Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] When do we import aodh?

2015-06-18 Thread Julien Danjou
On Wed, Jun 17 2015, gordon chung wrote: > don't we need an initial migration still? to create all the base > tables? You don't need a migration for that, SQLAlchemy handles that on its own. We'll add an initial migration once we start using Alembic. > any thought to using ceilometer repo as a

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] When do we import aodh?

2015-06-17 Thread gordon chung
i've no idea how to add comments to github so i'll ask here. On 16/06/2015 11:12 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: On Tue, Jun 16 2015, Chris Dent wrote: 5. anything in tempest to worry about? Yes, we need to adapt and reenable tempest after. 6. what's that stuff in the "ceilometer" dir? 6.1. L

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] When do we import aodh?

2015-06-16 Thread Julien Danjou
On Tue, Jun 16 2015, Chris Dent wrote: > 5. anything in tempest to worry about? Yes, we need to adapt and reenable tempest after. > 6. what's that stuff in the "ceilometer" dir? >6.1. Looks like migration artifacts, what about migration in > general? That's a rest of one of the many

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] When do we import aodh?

2015-06-16 Thread Chris Dent
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Julien Danjou wrote: To me the next step is to: 1. Someone cares and review what I've done in the repository 2. import the code into openstack/aodh Assuming that we'll do whatever is required to finish things after moving it under openstack/ then whatever you've done in st

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] When do we import aodh?

2015-06-16 Thread Julien Danjou
Hi there, The alarm code split blueprint¹ has been approved, and I finished the split of the code base. It's available online at: https://github.com/jd/aodh tox -e pep8,py27,docs passes. To me the next step is to: 1. Someone cares and review what I've done in the repository 2. import the code