Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][glance][osc][sdk] Image Encryption for OpenStack (proposal)

+1 to Julia's suggestion, Cinder should also have a spec to discuss the detail about how to implement the creation of volume from an encrypted image. Julia Kreger 于2018年9月28日周五 上午9:39写道： > > Greetings! > > I suspect the avenue of at least three different specs is likely going > to be the best

[openstack-dev] [all][Election] candidacy for Zaqar PTL Stein cycle

Hi all, This is my self-nomination to continue running as Zaqar PTL for the Stein cycle. We did a great job in Rocky. Supported the different format of client id to be more suitable for more use cases. We also introduced the function to query queues filtered by name and metadata in mongodb

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Nominating yangzhenyu for Zaqar core

+1, I'm glad to hear this, zhenyu is a great contributor in Zaqar team. Hope your great work in Rocky as well. 2018-02-27 17:22 GMT+08:00 Xiyuan Wang : > +1, zhenyu has done a lot of useful features in Zaqar. Such as delay queue > and message abstract support. Some

Re: [openstack-dev] [zaqar] Not run for PTL

Thanks Feilong, it's very great to work together with you ! 2018-01-23 10:56 GMT+08:00 Fei Long Wang : > Hi team, > > I have been working on Zaqar for more than 4 years and serving the PTL > for the past 5 cycles. I don't plan to run for Zaqar PTL again for the > Rocky

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Nominating gecong for Zaqar core

+1 I'm very exciting to hear this. gecong is an great contributor in Zaqar project, hope we can work together to make more awesome features done in Zaqar. 2017-10-11 15:41 GMT+08:00 Thomas Herve : > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:15 PM, feilong wrote: >>

[openstack-dev] [Mogan]Tasks update of Mogan Project

Hi, We are glad to present this week's tasks update of Mogan. See the details below: Essential Priorities == 1. Adopt servers (wanghao, litao) blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mogan/+spec/manage-existing-bms spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459967/ merged code:

[openstack-dev] [Mogan]Tasks update of Mogan Project

Hi, We are glad to present this week's tasks update of Mogan. See the details below: Essential Priorities == 1. Node aggregates (liudong, zhangyang, zhenguo)merged blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mogan/+spec/node-aggregate spec:

[openstack-dev] [Mogan]Tasks update of Mogan Project

Hi, We are glad to present this week's tasks update of Mogan. We have finish a lot of wonderful work in Pike release, and Mogan will have her first release! See the details below: Essential Priorities == 1. Node aggregates (liudong, zhangyang, zhenguo) blueprint:

[openstack-dev] [Mogan]Tasks update of Mogan Project

Hi, We are glad to present this week's tasks update of Mogan. We have finish a lot of wonderful work in Pike release, and Mogan will have her first release! See the details below: Essential Priorities == 1. Node aggregates (liudong, zhangyang, zhenguo) blueprint:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mogan] Queens PTL candidacy

+1, very happy to work together with Zhenguo, I'm sure he will be a great PTL in Mogan. 2017-08-09 16:33 GMT+08:00 Sheng Liu : > +1, > > Zhenguo has done great work for Mogan in the past year, and he is already > running as a competent PTL! > > 2017-08-03 20:17 GMT+08:00

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Not not running for PTL

Hi, Sean It's very nice to work together with you in Cinder team, I just want to thank you for your hard work in those cycles. I have been there for 4 years, fortunately we have very great PTLs and Cores to help our new guys to grow up. No matter if you are PTL in next cycle, it's both very

[openstack-dev] [Mogan]Tasks update of Mogan Project

Hi, We are glad to present this week's tasks update of Mogan. See the details below: Essential Priorities == 1. Track resources using placement service (liusheng, zhenguo) blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mogan/+spec/track-resources-using-placement spec:

[openstack-dev] [Mogan]Tasks update of Mogan Project

Hi, We are glad to present this week's tasks update of Mogan. See the details below: Essential Priorities == 1. Track resources using placement service (liusheng, zhenguo) blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mogan/+spec/track-resources-using-placement spec:

[openstack-dev] [Mogan]Tasks update of Mogan Project

Hi, We are glad to present this week's tasks update of Mogan. Essential Priorities 1. New flavors (zhenguo, liusheng) -- blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mogan/+spec/new-flavor spec:

[openstack-dev] [Mogan]Tasks update of Mogan Project

Hi, We are glad to present this week's tasks update of Mogan. Essential Priorities 1. New flavors (zhenguo, liusheng) -- blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mogan/+spec/new-flavor spec:

[openstack-dev] [Mogan]Tasks update of Mogan Project

Hi, We are glad to present this week's tasks update of Mogan. Essential Priorities 1. New flavors (zhenguo, liusheng) -- bluepring: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mogan/+spec/new-flavor spec:

[openstack-dev] [openstackclient][zaqar]ensure name convention about the new commands in zaqarclient

Hi! Zaqar now have a lot of commands in openstackclient, but some of them don't have a consistent command name. For example: queue_list = zaqarclient.queues.v2.cli:ListQueues queue_create = zaqarclient.queues.v2.cli:CreateQueue queue_delete = zaqarclient.queues.v2.cli:DeleteQueue

[openstack-dev] [openstackclient][zaqar]

Hi! Zaqar now have a lot of commands in openstackclient, but some of them don't have a consistent command name. For example: queue_list = zaqarclient.queues.v2.cli:ListQueues queue_create = zaqarclient.queues.v2.cli:CreateQueue queue_delete = zaqarclient.queues.v2.cli:DeleteQueue

[openstack-dev] Tasks update of Mogan Project

Hi, We are glad to present this week's tasks update of Mogan. Essential Priorities 1.Node aggregates (liudong, zhangyang, zhenguo) --- blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mogan/+spec/node-aggregate

Re: [openstack-dev] [mogan] Nominating liusheng for Mogan core

+1 Thanks LiuSheng for good reviewing and keeping contribution. 2017-03-20 16:41 GMT+08:00 Rui Chen : > +1 > > Liusheng is a responsible reviewer and keep good reviewing quality in Mogan. > > Thank you working hard for Mogan, Liusheng. > > 2017-03-20 16:19 GMT+08:00

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo_reports]Does GMR work for uwsgi mode service?

a report by > changing a file modification date [2]. > > Thanks, > Roman > > [1] > https://code.google.com/archive/p/modwsgi/wikis/ConfigurationDirectives.wiki#WSGIRestrictSignal > [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/260976/ > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 8:02 AM, hao wang <

[openstack-dev] [oslo_reports]Does GMR work for uwsgi mode service?

Hi, stackers, I'm trying to use Guru Meditation Report in Zaqar project which can support uwsgi server. I imported gmr and used "gmr.TextGuruMeditation.setup_autorun(version, conf=conf)", but it didn't work under uwsgi mode. Did I do something wrong, or GMR doesn't support uwsgi mode yet?

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][doc]An error in OpenStack architecture picture

Great! Thanks to fix this. 2016-05-11 11:31 GMT+08:00 Lana Brindley <openst...@lanabrindley.com>: > On 11/05/16 12:58, hao wang wrote: >> Hi, stackers, >> >> I found an error in OpenStack architecture picture in docs: >> http://docs.openstack.org/openst

[openstack-dev] [cinder][doc]An error in OpenStack architecture picture

Hi, stackers, I found an error in OpenStack architecture picture in docs: http://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ops/content/architecture.html. In OpenStack Logical Architecture picture, Cinder's database is named "nova database", it's not correct. It should be "cinder database".

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zaqar] Nominating Eva Balycheva for Zaqar core

Very glad to +1 for Eva, she is a very good reviewer and coder! 2016-03-01 11:00 GMT+08:00 Victoria Martínez de la Cruz : > A huge +1 for this proposal. > > Eva has joined as an Outreachy intern for this round and she impacted the > Zaqar project in a truly

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] the spec of Add-ServiceGroup-using-Tooz

Hi, dong.wenjuan Sounds very interesting about "doctor" project. What's timezone about the weekly meeting? I want to join it if I have time by then. Thanks Wang Hao 2016-02-01 14:43 GMT+08:00 : > > Hi all, > > I proposed the spec of Add-ServiceGroup-using-Tooz in

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [nova] whether the ServiceGroup in Cinder is necessary

hi, Janice This idea seems to me that is useful to detect the state of cinder-volume process more quickly, but I feel there is another issue that if the back-end device go to fail you still can't keep cloud in ha or create volume successfully since the service is up but device is down. So, what

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] what are the key errors with volume detach

Thanks to Andrea for clarifying this complex and long history problem. As he says, we have talked about many solutions, and finally we found this using nova-mange to call the terminate_connection and clean the bdm entry. It's simple and clear IMO and no bad impact to Nova API. 2015-12-03 1:37

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have project scope for cinder?

functionality. Yes, this will convince me about DR in Cinder, very clearly, thanks. > > On 30 November 2015 at 03:45, hao wang <sxmatch1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Sean and Michal, >> >> In fact, there is a reason that I ask this question. Recently I have a >&g

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have project scope for cinder?

; BR >> WangHao >> >> 2015-11-30 3:02 GMT+08:00 Sean McGinnis <sean.mcgin...@gmx.com>: >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 11:44:19AM +, Dulko, Michal wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sat, 2015-11-28 at 10:56 +0800, hao wang wrote: >>>&

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have project scope for cinder?

Thanks very much, Anita, very usefully information, I will check it. 2015-11-30 23:36 GMT+08:00 Anita Kuno <ante...@anteaya.info>: > On 11/29/2015 02:02 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 11:44:19AM +, Dulko, Michal wrote: >>> On Sat, 2015-11-28 at 10:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have project scope for cinder?

t; > It is a not an easy problem to solve. Not that we should rush on this > problem, but we should start thinking about how to solve this as some > backends can only replicate a CG or a pool of volumes. > > Thanks, > Xing > > > > On 11/30/15, 4:51 AM, "hao wang&

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have project scope for cinder?

n, Nov 29, 2015 at 11:44:19AM +, Dulko, Michal wrote: >> On Sat, 2015-11-28 at 10:56 +0800, hao wang wrote: >> > Hi guys, >> > >> > I notice nova have a clarification of project scope: >> > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/project_scope.html >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have project scope for cinder?

Hi Philipp, 2015-11-30 14:36 GMT+08:00 Philipp Marek <philipp.ma...@linbit.com>: > Hi Hao Wang, > >> In fact, there is a reason that I ask this question. Recently I have a >> confusion about if cinder should provide the ability of Disaster >> Recovery to storage res

[openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have project scope for cinder?

Hi guys, I notice nova have a clarification of project scope: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/project_scope.html I want to find cinder's, but failed, do you know where to find it? It's important to let developers know what feature should be introduced into cinder and what shouldn't.

Re: [openstack-dev] [zaqar] Zaqar PTL Candidacy

Well, I'm a new guy in Zaqar, but still glad to +1 to vote Fei Long. 2015-09-14 14:43 GMT+08:00 Fei Long Wang : > Greeting, > > I'd like to announce my candidacy for the Zaqar PTL in Mikata. > > I've been working on and contributing to Zaqar since Icehouse release as a >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

Thanks Mike ! Your help is very important to me to get started in cinder and we do a lot of proud work with your leadership. 2015-09-15 6:36 GMT+08:00 John Griffith : > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Sean McGinnis > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] PTL Candidacy

Thanks Sean, Vote +1. 2015-09-14 22:49 GMT+08:00 Sean McGinnis : > Hello everyone, > > I'm announcing my candidacy for Cinder PTL for the Mitaka release. > > The Cinder team has made great progress. We've not only grown the > number of supported backend drivers, but we've

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] L3 low pri review queue starvation

2015-09-02 17:19 GMT+08:00 Gorka Eguileor : > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:30:26AM -0600, John Griffith wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Tom Barron wrote: >> >> > [Yesterday while discussing the following issue on IRC, jgriffith >> > suggested that I

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] I have a question about openstack cinder zonemanager driver

I feel supporting multi drivers of zonemanager in one cinder.conf is not much value. How you can decide when to use driver-1 or driver-2? 2015-08-14 10:20 GMT+08:00 Chenying (A) ying.c...@huawei.com: Hi, Jay S. Bryant, Daniel Wilson .Thank you for your reply. Now I know that in this

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Midcycle Sprint Summary

Thanks Mike for summary. About the Getting rid of API extensions, I'd like help to move the extensions over to the core. Do we should begin this work at Mitaka? 2015-08-17 23:53 GMT+08:00 Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com: A *summary* of the Cinder midcycle sprint, in attempt to keep your

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have plan for restoring on-line volume?

john.griffi...@gmail.com: On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 9:54 PM, hao wang sxmatch1...@gmail.com wrote: @Duncan and John, I have a idea about this issue, if volume is in-use but the instance which it's attached to is power-off, so can we avoid data corruption? If it's true, cinder could free

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have plan for restoring on-line volume?

john.griffi...@gmail.com: On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 3:47 AM, hao wang sxmatch1...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry if I missed something, since now we have supported backup in-use volumes in L, so I wonder is there some plan or design to support restoring on-line volumes. Thanks. -- Best Wishes For You

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Do we have plan for restoring on-line volume?

the instance first and then restore volume. 2015-08-11 11:30 GMT+08:00 hao wang sxmatch1...@gmail.com: @Duncan and John, thank you both and I have understood this. The reason I ask this question is we can't restore the boot volume of instance which is boot-from-volume, since Nova can't detach

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [all] To changes-since or not to changes-since

projects already have it.). 2015-08-11 6:34 GMT+08:00 Everett Toews everett.to...@rackspace.com: On Aug 9, 2015, at 11:03 PM, hao wang sxmatch1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, stackers Since now we have merged filtering guideline[1], is that said we should implement this feature according

Re: [openstack-dev] Detach a volume when it's under migration

I think cinder allow detach volume when it's under migration, but the volume status will not become 'detaching' or 'available'. See the code of begin_detaching in cinder: # If we are in the middle of a volume migration, we don't want the user # to see that the volume is

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [all] To changes-since or not to changes-since

Hi, stackers Since now we have merged filtering guideline[1], is that said we should implement this feature according this guideline? like this: *GET /app/items?f_updated_at=gte:some_timestamp* Do we have reached a consensus about this? 2015-06-19 17:07 GMT+08:00 Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Should we allow this kind of action?

I wonder why user need to use this kind of image(vm snapshot) to create volume, and then use this volume to create a vm again. It's meaningless I think. On the other hand, if an image size is zero, cinder shouldn't allow to create this volume from image. 2015-07-27 9:39 GMT+08:00 Zhenyu Zheng

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Question for availability_zone of cinder

, but I do worry that it encorages people to misunderstand or worse intentionally fake multiple AZs. On 19 July 2015 at 05:19, hao wang sxmatch1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi stackers, I found now cinder only can configure one storage_availability_zone for cinder-volume. If using multi-backend in one

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Question for availability_zone of cinder

types to identify redundant storage within one AZ, or there are scheduler hints to achieve the same effect. I think that you/we should work on making these concepts clearer to new-comers and admins, and help developers keep the distinction. On 20 July 2015 at 09:35, hao wang sxmatch1

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][cinder]A discussion about quota update lower than current usage.

under it'. It honestly sounds like the right thing to do here is to educate the admins who are surprised by the current behaviour, rather than to introduce a new behaviour that is fundamentally no better. On 13 July 2015 at 12:14, hao wang sxmatch1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Mike I'm not sure we

[openstack-dev] [cinder]Question for availability_zone of cinder

Hi stackers, I found now cinder only can configure one storage_availability_zone for cinder-volume. If using multi-backend in one cinder-volume node, could we have different AZ for each backend? So that we can specify each backend as a AZ and create volume in this AZ. Regards, Wang Hao

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][cinder]A discussion about quota update lower than current usage.

a alternatives, but it depends on the application which is top on cinder I think, and is hard to have consistent. 2015-07-11 7:24 GMT+08:00 Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com: On 12:30 Jul 10, hao wang wrote: Cinder now doesn't check the existing resource when user lower the quota. It's reasonable

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][cinder]A discussion about quota update lower than current usage.

