Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Nova] summit overlap

2013-10-29 Thread Russell Bryant
On 10/28/2013 06:41 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote: I can't make the Wed 2:50 session -- I'm presenting at that time -- but I don't think it's essential for me to be there anyway. Everything else LGTM. Thanks! Would you rather be able to attend that one (Smarter resource placement for

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Nova] summit overlap

2013-10-29 Thread Devananda van der Veen
Based on the current descriptions, I think Instance Group Model looks more important for me. Current schedule appears fine for that. -D On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 10/28/2013 06:41 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote: I can't make the Wed 2:50

[openstack-dev] [TripleO][Nova] summit overlap

2013-10-28 Thread Robert Collins
Hey Russell, any chance you can shuffle the two tuesday nova sessions on scheduler - 1450 and 1640 - to another day? Both of those are pretty relevant to the baremetal workload aspect of TripleO, the former largely for Devananda with his Ironic hat on, the latter for our ability to schedule work

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Nova] summit overlap

2013-10-28 Thread Russell Bryant
On 10/28/2013 05:40 PM, Robert Collins wrote: Hey Russell, any chance you can shuffle the two tuesday nova sessions on scheduler - 1450 and 1640 - to another day? Both of those are pretty relevant to the baremetal workload aspect of TripleO, the former largely for Devananda with his Ironic

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Nova] summit overlap

2013-10-28 Thread Devananda van der Veen
I can't make the Wed 2:50 session -- I'm presenting at that time -- but I don't think it's essential for me to be there anyway. Everything else LGTM. Thanks! -Deva On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.netwrote: Thanks! -Rob On 29 October 2013 11:16,