[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Bug statuses definition in Fuel

2015-02-24 Thread Mike Scherbakov
Hi Dmitry,
thanks for extending info on what is different in Fuel for Confirmed  Fix
Released statuses [1]

It is pretty hard to go in history of the page now, but I think I like
original OpenStack Imporance description in [2], than Fuel-specific [3]:

 - Critical = can't deploy anything and there's no trivial workaround; data
 loss; or security vulnerability

- High = specific hardware, configurations, or components are unusable and
 there's no workaround; or everything is broken but there's a workaround

So, can't deploy anything is Critical. If you can deploy cloud, but it
doesn't work afterwards - is not Critical anymore with current description.
I do not think that it is just High that you can't open Horizon page after
deployment.

Why don't we stick to the original OpenStack criteria?

 - Critical if the bug prevents a key feature from working properly
 (regression) for all users (or without a simple workaround) or result in
 data loss
 - High if the bug prevents a key feature from working properly for some
 users (or with a workaround)



[1]
https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=Fuel%2FHow_to_contributediff=73079oldid=72329
[2]
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/BugTriage#Task_2:_Prioritize_confirmed_bugs_.28bug_supervisors.29

[3]
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fuel/How_to_contribute#Confirm_and_triage_bugs

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Mescheryakov 
dmescherya...@mirantis.com wrote:

 Guys,

 I was looking for a page where bug statuses in out LP projects are
 described and found none. Mike suggested to add this to How To Contribute
 page and so I did. Please take a look at the section [1], just to make sure
 that we are on the same page. The status descriptions are located in the
 second from the top list.

 Thanks,

 Dmitry

 [1]
 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fuel/How_to_contribute#Confirm_and_triage_bugs




-- 
Mike Scherbakov
#mihgen
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Bug statuses definition in Fuel

2015-02-24 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
Mike,

I introduced the Fuel specific bug priority descriptions in June 2014
[0], which may be why you were having trouble finding it in the recent
changes.

[0] 
https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=Fuel%2FHow_to_contributediff=56952oldid=56951

I think you're using a weird definition of the word deploy: the way
I understand it, if your deployment has finished but the software you
deployed doesn't work, it means the deployment has failed. Since
Horizon is the primary means for most users to operate OpenStack,
unusable dashboard means unusable OpenStack means means deployment has
failed means the bug is Critical.

Still, your confusion proves the point that it's not obvious that
these criteria are offered *in addition* to the OpenStack criteria,
meant only to cover the cases where OpenStack criteria are too generic
or not applicable. I've rephrased the description of that list to make
it more obvious.


On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Mike Scherbakov
mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote:
 Hi Dmitry,
 thanks for extending info on what is different in Fuel for Confirmed  Fix
 Released statuses [1]

 It is pretty hard to go in history of the page now, but I think I like
 original OpenStack Imporance description in [2], than Fuel-specific [3]:

 - Critical = can't deploy anything and there's no trivial workaround; data
 loss; or security vulnerability

 - High = specific hardware, configurations, or components are unusable and
 there's no workaround; or everything is broken but there's a workaround

 So, can't deploy anything is Critical. If you can deploy cloud, but it
 doesn't work afterwards - is not Critical anymore with current description.
 I do not think that it is just High that you can't open Horizon page after
 deployment.

 Why don't we stick to the original OpenStack criteria?

 - Critical if the bug prevents a key feature from working properly
 (regression) for all users (or without a simple workaround) or result in
 data loss
 - High if the bug prevents a key feature from working properly for some
 users (or with a workaround)



 [1]
 https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=Fuel%2FHow_to_contributediff=73079oldid=72329
 [2]
 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/BugTriage#Task_2:_Prioritize_confirmed_bugs_.28bug_supervisors.29
 [3]
 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fuel/How_to_contribute#Confirm_and_triage_bugs

 On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Dmitry Mescheryakov
 dmescherya...@mirantis.com wrote:

 Guys,

 I was looking for a page where bug statuses in out LP projects are
 described and found none. Mike suggested to add this to How To Contribute
 page and so I did. Please take a look at the section [1], just to make sure
 that we are on the same page. The status descriptions are located in the
 second from the top list.

 Thanks,

 Dmitry

 [1]
 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fuel/How_to_contribute#Confirm_and_triage_bugs




 --
 Mike Scherbakov
 #mihgen


 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




-- 
Dmitry Borodaenko

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev