Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][neutron] bonding?

10:19 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][neutron] bonding? On 24 May 2016 at 04:51, Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com<mailto:j...@jimrollenhagen.com>> wrote: H

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][neutron] bonding?

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:18:40PM -0700, Armando M. wrote: > On 24 May 2016 at 04:51, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > There's rumors floating around about Neutron having a bonding model in > > the near future. Are there any solid plans for that? > > > > Who

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][neutron] bonding?

Excerpts from Jim Rollenhagen's message of 2016-05-24 07:51:21 -0400: > Hi, > > There's rumors floating around about Neutron having a bonding model in > the near future. Are there any solid plans for that? > > For context, as part of the multitenant networking work, ironic has a > portgroup

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][neutron] bonding?

The only thing I am remotely aware of that is relevant is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558626 But that's really just in one agent. -- Sean M. Collins __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][neutron] bonding?

On 24 May 2016 at 04:51, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > Hi, > > There's rumors floating around about Neutron having a bonding model in > the near future. Are there any solid plans for that? > Who spreads these rumors :)? To the best of my knowledge I have not seen any RFE

[openstack-dev] [ironic][neutron] bonding?

Hi, There's rumors floating around about Neutron having a bonding model in the near future. Are there any solid plans for that? For context, as part of the multitenant networking work, ironic has a portgroup concept proposed, where operators can configure bonding for NICs in a baremetal machine.