Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?

2016-03-07 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi German, >> So if you have some 3rd party hardware you only need to change the database >> (your steps 1-5) since the 3rd party hardware will just keep load balancing… This is not the case with NetScaler it has to go through a Delete of V1 followed by Create in V2 if a smooth

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Integrating physical appliance into virtual infrastructure

2016-02-01 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi , How to integrate a physical appliance into the virtual OpenStack infrastructure (with L2 population)? Can you please point me to any relevant material. We want to add the capability to "properly" schedule the port on the physical appliance, so that the rest of the virtual infrastructure

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Integrating physical appliance into virtual infrastructure

2016-02-01 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/L2-GW There are also other possible solutions, depending what you are trying to do and what is the physical applicance job. On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Vijay Venkatachalam <vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com<mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com>> wrote: Hi ,

[openstack-dev] [Barbican] Enabling GET of secrets to work irrespective of Tenant name in login

2015-11-10 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi, Can we enable GET of secrets to work irrespective of Tenant name in the login? Consider there is an "admin" with "admin" role in "demo" tenant. I tried to query the "demo" tenant's secret using a login token which was generated from "admin" user & "admin" tenant. And I am getting a

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Is SSL offload config possible using non "admin" tenant?

2015-09-18 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
ely on it working). --Adam https://keybase.io/rm_you From: Vijay Venkatachalam <vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com<mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Providing service user read access to all tenant's certificates

2015-09-18 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Typos corrected. From: Vijay Venkatachalam Sent: 18 September 2015 00:36 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Providing service user read access to all tenant's certificates Ye

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Is SSL offload config possible using non "admin" tenant?

2015-09-18 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
ue is greatly appreciated! I just want to make sure the expected workflow is fully understood. --Adam https://keybase.io/rm_you From: Vijay Venkatachalam <vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com<mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Providing service user read access to all tenant's certificates

2015-09-18 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
I would think OpenStack as Self Service portal. Anyway, tenant’s admin need not play cloud admin’s role. Only the cloud admin who sets up and manages openstack infrastructure (like controller Nodes etc) could know about the LBaaS service user. As much as possible the tenant admin should not be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Providing service user read access to all tenant's certificates

2015-09-17 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
, should also do Step 2. From: Vijay Venkatachalam <vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com<mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.opensta

Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Providing service user read access to all tenant's certificates

2015-09-16 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
? Even better would be to help with the instance user spec and combined with lbaas doing step 2, you could restrict secret access to just the amphora that need the secret? Thanks, Kevin From: Vijay Venkatachalam Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 7:06:39 PM To: Ope

Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Providing service user read access to all tenant's certificates

2015-09-16 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
] Providing service user read access to all tenant's certificates A user with the role "observer" in a project will have read access to all secrets and containers for that project, using the default settings in the policy.json file. --Dave McCowan From: Vijay Venkatachalam <vijay

[openstack-dev] [Barbican] Providing service user read access to all tenant's certificates

2015-09-15 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi, Is there a way to provide read access to a certain user to all secrets/containers of all project/tenant's certificates? This user with universal "read" privilege's will be used as a service user by LBaaS plugin to read tenant's certificates during LB

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Is SSL offload config possible using non "admin" tenant?

2015-09-14 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
the credentials of the admin tenant, and is granted access to the user’s container. --Adam https://keybase.io/rm_you From: Vijay Venkatachalam <vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com<mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage qu

[openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Is SSL offload config possible using non "admin" tenant?

2015-09-11 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi, Has anyone tried configuring SSL Offload as a tenant? During listener creation there is an error thrown saying 'could not locate/find container'. The lbaas plugin is not able to fetch the tenant's certificate. From the code it looks

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate] and [lbaas] - GSLB API and backend support

2015-05-26 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
We would like to participate as well. Monday-Friday Morning US time works for me.. Thanks, Vijay V. From: Samuel Bercovici [mailto:samu...@radware.com] Sent: 26 May 2015 21:39 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: kunalhgan...@gmail.com; v.jain...@gmail.com;

