On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 15 February 2014 08:42, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com wrote:
Option B is we make our job easy by strong arming everyone into the same
defaults of our upstream choosing.
Does Nova strong arm everyone into
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2014-02-15 13:02:36 -0800:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 15 February 2014 08:42, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com wrote:
Option B is we make our job easy by strong arming everyone into the same
Hi
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:27:20AM +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
So progressing with the 'and folk that want to use packages can' arc,
we're running into some friction.
I've copied -operators in on this because its very relevant IMO to operators
:)
So far:
- some packages use
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:27:20AM +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
So progressing with the 'and folk that want to use packages can' arc,
we're running into some friction.
I've copied -operators in on this because its very relevant IMO to operators :)
So far:
- some packages use different
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-02-13 13:27:20 -0800:
So progressing with the 'and folk that want to use packages can' arc,
we're running into some friction.
I've copied -operators in on this because its very relevant IMO to operators
:)
So far:
- some packages use
- Original Message -
From: Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 4:27:20 PM
Subject: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] consistency vs
On 15 February 2014 07:46, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
* Reference implementations are always derided as not realistic. I think
we need to think of a different term. I prefer to just say that this
is the upstream implementation. We very much expect that a cloud can
and should
On 15 February 2014 08:42, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com wrote:
Let me restate the options the way I see it:
Option A is we do our job... by making it possible to install OpenStack using
various distributions using a set of distro agnostic tools (TripleO).
So our job is to be the upstream
So progressing with the 'and folk that want to use packages can' arc,
we're running into some friction.
I've copied -operators in on this because its very relevant IMO to operators :)
So far:
- some packages use different usernames
- some put things in different places (and all of them use
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
So progressing with the 'and folk that want to use packages can' arc,
we're running into some friction.
I've copied -operators in on this because its very relevant IMO to operators
:)
So far:
- some packages
10 matches
Mail list logo