Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

[Tomasz Napierala]

Sorry, I just mixed the names ;)

> On 15 Apr 2015, at 18:25, Igor Kalnitsky  wrote:
> 
> Tomasz, multi-node mode is a legacy non-HA mode with only 1
> controller. Currently, our so-called HA mode support deployment with 1
> controller, so it makes no sense to support both modes.
> 
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Tomasz Napierala
>  wrote:
>> Do you mean single node?
>> 
>>> On 15 Apr 2015, at 17:04, Dmitry Pyzhov  wrote:
>>> 
>>> FYI. We are going to disable Multi-node mode on UI even in experimental 
>>> mode. And we will remove related code from nailgun in 7.0.
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1428054
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Aleksandr Didenko  
>>> wrote:
>>> What do you guys think about switching CentOS CI job [1] to HA with single 
>>> controller (1 controller + 1 or 2 computes)? Just to verify that our 
>>> replacement of Simple mode works fine.
>>> 
>>> [1] 
>>> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Mike Scherbakov 
>>>  wrote:
>>> Thanks Igor for the quick turn over, excellent!
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Igor Belikov  wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>> 
>>> Changes in CI jobs have been made, for master branch of fuel-library we are 
>>> running CentOS HA + Nova VLAN and Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN .
>>> Job naming schema has also been changed, so now it includes actual 
>>> testgroup. Current links for master branch CI jobs are [1] and [2], all 
>>> other jobs can be found here[3] or will show up in your gerrit reviews.
>>> ISO and environments have been updated to the latest ones.
>>> 
>>> [1]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/
>>> [2]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.ubuntu.ha_neutron_vlan/
>>> [3]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com
>>> --
>>> Igor Belikov
>>> Fuel DevOps
>>> ibeli...@mirantis.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 On 29 Jan 2015, at 13:42, Aleksandr Didenko  wrote:
 
 Mike,
 
> Any objections / additional suggestions?
 
 no objections from me, and it's already covered by LP 1415116 bug [1]
 
 [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1415116
 
 On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Mike Scherbakov 
  wrote:
 Folks,
 one of the things we should not forget about - is out Fuel CI gating 
 jobs/tests. [1], [2].
 
 One of them is actually runs simple mode. Unfortunately, I don't see 
 details about tests ran for [1], [2], but I'm pretty sure it's same set as 
 [3], [4].
 
 I suggest to change tests. First of all, we need to get rid of simple runs 
 (since we are deprecating it), and second - I'd like us to run Ubuntu HA + 
 Neutron VLAN for one of the tests.
 
 Any objections / additional suggestions?
 
 [1] 
 https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_centos/
 [2] 
 https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/
 [3] 
 https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_centos/
 [4] 
 https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/
 
 On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Vasilenko 
  wrote:
 +1 to replace simple to HA with one controller
 
 /sv
 
 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 
 
 
 
 --
 Mike Scherbakov
 #mihgen
 
 
 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 
 
 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> 
>>> 
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Mike Scherbakov
>>> #mihgen
>>> 
>>> 
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> 
>>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

[Igor Kalnitsky]

Tomasz, multi-node mode is a legacy non-HA mode with only 1
controller. Currently, our so-called HA mode support deployment with 1
controller, so it makes no sense to support both modes.

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Tomasz Napierala
 wrote:
> Do you mean single node?
>
>> On 15 Apr 2015, at 17:04, Dmitry Pyzhov  wrote:
>>
>> FYI. We are going to disable Multi-node mode on UI even in experimental 
>> mode. And we will remove related code from nailgun in 7.0.
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1428054
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Aleksandr Didenko  
>> wrote:
>> What do you guys think about switching CentOS CI job [1] to HA with single 
>> controller (1 controller + 1 or 2 computes)? Just to verify that our 
>> replacement of Simple mode works fine.
>>
>> [1] 
>> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Mike Scherbakov  
>> wrote:
>> Thanks Igor for the quick turn over, excellent!
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Igor Belikov  wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> Changes in CI jobs have been made, for master branch of fuel-library we are 
>> running CentOS HA + Nova VLAN and Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN .
>> Job naming schema has also been changed, so now it includes actual 
>> testgroup. Current links for master branch CI jobs are [1] and [2], all 
>> other jobs can be found here[3] or will show up in your gerrit reviews.
>> ISO and environments have been updated to the latest ones.
>>
>> [1]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/
>> [2]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.ubuntu.ha_neutron_vlan/
>> [3]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com
>> --
>> Igor Belikov
>> Fuel DevOps
>> ibeli...@mirantis.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 29 Jan 2015, at 13:42, Aleksandr Didenko  wrote:
>>>
>>> Mike,
>>>
>>> > Any objections / additional suggestions?
>>>
>>> no objections from me, and it's already covered by LP 1415116 bug [1]
>>>
>>> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1415116
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Mike Scherbakov  
>>> wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>> one of the things we should not forget about - is out Fuel CI gating 
>>> jobs/tests. [1], [2].
>>>
>>> One of them is actually runs simple mode. Unfortunately, I don't see 
>>> details about tests ran for [1], [2], but I'm pretty sure it's same set as 
>>> [3], [4].
>>>
>>> I suggest to change tests. First of all, we need to get rid of simple runs 
>>> (since we are deprecating it), and second - I'd like us to run Ubuntu HA + 
>>> Neutron VLAN for one of the tests.
>>>
>>> Any objections / additional suggestions?
>>>
>>> [1] 
>>> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_centos/
>>> [2] 
>>> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/
>>> [3] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_centos/
>>> [4] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Vasilenko  
>>> wrote:
>>> +1 to replace simple to HA with one controller
>>>
>>> /sv
>>>
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mike Scherbakov
>>> #mihgen
>>>
>>>
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mike Scherbakov
>> #mihgen
>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

[Tomasz Napierala]

Do you mean single node?