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas]LBaaSv2 movies / links

2015-05-17 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
List (not for usage questions) Cc: Vijay Venkatachalam; Evgeny Fedoruk; Adam Harwell; Kyle Mestery; Brandon Logan; Johnson, Michael (HP Cloud - Corvallis); Doug Wiegley Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas]LBaaSv2 movies / links I would say: 1-2 minutes, no audio, mp4, must highlight lbaas

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas]LBaaSv2 movies / links

2015-05-17 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: Vijay Venkatachalam; Evgeny Fedoruk; Adam Harwell; Kyle Mestery; Brandon Logan; Johnson, Michael (HP Cloud - Corvallis); Doug Wiegley Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas]LBaaSv2 movies / links I would say: 1-2 minutes, no audio

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas]LBaaSv2 movies / links

2015-05-15 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi Sam, Thanks for probing. How many seconds/mins you have thought per vendor? By when do you need this? Will tomorrow work fine? Thanks, Vijay V. Sent from Surface From: Samuel Bercovicimailto:samu...@radware.com Sent: ‎Friday‎, ‎15‎ ‎May‎ ‎2015 ‎00‎:‎30 To: OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] adding lbaas core

2015-04-21 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Congratulations Phil! -Original Message- From: Tom Creighton [mailto:tom.creigh...@rackspace.com] Sent: Wednesday, 22 April 2015 12:14 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] adding lbaas core Congratulations

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] canceling meeting

2015-03-20 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
+1 For on demand meeting. On demand lbaas meetings will happen in neutron meeting and not in Octavia meetings, right? Sent from Surface From: Susanne Ballemailto:sleipnir...@gmail.com Sent: ‎Friday‎, ‎20‎ ‎March‎ ‎2015 ‎20‎:‎20 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

[openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Invalid import in tempest v2 api tests

2015-03-20 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi: The LBaaS API tests are failing to run because test_pools.py(and other tests as well) are importing data_utils from tempest.common.utils. Looks like data_utils is moved to tempest_lib now and the API tests need to change to import from tempest_lib. Is someone tracking this? We are

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Can entity calls be made to driver when entities get associated/disassociated with root entity?

2015-02-04 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Vijay Venkatachalam vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.commailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com wrote: Hi: In OpenStack neutron lbaas implementation, when entities are created/updated by the user, they might not be associated with the root entity, which is loadbalancer

[openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Can entity calls be made to driver when entities get associated/disassociated with root entity?

2015-02-03 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi: In OpenStack neutron lbaas implementation, when entities are created/updated by the user, they might not be associated with the root entity, which is loadbalancer. Since root entity has the driver information, the driver cannot be called by lbaas plugin during these operations by user.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] rescheduling meeting

2014-11-04 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Any day 16:00 UTC is fine with me. 17:00 UTC+ is quite late in India. -Original Message- From: Doug Wiegley [mailto:do...@a10networks.com] Sent: 04 November 2014 08:42 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] rescheduling

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Floating IP management

2014-10-15 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
directly on the LB appliance. Here there is no private IP involved. Pros: Not much changes in the LBaaS API, there is only one IP as part of the VIP. We can ensure backward compatibility with the driver as well by having Step (1) implemented in abstract driver. Thanks, Vjay From: Vijay

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Floating IP management

2014-10-15 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
on the LB. Thank you for responses! There is definitely a more thought out discussion to be had, and glad these ideas are being brought up now rather than later. From: Vijay Venkatachalam vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.commailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][Octavia] Floating IP management

2014-10-14 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Thanks for the doc. The floating IP could be hosted directly by the lb backend/lb appliance as well? It depends on the appliance deployment. From: Susanne Balle [mailto:sleipnir...@gmail.com] Sent: 14 October 2014 21:15 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject:

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Error at context exit for subnet in unit test case

2014-08-20 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi, I am writing a unit testcase with context as subnet, code here [1]. When the context exits a delete of subnet is attempted and I am getting a MismatchError . Traceback posted here [2]. What could be going wrong here? Testcase is written like the following -- with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Error at context exit for subnet in unit test case

2014-08-20 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
() as subnet: blah1 with self.loadbalancer() as lb: blah2 blah3 -- -Original Message- From: Vijay Venkatachalam [mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com] Sent: 20 August 2014 19:12 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Error at context exit for subnet in unit test case

2014-08-20 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
, Brandon On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 14:27 +, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote: I observed the following text as well One or more ports have an IP allocation from this subnet. Looks like loadbalancer context exit at blah2 is not cleaning up the port that was created. This ultimately resulted in failure

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Failure when trying to rebase to latest v2 patches

2014-08-17 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi Brandon, I am trying to rebase Netscaler driver to the latest v2 patches as mentioned in https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GerritWorkflow But it failed during review submit It failed with the following error remote: Processing changes: refs: 1, done To

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Failure when trying to rebase to latest v2 patches

2014-08-17 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
rebases, cherry-picks, etc without accidentally pushing more patch sets to dependent reviews. I've been meaning to do I've just been lazy about doing that. Thanks, Brandon From: Vijay Venkatachalam [vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com] Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Failure when trying to rebase to latest v2 patches

2014-08-17 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
-a --amend git log -n5 --decorate --pretty=oneline git review If you¹re not making any changes, then you can just hit the Œrebase¹ button in the gerrit ui. Thanks, doug On 8/17/14, 8:19 PM, Vijay Venkatachalam vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com wrote: Hi Brandon, I am trying to rebase Netscaler driver

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Continuing on Calling driver interface on every API request

2014-08-11 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi: Continuing from last week's LBaaS meeting... Currently an entity cannot be sent to driver unless it is linked to loadbalancer because loadbalancer is the root object and driver information is only available with loadbalancer. The request to the driver is delayed because of which error

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Continuing on Calling driver interface on every API request

2014-08-11 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
.), there should be one provider. Having provider defined in multiple places does not make sense. -San. From: Vijay Venkatachalam [mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 2:43 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org) Subject

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Improvements to current reviews

2014-08-10 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Thanks Brandon for constant improvisation. I agree with Doug. Please update current one. We already hv more number of reviews :-). It will be difficult to manage if we add more. Thanks, Vijay Sent using CloudMagic On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Doug Wiegley

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] status in entities

2014-08-06 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
:28 +, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote: Hi: I think we had some discussions around ‘status’ attribute earlier, I don’t recollect the conclusion. Does it reflect the deployment status? Meaning, if the status of an entity is ACTIVE, the user has to infer

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Weekly IRC Agenda

2014-08-06 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
I couldn't edit the wiki. Want to add 2 items 1. Separating deployment and operational status. 2. Can driver interface be called for every API request? Ex. It is not called for create pool. Sent using CloudMagichttps://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=pacv=5.0.32pv=4.2.2 On Thu, Aug 07,

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] status in entities

2014-08-05 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi: I think we had some discussions around 'status' attribute earlier, I don't recollect the conclusion. Does it reflect the deployment status? Meaning, if the status of an entity is ACTIVE, the user has to infer that the entity is deployed successfully in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] TLS capability - SNI - Extracting SubjectCommonName and/or SubjectAlternativeNames from X509

2014-07-16 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
during SSL negotiation 2. SAN support I will send out 2 separate mails on this. From: Samuel Bercovici [mailto:samu...@radware.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 11:52 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Vijay Venkatachalam Subject: RE: [openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] TLS capability - Certificate conflict resolution

2014-07-16 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
(not for usage questions); Vijay Venkatachalam Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] TLS capability - SNI - Extracting SubjectCommonName and/or SubjectAlternativeNames from X509 OK. Let me be more precise, extracting the information for view sake / validation would be good. Providing values

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] TLS capability - SubjectAlternativeNames (SAN)

2014-07-16 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
driver could either throw an error if certs with SAN are used or ignore it. Does anyone see a requirement for detailing? Thanks, Vijay V. From: Vijay Venkatachalam Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 8:54 AM To: 'Samuel Bercovici'; 'OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] Update on third party CI in Neutron

2014-07-11 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi Kyle, There is indeed a NetScaler CI and is currently running API and scenario tests on LBAAS changes + driver changes. It also votes. What time is the Monday 3rd party meeting? Thanks, Vijay. Sent using CloudMagichttps://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=pacv=1.0.21.3pv=4.2.2 On Fri, Jul

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Flavor meeting log captured?

2014-07-02 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi, I didn't attend the flavor framework meeting that was scheduled on irc #openstack-meeting-3 last Friday. Will be interested to see the meeting log/minutes. Was it captured? Thanks, Vijay V ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

[openstack-dev] Should TLS settings for listener be set through separate API/model?

2014-06-23 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi: In the LBaaS TLS termination capability specification proposal https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98640/ TLS settings like default certificate container id and SNI cert list are part of the listener properties. I think it is better to have this as a separate entity so that the

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Should TLS settings for listener be set through separate API/model?

2014-06-23 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi: In the LBaaS TLS termination capability specification proposal https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98640/ TLS settings like default certificate container id and SNI cert list are part of the listener properties. I think it is better to have this as a separate entity so that the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Should TLS settings for listener be set through separate API/model?

2014-06-23 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
+, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote: Hi: In the LBaaS TLS termination capability specification proposal https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98640/ TLS settings like default certificate container id and SNI

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Barbican Neutron LBaaS Integration Ideas

2014-06-11 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
/ additional tooling for lifecycle management if required but at the same time the simplest case (I want a cert and I want LBaaS) is met without massive code overhead for edge-cases. From: Vijay Venkatachalam vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.commailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.commailto:vijay.venkatacha

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Barbican Neutron LBaaS Integration Ideas

2014-06-09 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
My vote is for option #2 (without the registration). It is simpler to start with this approach. How is delete handled though? Ex. What is the expectation when user attempts to delete a certificate/container which is referred by an entity like LBaaS listener? 1. Will there be validation

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]LBaaS 1st Session etherpad

2014-05-15 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]LBaaS 1st Session etherpad Hi, If a tenant wishes to expose his application (listener, pool(s), etc.) via multiple different virtual IP addresses you can do so. -Sam. From: Vijay Venkatachalam [mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 12:21 AM

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model?

2014-05-15 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi Stephen: * The LBtoListener object is grayed out because it will need to exist in the database (to allow Listeners to be re-used, solving the IPv4 + IPv6 common use case), but should not be directly addressable via the user API. (This is also the reason it's got no tenant_id.) When you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model?

2014-05-15 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Thanks for the clarification. Eugene. A tangential point since you brought healthmon and pool. There will be an additional entity called ‘PoolMonitorAssociation’ which results in a many to many relationship between pool and monitors. Right? Now, the model is indicating a pool can have only one

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]LBaaS 1st Session etherpad

2014-05-14 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi, I see the following statement in the doc. multiple loadbalancers may referenece the same listener Does this mean listeners are independent of loadbalancer? Thanks, Vijay V. From: Samuel Bercovici [mailto:samu...@radware.com] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 9:26 AM To: OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Subteam meeting Thursday, 05/08 14-00 UTC

2014-05-08 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Excellent documentation. Thanks once again! I see the VIP creation is documented as a POST to the following URL http://client.url.com/v2.0/neutron/lbaas/vips I think the VIP should be outside the purview of LBaaS and remain in general neutron. Today an IP gets reserved as part of creation of a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] RackSpace API review (multi-call)

2014-05-01 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
I am expecting to be more active on community on the LBaaS front. May be reviewing and picking-up a few items to work as well. I had a look at the proposal. Seeing Single Multi-Call approach for each workflow makes it easy to understand. Thanks for the clear documentation, it is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] RackSpace API review (multi-call)

2014-05-01 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
, Comments in-line, hope I can clear some of this up for you :) -Trevor On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 13:16 +, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote: I am expecting to be more active on community on the LBaaS front. May be reviewing and picking-up a few items to work as well. I had a look at the proposal

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] SSL re-encryption scenario question

2014-04-18 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
There is no reasoning mentioned in AWS, but they do allow re-encryption. http://docs.aws.amazon.com/ElasticLoadBalancing/latest/DeveloperGuide/config-backend-auth.html For reasons I don’t understand, the workflow allows to configure backend-server certificates to be trusted and it doesn’t

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Load balancing use cases. Data from Operators needed.

2014-04-03 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
The document has Vendor column, it should be from Cloud Operator? Thanks, Vijay V. From: Eugene Nikanorov [mailto:enikano...@mirantis.com] Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 11:23 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron LBaaS] Need help with LBaaS drivers

2014-04-01 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Answered Inline! From: Vijay B [mailto:os.v...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 2, 2014 7:14 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron LBaaS] Need help with LBaaS drivers Hi, I'm trying to understand how LBaaS drivers work and so

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Weekly meeting Thursday 09.01.2014

2014-01-08 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Can you include the following in the agenda? 1. External/3rd Party testing 2. Common code for collecting status/statistics From: Eugene Nikanorov [mailto:enikano...@mirantis.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 7:58 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject:

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Member status update mangled with pool stats API

2013-12-25 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi Eugene et al, As of today, during a stats API query, a pool member's status is gathered along with the pool stats and stored in the db. Subsequent GETs to the members will have the correct member status. In this approach, only when a North Bound API call for stats is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Vote required for certificate as first-class citizen - SSL Termination (Revised)

2013-12-17 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
can be renamed 6. Renamed Certificate's public key to certificate. There are still keys used in place of certificate public_key : PEM-formatted string Regards, Evg -Original Message- From: Vijay Venkatachalam [mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 11

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Vote required for certificate as first-class citizen - SSL Termination (Revised)

2013-12-11 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Termination (Revised) Hi, I would be happy with this model. Yes, longer term it might be nice to have an independent certificate store so that when you need to be able to validate ssl you can, but this is a good intermediate step. Cheers, On 02/12/13 09:16, Vijay Venkatachalam

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Vote required for certificate as first-class citizen - SSL Termination (Revised)

2013-12-02 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
/1fFHbg3beRtmlyiryHiXlpWpRo1oWj8FqVeZISh07iGs/edit?usp=sharing Thanks, Vijay V. -Original Message- From: Vijay Venkatachalam Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 2:18 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Vote required for certificate as first level citizen

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Vote required for certificate as first level citizen - SSL Termination

2013-11-29 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
To summarize: Certificate will be a first level citizen which can be reused and For certificate management nothing sophisticated is required. Can you please Vote (+1, -1)? We can move on if there is consensus around this. -Original Message- From: Stephen Gran

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Are BIOS strings configured in Hyper-V ESX similar to KVM instantiated VMs?

2013-11-26 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
BIOS to query. Finally we're not clear on the use case here - What's the use case for needing to know whether you VM is running under OpenStack or not? Bob From: Vijay Venkatachalam [mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com] Sent: 26 November 2013 01:44 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Is there a way for the VM to identify that it is getting booted in OpenStack

2013-11-26 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
the title to be more friendly. Thanks, Vijay V. From: Vijay Venkatachalam [mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:58 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Are BIOS strings configured in Hyper-V

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 Switching

2013-11-21 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi, The CLI example is capturing the requirement concisely. Thanks. One suggestion, you could bring the --policy policy1 to the beginning of create-lb-l7rule command. Also, could rename associate-lb-pool-vip to associate-lb-vip-pool It will be best to define the db model to reflect the cli.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] SSL Termination write-up

2013-11-20 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi, Replies Inline! -Original Message- From: Stephen Gran [mailto:stephen.g...@guardian.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:59 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] SSL Termination write-up

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] SSL Termination write-up

2013-11-20 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
-Original Message- From: Stephen Gran [mailto:stephen.g...@guardian.co.uk] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 3:01 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] SSL Termination write-up Hi, On Wed, 2013-11-20

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] SSL Termination write-up

2013-11-20 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
- From: Samuel Bercovici [mailto:samu...@radware.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 5:40 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); stephen.g...@guardian.co.uk; Vijay Venkatachalam Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] SSL Termination write-up HI

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] SSL Termination write-up

2013-11-19 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi Sam, Eugene, Avishay, etal, Today I spent some time to create a write-up for SSL Termination not exactly design doc. Please share your comments! https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tFOrIa10lKr0xQyLVGsVfXr29NQBq2nYTvMkMJ_inbo/edit Would like comments/discussion especially on

[openstack-dev] Is python setup.py intsall recommended way to install Neutron Server in dev environment?

2013-09-23 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
Hi, I am new to openstack, please pardon if the questions are dumb. Attempting to run a neutron dev setup with openvswitch plugin with VLAN isolation and 2 hosts. DISCLAIMER: I am not using devstack. Attempting to install the services in a controller node - Ubuntu12.04 VM.