Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Undead DB objects: ProviderFirewallRule and InstanceGroupPolicy?

2014-11-18 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
AFAIK they are relics. Vish On Nov 13, 2014, at 7:20 AM, Matthew Booth mbo...@redhat.com wrote: There are 3 db apis relating to ProviderFirewallRule: provider_fw_rule_create, provider_fw_rule_get_all, and provider_fw_rule_destroy. Of these, only provider_fw_rule_get_all seems to be used.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Undead DB objects: ProviderFirewallRule and InstanceGroupPolicy?

2014-11-18 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/18/2014 3:28 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: AFAIK they are relics. Vish On Nov 13, 2014, at 7:20 AM, Matthew Booth mbo...@redhat.com wrote: There are 3 db apis relating to ProviderFirewallRule: provider_fw_rule_create, provider_fw_rule_get_all, and provider_fw_rule_destroy. Of these,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Undead DB objects: ProviderFirewallRule and InstanceGroupPolicy?

2014-11-18 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 11/18/2014 3:57 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 11/18/2014 3:28 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: AFAIK they are relics. Vish On Nov 13, 2014, at 7:20 AM, Matthew Booth mbo...@redhat.com wrote: There are 3 db apis relating to ProviderFirewallRule: provider_fw_rule_create,

[openstack-dev] [nova] Undead DB objects: ProviderFirewallRule and InstanceGroupPolicy?

2014-11-13 Thread Matthew Booth
There are 3 db apis relating to ProviderFirewallRule: provider_fw_rule_create, provider_fw_rule_get_all, and provider_fw_rule_destroy. Of these, only provider_fw_rule_get_all seems to be used. i.e. It seems they can be queried, but not created. InstanceGroupPolicy doesn't seem to be used anywhere