-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/11/14 17:43, Kevin Benton wrote:
This is awesome. I seem to have misplaced my 540-node cluster. ;-)
Is it possible for you to also patch in
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/132372/ ? In my rally testing of
port retrieval, this one
Ok. Thanks again for doing that.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:06 AM, James Page james.p...@ubuntu.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/11/14 17:43, Kevin Benton wrote:
This is awesome. I seem to have misplaced my 540-node cluster. ;-)
Is it possible for you to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Ihar
On 11/11/14 19:39, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
there is a series of Neutron backports in the Juno queue that are
intended to significantly improve service performance when
handling security groups (one of the issues that are main pain
Hi James,
This is awesome. I seem to have misplaced my 540-node cluster. ;-)
Is it possible for you to also patch in
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/132372/ ? In my rally testing of port
retrieval, this one probably made the most significant improvement.
On Nov 12, 2014 9:26 AM, James Page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Forwarding to openstack-dev since openstack-stable-maint is now read-only.
- Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: [Openstack-stable-maint] Neutron backports for security
group performance
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:25:43 -0800
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Personally, I think that enough information was provided to show that
the 1st fix is critical to successful deployment of neutron without
wasting nodes. I will vote +1 for now and wait for my fellow stable
maintainers to give their feedback.
As for