), then it shouldn't break anything for all callers that don't use that new option. And for those that want the new behavior, they can always pass force set to false. Cheers, Gorka. On 10 Jul 2015 07:33, hao wang sxmatch1...@gmail.com wrote: Cinder now doesn't check the existing resource when

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [Taskflow]Review help to cinder bp:Implement function to manage/unmanage snapshots

Sure, I have got this review link. :) 2015-07-10 16:10 GMT+08:00 Dulko, Michal michal.du...@intel.com: Feel free to start the work. Right now I’m working on c-vol’s create_volume flow. Review is there: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/193167/ *From:* hao wang [mailto:sxmatch1

[openstack-dev] [openstack][cinder]A discussion about quota update lower than current usage.

Cinder now doesn't check the existing resource when user lower the quota. It's reasonable for admin can adjust the quota limit to lower level than current usage. But it also bring confusion that I have received to end user, they saw the current usage was more than limit, but they can't create

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][cinder]VMware: concurrent create two volumes, one is failed when vcenter session is timout

Thanks Vipin*, *it's very helpful. 2015-06-14 16:23 GMT+08:00 Vipin Balachandran vbalachand...@vmware.com: Sorry for the long delay. This is fixed in oslo.vmware 0.9.0. https://github.com/openstack/oslo.vmware/commit/a229faf8ba59724a4fda3f37d5a7473376f93d9c *From:* hao wang

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [Taskflow]Review help to cinder bp:Implement function to manage/unmanage snapshots

flow in manager. It seem simple enough but maybe there are some improvement that we can do to make it more readable. *From:* hao wang [mailto:sxmatch1...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, June 2, 2015 11:30 AM *To:* openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [Taskflow

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] [Taskflow]Review help to cinder bp:Implement function to manage/unmanage snapshots

Hi, folks, There is a cinder bp:Implement function to manage/unmanage snapshots( https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144590/), that we use taskflow to implement this feature. So I need your guys' help(cinder taskflow) to push this forward. Thanks. -- Best Wishes For You!

[openstack-dev] [openstack][cinder]VMware: concurrent create two volumes, one is failed when vcenter session is timout

The default timeout about vCenter server(5.5 used) is 30 minutes, so when session is timeout and then concurrent create two volumes through cinder API. There will be one of volumes creation failed. The error log is here: http://paste.openstack.org/show/246678/ Looks like if there is concurrent

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Some Changes to Cinder Core

Not a core, but still happy to +1 for Sean. His review is important to improve our work. Thanks to Avishay for your contribution in cinder. 2015-05-27 5:42 GMT+08:00 Ivan Kolodyazhny e...@e0ne.info: +1, Welcome to the team, Sean. Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 12:07

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder]Nova can't detach volume in init host routine

exception to make to set vm status to error,and user can re-perform a delete action to clean up successfully. 2.Add full set of cinder admin credentials in nova.conf(just like what neutron does with nova) and make sure nova can clean up in init_host On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:21 PM, hao wang

[openstack-dev] [nova][cinder]Nova can't detach volume in init host routine

Hi, everyone There is a Nova bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1408865. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147042/ The bug Scenario is: 1. create a vm using bootable volume. 2. delete this vm 3. restart service nova-compute when vm's task state is deleting. When nova-compute is up, vm

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Is there any way to put the driver backend error message to the horizon

I prefer to the sub-state with a bit more detail. It will be simple for horizon or others to get the more detail error message from cinder. Maybe we can define some template messages(according to kinds of error reason, more general) to avoid specify driver info back to end user. 2015-04-14 0:24

[openstack-dev] Wrong Test Cases

Hi, I have got one question: if there is something wrong with a test case, and it causes the review can proceed, what should I do? Thanks, Hao ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] How to know who has written the component?

Hello, I am dealing with the bug *1308958*. I have some questions with the details. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] How to know who has written the component?

designs of the specific component? Thanks, Hao On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Hao Wang hao.1.w...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I am dealing with the bug *1308958*. I have some questions with the details. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack