Thanks everyone for the valuable feedback. Few folks in the Ironic meeting
agreed as well releasing often is better idea than git submodules, and we
will go ahead with that if no one has any objection.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2015-06-17 10:10:22 -0400 (-0400
On 2015-06-17 10:10:22 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Ramakrishnan G's message of 2015-06-17 12:50:25 +0530:
> > Seems to me like we can keep ironic-lib git repository as a git submodule
> > of the ironic and ironic-python-agent repositories. Any commit in Ironic
> > or Ironic
Excerpts from Ramakrishnan G's message of 2015-06-17 12:50:25 +0530:
> Seems to me like we can keep ironic-lib git repository as a git submodule
> of the ironic and ironic-python-agent repositories. Any commit in Ironic
> or Ironic-python-agent can change ironic-lib independently. Also, looks
> l
Seems to me like we can keep ironic-lib git repository as a git submodule
of the ironic and ironic-python-agent repositories. Any commit in Ironic
or Ironic-python-agent can change ironic-lib independently. Also, looks
like our CI system supports it by automatically pushing commits in the
subscri
Hi,
> I haven't paid any attention to ironic-lib; I just knew that we wanted to
> have a library of common code so that we didn't cut/paste. I just took a
> look[1] and there are files there from 2 months ago. So far, everything is
> under ironic_lib (ie, no subdirectories to group things). Going
Hi,
I haven't paid any attention to ironic-lib; I just knew that we wanted to
have a library of common code so that we didn't cut/paste. I just took a
look[1] and there are files there from 2 months ago. So far, everything is
under ironic_lib (ie, no subdirectories to group things). Going forward,