> On 15 Apr 2015, at 17:04, Dmitry Pyzhov  wrote:
> 
> FYI. We are going to disable Multi-node mode on UI even in experimental mode. 
> And we will remove related code from nailgun in 7.0.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1428054
> 
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Aleksandr Didenko  
> wrote:
> What do you guys think about switching CentOS CI job [1] to HA with single 
> controller (1 controller + 1 or 2 computes)? Just to verify that our 
> replacement of Simple mode works fine.
> 
> [1] 
> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/
> 
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Mike Scherbakov  
> wrote:
> Thanks Igor for the quick turn over, excellent!
> 
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Igor Belikov  wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> Changes in CI jobs have been made, for master branch of fuel-library we are 
> running CentOS HA + Nova VLAN and Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN .
> Job naming schema has also been changed, so now it includes actual testgroup. 
> Current links for master branch CI jobs are [1] and [2], all other jobs can 
> be found here[3] or will show up in your gerrit reviews.
> ISO and environments have been updated to the latest ones.
> 
> [1]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/
> [2]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.ubuntu.ha_neutron_vlan/
> [3]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com
> --
> Igor Belikov
> Fuel DevOps
> ibeli...@mirantis.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 29 Jan 2015, at 13:42, Aleksandr Didenko  wrote:
>> 
>> Mike,
>> 
>> > Any objections / additional suggestions?
>> 
>> no objections from me, and it's already covered by LP 1415116 bug [1]
>> 
>> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1415116
>> 
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Mike Scherbakov  
>> wrote:
>> Folks,
>> one of the things we should not forget about - is out Fuel CI gating 
>> jobs/tests. [1], [2].
>> 
>> One of them is actually runs simple mode. Unfortunately, I don't see details 
>> about tests ran for [1], [2], but I'm pretty sure it's same set as [3], [4].
>> 
>> I suggest to change tests. First of all, we need to get rid of simple runs 
>> (since we are deprecating it), and second - I'd like us to run Ubuntu HA + 
>> Neutron VLAN for one of the tests.
>> 
>> Any objections / additional suggestions?
>> 
>> [1] 
>> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_centos/
>> [2] 
>> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/
>> [3] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_centos/
>> [4] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/
>> 
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Vasilenko  
>> wrote:
>> +1 to replace simple to HA with one controller
>> 
>> /sv
>> 
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Mike Scherbakov
>> #mihgen
>> 
>> 
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> 
>> 
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mike Scherbakov
> #mihgen
> 
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-- 
Tomasz 'Zen' Napierala
Prod

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

[Dmitry Pyzhov]

FYI. We are going to disable Multi-node mode on UI even in experimental
mode. And we will remove related code from nailgun in 7.0.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1428054

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Aleksandr Didenko 
wrote:

> What do you guys think about switching CentOS CI job [1] to HA with single
> controller (1 controller + 1 or 2 computes)? Just to verify that our
> replacement of Simple mode works fine.
>
> [1]
> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Mike Scherbakov <
> mscherba...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Igor for the quick turn over, excellent!
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Igor Belikov 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> Changes in CI jobs have been made, for master branch of fuel-library we
>>> are running CentOS HA + Nova VLAN and Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN .
>>> Job naming schema has also been changed, so now it includes actual
>>> testgroup. Current links for master branch CI jobs are [1] and [2], all
>>> other jobs can be found here[3] or will show up in your gerrit reviews.
>>> ISO and environments have been updated to the latest ones.
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/
>>> [2]
>>> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.ubuntu.ha_neutron_vlan/
>>> [3]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com
>>> --
>>> Igor Belikov
>>> Fuel DevOps
>>> ibeli...@mirantis.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 29 Jan 2015, at 13:42, Aleksandr Didenko 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Mike,
>>>
>>> > Any objections / additional suggestions?
>>>
>>> no objections from me, and it's already covered by LP 1415116 bug [1]
>>>
>>> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1415116
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Mike Scherbakov <
>>> mscherba...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>>>
 Folks,
 one of the things we should not forget about - is out Fuel CI gating
 jobs/tests. [1], [2].

 One of them is actually runs simple mode. Unfortunately, I don't see
 details about tests ran for [1], [2], but I'm pretty sure it's same set as
 [3], [4].

 I suggest to change tests. First of all, we need to get rid of simple
 runs (since we are deprecating it), and second - I'd like us to run Ubuntu
 HA + Neutron VLAN for one of the tests.

 Any objections / additional suggestions?

 [1]
 https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_centos/
 [2]
 https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/
 [3]
 https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_centos/
 [4]
 https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/

 On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Vasilenko <
 svasile...@mirantis.com> wrote:

> +1 to replace simple to HA with one controller
>
> /sv
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe:
> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> 
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


 --
 Mike Scherbakov
 #mihgen



 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe:
 openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


>>>
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
>>> ?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mike Scherbakov
>> #mihgen
>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

[Aleksandr Didenko]

What do you guys think about switching CentOS CI job [1] to HA with single
controller (1 controller + 1 or 2 computes)? Just to verify that our
replacement of Simple mode works fine.

[1]
https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Mike Scherbakov 
wrote:

> Thanks Igor for the quick turn over, excellent!
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Igor Belikov 
> wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> Changes in CI jobs have been made, for master branch of fuel-library we
>> are running CentOS HA + Nova VLAN and Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN .
>> Job naming schema has also been changed, so now it includes actual
>> testgroup. Current links for master branch CI jobs are [1] and [2], all
>> other jobs can be found here[3] or will show up in your gerrit reviews.
>> ISO and environments have been updated to the latest ones.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/
>> [2]
>> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.ubuntu.ha_neutron_vlan/
>> [3]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com
>> --
>> Igor Belikov
>> Fuel DevOps
>> ibeli...@mirantis.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 29 Jan 2015, at 13:42, Aleksandr Didenko 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Mike,
>>
>> > Any objections / additional suggestions?
>>
>> no objections from me, and it's already covered by LP 1415116 bug [1]
>>
>> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1415116
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Mike Scherbakov <
>> mscherba...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Folks,
>>> one of the things we should not forget about - is out Fuel CI gating
>>> jobs/tests. [1], [2].
>>>
>>> One of them is actually runs simple mode. Unfortunately, I don't see
>>> details about tests ran for [1], [2], but I'm pretty sure it's same set as
>>> [3], [4].
>>>
>>> I suggest to change tests. First of all, we need to get rid of simple
>>> runs (since we are deprecating it), and second - I'd like us to run Ubuntu
>>> HA + Neutron VLAN for one of the tests.
>>>
>>> Any objections / additional suggestions?
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_centos/
>>> [2]
>>> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/
>>> [3]
>>> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_centos/
>>> [4]
>>> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Vasilenko <
>>> svasile...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>>>
 +1 to replace simple to HA with one controller

 /sv


 __
 OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 Unsubscribe:
 openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
 
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mike Scherbakov
>>> #mihgen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> 
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org
>> ?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Mike Scherbakov
> #mihgen
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

[Mike Scherbakov]

Thanks Igor for the quick turn over, excellent!

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Igor Belikov  wrote:

> Folks,
>
> Changes in CI jobs have been made, for master branch of fuel-library we
> are running CentOS HA + Nova VLAN and Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN .
> Job naming schema has also been changed, so now it includes actual
> testgroup. Current links for master branch CI jobs are [1] and [2], all
> other jobs can be found here[3] or will show up in your gerrit reviews.
> ISO and environments have been updated to the latest ones.
>
> [1]
> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/
> [2]
> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.ubuntu.ha_neutron_vlan/
> [3]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com
> --
> Igor Belikov
> Fuel DevOps
> ibeli...@mirantis.com
>
>
>
>
>
> On 29 Jan 2015, at 13:42, Aleksandr Didenko  wrote:
>
> Mike,
>
> > Any objections / additional suggestions?
>
> no objections from me, and it's already covered by LP 1415116 bug [1]
>
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1415116
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Mike Scherbakov  > wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>> one of the things we should not forget about - is out Fuel CI gating
>> jobs/tests. [1], [2].
>>
>> One of them is actually runs simple mode. Unfortunately, I don't see
>> details about tests ran for [1], [2], but I'm pretty sure it's same set as
>> [3], [4].
>>
>> I suggest to change tests. First of all, we need to get rid of simple
>> runs (since we are deprecating it), and second - I'd like us to run Ubuntu
>> HA + Neutron VLAN for one of the tests.
>>
>> Any objections / additional suggestions?
>>
>> [1]
>> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_centos/
>> [2]
>> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/
>> [3]
>> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_centos/
>> [4]
>> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Vasilenko <
>> svasile...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 to replace simple to HA with one controller
>>>
>>> /sv
>>>
>>>
>>> __
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> 
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mike Scherbakov
>> #mihgen
>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> 
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Mike Scherbakov
#mihgen
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

[Igor Belikov]

Folks,

Changes in CI jobs have been made, for master branch of fuel-library we are 
running CentOS HA + Nova VLAN and Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN .
Job naming schema has also been changed, so now it includes actual testgroup. 
Current links for master branch CI jobs are [1] and [2], all other jobs can be 
found here[3] or will show up in your gerrit reviews.
ISO and environments have been updated to the latest ones.

[1]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/
 

[2]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.ubuntu.ha_neutron_vlan/
 

[3]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com 
--
Igor Belikov
Fuel DevOps
ibeli...@mirantis.com





> On 29 Jan 2015, at 13:42, Aleksandr Didenko  wrote:
> 
> Mike,
> 
> > Any objections / additional suggestions?
> 
> no objections from me, and it's already covered by LP 1415116 bug [1]
> 
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1415116 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Mike Scherbakov  > wrote:
> Folks,
> one of the things we should not forget about - is out Fuel CI gating 
> jobs/tests. [1], [2].
> 
> One of them is actually runs simple mode. Unfortunately, I don't see details 
> about tests ran for [1], [2], but I'm pretty sure it's same set as [3], [4].
> 
> I suggest to change tests. First of all, we need to get rid of simple runs 
> (since we are deprecating it), and second - I'd like us to run Ubuntu HA + 
> Neutron VLAN for one of the tests.
> 
> Any objections / additional suggestions?
> 
> [1] 
> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_centos/ 
> 
> [2] 
> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/ 
> 
> [3] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_centos/ 
> 
> [4] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/ 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Vasilenko  > wrote:
> +1 to replace simple to HA with one controller
> 
> /sv
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe 
> 
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mike Scherbakov
> #mihgen
> 
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe 
> 
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev 
> 
> 
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

