Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][ceilometer] New project: collectd-ceilometer-plugin

2016-01-22 Thread gord chung
nice! thanks Emma! i'm wondering if there's an additional metrics/resources we should add to gnocchi to accommodate the data? On 22/01/2016 6:11 AM, Foley, Emma L wrote: Hi folks, A new plug-in for making collectd[1] stats available to Ceilometer [2] is ready for use. The

Re: [openstack-dev] Tip: jsonformatter site for parsing/debugging logs

2016-01-21 Thread gord chung
On 21/01/2016 11:27 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: You can also do this using Python's json module from the command line: $ echo '{"json":"obj"}' | python -m json.tool { "json": "obj" } Doug very useful... if you want a site, i use http://pro.jsonlint.com/ (vladikr told me about it... he

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] :Regarding wild card configuration in pipeline.yaml

2016-01-20 Thread gord chung
hi, i don't completely recall why we don't allow wildcarded exclude and include meters. it's probably because there's ambiguity of ordering of wildcard which can lead to different filter results. someone can correct me, but i don't think there's a strict requirement that stops us from

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] ceilometer Floatingip Pollster change

2016-01-20 Thread gord chung
i guess i should probably add that the current pollster doesn't work because of limitation in nova api[1]. if we want to support discovery of whether nova-network or neutron is used, the existing pollster and nova-api still needs to be fixed. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] ceilometer meter-list output is empty

2016-01-14 Thread gord chung
hi, please ensure you are running latest code (as you seem to want master) you are running into https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I4765b3b9627983a245aa5521a85ad89e83ab8551 On 14/01/2016 12:10 AM, lichen.hangzhou wrote: Hi, I have installed a devstack environment with ceilometer enabled:

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][neutron][cinder][swift][ceilometer][nova][keystone][sahara][glance][neutron-lbaas][imm] stylistic changes to code, how do we handle them?

2016-01-12 Thread gord chung
not a fan of these changes since it messes up git blame and it becomes harder to track down author if you have questions relating to bug/code. that said, "if var > 0" is not the same as "if var". in the latter, var can be any number (negative or positive) or any other datatype and it'll

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][aodh][vitrage] The purpose of notification about alarm updating

2016-01-11 Thread gord chung
so one point i should mention is that the notification we propose on removing was originally attended for Ceilometer events. much in same way as disabling the aodh-notifier to allow Vitrage to consume alarm triggers, it isn't exactly safe for Vitrage to consume the existing messages as

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

2016-01-08 Thread gord chung
On 08/01/16 04:49 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: On Thu, Jan 07 2016, Jay Pipes wrote: OK, I just watched that. Sorry, still don't see the value that Mimic provides over unit testing the client interfaces and mocking out the HTTP payloads so you have strict control over the expectations. The

[openstack-dev] [telemetry] mitaka virtual meetup follow-up

2016-01-08 Thread gord chung
hi folks, just to recap the meeting item[1], we won't have a meetup this cycle as we all have our tasks and there doesn't seem to be any items that are controversial. we've agree that going forward, if something does require quicker feedback than ML/irc, we'll set up a conference and promote

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][aodh][vitrage] The purpose of notification about alarm updating

2016-01-06 Thread gord chung
On 06/01/2016 8:11 AM, AFEK, Ifat (Ifat) wrote: Hi, We would like to be notified once an alarm state is changed, so we prefer using the message bus. As far as I understand, ceilometer and aodh APIs do not provide immediate notifications. If we use the APIs, we will have to poll the data

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Gnocchi] inconsistent instanceattributes cause infinite update

2015-12-21 Thread gord chung
shall we try to synchronise the two datapoints more than? i think that'd be the better route since pollster and notification values are attempting to meter the same thing. On 21/12/2015 8:33 AM, Luo Gangyi wrote: gord, I have looked your link, seems related. But still, image_ref is a problem.

[openstack-dev] [telemetry] cancelling upcoming meetings (24th and 31st)

2015-12-21 Thread gord chung
hi folks, before i forget, we'll be skipping meetings the next two weeks (24th and 31st). we'll resume regularly scheduled meetings on Jan 7th. please raise anything important to the mailing list (as normal). have a nice holidays. cheers, -- gord

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Gnocchi] inconsistent instance attributes cause infinite update

2015-12-21 Thread gord chung
we actually looked at this problem here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/235702/ i think we should add support of new attribute instead. On 20/12/2015 10:52 AM, Luo Gangyi wrote: Hi devs, I found a problem which may cause infinite update of instance's attributes in gnocchi. Let's see the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer][gnocchi][vitrage] 'bad' resource_id

2015-12-17 Thread gord chung
On 17/12/15 08:17 AM, AFEK, Ifat (Ifat) wrote: What do you mean by "create new types of resources"? Suppose we want to add a new resource type with a new id format, what should we do for that? Change Gnocchi code / add a plug-in / add a new type definition in the database / ...? i believe

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer][gnocchi] 'bad' resource_id

2015-12-16 Thread gord chung
On 16/12/2015 4:24 PM, Lu, Lianhao wrote: On Dec 16, 2015 14:13, Chris Dent wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2015, Lu, Lianhao wrote: In ceilometer, some metrics(e.g. network.incoming.bytes for VM net interface, hardware.network.incoming.bytes for host net interface, compute.node.cpu.percentage for

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] status of distil?

2015-12-14 Thread gord chung
wasn't aware this project existed. i've contacted flwang. just for reference, for those that extend Telemetry projects, it's good to promote it here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Telemetry#Externally_Managed On 14/12/2015 4:09 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: On 12/14/2015 10:01 AM, Steve

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][aodh][vitrage] The purpose of notification about alarm updating

2015-12-11 Thread gord chung
sorry, my email was blocking the list for a bit so i missed this. the original reason this was implemented i believe was to track alarm state changes as an event in ceilometer events. i still see this as a valid use case but it does duplicate some of the functionality of alarm history. i

Re: [openstack-dev] Cleaning Up Deprecation Warnings in the Gate

2015-12-10 Thread gord chung
On 10/12/15 12:04 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote: Using this query to see how many deprecation warning we emit on jobs running on master in the past 7 days:

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.db][sqlalchemy][mistral] Configuring default transaction isolation level

2015-12-08 Thread gord chung
we had this in ceilometer events. you can see it here: https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer/commit/898cd3d036c4358aa16f7b3e2028365dc9829213 note, that patch is removing it because it slowed everything way down because of locking. if you can avoid it, avoid it. On 08/12/2015 7:28 AM, Renat

[openstack-dev] [telemetry] upcoming Mitaka-1 release

2015-11-26 Thread gord chung
hi, just a quick note, i'll be tagging the Mitaka-1 release early next week for Ceilometer and Aodh. if you want to get something in for M-1, now is the time. please let us know so we can track it. Gnocchi will not have a release -- it will continue to be released independently as features

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][stable][keystone] keystonemiddleware release 1.5.3 (kilo)

2015-11-24 Thread gord chung
again due to internal-interface mocking? On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:24 AM, gord chung <g...@live.ca <mailto:g...@live.ca>> wrote: mriedem and myself resolved this with keystone folks earlier today[1]. should be all better now [2] [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][stable][keystone] keystonemiddleware release 1.5.3 (kilo)

2015-11-24 Thread gord chung
mriedem and myself resolved this with keystone folks earlier today[1]. should be all better now [2] [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-dev/%23openstack-dev.2015-11-24.log.html#t2015-11-24T14:38:39 [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/249268/ On 24/11/15 12:33 PM, Alan

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer][aodh][vitrage] Raising custom alarms in AODH

2015-11-23 Thread gord chung
On 23/11/2015 11:14 AM, AFEK, Ifat (Ifat) wrote: I guess I would like to do both: create a new alarm definition, then trigger it (call alarm_actions), and possibly later on set its state back to OK (call ok_action). I understood that currently all alarm triggering is internal in AODH,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Versioned notifications... who cares about the version?

2015-11-23 Thread gord chung
On 20/11/2015 5:12 PM, Chris Dent wrote: On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, gord chung wrote: i think a lot of the complexity we have in versioning is that the projects are too silo'd. i think some of the versioning issues would be irrelevant if the producer knew it's consumers before sending rather

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Versioned notifications... who cares about the version?

2015-11-23 Thread gord chung
given John's reply, i think we should start a new thread? apologies for hijacking log thread. On 23/11/2015 5:01 AM, Alexis Lee wrote: gord chung said on Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 01:32:02PM -0500: On 20/11/15 11:33 AM, Alexis Lee wrote: why would a producer spit out non-useful datapoints

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]:Subscribe and Publish Notification frame work in Ceilometer !

2015-11-23 Thread gord chung
On 22/11/2015 10:04 PM, Srikanth Vavilapalli wrote: We have found a related blueprint *[1],* which is exactly addressing this dynamic provisioning of pipelines via an API and making use of a new data store to store this configuration. But seems like that blueprint was abandoned due its

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer][aodh][vitrage] Raising custom alarms in AODH

2015-11-23 Thread gord chung
hi Ifat, i added some questions below. On 23/11/2015 7:16 AM, AFEK, Ifat (Ifat) wrote: Hi, We have a couple of questions regarding AODH alarms. In Vitrage[1] project we have two use cases that involve Ceilometer: 1. Import Ceilometer alarms, as well as alarms and resources from other

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Versioned notifications... who cares about the version?

2015-11-20 Thread gord chung
On 20/11/15 11:33 AM, Alexis Lee wrote: gord chung said on Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:59:33PM -0500: just to clarify, the idea doesn't involve tailoring the notification payload to ceilometer, just that if a producer is producing a notification it knows contains a useful datapoint, the producer

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Versioned notifications... who cares about the version?

2015-11-19 Thread gord chung
ceilometer cares. we listen to all notifications and build Measurement and Event data from (some of) them. to be honest, i don't know if changes in nova notifications have/are broken in ceilometer because quite frankly there are far too many notifications to test and track. as a consumer of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]:Subscribe and Publish Notification frame work in Ceilometer !

2015-11-19 Thread gord chung
On 19/11/15 10:26 PM, Srikanth Vavilapalli wrote: Hi Gord On your second point, Yes, Ceilometer does provide a framework to capture a notification and republish to multiple “publish targets” in addition to the collector service using udp/kafka/notification as the transport mechanisms… We

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Versioned notifications... who cares about the version?

2015-11-19 Thread gord chung
On 19/11/15 08:53 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 11/19/2015 5:52 PM, gord chung wrote: ceilometer cares. we listen to all notifications and build Measurement and Event data from (some of) them. to be honest, i don't know if changes in nova notifications have/are broken in ceilometer because

Re: [openstack-dev] [aodh] HBase gate job

2015-11-17 Thread gord chung
let's change this gate to experimental for now. On 17/11/15 05:10 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: Hi, So we recently decided to run the functional tests for the HBase driver and enabled the gate job. It turned out the gate job didn't worked, so I tried to fix it. Now it's almost fixed, and it run the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Do we need to have a mid-cycle?

2015-11-16 Thread gord chung
in Liberty, we did a virtual meetup in for the telemetry team so i thought i'd share experience. On 16/11/2015 9:05 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: Then we can set up some hangouts (or similar) to get people in the same "room" working on things. Time zones will get weird, but we tend to hangouts is

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] Oslo libraries dropping python 2.6 compatability

2015-11-16 Thread gord chung
do we require a major versioning bump for this? i'm wondering how 'breaking' this is in real life if all the services have dropped py2.6 already. maybe this just requires an upper-cap in appropriate stable branches? to be devils advocate, one (arguably terrible) reason for not doing a major

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [oslo] Please stop removing usedevelop from tox.ini (at least for now)

2015-11-16 Thread gord chung
On 16/11/2015 11:13 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: does anyone want to sign up to remove that last namespace package? already in action: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/243255/ -- gord __ OpenStack Development Mailing

[openstack-dev] [telemetry][aodh][ceilometer][gnocchi] the story of telemetry

2015-11-13 Thread gord chung
hi, you may have noticed that changes are in motion and an extra telemetry tag being floated around. the following is your coles|cliff|spark notes on what you need to know. -- background -- three years ago, the ceilometer project was created to tackle the billing of cloud environments.

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] zombie process after ceilometer-api

2015-11-12 Thread gord chung
can you clarify what you mean by 'zombie process'? i'm not aware of a bug relating to this so could you open one. just for reference, this is the suggested method for deploying the ceilometer-api: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ceilometer/install/mod_wsgi.html cheers, On 12/11/2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][gnocchi] defining scope/domain

2015-11-12 Thread gord chung
On 11/11/2015 4:19 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: Yes, I think there is. We should write typical use cases and example in the documentation so that people may get a grasp of what Gnocchi is and what kind of problem it can or cannot solve. cool stuff... how should we start this? etherpad[1]? i think

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] zombie process after ceilometer-api

