[openstack-dev] New OpenStack Bug Smash

2016-10-11 Thread Wang, Shane
Hi all, We want to kick off the next OpenStack bug smash and it targets Nov 30 - Dec 2 (Wed - Fri) at Shenzhen in China, which was voted in the last bug smash at Hangzhou, for the next Ocata release. The release schedule and Thanksgiving day are considered for the date. Do any of you want to

[openstack-dev] OpenStack: Happy 6th Birthday:)

2016-07-18 Thread Wang, Shane
__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Invitation to join Hangzhou Bug Smash

2016-06-16 Thread Wang, Shane
Anita, sorry about replying to you slowly. Because we are a committee from a couple of companies, and need discussion, which causes slowness. I am not the only decision maker. Thanks Anita;) Regards. -- Shane -Original Message- From: Anita Kuno [mailto:ante...@anteaya.info] Sent:

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Invitation to join Hangzhou Bug Smash

2016-06-16 Thread Wang, Shane
; Liang, Maggie Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Invitation to join Hangzhou Bug Smash On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 08:06:50AM +, Wang, Shane wrote: > Hi, OpenStackers, > > As you know, Huawei, Intel and CESI are hosting the 4th China OpenStack Bug > Smash at Hangzhou, China. > The 1st

Re: [openstack-dev] Invitation to join Hangzhou Bug Smash

2016-06-16 Thread Wang, Shane
; Liang, Maggie Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Invitation to join Hangzhou Bug Smash On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 08:06:50AM +, Wang, Shane wrote: > Hi, OpenStackers, > > As you know, Huawei, Intel and CESI are hosting the 4th China OpenStack Bug > Smash at Hangzhou, China. > The 1st

Re: [openstack-dev] Invitation to join Hangzhou Bug Smash

2016-06-16 Thread Wang, Shane
, a best practice is to publish a sponsorship prospectus online on a date known in advance with sponsorships filled on a "first to sign" basis. Regards, Tom On 13/06/16 16:06, Wang, Shane wrote: > Hi, OpenStackers, > As you know, Huawei, Intel and CESI are hosting the 4th Ch

Re: [openstack-dev] Invitation to join Hangzhou Bug Smash

2016-06-16 Thread Wang, Shane
: Zhuangzhen; anni@huawei.com; Liang, Maggie Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Invitation to join Hangzhou Bug Smash On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 08:06:50AM +, Wang, Shane wrote: > Hi, OpenStackers, > > As you know, Huawei, Intel and CESI are hosting the 4th China OpenStack Bug > Smash at Han

Re: [openstack-dev] Invitation to join Hangzhou Bug Smash

2016-06-16 Thread Wang, Shane
to join Hangzhou Bug Smash Hi I would, once again, love to attend. If you find that other cores apply and you'd rather have a new face, I would be very understanding of the situation. Regards -- Duncan Thomas On 13 June 2016 at 11:06, Wang, Shane <shane.w...@intel.com<mailto:shane.w...@int

[openstack-dev] RESEND: Invitation to join Hangzhou Bug Smash

2016-06-13 Thread Wang, Shane
Sorry I had a wrong person on the CC list, so resend. Hi, OpenStackers, As you know, Huawei, Intel and CESI are hosting the 4th China OpenStack Bug Smash at Hangzhou, China. The 1st China Bug Smash was at Shanghai, the 2nd was at Xi'an, and the 3rd was at Chengdu. We are constructing the

[openstack-dev] Invitation to join Hangzhou Bug Smash

2016-06-13 Thread Wang, Shane
Hi, OpenStackers, As you know, Huawei, Intel and CESI are hosting the 4th China OpenStack Bug Smash at Hangzhou, China. The 1st China Bug Smash was at Shanghai, the 2nd was at Xi'an, and the 3rd was at Chengdu. We are constructing the etherpad page for registration, and the date will be

Re: [openstack-dev] [bug-smash] Global OpenStack Bug Smash Mitaka

2016-03-04 Thread Wang, Shane
Typo: view -> review:) From: Wang, Shane Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2016 2:09 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: RE: [bug-smash] Global OpenStack Bug Smash Mitaka A reminder for the community, the bug smashes are going to start next Monday, if you ca

Re: [openstack-dev] [bug-smash] Global OpenStack Bug Smash Mitaka

2016-03-04 Thread Wang, Shane
A reminder for the community, the bug smashes are going to start next Monday, if you can't join those 11 sites, you can do virtual bug smash remotely by fixing the bugs in your offices. Also, please help do remote view. Thanks. Best Regards. -- Shane From: Wang, Shane [mailto:shane.w

