Sean, David,
Thanks for your reply and useful links.
Neutron LBaaS API had experimental status, so i think the guidelines might
be relaxed for this case, but now I just tend to workaround this and
preserve API compatibility.
Thanks,
Eugene.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:57 PM, David Kranz wrote:
On 11/19/2013 09:40 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 11/17/2013 09:55 PM, Eugene Nikanorov wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm working on major change to Neutron LBaaS API, obviously it will
break existing tempest API tests for LBaaS.
What would be the right process to deal with this? I guess I can't just
push fixed
On 11/17/2013 09:55 PM, Eugene Nikanorov wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm working on major change to Neutron LBaaS API, obviously it will
break existing tempest API tests for LBaaS.
What would be the right process to deal with this? I guess I can't just
push fixed tests to tempest because they will not pass
Hi folks,
I'm working on major change to Neutron LBaaS API, obviously it will break
existing tempest API tests for LBaaS.
What would be the right process to deal with this? I guess I can't just
push fixed tests to tempest because they will not pass against existing
neutron code, and vice versa.
T
