Hi, It's been a week, and I've heard no objections this proposal:
>> Specifically, the folks I'm proposing are:
>> Brad P. Crochet
>> Dougal Matthews
>> - keep just 1 tripleo acl, and add additional folks there, with a good
>> faith agreement not to +/-2,+A
On 09/10/2015 10:06 AM, James Slagle wrote:
TripleO has added a few new repositories, one of which is
python-tripleoclient[1], the former python-rdomanager-oscplugin.
With the additional repositories, there is an additional review burden
on our core reviewers. There is also the fact that folks
On 09/10/2015 09:06 AM, James Slagle wrote:
> TripleO has added a few new repositories, one of which is
> python-tripleoclient[1], the former python-rdomanager-oscplugin.
>
> With the additional repositories, there is an additional review burden
> on our core reviewers. There is also the fact
TripleO has added a few new repositories, one of which is
python-tripleoclient[1], the former python-rdomanager-oscplugin.
With the additional repositories, there is an additional review burden
on our core reviewers. There is also the fact that folks who have been
working on the client code for a
On 10/09/15 15:06, James Slagle wrote:
TripleO has added a few new repositories, one of which is
python-tripleoclient[1], the former python-rdomanager-oscplugin.
With the additional repositories, there is an additional review burden
on our core reviewers. There is also the fact that folks who
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:06:31AM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
> TripleO has added a few new repositories, one of which is
> python-tripleoclient[1], the former python-rdomanager-oscplugin.
>
> With the additional repositories, there is an additional review burden
> on our core reviewers. There is