Hi folks,
I want to bring this topic up again. We had a blocker in Fuel-Web
project - Evgeniy L found a bug for old releases, so I had to add data
migration.
Today I built a new ISO and it successfully passed BVT tests. So I
would ask you to merge this patches if there are no objections.
Thanks,
Folks,
BVT tests are passed successfully.
What about merging?
Thanks,
Igor
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Igor Kalnitsky
wrote:
> As I mentioned early, I already have an ISO with patches and it works
> fine in my own deployment.
>
> However, I ran the BVT tests on centos [1] and ubuntu [2].
As I mentioned early, I already have an ISO with patches and it works
fine in my own deployment.
However, I ran the BVT tests on centos [1] and ubuntu [2].
[1]:
http://jenkins-product.srt.mirantis.net:8080/view/custom_iso/job/custom.centos.bvt_1/198/
[2]:
http://jenkins-product.srt.mirantis.net
I have no objections, and essentially I'm for such initiatives at the
beginning of development cycle, when risks are lower.
If we ensure tests coverage, and do it carefully (for instance, building
custom ISO with changes and making sure it passes BVTs), then let's do it.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:0
+1. It was a legacy item and it should go away. I'll review the patches.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Igor Kalnitsky wrote:
> Hi fuelers,
>
> I'm going to propose you remove "fuelweb" word from repos' paths. What
> am I talking about? Let me show you.
>
> Currently we have the following paths
I do not have any objections about removing legacy "fuelweb" suffix from
our repo URLs. So I am +1 here.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Igor Kalnitsky
wrote:
> Hi fuelers,
>
> I'm going to propose you remove "fuelweb" word from repos' paths. What
> am I talking about? Let me show you.
>
> Curre
Hi fuelers,
I'm going to propose you remove "fuelweb" word from repos' paths. What
am I talking about? Let me show you.
Currently we have the following paths to repos:
/var/www/nailgun/2014.2-6.0/centos/fuelweb/x86_64/
/var/www/nailgun/2014.2-6.0/ubuntu/fuelweb/x86_64/
Obviously, the wo
