Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Stein forum session notes

[Surya Seetharaman]

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 2:39 PM Matt Riedemann  wrote:

> On 11/19/2018 3:17 AM, melanie witt wrote:
> > - Not directly related to the session, but CERN (hallway track) and
> > NeCTAR (dev ML) have both given feedback and asked that the
> > policy-driven idea for handling quota for down cells be avoided. Revived
> > the "propose counting quota in placement" spec to see if there's any
> way
> > forward here
>
> Should this be abandoned then?
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/614783/
>
> Since there is no microversion impact to that change, it could be added
> separately as a bug fix for the down cell case if other operators want
> that functionality. But maybe we don't know what other operators want
> since no one else is at multi-cell cells v2 yet.
>
>
I thought the policy check was needed until the "propose counting quota in
placement"
has been implemented as a workaround and that is what the "handling down
cell" spec also proposed,
unless the former spec would be implemented within this cycle in which case
we do not need the
policy check.

-- 

Regards,
Surya.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] API updates week 19-25

[Surya Seetharaman]

Hi!

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Ghanshyam Mann 
wrote:

>
> 5. API Extensions merge work
> - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/api-extensions-merge-rocky
> - https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/nova+
> branch:master+topic:bp/api-extensions-merge-rocky
> - Weekly Progress: part-1 of schema merge and part-2 of server_create
> merge has been merged for Rocky. 1 last patch of removing the placeholder
> method are on gate.
> part-3 of view builder merge
> cannot make it to Rocky (7 patch up for review + 5 more to push)< Postponed
> this work to Stein.
>
> 6. Handling a down cell
> - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/handling-down-cell
> - https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/handling-down-
> cell+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
> - Weekly Progress: It is difficult to make it in Rocky? matt has open
> comment on patch about changing the service list along with server list in
> single microversion which make
>sense.
>
>
​The handling down cell spec related API changes will also be postponed to
Stein since the view builder merge (part-3 of API Extensions merge work)​
is postponed to Stein. It would be more cleaner.

-- 

Regards,
Surya.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Rocky PTG summary - cells

[Surya Seetharaman]

I would also prefer not having to rely on reading all the cell DBs to
calculate quotas.


On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 3:29 AM, melanie witt  wrote:

>
>
> I would prefer not to block instance creations because of "down" cells,


​++

​


> so maybe there is some possibility to avoid it if we can get
> "queued_for_delete" and "user_id" columns added to the instance_mappings
> table.
>
>
seems reason enough to add them from my perspective.


Regards,
Surya.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] PTL Election Season

[Surya Seetharaman]

Thanks Matt, for patiently reviewing our patches, helping newbies like me
integrate well into the Nova team and for being an amazing PTL.

Best Regards,
Surya.

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:00 AM, John Garbutt  wrote:

> On 23 January 2018 at 04:04, Ed Leafe  wrote:
>
>> On Jan 22, 2018, at 5:09 PM, Matt Riedemann  wrote:
>> > To anyone that cares, I don't plan on running for Nova PTL again for
>> the Rocky release. Queens was my fourth tour and it's definitely time for
>> someone else to get the opportunity to lead here. I don't plan on going
>> anywhere and I'll be here to help with any transition needed assuming
>> someone else (or a couple of people hopefully) will run in the election.
>> It's been a great experience and I thank everyone that has had to put up
>> with me and my obsessive paperwork and process disorder in the meantime.
>>
>> I still don't understand how anyone could do what you have done over
>> these past two years and not a) had a stress-induced heart attack or b)
>> gotten divorced.
>>
>
> ++
> Great work and amazing sticking power.
> I know I hit a brick wall after two seasons.
>
> johnthetubaguy
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 

Regards,
Surya.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev