Jarret Raim wrote:
Barbican, the key management service for OpenStack, requested incubation
before the holidays. After the initial review, there were several issues
brought up by various individuals that needed to be resolved
pre-incubation. At this point, we have completed the work on those
I spun one up here
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/GFoJ4LpK8A
Most of the questions are on our incubation wiki, but I answered each of
the issues from the page you linked.
Thanks,
--
Jarret Raim
@jarretraim
On 2/4/14, 7:45 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Jarret Raim
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Justin Santa Barbara
jus...@fathomdb.com wrote:
Jarret Raim wrote:
I'm presuming that this is our last opportunity for API review - if
this isn't the right occasion to bring this up, ignore me!
Apparently you are right:
For incubation
'Project APIs should be
This is a follow-up to Jarret Raim's email regarding Barbican's incubation
review:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-January/025860.html
Please note that the PR for Barbican's DevStack integration can now be
found here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70512/
Thanks for
All,
Barbican, the key management service for OpenStack, requested incubation
before the holidays. After the initial review, there were several issues
brought up by various individuals that needed to be resolved
pre-incubation. At this point, we have completed the work on those tasks.
I'd like
Given the issues we continue to face with achieving stable APIs, I
hope there will be some form of formal API review before we approve
any new OpenStack APIs. When we release an API, it should mean that
we're committing to support that API _forever_.
Glancing at the specification, I noticed some
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Jarret Raim jarret.r...@rackspace.comwrote:
All,
Barbican, the key management service for OpenStack, requested incubation
before the holidays. After the initial review, there were several issues
brought up by various individuals that needed to be resolved
Jarret Raim wrote:
I'm presuming that this is our last opportunity for API review - if
this isn't the right occasion to bring this up, ignore me!
I wouldn't agree here. The barbican API will be evolving over time as we
add new functionality. We will, of course, have to deal with backwards
