hey Dan,
On 2018-01-11 06:05 PM, Daniel Dyer wrote:
> My understanding was that the API is not officially deprecated until queens.
> Is this not the case?
not quite. we removed the API permanently in queens. it was actually
deprecated back in 2016[1] officially. we've unofficially/transparently
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 3:05 PM, Daniel Dyer wrote:
> My understanding was that the API is not officially deprecated until queens.
> Is this not the case?
https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/ceilometer/ocata.html#deprecation-notes
https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/ceilometer/unreleased
Gordon,
My understanding was that the API is not officially deprecated until queens. Is
this not the case?
Dan
> On Jan 11, 2018, at 7:05 AM, gordon chung wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2018-01-11 01:48 AM, Thomas Bechtold wrote:
>>
>> It was at lease for openSUSE:
>> https://build.opensuse.org/packag
On 2018-01-11 01:48 AM, Thomas Bechtold wrote:
>
> It was at lease for openSUSE:
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/Cloud:OpenStack:Pike/openstack-ceilometer
ah, maybe just centos then... or i'm not searching the correct place. :)
--
gord
_
On 2018-01-11 07:48, Thomas Bechtold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11.01.2018 01:18, gordon chung wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2018-01-10 06:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
It's worth pointing out that openstacksdk has ceilometer REST API
support in it, although it is special-cased since ceilometer was
ret
Hi,
On 11.01.2018 01:18, gordon chung wrote:
On 2018-01-10 06:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
It's worth pointing out that openstacksdk has ceilometer REST API
support in it, although it is special-cased since ceilometer was retired
before we even made the service-types-authority:
so ceilometer
I'm favor of dropping Ceilometer API support in the SDK if we claim
1.0 will support Queens and beyond.
If the SDK has to support previous versions (Pike, Ocata, etc), then
we should warn the SDK users that Ceilometer API has been deprecated
and removed so depending on your cloud provider the SDK m
Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2018-01-10 18:08:52 -0600:
> On 01/10/2018 05:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2018-01-10 17:40:28 -0600:
> >> On 01/10/2018 04:10 PM, Jon Schlueter wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:12 PM, gordon chung wrote:
> >>
On 2018-01-10 06:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> It's worth pointing out that openstacksdk has ceilometer REST API
>> support in it, although it is special-cased since ceilometer was retired
>> before we even made the service-types-authority:
so ceilometer's REST API does not exist anymore. i don
On 01/10/2018 05:44 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2018-01-10 17:40:28 -0600:
On 01/10/2018 04:10 PM, Jon Schlueter wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:12 PM, gordon chung wrote:
On 2017-11-22 04:18 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
Hi,
Now that the Ceilometer API i
Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2018-01-10 17:40:28 -0600:
> On 01/10/2018 04:10 PM, Jon Schlueter wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:12 PM, gordon chung wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2017-11-22 04:18 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Now that the Ceilometer API is gone, we
On 01/10/2018 04:10 PM, Jon Schlueter wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:12 PM, gordon chung wrote:
On 2017-11-22 04:18 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
Hi,
Now that the Ceilometer API is gone, we really don't need
ceilometerclient anymore. I've proposed a set of patches to retire it:
https://r
Excerpts from gordon chung's message of 2018-01-10 23:28:05 +:
>
> On 2018-01-10 05:10 PM, Jon Schlueter wrote:
> > I would think that a discussion around retiring a project should also
> > include at least enumerating
> > which projects are currently consuming it [5]. That way a little bit
>
On 2018-01-10 05:10 PM, Jon Schlueter wrote:
> I would think that a discussion around retiring a project should also
> include at least enumerating
> which projects are currently consuming it [5]. That way a little bit
> of pressure on those consumers
> can be exerted to evaluate their usage of
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:12 PM, gordon chung wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2017-11-22 04:18 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Now that the Ceilometer API is gone, we really don't need
> > ceilometerclient anymore. I've proposed a set of patches to retire it:
> >
> >https://review.openstack.org/#/c
On 2017-11-22 04:18 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now that the Ceilometer API is gone, we really don't need
> ceilometerclient anymore. I've proposed a set of patches to retire it:
>
>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/522183/
>
just for reference, we had a super short discussion on th
Hi,
Now that the Ceilometer API is gone, we really don't need
ceilometerclient anymore. I've proposed a set of patches to retire it:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/522183/
--
Julien Danjou
;; Free Software hacker
;; https://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_
17 matches
Mail list logo
