Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] Question about where to render
haproxy configurations
Hi German,
Responses in-line:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Eichberger, German
german.eichber...@hp.com wrote:
Hi Stephen
Hi German and Brandon,
Responses in-line:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Brandon Logan brandon.lo...@rackspace.com
wrote:
Hi German,
Comments in-line
On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 04:49 +, Eichberger, German wrote:
Hi Steven,
Thanks for taking the time to lay out the components
] Question about where to render haproxy
configurations
Hi German,
Responses in-line:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Eichberger, German
german.eichber...@hp.commailto:german.eichber...@hp.com wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I think this is a good discussion to have and will make it more clear why we
chose
Hi German,
Thanks for your reply! My responses are in-line below, and of course you
should feel free to counter my counter-points. :)
For anyone else paying attention and interested in expressing a voice here,
we'll probably be voting on this subject at next week's Octavia meeting.
On Thu, Sep
.
Thanks,
German
From: Stephen Balukoff [mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 10:44 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] Question about where to render haproxy
configurations
Hi German,
Thanks
Hi German,
Responses in-line:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Eichberger, German german.eichber...@hp.com
wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I think this is a good discussion to have and will make it more clear why
we chose a specific design. I also believe by having this discussion we
will make the
@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] Question about where to render haproxy
configurations
Hi,
Stephen visited us today (the joy of spending some days in Seattle☺) and we
discussed that further (and sorry for using VM – not sure what won):
1. We will only support one
Hello!
At today's Octavia meeting, one of the questions briefly discussed was
where, in the Octavia architecture, haproxy configuration files should be
rendered. This discussion went long and we decided to take it to the
mailing list for more thorough discussion and to gather alternate ideas.
