On Nov 13, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Collins, Sean (Contractor)
sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:20:55AM -0500, Shixiong Shang wrote:
Thanks a bunch for finalizing the time! Sorry for my ignorance….how do we
usually run the meeting? On Webex or IRC channel?
I haven't heard any negative response to the proposed time,
so I'd like to put a stake in the ground and utilize that time slot.
We will have our first meeting on Nov 21st.
--
Sean M. Collins
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Hi, Sean:
Thanks a bunch for finalizing the time! Sorry for my ignorance….how do we
usually run the meeting? On Webex or IRC channel?
Look forward to it!
Shixiong
On Nov 13, 2013, at 9:32 AM, Collins, Sean (Contractor)
sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
I haven't heard any negative
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:20:55AM -0500, Shixiong Shang wrote:
Thanks a bunch for finalizing the time! Sorry for my ignorance….how do we
usually run the meeting? On Webex or IRC channel?
IRC.
I'm not opposed to Webex (other teams have used it before) - but it
would involve more set-up. We'd
Thanks, Sean! I am on east coast, so Monday 20:00 UTC time and Thursday 21:00
UTC time work great for me. Hopefully we can find a timeslot working for
everybody!
Shixiong
On Nov 11, 2013, at 1:23 PM, Collins, Sean (Contractor)
sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at
questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:01
To: Collins, Sean (Contractor) sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com
Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] IPv6 sub-team?
Thanks, Sean! I am on east
+1 for me as well.
So have we finalized on the meeting time?
Thanks,
- Stephen
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
kmest...@cisco.com wrote:
On Nov 8, 2013, at 12:01 AM, Brian Haley brian.ha...@hp.com wrote:
On 11/08/2013 11:21 AM, Collins, Sean (Contractor) wrote:
OK - how about Thursdays, 21:00 UTC?
--
Sean M. Collins
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 01:16:43PM -0500, Shixiong Shang wrote:
+1.
We have great interest to run OpenStack over IPv6 and would love to be a
part of the discussion.
Excellent - please see the thread I've made in OpenStack-Dev - we're
tossing out times for the IRC meeting, that works for
How about scheduling an IRC meeting in close proximity to the other
Neutron meetings on Mondays?
* 20:00 to 21:00 UTC, before the Neutron meeting
OR
* 23:00 UTC - after the distributed virtual router meeting?
--
Sean M. Collins
___
OpenStack-dev
I definitely think this should be a standing Neutron sub team.
mark
On Nov 6, 2013, at 7:50 AM, Collins, Sean (Contractor)
sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there any interest in organizing a IPv6 sub-team, similar to how
there are sub-teams for FwaaS, VPNaas, ML2, etc?
+1 from me!
(I think it's my first message on the list, so Hi! ;)
Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
+34 636 52 25 69
skype: ajoajoajo
2013/11/6 Mark McClain mark.mccl...@dreamhost.com
I definitely think this should be a standing Neutron sub team.
mark
On Nov 6, 2013, at 7:50 AM, Collins, Sean
+1
we are in process of designing/implementing this and want to be part of the
community effort.
On Nov 5, 2013, at 3:50 PM, Collins, Sean (Contractor)
sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there any interest in organizing a IPv6 sub-team, similar to how
there are sub-teams for
Hi,
Is there any interest in organizing a IPv6 sub-team, similar to how
there are sub-teams for FwaaS, VPNaas, ML2, etc?
--
Sean M. Collins
AIM: seanwdp
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On Nov 5, 2013, at 5:50 PM, Collins, Sean (Contractor)
sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there any interest in organizing a IPv6 sub-team, similar to how
there are sub-teams for FwaaS, VPNaas, ML2, etc?
+1, lets do it!
___
On 11/06/2013 07:50 AM, Collins, Sean (Contractor) wrote:
Hi,
Is there any interest in organizing a IPv6 sub-team, similar to how
there are sub-teams for FwaaS, VPNaas, ML2, etc?
+1 from me.
-Brian
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Absolutely!
+1
Edgar
On 11/5/13 3:50 PM, Collins, Sean (Contractor)
sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there any interest in organizing a IPv6 sub-team, similar to how
there are sub-teams for FwaaS, VPNaas, ML2, etc?
--
Sean M. Collins
AIM: seanwdp
Cool!
I've put a placeholder on the meetings wiki page, until we can find a
time that works for everyone.
--
Sean M. Collins
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On 21 October 2013 19:51, Sean M. Collins s...@coreitpro.com wrote:
The motivation is to help Neutron work with IPv6 - which is a must-have
for Comcast.
Deutsche Telekom too. We are working on making Neutron interoperate well
with a service provider network that's based on IPv6. I look
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 08:58:52AM +0200, Luke Gorrie wrote:
Deutsche Telekom too. We are working on making Neutron interoperate well
with a service provider network that's based on IPv6. I look forward to
talking about this with people in Hong Kong :)
I may be mistaken, but I don't see a
: 1-507-990-1889
E-mail: mrie...@us.ibm.com
3605 Hwy 52 N
Rochester, MN 55901-1407
United States
From: Sean M. Collins s...@coreitpro.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 10/22/2013 10:33 AM
Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron
On 10/22/2013 12:48 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
FWIW, we've wanted IPv6 support too but there are limitations in
sqlalchemy and python 2.6 and since openstack is still supporting both
of those, we are gated on that.
What limitations re: IPv6 does SQLAlchemy present?
-jay
I am guessing Matt is talking about running openstack in a pure ipv6
environment. So it would be this bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1190454
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/22/2013 12:48 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
FWIW, we've wanted IPv6
Interesting, thx! :)
On 10/22/2013 01:18 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
I am guessing Matt is talking about running openstack in a pure ipv6
environment. So it would be this bug
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1190454
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
Hi,
Looking at the code for the linux DHCP agent, there's a comment
about trying to figure out how to indicate other options (ra-only,
slaac, ra-nameservers, and ra-stateless).
https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/agent/linux/dhcp.py#L330
I decided to take a crack at
301 - 325 of 325 matches
Mail list logo
