Re: [openstack-dev] [Tuskar] Tuskar Names Clarification Unification
On 09/17/2013 04:17 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: On 2013/16/09 15:11, Tomas Sedovic wrote: On 09/16/2013 05:50 PM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi, after few days of gathering information, it looks that no more new ideas appear there, so let's take the last round of voting for names which you prefer. It's important for us to get on the same page. https://etherpad.openstack.org/tuskar-naming Thanks guys -- Jarda Thanks Jarda, I was thinking we could do the voting during the weekly IRC meeting (the bot has some cool voting capabilities). Unfortunately, I've fallen ill and chances are I won't be able to drive the meeting. If you folks want to self-organise and start the vote, you have my blessing. Otherwise, shall we do it on the IRC meeting after that? T. Sure Thomas, thanks for following the thread. We can try to self-organize there, I might try to run it, just can you point me to bot commands? Get well soon Thanks. Here's the manual: http://meetbot.debian.net/Manual.html The most important commands are: #startmeeting tuskar #topic an item from the agenda #info an item to be listed in the meeting minutes #agreed whatever the people agreed to do #action nick an action the person is supposed to take #endmeeting If you scroll to the last section of the Heat meeting page, they have some instructions on running the meetings: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/HeatAgenda -- Jarda [snip] ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Tuskar] Tuskar Names Clarification Unification
On 09/17/2013 04:53 AM, Mike Spreitzer wrote: From: Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 09/16/2013 11:51 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Tuskar] Tuskar Names Clarification Unification Hi, after few days of gathering information, it looks that no more new ideas appear there, so let's take the last round of voting for names which you prefer. It's important for us to get on the same page. I am concerned that the proposals around the term 'rack' do not recognize that there might be more than one layer in the organization. Is it more important to get appropriately abstract and generic terms, or is the desire to match common concrete terms? So our thinking here is to work with a grouping of nodes in the same physical location, the same subnet and ideally the same hardware configuration. This can be a physical rack, or what I believe you call a chassis (a group of servers inside the rack). Regarding layers, I see two physical layers in play: a rack and a chassis. Could there be more? The idea right now is that the Tuskar admins would choose their preferred granularity and just work on that level. Do you think that's not sufficient? T. Regards, Mike ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Tuskar] Tuskar Names Clarification Unification
Hi, after few days of gathering information, it looks that no more new ideas appear there, so let's take the last round of voting for names which you prefer. It's important for us to get on the same page. https://etherpad.openstack.org/tuskar-naming Thanks guys -- Jarda On 2013/12/09 11:20, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hello everybody, I just started and etherped with various names of concepts in Tuskar. It is important to get all of us on the same page, so the usage and discussions around Tuskar concepts are clear and easy to use (also for users, not just contributors!). https://etherpad.openstack.org/tuskar-naming Keep in mind, that we will use these names in API, CLI and UI as well, so they should be as descriptive as possible and not very long or difficult though. Etherpad is not the best tool for mark up, but I did my best. Each concept which needs name is bold and is followed with bunch of bullets - description, suggestion of names, plus discussion under each suggestion, why yes or not. Name suggestions are in underlined italic font. Feel free to add update discuss anything in the document, because I might have forgotten bunch of stuff. Thank you all and follow the etherpad :) -- Jarda ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Tuskar] Tuskar Names Clarification Unification
On 09/16/2013 05:50 PM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hi, after few days of gathering information, it looks that no more new ideas appear there, so let's take the last round of voting for names which you prefer. It's important for us to get on the same page. https://etherpad.openstack.org/tuskar-naming Thanks guys -- Jarda Thanks Jarda, I was thinking we could do the voting during the weekly IRC meeting (the bot has some cool voting capabilities). Unfortunately, I've fallen ill and chances are I won't be able to drive the meeting. If you folks want to self-organise and start the vote, you have my blessing. Otherwise, shall we do it on the IRC meeting after that? T. On 2013/12/09 11:20, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Hello everybody, I just started and etherped with various names of concepts in Tuskar. It is important to get all of us on the same page, so the usage and discussions around Tuskar concepts are clear and easy to use (also for users, not just contributors!). https://etherpad.openstack.org/tuskar-naming Keep in mind, that we will use these names in API, CLI and UI as well, so they should be as descriptive as possible and not very long or difficult though. Etherpad is not the best tool for mark up, but I did my best. Each concept which needs name is bold and is followed with bunch of bullets - description, suggestion of names, plus discussion under each suggestion, why yes or not. Name suggestions are in underlined italic font. Feel free to add update discuss anything in the document, because I might have forgotten bunch of stuff. Thank you all and follow the etherpad :) -- Jarda ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Tuskar] Tuskar Names Clarification Unification
From: Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 09/16/2013 11:51 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Tuskar] Tuskar Names Clarification Unification Hi, after few days of gathering information, it looks that no more new ideas appear there, so let's take the last round of voting for names which you prefer. It's important for us to get on the same page. I am concerned that the proposals around the term 'rack' do not recognize that there might be more than one layer in the organization. Is it more important to get appropriately abstract and generic terms, or is the desire to match common concrete terms? Regards, Mike___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
[openstack-dev] [Tuskar] Tuskar Names Clarification Unification
Hello everybody, I just started and etherped with various names of concepts in Tuskar. It is important to get all of us on the same page, so the usage and discussions around Tuskar concepts are clear and easy to use (also for users, not just contributors!). https://etherpad.openstack.org/tuskar-naming Keep in mind, that we will use these names in API, CLI and UI as well, so they should be as descriptive as possible and not very long or difficult though. Etherpad is not the best tool for mark up, but I did my best. Each concept which needs name is bold and is followed with bunch of bullets - description, suggestion of names, plus discussion under each suggestion, why yes or not. Name suggestions are in underlined italic font. Feel free to add update discuss anything in the document, because I might have forgotten bunch of stuff. Thank you all and follow the etherpad :) -- Jarda ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
