Re: [openstack-dev] [heat-translator] Nominating new core reviewers

2015-08-17 Thread Thomas Spatzier
+1 on both from my side. Regards, Thomas From: Sahdev P Zala spz...@us.ibm.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 17/08/2015 21:38 Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat-translator] Nominating new core reviewers Hello, I am glad to nominate Vahid

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposing Kanagaraj Manickam and Ethan Lynn forheat-core

2015-07-31 Thread Thomas Spatzier
+1 on both from me! Cheers, Thomas From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 31/07/2015 06:37 Subject: [openstack-dev] Proposing Kanagaraj Manickam and Ethan Lynn for heat-core I believe the heat project would

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][tripleo]Recursive validation for easier composability

2015-06-22 Thread Thomas Spatzier
From: Jay Dobies jason.dob...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 22/06/2015 19:22 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][tripleo]Recursive validation for easier composability On 06/22/2015 12:19 PM, Steven Hardy wrote: Hi all, Lately I've been giving some thought to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat][Keystone] Native keystone resources in Heat

2015-01-29 Thread Thomas Spatzier
From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com To: openstack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 29/01/2015 17:47 Subject: [openstack-dev] [Heat][Keystone] Native keystone resources in Heat I got a question today about creating keystone users/roles/tenants in Heat

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] core team changes

2015-01-28 Thread Thomas Spatzier
+1 on all changes. Regards, Thomas From: Angus Salkeld asalk...@mirantis.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 28/01/2015 02:40 Subject: [openstack-dev] [Heat] core team changes Hi all After having a look at the

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][tripleo] Making diskimage-builder install from forked repo?

2015-01-13 Thread Thomas Spatzier
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 12/01/2015 21:16 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][tripleo] Making diskimage- builder install from forked repo? On 09/01/15 07:06, Gregory Haynes wrote: Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2015-01-08

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] How can I write at milestone section of blueprint?

2014-12-19 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Hi Yasunori, you can submit a blueprint spec as a gerrit review to the heat-specs repository [1]. I would suggest to have a look at some existing specs that already got accepted to have an example for the format, important sections etc. All kilo related specs are in a kilo sub-directory in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] image requirements for Heat software config

2014-10-15 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message on 14/10/2014 23:38:46: snip Regarding the process of building base images, the currently documented way [1] of using diskimage-builder turns out to be a bit unstable sometimes. Not because diskimage-builder is unstable, but probably because it pulls in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] image requirements for Heat software config

2014-10-15 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message on 14/10/2014 23:52:41: snip Regarding the process of building base images, the currently documented way [1] of using diskimage-builder turns out to be a bit unstable sometimes. Not because diskimage-builder is unstable, but probably because it pulls in

[openstack-dev] [Heat] image requirements for Heat software config

2014-10-14 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Hi all, I have been experimenting a lot with Heat software config to check out what works today, and to think about potential next steps. I've also worked on an internal project where we are leveraging software config as of the Icehouse release. I think what we can do now from a user's

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Request for python-heatclient project to adopt heat-translator

2014-09-23 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message on 23/09/2014 11:37:42: snip On the other hand, there is a big downside to having it (only) in Heat also - you're dependent on the operator deciding to provide it. - You prempt the decision about integration with any higher levelservices, e.g

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] naming of provider template for docs

2014-09-19 Thread Thomas Spatzier
From: Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 19/09/2014 07:15 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] naming of provider template for docs Angus Salkeld asalk...@mirantis.com wrote on

Re: [openstack-dev] [HEAT] Qestions on adding a new Software Config element for Opscode Chef

2014-08-02 Thread Thomas Spatzier
From: Tao Tao t...@us.ibm.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Cc: Shu Tao shu...@us.ibm.com, Yan Yan YY Hu yanya...@cn.ibm.com, Bo B Yang yang...@cn.ibm.com Date: 01/08/2014 22:19 Subject: [openstack-dev] [HEAT] Qestions on adding a new Software Config element for Opscode Chef Hi,

Re: [openstack-dev] heat stack-create with two vm instances always got one failed

2014-07-16 Thread Thomas Spatzier
I think the problem could be that you need one network port for each server, but you just have one OS::Neutron::Port resource defined. yulin...@dell.com wrote on 16/07/2014 08:17:00: From: yulin...@dell.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 16/07/2014 08:20 Subject: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Nova-network support

2014-07-14 Thread Thomas Spatzier
From: Pavlo Shchelokovskyy pshchelokovs...@mirantis.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 14/07/2014 16:42 Subject: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Nova-network support Hi Heaters, I would like to start a discussion about Heat

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Update behavior for CFN compatible resources

2014-07-07 Thread Thomas Spatzier
From: Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 07/07/2014 10:39 Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat] Update behavior for CFN compatible resources Hi all, Recently I've been adding review comments, and having IRC discussions about changes to update behavior for

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Sergey Kraynev for heat-core

2014-06-27 Thread Thomas Spatzier
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 27/06/2014 00:10 Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat] Sergey Kraynev for heat-core I'd like to nominate Sergey Kraynev for heat-core. His reviews are valuable and prolific, and his

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] [Heat] Mid-cycle collaborative meetup

2014-05-30 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Excerpt from Zane Bitter's message on 29/05/2014 20:57:10: From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 29/05/2014 20:59 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Ironic] [Heat] Mid-cycle collaborative meetup snip BTW one timing option I haven't seen

Re: [openstack-dev] Heat SoftwareConfig and SoftwareDevelopment

2014-05-15 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Excerpts from Lingxian Kong's message on 15/05/2014 22:51:33: From: Lingxian Kong anlin.k...@gmail.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 15/05/2014 22:53 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Heat SoftwareConfig and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Design summit preparation - Next steps for Heat Software Orchestration

2014-05-08 Thread Thomas Spatzier
steps for Heat Software Orchestration On 29/04/14 01:41, Thomas Spatzier wrote: Excerpts from Steve Baker's message on 28/04/2014 01:25:29: I'm with Clint on this one. Heat-engine cannot know the true state of a server just by monitoring what has been polled and signaled. Since it can't

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Special session on heat-translator project at Atlanta summit

2014-05-08 Thread Thomas Spatzier
next Thursday. [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-design-summit-heat-translator Regards, Thomas From: Thomas Spatzier/Germany/IBM@IBMDE To: OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 06/05/2014 10:47 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Special session on heat-translator project at Atlanta summit

2014-05-06 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Relay, etc)? - Dimitri [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/Vision On 05/05/14 19:21, Thomas Spatzier thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com wrote: Hi all, I mentioned in some earlier mail that we have started to implement a TOSCA YAML to HOT translator on stackforge as project heat-translator. We

[openstack-dev] [Heat] Special session on heat-translator project at Atlanta summit

2014-05-05 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Hi all, I mentioned in some earlier mail that we have started to implement a TOSCA YAML to HOT translator on stackforge as project heat-translator. We have been lucky to get a session allocated in the context of the Open source @ OpenStack program for the Atlanta summit, so I wanted to share

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Design summit preparation - Next steps for Heat Software Orchestration

2014-04-28 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message on 28/04/2014 01:25:29: snip #1 Enable software components for full lifecycle: snip So in a short, stripped-down version, SoftwareConfigs could look like my_sw_config: type: OS::Heat::SoftwareConfig properties: create_config: # the hook for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Design summit preparation - Next steps for Heat Software Orchestration

2014-04-24 Thread Thomas Spatzier
preparation - Next steps for Heat Software Orchestration On 24 Apr 2014, at 01:43, Ruslan Kamaldinov rkamaldi...@mirantis.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Thomas Spatzier thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com wrote: #2 Enable add-hoc actions on software components: Cool, coincidentally

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Design summit preparation - Next steps for Heat Software Orchestration

2014-04-24 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Hi Clint, thanks for the comments. Those are some really good points. I added some more thoughts from my side below. Exceprts from Clint Byrum's message on 24/04/2014 17:53:40: snip So in a short, stripped-down version, SoftwareConfigs could look like my_sw_config: type:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron][Cinder][Heat]Should we support tags for os resources?

2014-04-23 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Excerpts from Jay Pipes' jaypi...@gmail.com message on 23/04/2014 01:43:42: On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 13:14 +0200, Thomas Spatzier wrote: snip * Identify key/value pairs that are relied on by all of Nova to be a specific key and value combination, and make these things actual real

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Proposing Thomas Spatzier for heat-core

2014-04-23 Thread Thomas Spatzier
cbjc...@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 23/04/2014 07:56 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Proposing Thomas Spatzier for heat-core +1 ! On 04/23/2014 02:43 AM, Zane Bitter wrote: Resending with [Heat] in the subject line. My bad. On 22/04/14 14:21, Zane

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron][Cinder][Heat]Should we support tags for os resources?

2014-04-22 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote on 20/04/2014 15:05:51: From: Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 20/04/2014 15:07 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron][Cinder][Heat]Should we support tags for os resources? On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 08:35 +,

[openstack-dev] [Heat] Design summit preparation - Next steps for Heat Software Orchestration

2014-04-22 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Hi all, following up on Zane's request from end of last week, I wanted to kick off some discussion on the ML around a design summit session proposal titled Next steps for Heat Software Orchestration. I guess there will be things that can be sorted out this way and others that can be refined so

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [heat-templates] [qa] [tempest] Questions about images

2014-04-17 Thread Thomas Spatzier
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 17/04/2014 00:55 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [heat-templates] [qa] [tempest] Questions about images On 17/04/14 09:11, Thomas Spatzier wrote: From: Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com To: OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] computed package names?

2014-04-16 Thread Thomas Spatzier
From: Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 16/04/2014 01:43 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] computed package names? On 04/15/2014 03:45 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: On 15/04/14 17:59, Mike

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] computed package names?

2014-04-16 Thread Thomas Spatzier
From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 16/04/2014 00:46 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] computed package names? On 15/04/14 17:59, Mike Spreitzer wrote: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 04/15/2014 05:17:21 PM: Excerpts from Zane

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] [Murano] [Solum] applications in the cloud

2014-04-16 Thread Thomas Spatzier
know if this plan sounds sane to you. [0] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/interface-types Thanks, Ruslan On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Thomas Spatzier thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com wrote: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 04/04/2014 19:05:04: From: Clint Byrum cl

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [heat-templates] [qa] [tempest] Questions about images

2014-04-16 Thread Thomas Spatzier
From: Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 16/04/2014 19:58 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [heat-templates] [qa] [tempest] Questions about images Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Managing changes to the Hot Specification (hot_spec.rst)

2014-04-08 Thread Thomas Spatzier
From: Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 07/04/2014 21:45 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Managing changes to the Hot Specification (hot_spec.rst) On 04/07/2014 11:01 AM, Zane Bitter

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Managing changes to the Hot Specification (hot_spec.rst)

2014-04-07 Thread Thomas Spatzier
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 06/04/2014 22:32 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Managing changes to the Hot Specification (hot_spec.rst) On 07/04/14 06:23, Steven Dake wrote: Hi folks, There are two problems we should address

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] [Murano] [Solum] applications in the cloud

2014-04-05 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 04/04/2014 19:05:04: From: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 04/04/2014 19:06 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] [Murano] [Solum] applications inthe cloud Excerpts from Stan Lagun's message of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] [Murano] [Solum] applications in the cloud

2014-04-04 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Hi Steve, your indexing idea sounds interesting, but I am not sure it would work reliably. The kind of matching based on names of parameters and outputs and internal get_attr uses has very strong assumptions and I think there is a not so low risk of false positives. What if the templates includes

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] metadata for a HOT

2014-04-03 Thread Thomas Spatzier
From: Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 03/04/2014 07:10 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] metadata for a HOT Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote on 04/02/2014 05:36:43 PM: I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Some thoughts on the mapping section

2014-04-03 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Excerpts from Thomas Herve's message on 03/04/2014 09:21:05: From: Thomas Herve thomas.he...@enovance.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 03/04/2014 09:21 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Some thoughts on the mapping

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] metadata for a HOT

2014-04-03 Thread Thomas Spatzier
From: Keith Bray keith.b...@rackspace.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 03/04/2014 19:51 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] metadata for a HOT Steve, agreed. Your description I believe is the conclusion that the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Some thoughts on the mapping section

2014-04-03 Thread Thomas Spatzier
From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 03/04/2014 22:09 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Some thoughts on the mapping section On 03/04/14 03:21, Thomas Herve wrote: Speaking of offering options for selection, there is another proposal on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano][Heat] MuranoPL questions?

2014-03-26 Thread Thomas Spatzier
now with TOSCA-compliant layer? We would like to join to this effort. Thanks, Dmitry On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Thomas Spatzier thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com wrote: Excerpt from Zane Bitter's message on 26/03/2014 02:26:42: From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Resource dependencies

2014-03-21 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Shaunak Kashyap shaunak.kash...@rackspace.com wrote on 21/03/2014 05:26:50: From: Shaunak Kashyap shaunak.kash...@rackspace.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 21/03/2014 05:29 Subject: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Resource dependencies Hi, In a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat]Heat use as a standalone component for Cloud Managment over multi IAAS

2014-03-20 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Just out of curiosity: what is the purpose of project warm? From the wiki page and the sample it looks pretty much like what Heat is doing. And warm is almost HOT so could you imagine your use cases can just be addressed by Heat using HOT templates? Regards, Thomas sahid

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano][Heat] MuranoPL questions?

2014-03-19 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message on 19/03/2014 18:18:34: From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 19/03/2014 18:21 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano][Heat] MuranoPL questions? On 19/03/14 05:00, Stan Lagun wrote: Steven, Agree with your

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat][Murano][TOSCA] Murano team contrib. to Heat TOSCA activities

2014-03-11 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Randall Burt randall.b...@rackspace.com wrote on 10/03/2014 19:51:58: From: Randall Burt randall.b...@rackspace.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 10/03/2014 19:55 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat][Murano][TOSCA]

Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request: Murano

2014-03-05 Thread Thomas Spatzier
] https://github.com/stackforge/heat-translator Regards, Thomas Thanks Georgy On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Thomas Spatzier thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com wrote: Excerpt from Zane Bitter's message on 04/03/2014 23:16:21: From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request: Murano

2014-03-05 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Hi Stan, thanks for sharing your thoughts about Murano and relation to TOSCA. I have added a few comments below. From: Stan Lagun sla...@mirantis.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 05/03/2014 00:51 Subject: Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request: Murano

2014-03-05 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Forgot to provide the email addresses of Paul and Simon in my last mail: paul.lip...@ca.com smo...@de.ibm.com Regards, Thomas From: Thomas Spatzier/Germany/IBM@IBMDE To: OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 05/03/2014 10:21

Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request: Murano

2014-03-04 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Hi all, I would like to pick up the TOSCA topic brought up by Zane in his mail below. TOSCA is in fact a standard that seems closely aligned with the concepts that Murano is implementing, so thanks Zane for bringing up this discussion. I saw Georgy's reply early today where he stated that Murano

Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request: Murano

2014-03-04 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Excerpt from Zane Bitter's message on 04/03/2014 23:16:21: From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 04/03/2014 23:20 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request: Murano On 04/03/14 00:04, Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote: It so happens that the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Need more sample HOT templates for users

2014-02-13 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Hi Qiming, not sure if you have already seen it, but there is some documentation available at the following locations. If you already know it, sorry for dup ;-) Entry to Heat documentation: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/heat/ Template Guide with pointers to more details like documentation

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] in-instance update hooks

2014-02-11 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Hi Clint, thanks for writing this down. This is a really interesting use case and feature, also in relation to what was recently discussed on rolling updates. I have a couple of thoughts and questions: 1) The overall idea seems clear to me but I have problems understanding the detailed flow and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] [TripleO] Rolling updates spec re-written. RFC

2014-02-04 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Thomas Herve thomas.he...@enovance.com wrote on 03/02/2014 21:46:05: From: Thomas Herve thomas.he...@enovance.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 03/02/2014 21:52 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] [TripleO] Rolling

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] About LaunchConfiguration and Autoscaling

2014-01-30 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Hi Thomas, I haven't looked at the details of the autoscaling design for a while, but the first option looks more intuitive to me. It seems to cover the same content as LaunchConfiguration, but is it generic and therefore would provide for one common approach for all kinds of resources. Regards,

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][horizon]Heat UI related requirements roadmap

2013-11-27 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Excerpts from Tim Schnell's message on 27.11.2013 00:44:04: From: Tim Schnell tim.schn...@rackspace.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 27.11.2013 00:47 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][horizon]Heat UI related

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][horizon]Heat UI related requirements roadmap

2013-11-27 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message on 26.11.2013 23:29:06: From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 26.11.2013 23:32 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][horizon]Heat UI related requirements roadmap On 11/27/2013 11:02 AM, Christopher Armstrong

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][horizon]Heat UI related requirements roadmap

2013-11-27 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote on 27.11.2013 22:56:16: From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 27.11.2013 23:00 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][horizon]Heat UI related requirements roadmap On 27/11/13 19:57, Jay Pipes wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration refined after design summit discussions

2013-11-21 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote on 21.11.2013 21:19:07: From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 21.11.2013 21:25 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration refined after design summit discussions On 11/21/2013 08:48 PM, Thomas

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration refined after design summit discussions

2013-11-20 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote on 20.11.2013 09:51:34: From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 20.11.2013 09:55 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration refined after design summit discussions On 11/20/2013 09:29 PM, Clint

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration refined after design summit discussions

2013-11-20 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Excerpts from Steve Baker's message on 21.11.2013 00:00:47: From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 21.11.2013 00:04 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration refined after design summit discussions On 11/21/2013 11:41 AM, Clint

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration refined after design summit discussions

2013-11-18 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Hi all, I have reworked the wiki page [1] I created last week to reflect discussions we had on the mail list and in IRC. From ML discussions last week it looked like we were all basically on the same page (with some details to be worked out), and I hope the new draft eliminates some confusion

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration refined after design summit discussions

2013-11-18 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote on 18.11.2013 21:52:04: From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 18.11.2013 21:54 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration refined after design summit discussions On 11/19/2013 02:22 AM, Thomas

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Continue discussing multi-region orchestration

2013-11-14 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Hi Bartosz, one thing that is still not clear to me: In the discussion at the summit and in your updated architecture on the wiki it talks about two Heat engines, one in each region, and on-top only the dashboard. So what entity will really do the cross region orchestration? In the discussions I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration refined after design summit discussions

2013-11-13 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Excerpts form Clint Byrum's message on 12.11.2013 19:32:50: From: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 12.11.2013 19:35 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration refined after design summit discussions Excerpts from

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration refined after design summit discussions

2013-11-13 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Georgy Okrokvertskhov gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote on 12.11.2013 21:27:13: From: Georgy Okrokvertskhov gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 12.11.2013 21:29 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration refined after design summit discussions

2013-11-13 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com wrote on 13.11.2013 00:22:44: From: Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 13.11.2013 00:25 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration refined after design summit discussions On 12/11/13 10:32

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] really simple workflow for Heat configuration tasks

2013-11-13 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com wrote on 12.11.2013 23:05:57: From: Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 12.11.2013 23:09 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] really simple workflow for Heat configuration tasks On 12/11/13 13:04 +0100, Thomas

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration refined after design summit discussions

2013-11-13 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote on 13.11.2013 18:11:18: From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 13.11.2013 18:14 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration refined after design summit discussions On 11/11/13 17:57, Thomas

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] really simple workflow for Heat configuration tasks

2013-11-12 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Hi Angus, that is an interesting idea. Since you mentioned the software config proposal in the beginning as a related item, I guess you are trying to solve some software config related issues with Mistral. So a few questions, looking at this purely from a software config perspect: Are you

[openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration refined after design summit discussions

2013-11-11 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Hi all, I have just posted the following wiki page to reflect a refined proposal for HOT software configuration based on discussions at the design summit last week. Angus also put a sample up in an etherpad last week, but we did not have enough time to go thru it in the design session. My

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Comments on Steve Baker's Proposal on HOT Software Config

2013-10-31 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote on 30.10.2013 22:33:31: From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 30.10.2013 22:36 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Comments on Steve Baker's Proposal on HOT Software Config On 30/10/13 20:35, Lakshminaraya

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration proposal

2013-10-25 Thread Thomas Spatzier
the need for HOT syntax. I think both projects are on a good path with a lot of fun collaboration time ahead. Kind regards, -Keith On 10/24/13 7:56 AM, Thomas Spatzier thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com wrote: Hi all, maybe a bit off track with respect to latest concrete discussions, but I noticed

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration proposal

2013-10-24 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Hi all, maybe a bit off track with respect to latest concrete discussions, but I noticed the announcement of project Solum on openstack-dev. Maybe this is playing on a different level, but I still see some relation to all the software orchestration we are having. What are your opinions on this?

