- Original Message -
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > Hi William,
> >
> > I think Doug has done a good job of answering all these, but here's
> > another set of answers to make sure there's no confusion :)
> >
> > On Fri, 2
- Original Message -
> Hi William,
>
> I think Doug has done a good job of answering all these, but here's
> another set of answers to make sure there's no confusion :)
>
> On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 17:40 -0400, William Henry wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
- Original Message -
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 8:09 PM, William Henry < whe...@redhat.com > wrote:
> > Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jul 12, 2013, at 5:27 PM, Doug Hellmann < doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com >
> > wrote:
>
> > > On F
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 12, 2013, at 5:27 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:40 PM, William Henry wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been reading through the Messaging Wiki and have some comments. Not
>> criticisms, just comm
- Original Message -
> On 07/11/2013 12:06 PM, William Henry wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> On 07/08/2013 10:51 AM, Ted Ross wrote:
> >>> If someone from the Qpid community were to work on integrating the new
> >&g
Woops the wiki I am referring to is:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo/Messaging
William
- Original Message -
> Hi all,
> I've been reading through the Messaging Wiki and have some comments. Not
> criticisms, just comments and questions.
> I have found this to be a very useful do
Hi all,
I've been reading through the Messaging Wiki and have some comments. Not
criticisms, just comments and questions.
I have found this to be a very useful document. Thanks.
1. "There are multiple backend transport drivers which implement the API
semantics using different messaging syste
- Original Message -
> On 07/08/2013 10:51 AM, Ted Ross wrote:
> > If someone from the Qpid community were to work on integrating the new
> > AMQP 1.0 technology into OpenStack, where would be the right place to
> > start? Would it be to add a new transport to oslo.messaging?
>
> I thin