Re: [openstack-dev] [bug-smash] Global OpenStack Bug Smash Mitaka

2016-03-04 Thread Wang, Shane
-smash] Global OpenStack Bug Smash Mitaka "Wang, Shane" <shane.w...@intel.com> wrote on 02/05/2016 04:42:21 AM: > From: "Wang, Shane" <shane.w...@intel.com> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstac

Re: [openstack-dev] [bug-smash] Global OpenStack Bug Smash Mitaka

2016-02-06 Thread Wang, Shane
page for the location [2] is under construction. Hope to see some of you in Nuremberg! [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/OpenStack-Bug-Smash-Mitaka [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/OpenStack-Bug-Smash-Mitaka-Nuremberg -- Thanks, Robert On Friday 05 February 2016, 03:42:21 Wang, Shane

Re: [openstack-dev] [bug-smash] Global OpenStack Bug Smash Mitaka

2016-02-06 Thread Wang, Shane
: Saturday, February 06, 2016 5:25 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [bug-smash] Global OpenStack Bug Smash Mitaka On 2016-02-05 03:42:21 + (+), Wang, Shane wrote: > After discussing with TC members and other community guys,

Re: [openstack-dev] [bug-smash] Global OpenStack Bug Smash Mitaka

2016-02-04 Thread Wang, Shane
Hi all, After discussing with TC members and other community guys, we thought March 2-4 might not be a good timing for bug smash. So we decided to change the dates to be March 7 - 9 (Monday - Wednesday) in R4. Please join our efforts to fix bugs for OpenStack. Thanks. -- Shane From: Wang

Re: [openstack-dev] Call for papers already closed?

2016-02-01 Thread Wang, Shane
Hope somebody on the website infrastructure can help us. I have one presentation which was filled into the form but not submitted. Best Regards. -- Shane -Original Message- From: Nick Chase [mailto:nch...@mirantis.com] Sent: Monday, February 01, 2016 4:09 PM To:

Re: [openstack-dev] Call for papers already closed?

2016-01-31 Thread Wang, Shane
Yes, I was confused too. The time is yet up. -- Shane -Original Message- From: Christian Berendt [mailto:christ...@berendt.io] Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2016 11:43 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] Call for papers already closed? Hello. I am a little

[openstack-dev] [bug-smash] Global OpenStack Bug Smash Mitaka

2016-01-28 Thread Wang, Shane
Save the Date: Global OpenStack Bug Smash Wednesday-Friday, March 2-4, 2016 RSVP by Friday, February 19 How can you help make the OpenStack Mitaka release stable and bug-free while having fun with your peers? Join Intel, Rackspace, Mirantis, IBM, HP, Huawei, CESI and others in a global bug

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] hackathon day

2015-11-12 Thread Wang, Shane
Hi Rosa, I am one of the organizers of China Hackathons. I think it is a good idea to host a Hackathon in Europe right after the mid-cycle meetup. However, I suggest to allow more days instead of only 1 to fix bugs, or you have to get well prepared, because fixing bugs is about reproducing,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] hackathon day

2015-11-12 Thread Wang, Shane
Open the mid-cycle one day ahead, feasible? -Original Message- From: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 10:25 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] hackathon day On Thu, Nov

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] hackathon day

2015-11-12 Thread Wang, Shane
Hey, how about driving a Hackathon on the same dates in 3 geos right before release? Who are interested in? Best Regards. -- Shane -Original Message- From: Wang, Shane [mailto:shane.w...@intel.com] Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 11:03 PM To: Daniel P. Berrange; OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][infra][third-party] Intel actively seeking solution to CI issue and getting close to a solution

2015-07-17 Thread Wang, Shane
Yes, Anita. We are seeking the alternatives to fix it and hope the CIs can be recovered very soon. Also please allow me to explain a little bit, we shut down the service without any email notification, but update the wiki (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/Intel-PCI-CI) only

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How to properly detect and fence a compromised host (and why I dislike TrustedFilter)

2015-06-23 Thread Wang, Shane
AFAIK, TrustedFilter is using a sort of cache to cache the trusted state, which is designed to solve the performance issue mentioned here. My thoughts for deprecating it are: #1. We already have customers here in China who are using that filter. How are they going to do upgrade in the future?

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Dynamic scheduling

2014-04-10 Thread Wang, Shane
Ditto, I am also interested in that area. We're implementing a framework to monitor different metrics from Ceilometer, apply predefined policies from administrators, and take actions if some conditions are met for resource optimization purpose or SLA purpose. Jay, is IBM PRS open source?

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Detect changes in object model

2014-01-13 Thread Wang, Shane
Hi Dan, are you going to cook a patch to expand the base class? Or we can do that ourselves? For the list, I also agree your dirty assumption. -- Shane -Original Message- From: Dan Smith [mailto:d...@danplanet.com] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 10:42 PM To: Wang, Shane; OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Detect changes in object model

2014-01-09 Thread Wang, Shane
Hi Dan, There is a discussion in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58199/ talking about the change detection in objects. If an object A contains another object or object list (called sub-object), any change happened in the sub-object can't be detected by obj_what_changed() in object A. A

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Schduler] Volunteers wanted for a modest proposal for an external scheduler in our lifetime

2013-12-02 Thread Wang, Shane
Lianhao Lu, Shuangtai Tian and I are also willing to join the team to contribute because we are also changing scheduler, but it seems the team is full. You can put us to the backup list. Thanks. -- Shane -Original Message- From: Robert Collins [mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net] Sent:

[openstack-dev] [nova] Help to review UBS patch

2013-11-12 Thread Wang, Shane
Hi stackers, From the design summit, Boris has a great idea to improve db performance but needs more evaluation because of memcached. For UBS, it seems we agree to go with the current solution and don't depend on Boris's great idea. Can someone help to review the ground work of UBS

[openstack-dev] Help to review UBS patch

2013-11-12 Thread Wang, Shane
Hi stackers, From the design summit, Boris has a great idea to improve db performance but needs more evaluation because of memcached. For UBS, it seems we agree to go with the current solution and don't depend on Boris's great idea. Can someone help to review the ground work of UBS

[openstack-dev] [Nova] FFE Request: utilization aware scheduling

2013-09-05 Thread Wang, Shane
Hi core developers and everyone, Please allow me to make an FFE request for adding utilization aware scheduling support in Havana. The blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/utilization-aware-scheduling. The patches are: [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/35759/ [2]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Frustrations with review wait times

2013-08-27 Thread Wang, Shane
Definitely, +1 ;-) -- Shane From: Joe Gordon [mailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 11:40 PM To: Daniel P. Berrange; OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Frustrations with review wait times On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Daniel P.

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Requesting feedback on review 35759

2013-08-26 Thread Wang, Shane
Hi, We submitted the patches for bp https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/utilization-aware-scheduling 1+ month ago. The first patch is to add a column to save metrics collected by plugins - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/35759/. Is there anyone who is interested in that, would it be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Monitoring plugin file names

2013-08-04 Thread Wang, Shane
I prefer nova/compute/plugins/virt/libvirt, because I think a plugin might not call libvirt or any virt driver. By the way, can nova core or those who are interested in the bp review our patch sets at

Re: [openstack-dev] A simple way to improve nova scheduler

2013-07-31 Thread Wang, Shane
community agreed that it would be discussed on the coming summit. Best regards, Boris Pavlovic -- Mirantis Inc. On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Wang, Shane shane.w...@intel.commailto:shane.w...@intel.com wrote: Hi, I have a patchset ready for your review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38802

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Ceilometer vs. Nova internal metrics collector for scheduling

2013-07-22 Thread Wang, Shane
Sandy Walsh wrote onĀ 2013-07-19: On 07/19/2013 09:47 AM, Day, Phil wrote: -Original Message- From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] Sent: 19 July 2013 12:04 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Ceilometer vs. Nova internal metrics

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] New DB column or new DB table?

2013-07-22 Thread Wang, Shane
Daniel raised a good point, I also agreed that is not a good architecture. Nova can't touch any monitoring stuffs - I don't think that is good. At least, Ceilometer can be a monitoring hub for external utilities. On the other hand, for the options Lianhao raised. Is a query on a DB and a json

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] A DB question for UniqueName/Event/Trait

2013-06-24 Thread Wang, Shane
Hi I am looking at ceilometer DB code. I find there are 3 tables (UniqueName, Event, Trait), and in Trait, the two columns name_id and event_id refer to table UniqueName and table Event. My question is why we need UniqueName and Event, because in both tables there are no many other columns,

Re: [openstack-dev] XML Support for Nova v3 API

2013-06-23 Thread Wang, Shane
+1 for that. If needed, some tools/languages could help to do XML transformation, regarding different XML schemas. I also agree with Hellmann that we shouldn't invent something new or a fixed schema for that. XML is flexible for data exchange, we can leave those mapping jobs to those XML

Re: [openstack-dev] Efficiently pin running VMs to physical CPUs automatically

2013-06-23 Thread Wang, Shane
Very glad to see that, too. We also have some thoughts to look at the usage of CPU resources (like cache) for each VM, and adjust to aggregate and bind VMs to physical CPUs for QoS. Look forward to seeing the initiatives proposed below to move forward. Thanks. -- Shane -Original