-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 15/12/14 18:57, Doug Hellmann wrote:
There may be a similar problem managing dependencies on libraries
that live outside of either tree. I assume you already decided how
to handle that. Are you doing the same thing, and adding the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 15/12/14 17:22, Doug Wiegley wrote:
Hi Ihar,
I’m actually in favor of option 2, but it implies a few things
about your time, and I wanted to chat with you before presuming.
I think split didn't mean moving project trees under separate
On Dec 16, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
Signed PGP part
On 15/12/14 18:57, Doug Hellmann wrote:
There may be a similar problem managing dependencies on libraries
that live outside of either tree. I assume you already decided how
to handle that. Are you
On Dec 16, 2014, at 5:22 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
Signed PGP part
On 15/12/14 17:22, Doug Wiegley wrote:
Hi Ihar,
I’m actually in favor of option 2, but it implies a few things
about your time, and I wanted to chat with you before presuming.
I think split
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 16/12/14 12:50, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Dec 16, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com
wrote:
Signed PGP part On 15/12/14 18:57, Doug Hellmann wrote:
There may be a similar problem managing dependencies on
libraries that
On Dec 16, 2014, at 7:27 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
Signed PGP part
On 16/12/14 12:50, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Dec 16, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com
wrote:
Signed PGP part On 15/12/14 18:57, Doug Hellmann wrote:
There may be a similar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 16/12/14 12:52, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Dec 16, 2014, at 5:22 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com
wrote:
Signed PGP part On 15/12/14 17:22, Doug Wiegley wrote:
Hi Ihar,
I’m actually in favor of option 2, but it implies a few things
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 16/12/14 13:41, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Dec 16, 2014, at 7:27 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com
wrote:
Signed PGP part On 16/12/14 12:50, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Dec 16, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
ihrac...@redhat.com
On 12/16/14, 2:41 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
On Dec 16, 2014, at 7:27 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
Signed PGP part
On 16/12/14 12:50, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Dec 16, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com
wrote:
Signed PGP part
On Dec 16, 2014, at 7:42 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
Signed PGP part
On 16/12/14 12:52, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Dec 16, 2014, at 5:22 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com
wrote:
Signed PGP part On 15/12/14 17:22, Doug Wiegley wrote:
Hi Ihar,
I’m actually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi all,
the question arose recently in one of reviews for neutron-*aas repos
to remove all oslo-incubator code from those repos since it's
duplicated in neutron main repo. (You can find the link to the review
at the end of the email.)
Brief
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 15/12/14 15:15, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
- it's a delusion that there will be no neutron-main syncs that
will break neutron-*aas repos ever.
OK, I've just decided to check whether my (non-native speaker)
understanding of the meaning of the word
Hi Ihar,
I’m actually in favor of option 2, but it implies a few things about your
time, and I wanted to chat with you before presuming.
Maintenance can not involve breaking changes. At this point, the co-gate
will block it. Also, oslo graduation changes will have to be made in the
services
Hi all,
Ihar and I discussed this on IRC, and are going forward with option 2
unless someone has a big problem with it.
Thanks,
Doug
On 12/15/14, 8:22 AM, Doug Wiegley do...@a10networks.com wrote:
Hi Ihar,
I’m actually in favor of option 2, but it implies a few things about your
time, and I
Option 2 works for me, thanks for figuring this out Ihar and Doug!
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Doug Wiegley do...@a10networks.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Ihar and I discussed this on IRC, and are going forward with option 2
unless someone has a big problem with it.
Thanks,
Doug
On
There may be a similar problem managing dependencies on libraries that live
outside of either tree. I assume you already decided how to handle that. Are
you doing the same thing, and adding the requirements to neutron’s lists?
On Dec 15, 2014, at 12:16 PM, Doug Wiegley do...@a10networks.com
16 matches
Mail list logo