Re: [openstack-dev] Announcing Project Solum

2013-10-24 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Hi Adrian, really intersting! I wonder what the relation to all the software orchestration in Heat discussions is that have been going on for a while now. Regards, Thomas Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote on 23.10.2013 21:03:10: From: Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration proposal

2013-10-23 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 23.10.2013 00:28:17: From: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 23.10.2013 00:30 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration proposal Excerpts from Georgy Okrokvertskhov's message of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration proposal

2013-10-22 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote on 21.10.2013 23:02:47: From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 21.10.2013 23:06 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration proposal On 10/22/2013 08:45 AM, Mike Spreitzer wrote: Steve Baker

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration proposal

2013-10-22 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote on 22.10.2013 15:24:28: From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 22.10.2013 15:27 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration proposal On 22/10/13 09:15, Thomas Spatzier wrote: BTW

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration proposal

2013-10-22 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote on 22.10.2013 17:23:52: From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 22.10.2013 17:26 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration proposal On 22/10/13 16:35, Thomas Spatzier wrote: Zane Bitter zbit

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration proposal

2013-10-22 Thread Thomas Spatzier
at 8:35 PM, Thomas Spatzier thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com wrote: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote on 22.10.2013 17:23:52: From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 22.10.2013 17:26 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] A prototype for cross-vm synchronization and communication

2013-10-21 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Hi Lakshmi, you mentioned an example in your original post, but I did not find it. Can you add the example? Lakshminaraya Renganarayana lren...@us.ibm.com wrote on 18.10.2013 20:57:43: From: Lakshminaraya Renganarayana lren...@us.ibm.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration proposal

2013-10-16 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Hi Steve, thanks a lot taking the effort to write all this down. I had a look at both wiki pages and have some comments below. This is really from the top of my head, and I guess I have to spend some more time thinking about it, but I wanted to provide some feedback anyway. On components vs.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software orchestration proposal for workflows

2013-10-14 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com wrote on 11.10.2013 21:02:38: From: Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 11.10.2013 21:04 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software orchestration proposal for workflows On 10/11/2013

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software orchestration proposal for workflows

2013-10-10 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Hi all, Lakshminaraya Renganarayana lren...@us.ibm.com wrote on 10.10.2013 01:34:41: From: Lakshminaraya Renganarayana lren...@us.ibm.com To: Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com, Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 10.10.2013 01:37 Subject: Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software orchestration proposal for workflows

2013-10-09 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message From: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 09.10.2013 03:54 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software orchestration proposal for workflows Excerpts from Stan Lagun's message of 2013-10-08 13:53:45

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Autoscale and load balancers

2013-10-03 Thread Thomas Spatzier
, Thomas Spatzier thomas.spatz...@de.ibm.com  wrote: A way to achieve the same behavior as you suggest but less verbose would be to use relationships in HOT. We had some discussion about relationships earlier this year and in other contexts, but this would fit here very well. And I think you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Autoscale and load balancers

2013-10-02 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Thomas Hervé the...@gmail.com wrote on 02.10.2013 17:06:48: From: Thomas Hervé the...@gmail.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 02.10.2013 17:09 Subject: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Autoscale and load balancers Hi all, There is a small but

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [scheduler] Bringing things together for Icehouse (now featuring software orchestration)

2013-10-01 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 01.10.2013 08:31:44 - Excerpt: From: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 01.10.2013 08:33 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [scheduler] Bringing things together for Icehouse (now featuring software

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [scheduler] Bringing things together for Icehouse (now featuring software orchestration)

2013-09-25 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 25.09.2013 08:46:57: From: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 25.09.2013 08:48 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [scheduler] Bringing things together for Icehouse (now featuring software

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [scheduler] Bringing things together for Icehouse (now featuring software orchestration)

2013-09-25 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Excerpt from Clint's mail on 25.09.2013 22:23:07: I think we already have some summit suggestions for discussing HOT, it would be good to come prepared with some visions for the future of HOT so that we can hash these things out, so I'd like to see this discussion continue. Absolutely! Can

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Long-term, how do we make heat image/flavor name agnostic?

2013-07-18 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote on 18.07.2013 00:00:40: From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 18.07.2013 00:08 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Long-term, how do we make heat image/flavor name agnostic? On 07/18/2013 08:53 AM, Gabriel Hurley

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Does it make sense to have a resource-create API?

2013-06-19 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com wrote on 19.06.2013 03:09:34: From: Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 19.06.2013 03:19 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Does it make sense to have a resource-create API? On 18/06/13 23:32 +, Adrian Otto