[Aleksandr Didenko]

Mike,

> Any objections / additional suggestions?

no objections from me, and it's already covered by LP 1415116 bug [1]

[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1415116

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Mike Scherbakov 
wrote:

> Folks,
> one of the things we should not forget about - is out Fuel CI gating
> jobs/tests. [1], [2].
>
> One of them is actually runs simple mode. Unfortunately, I don't see
> details about tests ran for [1], [2], but I'm pretty sure it's same set as
> [3], [4].
>
> I suggest to change tests. First of all, we need to get rid of simple runs
> (since we are deprecating it), and second - I'd like us to run Ubuntu HA +
> Neutron VLAN for one of the tests.
>
> Any objections / additional suggestions?
>
> [1]
> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_centos/
> [2]
> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/
> [3]
> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_centos/
> [4]
> https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Vasilenko  > wrote:
>
>> +1 to replace simple to HA with one controller
>>
>> /sv
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Mike Scherbakov
> #mihgen
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

[Mike Scherbakov]

Folks,
one of the things we should not forget about - is out Fuel CI gating
jobs/tests. [1], [2].

One of them is actually runs simple mode. Unfortunately, I don't see
details about tests ran for [1], [2], but I'm pretty sure it's same set as
[3], [4].

I suggest to change tests. First of all, we need to get rid of simple runs
(since we are deprecating it), and second - I'd like us to run Ubuntu HA +
Neutron VLAN for one of the tests.

Any objections / additional suggestions?

[1]
https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_centos/
[2]
https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/
[3] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_centos/
[4] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Vasilenko 
wrote:

> +1 to replace simple to HA with one controller
>
> /sv
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Mike Scherbakov
#mihgen
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

[Sergey Vasilenko]

+1 to replace simple to HA with one controller

/sv
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

[Dmitriy Shulyak]

> not to prolong single mode, I'd like to see it die. However we will
> need to be able to add, change, remove, or noop portions of the tasks
> graph in the future. Many of the plugins that cant currently be built
> would rely on being able to sub out parts of the graph. How is that
> going to factor into granular deployments?
>

There is several ways to achieve "noop" task:

1. By condition on task itself (same expression parser that is used for UI
validation).
Right now we are able to add condtion like, cluster:mode != multinode,
but the problem is additional complexity to support different chains of
tasks, and additional refactoring in library.
2. Skip particular task in deployment API call

As for plugins and add/stubout/change - all of this is possible, there is
no plugins API for that stuff,
and we will need to think what exactly we want to expose, but from granular
deployment perspective
it is just a matter of changing data for particular task in graph
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

[Andrew Woodward]

not to prolong single mode, I'd like to see it die. However we will
need to be able to add, change, remove, or noop portions of the tasks
graph in the future. Many of the plugins that cant currently be built
would rely on being able to sub out parts of the graph. How is that
going to factor into granular deployments?

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Aleksandr Didenko
 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After starting implementing granular deployment we've faced a bunch of
> issues that would make further development of this feature much more
> complicated if we have to support both Simple and HA deployment modes. For
> example: simple mode does not require cluster (corosync, pacemaker, vips,
> etc), so we had to skip this task for Simple mode somehow - we can use
> conditional tasks, or conditional manifests in our tasks, or create separate
> task graphs for different deployment modes, etc - either way it's pretty
> much doubling the amount of work for some parts of Fuel and our development
> cycle.
>
> At the moment, CI blocks us from further development of fuel-library
> modularization BP [2] because we still use Simple mode in CI. So in order to
> proceed with this BP we have two options:
>
> 1) remove Simple mode from CI/QA and thus drop it completely from Fuel
> 2) double our efforts to support both Simple and HA modes in granular
> deployment
>
> We have a BP about single-controller HA [1]. HA with single controller works
> just fine at the moment. So if you want to test Fuel on a minimum set of
> nodes, you can do this on 3 nodes (Fuel master, controller, compute), just
> like with Simple mode before. I suppose, it's time to finally drop support
> for Simple mode in Fuel :)
>
> [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/single-controller-ha
> [2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/fuel-library-modularization
>
> --
> Regards,
> Aleksandr Didenko
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Mike Scherbakov 
> wrote:
>>
>> Definitely fuel spec is needed :)
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Evgeniy L  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> I have some comments regarding to you action items
>>>
>>> >> 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests
>>> >> 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and
>>> >> cli
>>>
>>> We shouldn't do it, because nailgun should handle both versions of
>>> cluster.
>>> What we have to do here is to use openstack.yaml to keep all possible
>>> modes.
>>> For new release there will be only ha, to manage previous releases we
>>> have
>>> to create data migrations in nailgun to create the filed with modes i.e.
>>> multinode
>>> and ha.
>>>
>>> Also fixes for ui are required too, I think it mostly related to wizard,
>>> 'mode' tab
>>> where use can chose ha or non ha cluster in case of new release there
>>> should
>>> be only ha, and in case of old releases there should be ha and multinode.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Andrew Woodward 
>>> wrote:

 Started a new thread so that we don't hijack the older thread.
  as

>
> Andrew, will you work on it in 6.0? What are remaining items there?
> Also, it might affect our tests - simple mode runs faster so we use it for
> smoke ISO test. Anastasia, please confirm that we can switch smoke to
> one-ha-controller model, or even drop smoke at all and use BVT only 
> (running
> CentOS 3 HA controllers and same with Ubuntu).


 The primary reason that we haven't disabled single yet is was due to [0]
 where we where having problems adding additional controllers. With the
 changes to galera and rabbit clustering it appears that we ended up fixing
 it already.

 The remaining issues are:
 1) Ensuring we have good test coverage for the cases we expect to
 support [1]
 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests
 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli
 4) Updating documentation

 [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266
 [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266/comments/7

 --
 Andrew
 Mirantis
 Ceph community

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mike Scherbakov
>> #mihgen
>>
>>
>> ___
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-re

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

[Tomasz Napierala]

+1, long awaited


> On 27 Jan 2015, at 14:05, Aleksandr Didenko  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> After starting implementing granular deployment we've faced a bunch of issues 
> that would make further development of this feature much more complicated if 
> we have to support both Simple and HA deployment modes. For example: simple 
> mode does not require cluster (corosync, pacemaker, vips, etc), so we had to 
> skip this task for Simple mode somehow - we can use conditional tasks, or 
> conditional manifests in our tasks, or create separate task graphs for 
> different deployment modes, etc - either way it's pretty much doubling the 
> amount of work for some parts of Fuel and our development cycle.
> 
> At the moment, CI blocks us from further development of fuel-library 
> modularization BP [2] because we still use Simple mode in CI. So in order to 
> proceed with this BP we have two options:
> 
> 1) remove Simple mode from CI/QA and thus drop it completely from Fuel
> 2) double our efforts to support both Simple and HA modes in granular 
> deployment
> 
> We have a BP about single-controller HA [1]. HA with single controller works 
> just fine at the moment. So if you want to test Fuel on a minimum set of 
> nodes, you can do this on 3 nodes (Fuel master, controller, compute), just 
> like with Simple mode before. I suppose, it's time to finally drop support 
> for Simple mode in Fuel :)
> 
> [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/single-controller-ha
> [2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/fuel-library-modularization
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Aleksandr Didenko
> 
> 
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Mike Scherbakov  
> wrote:
> Definitely fuel spec is needed :)
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Evgeniy L  wrote:
> Hi Andrew, 
> 
> I have some comments regarding to you action items
> 
> >> 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests
> >> 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli
> 
> We shouldn't do it, because nailgun should handle both versions of cluster.
> What we have to do here is to use openstack.yaml to keep all possible modes.
> For new release there will be only ha, to manage previous releases we have
> to create data migrations in nailgun to create the filed with modes i.e. 
> multinode
> and ha.
> 
> Also fixes for ui are required too, I think it mostly related to wizard, 
> 'mode' tab
> where use can chose ha or non ha cluster in case of new release there should
> be only ha, and in case of old releases there should be ha and multinode.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Andrew Woodward  wrote:
> Started a new thread so that we don't hijack the older thread.
>  as 
>  
> Andrew, will you work on it in 6.0? What are remaining items there? Also, it 
> might affect our tests - simple mode runs faster so we use it for smoke ISO 
> test. Anastasia, please confirm that we can switch smoke to one-ha-controller 
> model, or even drop smoke at all and use BVT only (running CentOS 3 HA 
> controllers and same with Ubuntu).
> 
> The primary reason that we haven't disabled single yet is was due to [0] 
> where we where having problems adding additional controllers. With the 
> changes to galera and rabbit clustering it appears that we ended up fixing it 
> already.
> 
> The remaining issues are:
> 1) Ensuring we have good test coverage for the cases we expect to support [1]
> 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests
> 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli
> 4) Updating documentation
> 
> [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266/comments/7
> 
> -- 
> Andrew
> Mirantis
> Ceph community
> 
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mike Scherbakov
> #mihgen
> 
> 
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-- 
Tomasz 'Zen' Napierala
Sr. OpenStack Engineer
tnapier...@mirantis.com







__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

[Vladimir Kuklin]

+1 to simple mode removal

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Stanislaw Bogatkin 
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Aleksandr Didenko 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> After starting implementing granular deployment we've faced a bunch of
>> issues that would make further development of this feature much more
>> complicated if we have to support both Simple and HA deployment modes. For
>> example: simple mode does not require cluster (corosync, pacemaker, vips,
>> etc), so we had to skip this task for Simple mode somehow - we can use
>> conditional tasks, or conditional manifests in our tasks, or create
>> separate task graphs for different deployment modes, etc - either way it's
>> pretty much doubling the amount of work for some parts of Fuel and our
>> development cycle.
>>
>> At the moment, CI blocks us from further development of fuel-library
>> modularization BP [2] because we still use Simple mode in CI. So in order
>> to proceed with this BP we have two options:
>>
>> 1) remove Simple mode from CI/QA and thus drop it completely from Fuel
>> 2) double our efforts to support both Simple and HA modes in granular
>> deployment
>>
>> We have a BP about single-controller HA [1]. HA with single controller
>> works just fine at the moment. So if you want to test Fuel on a minimum set
>> of nodes, you can do this on 3 nodes (Fuel master, controller, compute),
>> just like with Simple mode before. I suppose, it's time to finally drop
>> support for Simple mode in Fuel :)
>>
>> [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/single-controller-ha
>> [2]
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/fuel-library-modularization
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Aleksandr Didenko
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Mike Scherbakov <
>> mscherba...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Definitely fuel spec is needed :)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Evgeniy L  wrote:
>>>
 Hi Andrew,

 I have some comments regarding to you action items

 >> 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests
 >> 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and
 cli

 We shouldn't do it, because nailgun should handle both versions of
 cluster.
 What we have to do here is to use openstack.yaml to keep all possible
 modes.
 For new release there will be only ha, to manage previous releases we
 have
 to create data migrations in nailgun to create the filed with modes
 i.e. multinode
 and ha.

