contributors community through almost 8 cycles of pedant comments and annoying what if

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] L2 Gateway API released

Folks, L2 Gateway team is pleased to announce the release of L2 Gateway API. This API can be downloaded from [1] If you plan on attending OpenStack summit in Vancouver next week, please attend presentation [2] to find more details about this feature. If you are not able to attend the summit, be

Re: [openstack-dev] [third-party][infra] Third-Party CI Operators: Let's use a common CI Solution!

framework can reduce/eliminate this effort, I would like to at least understand it and discuss with the participants - and, may join in. Thanks for the good work. -Sukhdev On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: On 04/20/2015 04:39 PM, Sukhdev Kapur wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [third-party][infra] Third-Party CI Operators: Let's use a common CI Solution!

Hi Ramy, While I agree, in principal, with this line of thinking and goal, my concern will be how much extra work is it going to create for existing CI owners? Our Ci system has been stable for a long time, and we put in a good amount of effort to get it to that point. Our CI is not based upon

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] ML2 versus core plugin for OVN

Folks, A great discussion. I am not expert at OVN, hence, want to ask a question. The answer may make a case that it should probably be a ML2 driver as oppose to monolithic plugin. Say a customer want to deploy an OVN based solution and use HW devices from one vendor for L2 and L3 (e.g. Arista

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][neutron] backports vs. vendor decomposition

Hi Ihar, I have added this on the agenda for next neutron core meeting to discuss. This email gives an excellent context to the issue at hand. Only one thing I would like to add is that the deadline for stable/juno is only one week away - hence, it raises the urgency to call for action. Thanks

[openstack-dev] [neutron][devstack][keystone] Devstack failures due to empty service catalogue

Hi All, I noticed that our CI got hit sometime last night. Neutron is unable to create private network as there is no Tenant ID. Please see the error log here - http://paste.openstack.org/show/159912/ It appears that keystone is not creating tenant. Keystone screen log did not show anything

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Devstack failures related to q-vpn service

Hi All, I am seeing very frequent failures of devstack on our CI because of q-vpn service failures. This has happened very recently. Is this a know issue? I am tempted to disable q-vpn service on our CI to avoid this noise. I wanted to reach out to see if others are also seeing this issue.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Devstack failures related to q-vpn service

you are seeing? Regards, PCM PCM (Paul Michali) IRC pc_m (irc.freenode.com) Twitter... @pmichali On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Sukhdev Kapur sukhdevka...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I am seeing very frequent failures of devstack on our CI because of q-vpn service

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] grenade failures

Hi All, I noticed that several neutron patches are failing check-grenade-dsvm-neutron. I pinged it on IRC, did not get any response, thought I post it here. -Sukhdev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2-Gateway] Meetings announcement

you say 'L2 gateway'? Cheers, -- Ian. On 2 January 2015 at 18:28, Sukhdev Kapur sukhdevka...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, HAPPY NEW YEAR. Starting Monday (Jan 5th, 2015) we will be kicking of bi-weekly meetings for L2 Gateway discussions. We are hoping to come up with an initial version

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][L2-Gateway] Meetings announcement

Hi all, HAPPY NEW YEAR. Starting Monday (Jan 5th, 2015) we will be kicking of bi-weekly meetings for L2 Gateway discussions. We are hoping to come up with an initial version of L2 Gateway API in Kilo cycle. The intent of these bi-weekly meetings is to discuss issues related to L2 Gateway API.

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][ML2] - canceling this week's ML2 meeting

Dear fellow ML2'ers, In sprit of holidays, Bob and I decided to cancel this week's ML2 meeting. We will resume our meetings from January 7th onwards. Happy New Year to you and your loved ones. -Sukhdev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Changes to the core team

Congratulations Henry and Kevin. It has always been pleasure working with you guys. If I may express my opinion, Bob's contribution to ML2 has been quite substantial. The kind of stability ML2 has achieved makes a statement of his dedication to this work. I have worked very closely with Bob

[openstack-dev] (no subject)

Folks, After Maruti's lighting talk on L2 Gateway, bunch of people/vendors expressed interest in coming up with an API for this service. The goal is to come up with a basic set of API which can be implemented in Kilo time frame and build upon it over time in the future. Armando, Akihiro, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L2 Gateway discussion

resending with with the correct subject On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Sukhdev Kapur sukhdevka...@gmail.com wrote: Folks, After Maruti's lighting talk on L2 Gateway, bunch of people/vendors expressed interest in coming up with an API for this service. The goal is to come up with a basic

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L2 Gateway discussion

, Sukhdev Kapur sukhdevka...@gmail.com wrote: Folks, After Maruti's lighting talk on L2 Gateway, bunch of people/vendors expressed interest in coming up with an API for this service. The goal is to come up with a basic set of API which can be implemented in Kilo time frame and build upon

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] VMWare NSX CI - recheck info

Hi Kurt, We (Arista) were one of the early adapters of the CI systems. We built our system based upon the Neutron requirements as of late last year/early this year. Our CI has been up and operational since January of this year. This is before (or in parallel to Jay Pipes effort of Zuul based

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] collecting recheck command to re-trigger third party CI

Incidentally, I replied to Kurt's email this morning on this subject - below is what I wrote. There are several threads with such information. While it is great to express opinions on the MLs, converting them into decisions/conclusions should be done in a formal fashion. I suggested that this be

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] New meeting rotation starting next week

+1 It will be very useful to have neutron specific meetings on iCal - considering that they will be moving around... -Sukhdev On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote: Unfortunately the master ICAL has so many meetings that it's not useful to have displaying as

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][third-party] Arista CI hits 10, 000 runs this morning

Folks, Just wanted to share with you that Arista CI has been up and running 24x7 since the beginning of this year with no down time. This morning it posted a vote on 10,000th Neutron patch cheers.. -Sukhdev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [Neutron][third-party] Arista CI hits 10, 000 runs this morning

:19 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: Congratulations! And to celebrate this milestone, I would consider running something more than ~280 api tests... perhaps also a few scenario tests? Salvatore On 7 August 2014 01:09, Sukhdev Kapur sukhdevka...@gmail.com wrote: Folks

[openstack-dev] [neutron][third-party] Updated Gerrit plugin for Third party CIs

The upgrade of Gerrit in the upstream had impacted the gerrit triggers for recheck no bug and recheck bug in the downstream CI's that use Gerrit plugin with Jenkins. We have fixed the issue and have uploaded patch for the fix. The following wiki has updated links to the correct patch, along

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] Neutron 3rd Party CI status dashboard

Well, Luke, this is collaborative effort by everybody. By having these CI systems in place ensures that one person's code does not break other person's code and vice versa. Therefore, having these CI systems operational and voting 24x7 is a critical step in achieving this goal. However, the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] Neutron 3rd Party CI status dashboard

months. This information is not available anywhere - hence, presenting this kind of information on a dashboard created by Ilya would be very useful to the community as well to the vendors.. thoughts? -Sukhdev On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Sukhdev Kapur sukhdevka...@gmail.com wrote: Well

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Swift][third-party] Most Third Party CI's failing

I noticed this afternoon (Saturday PST 1:18pm) that most of the Third Party test systems started to fail because of the seuptools bug because of dependency in python-swiftclient. I further noticed that some of the CI's are voting +1, but, when I look through the logs, they seem to be hitting this

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] Current status of Neutron 3rd Party CI and how to move forward

Hi Kyle, Arista CI has been voting +1 for success and comments in case of Failures. Are the CI's now allowed to post -1 for failures? I have to make a minor change to start voting -1. Please advise. -Sukhdev On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Swift][third-party] Most Third Party CI's failing

to get past the issue - until the fix in the upstream is merged. Note that you have to install mercurial to pull this patch. Hope this helps. regards.. -Sukhdev On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Sukhdev Kapur sukhdevka...@gmail.com wrote: I noticed this afternoon (Saturday PST 1:18pm

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Swift][third-party] Most Third Party CI's failing

Oppss...sorry wrong link... please use this http://paste.openstack.org/show/84073/. If anybody needs help, please ping me or go to #openstack-infra. regards.. -Sukhdev On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Sukhdev Kapur sukhdevka...@gmail.com wrote: Fellow Stackers, I have an update

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] tgt restart fails in Cinder startup start: job failed to start

with the Kernel Semaphore Limits parameters [1]: Adding this [2] line to `/etc/sysctl.conf` seems to do the trick. - Roey [1] http://paste.openstack.org/show/73086/ [2] http://paste.openstack.org/show/73082/ *From:* Sukhdev Kapur [mailto:sukhdevka...@gmail.com] *Sent

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Intermittent failures cloning noVNC from github.com/kanaka

I have noticed that even clone of devstack has failed few times within last couple of hours - it was running fairly smooth so far. -Sukhdev On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Sukhdev Kapur sukhdevka...@gmail.comwrote: [adding openstack-dev list as well ] I have noticed that this has stated

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Intermittent failures cloning noVNC from github.com/kanaka

Hey Monty, The issue is when we are using stack.sh, how do we use cache dir as oppose to going at git? Is there any option which can be set to utilize this feature? -Sukhdev On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: Honestly not being snarky here ... The

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Intermittent failures cloning noVNC from github.com/kanaka

[adding openstack-dev list as well ] I have noticed that this has stated hitting my builds within last few hours. I have noticed exact same failures on almost 10 builds. Looks like something has happened within last few hours - perhaps the load? -Sukhdev On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Dane

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] tgt restart fails in Cinder startup start: job failed to start

I see the same issue. This issue has crept in during the latest flurry of check-ins. I started noticing this issue a day or two before the Icehouse Feature Freeze deadline. I tried restarting tgt as well, but, it does not help. However, rebooting the VM helps clear it up. Has anybody else seen

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] tgt restart fails in Cinder startup start: job failed to start

, Sukhdev Kapur sukhdevka...@gmail.comwrote: I see the same issue. This issue has crept in during the latest flurry of check-ins. I started noticing this issue a day or two before the Icehouse Feature Freeze deadline. I tried restarting tgt as well, but, it does not help. However, rebooting the VM

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [Neutron][third-party-testing] Third Party Test setup and details

to follow. best of luck -- Trinath Somanchi - B39208 trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048 *From:* Sukhdev Kapur [mailto:sukhdevka...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, February 26, 2014 3:39 AM *To:* openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org; OpenStack Development Mailing List

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][third-party-testing] Third Party Test setup and details

Fellow developers, I just put together a wiki describing the Arista Third Party Setup. In the attached document we provide a link to the modified Gerrit Plugin to handle the regex matching for the Comment Added event so that recheck/reverify no bug/ can be handled.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][neutron][nova][3rd party testing] Gerrit Jenkins plugin will not fulfill requirements of 3rd party testing

Folks, I just sent out another email. Here is the link to the wiki which has details about this patch. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Arista-third-party-testing Hope this helps. -Sukhdev On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Sukhdev Kapur sukh...@aristanetworks.comwrote: On Thu, Feb 13

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][neutron][nova][3rd party testing] Gerrit Jenkins plugin will not fulfill requirements of 3rd party testing

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 12:34 -0800, Sukhdev Kapur wrote: Jay, Just an FYI. We have modified the Gerrit plugin it accept/match regex to generate notifications of for receck no bug/bug ###. It turned out to be very

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][neutron][nova][3rd party testing] Gerrit Jenkins plugin will not fulfill requirements of 3rd party testing

, Sukhdev Kapur sukh...@aristanetworks.comwrote: Hi Jay, Thanks for bringing this up. I have been trying to make the recheck work and have not had much success. Therefore, I agree that we should go with option a) for the short term until b) or c) becomes available. I would prefer b) because we have

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][neutron][nova][3rd party testing] Gerrit Jenkins plugin will not fulfill requirements of 3rd party testing

Hi Jay, Thanks for bringing this up. I have been trying to make the recheck work and have not had much success. Therefore, I agree that we should go with option a) for the short term until b) or c) becomes available. I would prefer b) because we have already invested a lot in our solution and it

[openstack-dev] [oepnstack-dev][Neutron] Neutron API behavior

Hi All, During tempest sprint in Montreal, as we were writing API tests, we noticed a behavior which we believed is an issue with the Neutron API (or perhaps documentation or both) Let me start with a question: If one executes an api to create/delete/update a neutron resource, what is the API's

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][qa]API testing update

drivers seems to fit in 3rd party testing where you can run additional tests which are configuration-specific. Thanks, Eugene. On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 4:36 AM, Sukhdev Kapur sukhdevka...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Miguel, As I am using neutron API tempest tests, I notice that in the create_port

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][qa] Intermittent failure of tempest test test_network_basic_ops

/neutron/+spec/neutron-tempest-parallel On 9 January 2014 05:38, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 18:46 -0800, Sukhdev Kapur wrote: Dear fellow developers, I am running few Neutron tempest tests and noticing an intermittent

  1   2   >