2015-11-12 Thread gord chung
if you have configured two workers and you have two ceilometer-api processes and an extra 'zombie' process, then it's correct. someone else might be able to articulate this better but when you use workers, it creates child processes that represent the workers you set, and there is a parent

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Bug opening policy

2015-11-12 Thread gord chung
On 12/11/2015 10:44 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: Hi telemetry team and contributors, We are starting to distinguish a terrible trend in our bug tracking system. Some people tend to: 1. Open a bug for a (trivial) issue (e.g. a typo in the documentation) 2. Submit a patch 2 minutes later fixing

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] proposal to add Rohit Jaiswal to Ceilometer core

2015-11-11 Thread gord chung
thanks for the feedback. it's my pleasure to welcome Rohit to the Ceilometer core team. everyone back to work! :) On 05/11/15 08:45 AM, gord chung wrote: hi folks, i'd like to nominate Rohit Jaiswal as core for Ceilometer. he's done a lot of good work recently like discovering and fixing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] OpenStack Tokyo Summit Summary

2015-11-10 Thread gord chung
for reference, Julien is currently signed up for that task[1]. if this is a high priority requirement, we might want to see if another resource can pick it up, we can help out to explain how it should all be done :) cheers, [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-telemetry-todos On

[openstack-dev] [telemetry][gnocchi] defining scope/domain

2015-11-10 Thread gord chung
hi, i was doing some googling on the current state of time series databases to see if there was a worthwhile db to implement as a Gnocchi driver and it seems we're currently in the same state as before: there are flaws with all open source time series databases but if you have lots of money,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] [Bug#1497073]The return sample body of sample-list is different when use -m and not

2015-11-09 Thread gord chung
again, it's been debated that we shouldn't be allowed to completely drop apis. in regards to deprecation, how do you make this deprecation known? also, this goes beyond the client. if we deprecated in the client we should really have the endpoint deprecated in API as well. On 05/11/2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo_messaging] Regarding " WARNING [oslo_messaging.server] wait() should have been called after stop() as wait() ...

2015-11-05 Thread gord chung
On 05/11/2015 1:06 PM, Nader Lahouti wrote: Hi Doug, I have an app that listens to notifications and used the info provided in http://docs.openstack.org/developer/oslo.messaging/notification_listener.html Basically I create 1. NotificationEndpoints(object):

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo_messaging] Regarding " WARNING [oslo_messaging.server] wait() should have been called after stop() as wait() ...

2015-11-05 Thread gord chung
to be stop() and then wait() there as well? Thanks, Nader. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:19 AM, gord chung <g...@live.ca <mailto:g...@live.ca>> wrote: On 05/11/2015 1:06 PM, Nader Lahouti wrote: Hi Doug, I have an app that listens to notifications and u

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]:Subscribe and Publish Notification frame work in Ceilometer !

2015-11-05 Thread gord chung
On 05/11/2015 5:11 AM, Raghunath D wrote: Hi Pradeep, Presently we are looking for a monitoring service.Using monitoring service user's/application's will subscribe for few notification's/events from openstack infrastructure and monitoring service will publish these notification to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] [Bug#1497073]The return sample body of sample-list is different when use -m and not

2015-11-05 Thread gord chung
i'm sort of torn on this item. there's a general feeling that regarding api, nothing should be dropped so i'm hesitant to actually deprecate it. i think changing the data also is very dangerous when it comes to compatibility (even though keeping it increases inconsistency). maybe the better

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] proposal to add Rohit Jaiswal to Ceilometer core

2015-11-05 Thread gord chung
hi folks, i'd like to nominate Rohit Jaiswal as core for Ceilometer. he's done a lot of good work recently like discovering and fixing many issues with Events and implemented the configuration reloading functionality. he's also been very active providing input and fixes for many bugs. as

[openstack-dev] [telemetry][ceilometer][aodh][gnocchi] Tokyo summit roundup

2015-11-04 Thread gord chung
hi folks, i want to start off by thanking everyone for joining the telemetry related discussions at the Tokyo summit -- we got some great feedback and ideas. similar to the last summit, here's a rundown of items that we talked about[1] and will be tracking in the upcoming cycle. as before,

[openstack-dev] [telemetry][ceilometer][aodh][gnocchi] no (in person) mid-cycle for Mitaka

2015-11-04 Thread gord chung
hi all, after discussions on the usefulness of a Telemetry mid-cycle, we've decided to forego having an in-person mid-cycle for Mitaka. to avoid rehashing already discussed items, see: same reasons as Glance[1]. much thanks to jasonamyers for offering a venue for a Telemetry mid-cycle. that

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api][tc][perfromance] API for getting only status of resources

2015-11-04 Thread gord chung
apologies, if the below was mentioned at some point in this thread. On 04/11/2015 10:42 AM, Sean Dague wrote: This seems like a fundamental abuse of HTTP honestly. If you find yourself creating a ton of new headers, you are probably doing it wrong. if we want to explore the HTTP path, did we

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.config][oslo.service] Dynamic Reconfiguration of OpenStack Services

2015-11-04 Thread gord chung
we actually had a solution implemented in Ceilometer to handle this[1]. that said, based on the results of our survey[2], we found that most operators *never* update configuration files after the initial setup and if they did it was very rarely (monthly updates). the question related to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Meeting cancelled for this week

2015-10-21 Thread gord chung
thanks Ildiko it's also safe to assume the meeting will be cancelled for October 29 and November 5. please use the mailing list (it's actually preferred) for any discussion items. On 21/10/2015 8:22 AM, Ildikó Váncsa wrote: Hi All, I would like to inform you that we cancel the Ceilometer

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer][aodh] proposal to add Ryota Mibu to Aodh core

2015-10-21 Thread gord chung
thanks for the feedback folks. i'd like to welcome Ryota to the Aodh core team. thank you for all the continued effort in building alarming functionality in OpenStack! On 16/10/2015 8:59 AM, gord chung wrote: sorry, as we usually do, please comment on gerrit[1]. if you cannot, then please

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [watcher] New project: Watcher

2015-10-21 Thread gord chung
hi, seems like a neat idea, i had a few questions after watching the presentation from Vancouver. - is Watcher streaming the data captured by Ceilometer or is it querying the Ceilometer db? - is it utilising the Event data captured by Ceilometer or metric data? both? - i notice there's a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] "Infinite" values for "sum" and "average" fields in statistics query

2015-10-20 Thread gord chung
which backend are you using? this potentially may be a bug where we're hitting some size limit restricted by datatype. On 19/10/2015 4:02 PM, Srikanth Vavilapalli wrote: Hi I have observed "inf" values for "sum" and "average" fields in a ceilometer statistics query on one of my custom meter

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] "Infinite" values for "sum" and "average" fields in statistics query

2015-10-20 Thread gord chung
, Srikanth Vavilapalli wrote: Hi I am using MongoDB backend. Thanks Srikanth -Original Message- From: gord chung [mailto:g...@live.ca] Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 9:20 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] "Infinite" values for "sum

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] ceilometer+ops session

2015-10-19 Thread gord chung
hi folks, to followup on an item regarding Ceilometer+ops session at the summit. there isn't one explicitly for Ceilometer but there is a monitoring session[1] and a billing session[2]. based on the past, these sessions tend to focus more on 3rd party tools such as Sensu et al but if free it

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer][aodh] proposal to add Ryota Mibu to Aodh core

2015-10-16 Thread gord chung
hi, i'd like to nominate Ryota Mibu to the Aodh core team. he has been an active participant in Aodh and leads the Event alarms work done there. he also brings good insight related to NFV use case. patches: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:%22Ryota+MIBU%22+project:openstack/aodh,n,z

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer][aodh] proposal to add Ryota Mibu to Aodh core

2015-10-16 Thread gord chung
sorry, as we usually do, please comment on gerrit[1]. if you cannot, then please comment here. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/235890/ On 16/10/15 08:39 AM, gord chung wrote: hi, i'd like to nominate Ryota Mibu to the Aodh core team. he has been an active participant in Aodh and leads

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer][horizon] tentative design summit schedule

2015-10-13 Thread gord chung
hi, for those interested, i've put up the tentative schedule[1] for telemetry-related topics for the Tokyo design summit. note, there's a session to discuss horizon and ceilometer integration as that was a common issue raised in the recent ceilometer survey. please let me know if there's

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] external projects extending ceilometer

2015-10-06 Thread gord chung
hi, telemetry is a big space and its requirements differ from company to company. there are existing projects that extend/leverage the functionality of Ceilometer to either customise, fill in gaps or resolve complementary problems. as the projects are not all managed by the Ceilometer team,

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer][aodh][gnocchi] Tokyo design session planning

2015-10-01 Thread gord chung
hi, just a reminder, please submit any topics ASAP so we can properly vote on items. if you have a feature you'd like to submit this cycle it'd greatly help your chances of merging should you present/explain your topic to us common folks. On 10/09/15 02:03 PM, gord chung wrote: hi

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] OpenStack Telemetry user survey

2015-09-28 Thread gord chung
Hello, The OpenStack Telemetry (aka Ceilometer) team would like to collect feedback and information from its user base in order to drive future improvements to the project. To do so, we have developed a survey. It should take about 15min to complete. Questions are fairly technical, so please

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] how to get current memory utilization of an instance

2015-09-16 Thread gord chung
is this using KVM? there are actually a few requirements[1] to ensure memory.usage meter works using libvirt: - libvirt 1.1.1+ - qemu 1.5+ - guest driver that supports memory balloon stats retagging to ceilometer to get more eyes. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] ceilometer code debugging

2015-09-16 Thread gord chung
hi, i'm not familiar with eclipse+pydev but you should be able to run that command as is in terminal './tools/ceilometer-test-event.py' the main question i have is what are you trying to debug? that script, to be honest, does not do much. it seems to just test the event conversion

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] PTL candidacy

2015-09-15 Thread gord chung
hi folks, less than six months ago, i decided to run for PTL of Ceilometer where my main goal was to support the community of contributors that exists within OpenStack with interests in telemetry[1]. it is under that tenet which i will run again for team lead of Ceilometer. as mentioned

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Ceilometer M Midcycle

2015-09-15 Thread gord chung
thanks for organising this Jason. for those who can't attend but want to, i think it'd also be good to know if location is the blocker here. retagging with [ceilometer]. On 15/09/2015 9:50 AM, Jason Myers wrote: Hello Everyone, We are setting up a few polls to determine the possibility

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][versionedobjects][ceilometer] explain the benefits of ceilometer+versionedobjects

2015-09-15 Thread gord chung
On 03/09/2015 4:02 PM, Dan Smith wrote: - do we need to migrate the db to some handle different set of >attributes and what happens for nosql dbs? No, Nova made no schema changes as a result of moving to objects. so i don't really understand how this part works. if i have two collectors --

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][TC] 'team:danger-not-diverse tag' and my concerns

2015-09-11 Thread gord chung
On 11/09/2015 3:26 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: Hi all, I was reading over the TC IRC logs for this week (my weekly reading) and I just wanted to let my thoughts and comments be known on: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2015/tc.2015-09-08-20.01.log.html#l-309 I feel it's very

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometerclient] Updating global-requirements caps.

2015-09-11 Thread gord chung
On 10/09/2015 7:26 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: Hi all, In trying to fix a few stable/juno issues we need to release a new version of ceilometerclient for stable/juno. This email is to try and raise awareness so that if the proposal is bonkers [1] we can come up with something better. This

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer][aodh][gnocchi] Tokyo design session planning

2015-09-10 Thread gord chung
hi, as mentioned during today's meeting, since we have our slots for design summit, we'll start accepting proposals for the telemetry-related topics for the Tokyo summit. similar to previous design summits, anyone is welcome to propose topics related to ceilometer, aodh, gnocchi, or any

[openstack-dev] [aodh][ceilometer] (re)introducing Aodh - OpenStack Alarming

2015-09-08 Thread gord chung
hi all, as you may have heard, in an effort to simplify OpenStack Telemetry (Ceilometer) and streamline it's code, the alarming functionality provided by OpenStack Telemetry has been moved to it's own repository[1]. The new project is called Aodh[2]. the idea is that Aodh will grow as it's

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Base feature deprecation policy

2015-09-08 Thread gord chung
On 08/09/2015 5:29 PM, Sean Dague wrote: On 09/08/2015 03:32 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-09-08 14:11:48 -0400: On 09/08/2015 01:07 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Dean Troyer's message of 2015-09-08 11:20:47 -0500: On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:10

Re: [openstack-dev] Getting Started : OpenStack

2015-09-08 Thread gord chung
On 07/09/2015 1:59 PM, Bhagyashree Uday wrote: Hi , I am Bhagyashree from India(IRC nick : bee2502 ). I have previous experience in data analytics including Machine Leraning,,NLP,IR and User Experience Research. I am interested in contributing to OpenStack on projects involving data

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Meters

2015-09-08 Thread gord chung
is this using libvirt? if so, can you verify you have the following requirements: * libvirt 1.1.1+ * qemu 1.5+ * guest driver that supports memory balloon stats also, please check to see if there are any visible ERRORs in ceilometer-agent-compute log. On 08/09/2015 2:04 AM, Abhishek

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Mitaka Design Summit - Proposed slot allocation

2015-09-04 Thread gord chung
On 04/09/2015 6:14 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi PTLs, Here is the proposed slot allocation for every "big tent" project team at the Mitaka Design Summit in Tokyo. This is based on the requests the liberty PTLs have made, space availability and project activity & collaboration needs. We have

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][versionedobjects][ceilometer] explain the benefits of ceilometer+versionedobjects

2015-09-03 Thread gord chung
On 28/08/15 01:54 PM, Dan Smith wrote: we store everything as primitives: floats, time, integer, etc... since we need to query on attributes. it seems like versionedobjects might not be useful to our db configuration currently. I don't think the former determines the latter -- we have lots of

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] proposal to add Liusheng to Ceilometer core

2015-09-03 Thread gord chung
On 31/08/15 09:18 AM, gord chung wrote: hi, we'd like to nominate Liusheng to the Ceilometer core team. he has been a leading contributor in Ceilometer, provides solid reviews, and regularly adds ideas for new improvements. as we did last time, please vote here: https

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] proposal to add Pradeep Kilambi to Ceilometer core

2015-09-03 Thread gord chung
On 31/08/15 09:13 AM, gord chung wrote: hi, we'd like to nominate Pradeep Kilambi to the Ceilometer core team. he has contributed by adding declarative meter support in Ceilometer and provides feedback/input in regards to packaging and design. as we did last time, please vote here: https

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][versionedobjects][ceilometer] explain the benefits of ceilometer+versionedobjects

2015-09-02 Thread gord chung
On 02/09/2015 11:25 AM, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: On 9/1/15, 11:31 AM, "gord chung" <g...@live.ca> wrote: re: serialisation, that probably isn't the biggest concern for Ceilometer performance. the main items are storage -- to be addressed by Gnocchi/tsdb, and poll

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ceilometer] cputime value resets on restart/shutdown

2015-09-01 Thread gord chung
On 01/09/2015 12:10 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: On Tue, Sep 01 2015, gord chung wrote: but if it's not actually cumulative in Ceilometer (pre-storage), should we really be tagging it as such? We only have 3 meters type, and the cumulative definition I wrote somewhere back in 2012 states

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][versionedobjects][ceilometer] explain the benefits of ceilometer+versionedobjects

2015-09-01 Thread gord chung
On 28/08/2015 5:18 PM, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: On 8/28/15, 11:39 AM, "gord chung" <g...@live.ca> wrote: i should start by saying i re-read my subject line and it arguably comes off aggressive -- i should probably have dropped 'explain' :) On 28/08/15 01:47 PM, Alec

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ceilometer] cputime value resets on restart/shutdown

2015-09-01 Thread gord chung
On 31/08/2015 3:36 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: On Mon, Aug 31 2015, gord chung wrote: i'm not sure Gnocchi is where we should be fixing this as it really only (potentially) fixes it for Gnocchi and not for any of the other ways Ceilometer data can be consumed. The ideal way is to send the data

[openstack-dev] [nova][ceilometer] cputime value resets on restart/shutdown

2015-08-31 Thread gord chung
hi i'm reaching out for help understanding meter values across hypervisors. for context, we have an open bug in Ceilometer where the value used to capture cputime of an instance is being reset whenever the instance is restarted or shutdown[1]. this seems to be the expected behaviour for

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ceilometer] cputime value resets on restart/shutdown

2015-08-31 Thread gord chung
On 31/08/2015 1:06 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: On Mon, Aug 31 2015, gord chung wrote: for context, we have an open bug in Ceilometer where the value used to capture cputime of an instance is being reset whenever the instance is restarted or shutdown[1]. this seems to be the expected behaviour

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] proposal to add Liusheng to Ceilometer core

2015-08-31 Thread gord chung
hi, we'd like to nominate Liusheng to the Ceilometer core team. he has been a leading contributor in Ceilometer, provides solid reviews, and regularly adds ideas for new improvements. as we did last time, please vote here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218819/ . if for whatever reason

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] proposal to add Pradeep Kilambi to Ceilometer core

2015-08-31 Thread gord chung
hi, we'd like to nominate Pradeep Kilambi to the Ceilometer core team. he has contributed by adding declarative meter support in Ceilometer and provides feedback/input in regards to packaging and design. as we did last time, please vote here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218822/ . if

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][versionedobjects][ceilometer] explain the benefits of ceilometer+versionedobjects

2015-08-28 Thread gord chung
On 28/08/15 12:18 PM, Roman Dobosz wrote: So imagine we have new versions of the schema for the events, alarms or samples in ceilometer introduced in Mitaka release while you have all your ceilo services on Liberty release. To upgrade ceilometer you'll have to stop all services to avoid data

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][versionedobjects][ceilometer] explain the benefits of ceilometer+versionedobjects

2015-08-28 Thread gord chung
On 28/08/15 12:49 PM, Dan Smith wrote: there was a little skeptism because it was originally sold as magic, but reading the slides from Vancouver[1], it is not magic. I think I specifically said they're not magic in my slides. Not sure who sold you them as magic, but you should leave them a

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][versionedobjects][ceilometer] explain the benefits of ceilometer+versionedobjects

2015-08-28 Thread gord chung
i should start by saying i re-read my subject line and it arguably comes off aggressive -- i should probably have dropped 'explain' :) On 28/08/15 01:47 PM, Alec Hothan (ahothan) wrote: On 8/28/15, 10:07 AM, gord chung g...@live.ca wrote: On 28/08/15 12:18 PM, Roman Dobosz wrote: So

Re: [openstack-dev] [Gnocchi] Added Ilya Tyaptin as core reviewer

2015-08-28 Thread gord chung
On 28/08/15 02:48 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: Hi fellows, Ilya did a few good contributions to Gnocchi, especially around the InfluxDB driver, so I'm glad to add him to the list of core reviewers. Welcome aboard. Cheers,

[openstack-dev] [oslo][versionedobjects][ceilometer] explain the benefits of ceilometer+versionedobjects

2015-08-27 Thread gord chung
hi, there has been a lot of work done across the community and Ceilometer relating to versionedobjects. in Ceilometer particularly, this effort has somewhat stalled as contributors are unsure of the benefits of versionedobjects and how it relates to Ceilometer. there was a little skeptism

Re: [openstack-dev] Cross-project meeting times

2015-08-21 Thread gord chung
On 21/08/2015 4:58 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Anne Gentle wrote: Hi all, In last week's TC Highlights blog post [1] I asked if there is interest in moving the cross-project meeting. Historically it is held after the TC meeting, but there isn't a requirement for those timings to line up. I've

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][AODH] Timeout Event Alarms

2015-08-17 Thread gord chung
good questions... On 17/08/2015 10:19 AM, Igor Degtiarov wrote: Gordon probably that question to you: Are we going to create a new folder in spec's dir for next cycle, or we continue discussing new specs as part of liberty? we can create a new dir for M* cycle specs. as mentioned in last

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] deprecating RPC publisher/collector

2015-08-11 Thread gord chung
hi, this note is to raise awareness that the rpc publishing functionality in Ceilometer will be deprecated and disabled in Liberty[1] as it offers redundant capabilities vs notifier publishing. back in Juno, we adopted oslo.messaging and switched from RPC to work queues in Ceilometer -- the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [aodh] upgrade path

2015-08-07 Thread gord chung
On 07/08/2015 3:49 AM, Chris Dent wrote: Despite our conversation in the meeting yesterday[1] I still remain a bit confused about the upgrade path from alarming-in-ceilometer to alarming provided by aodh and the availability of the older code in released liberty. Much of my confusion can

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] [aodh] upgrade path

2015-08-07 Thread gord chung
On 07/08/2015 3:49 AM, Chris Dent wrote: Despite our conversation in the meeting yesterday[1] I still remain a bit confused about the upgrade path from alarming-in-ceilometer to alarming provided by aodh and the availability of the older code in released liberty. Much of my confusion can

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][AODH] Timeout Event Alarms

2015-08-04 Thread gord chung
hi Igor, i would suggest you go with second option as i believe your implementation will overlap and reuse some of the functionality Ryota would code for his alarm spec [1]. also, since Aodh is working on an independent release cycle, it'll give you some more time as i don't think we'd be

  1   2   >