 Also fixes for ui are required too, I think it mostly related to
 wizard, 'mode' tab
 where use can chose ha or non ha cluster in case of new release there
 should
 be only ha, and in case of old releases there should be ha and
 multinode.

 Thanks,



  On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Andrew Woodward 
 wrote:

>  Started a new thread so that we don't hijack the older thread.
>  as
>
>
>> Andrew, will you work on it in 6.0? What are remaining items there?
>> Also, it might affect our tests - simple mode runs faster so we use it 
>> for
>> smoke ISO test. Anastasia, please confirm that we can switch smoke to
>> one-ha-controller model, or even drop smoke at all and use BVT only
>> (running CentOS 3 HA controllers and same with Ubuntu).
>>
>
> The primary reason that we haven't disabled single yet is was due to
> [0] where we where having problems adding additional controllers. With the
> changes to galera and rabbit clustering it appears that we ended up fixing
> it already.
>
> The remaining issues are:
> 1) Ensuring we have good test coverage for the cases we expect to
> support [1]
> 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests
> 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and
> cli
> 4) Updating documentation
>
> [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266/comments/7
>
> --
> Andrew
> Mirantis
> Ceph community
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mike Scherbakov
>>> #mihgen
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubsc

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

[Sergii Golovatiuk]

+1

--
Best regards,
Sergii Golovatiuk,
Skype #golserge
IRC #holser

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Stanislaw Bogatkin 
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Aleksandr Didenko 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> After starting implementing granular deployment we've faced a bunch of
>> issues that would make further development of this feature much more
>> complicated if we have to support both Simple and HA deployment modes. For
>> example: simple mode does not require cluster (corosync, pacemaker, vips,
>> etc), so we had to skip this task for Simple mode somehow - we can use
>> conditional tasks, or conditional manifests in our tasks, or create
>> separate task graphs for different deployment modes, etc - either way it's
>> pretty much doubling the amount of work for some parts of Fuel and our
>> development cycle.
>>
>> At the moment, CI blocks us from further development of fuel-library
>> modularization BP [2] because we still use Simple mode in CI. So in order
>> to proceed with this BP we have two options:
>>
>> 1) remove Simple mode from CI/QA and thus drop it completely from Fuel
>> 2) double our efforts to support both Simple and HA modes in granular
>> deployment
>>
>> We have a BP about single-controller HA [1]. HA with single controller
>> works just fine at the moment. So if you want to test Fuel on a minimum set
>> of nodes, you can do this on 3 nodes (Fuel master, controller, compute),
>> just like with Simple mode before. I suppose, it's time to finally drop
>> support for Simple mode in Fuel :)
>>
>> [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/single-controller-ha
>> [2]
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/fuel-library-modularization
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Aleksandr Didenko
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Mike Scherbakov <
>> mscherba...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Definitely fuel spec is needed :)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Evgeniy L  wrote:
>>>
 Hi Andrew,

 I have some comments regarding to you action items

 >> 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests
 >> 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and
 cli

 We shouldn't do it, because nailgun should handle both versions of
 cluster.
 What we have to do here is to use openstack.yaml to keep all possible
 modes.
 For new release there will be only ha, to manage previous releases we
 have
 to create data migrations in nailgun to create the filed with modes
 i.e. multinode
 and ha.

 Also fixes for ui are required too, I think it mostly related to
 wizard, 'mode' tab
 where use can chose ha or non ha cluster in case of new release there
 should
 be only ha, and in case of old releases there should be ha and
 multinode.

 Thanks,



  On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Andrew Woodward 
 wrote:

>  Started a new thread so that we don't hijack the older thread.
>  as
>
>
>> Andrew, will you work on it in 6.0? What are remaining items there?
>> Also, it might affect our tests - simple mode runs faster so we use it 
>> for
>> smoke ISO test. Anastasia, please confirm that we can switch smoke to
>> one-ha-controller model, or even drop smoke at all and use BVT only
>> (running CentOS 3 HA controllers and same with Ubuntu).
>>
>
> The primary reason that we haven't disabled single yet is was due to
> [0] where we where having problems adding additional controllers. With the
> changes to galera and rabbit clustering it appears that we ended up fixing
> it already.
>
> The remaining issues are:
> 1) Ensuring we have good test coverage for the cases we expect to
> support [1]
> 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests
> 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and
> cli
> 4) Updating documentation
>
> [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266/comments/7
>
> --
> Andrew
> Mirantis
> Ceph community
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mike Scherbakov
>>> #mihgen
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-r

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

[Stanislaw Bogatkin]

+1

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Aleksandr Didenko 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> After starting implementing granular deployment we've faced a bunch of
> issues that would make further development of this feature much more
> complicated if we have to support both Simple and HA deployment modes. For
> example: simple mode does not require cluster (corosync, pacemaker, vips,
> etc), so we had to skip this task for Simple mode somehow - we can use
> conditional tasks, or conditional manifests in our tasks, or create
> separate task graphs for different deployment modes, etc - either way it's
> pretty much doubling the amount of work for some parts of Fuel and our
> development cycle.
>
> At the moment, CI blocks us from further development of fuel-library
> modularization BP [2] because we still use Simple mode in CI. So in order
> to proceed with this BP we have two options:
>
> 1) remove Simple mode from CI/QA and thus drop it completely from Fuel
> 2) double our efforts to support both Simple and HA modes in granular
> deployment
>
> We have a BP about single-controller HA [1]. HA with single controller
> works just fine at the moment. So if you want to test Fuel on a minimum set
> of nodes, you can do this on 3 nodes (Fuel master, controller, compute),
> just like with Simple mode before. I suppose, it's time to finally drop
> support for Simple mode in Fuel :)
>
> [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/single-controller-ha
> [2]
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/fuel-library-modularization
>
> --
> Regards,
> Aleksandr Didenko
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Mike Scherbakov  > wrote:
>
>> Definitely fuel spec is needed :)
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Evgeniy L  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> I have some comments regarding to you action items
>>>
>>> >> 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests
>>> >> 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and
>>> cli
>>>
>>> We shouldn't do it, because nailgun should handle both versions of
>>> cluster.
>>> What we have to do here is to use openstack.yaml to keep all possible
>>> modes.
>>> For new release there will be only ha, to manage previous releases we
>>> have
>>> to create data migrations in nailgun to create the filed with modes i.e.
>>> multinode
>>> and ha.
>>>
>>> Also fixes for ui are required too, I think it mostly related to wizard,
>>> 'mode' tab
>>> where use can chose ha or non ha cluster in case of new release there
>>> should
>>> be only ha, and in case of old releases there should be ha and multinode.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Andrew Woodward 
>>> wrote:
>>>
  Started a new thread so that we don't hijack the older thread.
  as


> Andrew, will you work on it in 6.0? What are remaining items there?
> Also, it might affect our tests - simple mode runs faster so we use it for
> smoke ISO test. Anastasia, please confirm that we can switch smoke to
> one-ha-controller model, or even drop smoke at all and use BVT only
> (running CentOS 3 HA controllers and same with Ubuntu).
>

 The primary reason that we haven't disabled single yet is was due to
 [0] where we where having problems adding additional controllers. With the
 changes to galera and rabbit clustering it appears that we ended up fixing
 it already.

 The remaining issues are:
 1) Ensuring we have good test coverage for the cases we expect to
 support [1]
 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests
 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli
 4) Updating documentation

 [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266
 [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266/comments/7

 --
 Andrew
 Mirantis
 Ceph community

 ___
 OpenStack-dev mailing list
 OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
 http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


>>>
>>> ___
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mike Scherbakov
>> #mihgen
>>
>>
>> ___
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsu

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

[Aleksandr Didenko]

Hi,

After starting implementing granular deployment we've faced a bunch of
issues that would make further development of this feature much more
complicated if we have to support both Simple and HA deployment modes. For
example: simple mode does not require cluster (corosync, pacemaker, vips,
etc), so we had to skip this task for Simple mode somehow - we can use
conditional tasks, or conditional manifests in our tasks, or create
separate task graphs for different deployment modes, etc - either way it's
pretty much doubling the amount of work for some parts of Fuel and our
development cycle.

At the moment, CI blocks us from further development of fuel-library
modularization BP [2] because we still use Simple mode in CI. So in order
to proceed with this BP we have two options:

1) remove Simple mode from CI/QA and thus drop it completely from Fuel
2) double our efforts to support both Simple and HA modes in granular
deployment

We have a BP about single-controller HA [1]. HA with single controller
works just fine at the moment. So if you want to test Fuel on a minimum set
of nodes, you can do this on 3 nodes (Fuel master, controller, compute),
just like with Simple mode before. I suppose, it's time to finally drop
support for Simple mode in Fuel :)

[1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/single-controller-ha
[2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/fuel-library-modularization

--
Regards,
Aleksandr Didenko


On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Mike Scherbakov 
wrote:

> Definitely fuel spec is needed :)
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Evgeniy L  wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> I have some comments regarding to you action items
>>
>> >> 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests
>> >> 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and
>> cli
>>
>> We shouldn't do it, because nailgun should handle both versions of
>> cluster.
>> What we have to do here is to use openstack.yaml to keep all possible
>> modes.
>> For new release there will be only ha, to manage previous releases we have
>> to create data migrations in nailgun to create the filed with modes i.e.
>> multinode
>> and ha.
>>
>> Also fixes for ui are required too, I think it mostly related to wizard,
>> 'mode' tab
>> where use can chose ha or non ha cluster in case of new release there
>> should
>> be only ha, and in case of old releases there should be ha and multinode.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>>  On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Andrew Woodward 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>  Started a new thread so that we don't hijack the older thread.
>>>  as
>>>
>>>
 Andrew, will you work on it in 6.0? What are remaining items there?
 Also, it might affect our tests - simple mode runs faster so we use it for
 smoke ISO test. Anastasia, please confirm that we can switch smoke to
 one-ha-controller model, or even drop smoke at all and use BVT only
 (running CentOS 3 HA controllers and same with Ubuntu).

>>>
>>> The primary reason that we haven't disabled single yet is was due to [0]
>>> where we where having problems adding additional controllers. With the
>>> changes to galera and rabbit clustering it appears that we ended up fixing
>>> it already.
>>>
>>> The remaining issues are:
>>> 1) Ensuring we have good test coverage for the cases we expect to
>>> support [1]
>>> 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests
>>> 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli
>>> 4) Updating documentation
>>>
>>> [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266
>>> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266/comments/7
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andrew
>>> Mirantis
>>> Ceph community
>>>
>>> ___
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Mike Scherbakov
> #mihgen
>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

[Mike Scherbakov]

Definitely fuel spec is needed :)


On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Evgeniy L  wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
>
> I have some comments regarding to you action items
>
> >> 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests
> >> 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli
>
> We shouldn't do it, because nailgun should handle both versions of cluster.
> What we have to do here is to use openstack.yaml to keep all possible
> modes.
> For new release there will be only ha, to manage previous releases we have
> to create data migrations in nailgun to create the filed with modes i.e.
> multinode
> and ha.
>
> Also fixes for ui are required too, I think it mostly related to wizard,
> 'mode' tab
> where use can chose ha or non ha cluster in case of new release there
> should
> be only ha, and in case of old releases there should be ha and multinode.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>  On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Andrew Woodward 
> wrote:
>
>>  Started a new thread so that we don't hijack the older thread.
>>  as
>>
>>
>>> Andrew, will you work on it in 6.0? What are remaining items there?
>>> Also, it might affect our tests - simple mode runs faster so we use it for
>>> smoke ISO test. Anastasia, please confirm that we can switch smoke to
>>> one-ha-controller model, or even drop smoke at all and use BVT only
>>> (running CentOS 3 HA controllers and same with Ubuntu).
>>>
>>
>> The primary reason that we haven't disabled single yet is was due to [0]
>> where we where having problems adding additional controllers. With the
>> changes to galera and rabbit clustering it appears that we ended up fixing
>> it already.
>>
>> The remaining issues are:
>> 1) Ensuring we have good test coverage for the cases we expect to support
>> [1]
>> 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests
>> 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli
>> 4) Updating documentation
>>
>> [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266
>> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266/comments/7
>>
>> --
>> Andrew
>> Mirantis
>> Ceph community
>>
>> ___
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Mike Scherbakov
#mihgen
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

[Evgeniy L]

Hi Andrew,

I have some comments regarding to you action items

>> 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests
>> 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli

We shouldn't do it, because nailgun should handle both versions of cluster.
What we have to do here is to use openstack.yaml to keep all possible modes.
For new release there will be only ha, to manage previous releases we have
to create data migrations in nailgun to create the filed with modes i.e.
multinode
and ha.

Also fixes for ui are required too, I think it mostly related to wizard,
'mode' tab
where use can chose ha or non ha cluster in case of new release there should
be only ha, and in case of old releases there should be ha and multinode.

Thanks,



On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Andrew Woodward  wrote:

> Started a new thread so that we don't hijack the older thread.
>  as
>
>
>> Andrew, will you work on it in 6.0? What are remaining items there? Also,
>> it might affect our tests - simple mode runs faster so we use it for smoke
>> ISO test. Anastasia, please confirm that we can switch smoke to
>> one-ha-controller model, or even drop smoke at all and use BVT only
>> (running CentOS 3 HA controllers and same with Ubuntu).
>>
>
> The primary reason that we haven't disabled single yet is was due to [0]
> where we where having problems adding additional controllers. With the
> changes to galera and rabbit clustering it appears that we ended up fixing
> it already.
>
> The remaining issues are:
> 1) Ensuring we have good test coverage for the cases we expect to support
> [1]
> 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests
> 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli
> 4) Updating documentation
>
> [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266/comments/7
>
> --
> Andrew
> Mirantis
> Ceph community
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

[Mike Scherbakov]

Thanks, Andrew.

I think it's worth to track as a normal feature with formal fuel-specs, as
it touches too many things (docs and a number of tests). Should be short
spec though.


On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Andrew Woodward  wrote:

> Started a new thread so that we don't hijack the older thread.
>  as
>
>
>> Andrew, will you work on it in 6.0? What are remaining items there? Also,
>> it might affect our tests - simple mode runs faster so we use it for smoke
>> ISO test. Anastasia, please confirm that we can switch smoke to
>> one-ha-controller model, or even drop smoke at all and use BVT only
>> (running CentOS 3 HA controllers and same with Ubuntu).
>>
>
> The primary reason that we haven't disabled single yet is was due to [0]
> where we where having problems adding additional controllers. With the
> changes to galera and rabbit clustering it appears that we ended up fixing
> it already.
>
> The remaining issues are:
> 1) Ensuring we have good test coverage for the cases we expect to support
> [1]
> 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests
> 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli
> 4) Updating documentation
>
> [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266/comments/7
>
> --
> Andrew
> Mirantis
> Ceph community
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Mike Scherbakov
#mihgen
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode

[Andrew Woodward]

Started a new thread so that we don't hijack the older thread.
 as


> Andrew, will you work on it in 6.0? What are remaining items there? Also,
> it might affect our tests - simple mode runs faster so we use it for smoke
> ISO test. Anastasia, please confirm that we can switch smoke to
> one-ha-controller model, or even drop smoke at all and use BVT only
> (running CentOS 3 HA controllers and same with Ubuntu).
>

The primary reason that we haven't disabled single yet is was due to [0]
where we where having problems adding additional controllers. With the
changes to galera and rabbit clustering it appears that we ended up fixing
it already.

The remaining issues are:
1) Ensuring we have good test coverage for the cases we expect to support
[1]
2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests
3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli
4) Updating documentation

[0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266/comments/7

-- 
Andrew
Mirantis
Ceph community
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev