Re: [openstack-dev] Telco Working Group meeting for Wednesday April 6th CANCELLED

2016-04-12 Thread Shamail 


> On Apr 12, 2016, at 1:12 PM, Steve Gordon <sgor...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Calum Loudon" <calum.lou...@metaswitch.com>
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
>> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>,
>> "openstack-operators" <openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 6:09:16 AM
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Telco Working Group meeting for Wednesday April 
>>6th CANCELLED
>> 
>> Thanks Steve
>> 
>> I agree with moving to the PWG.
>> 
>> On that topic, do you know what's happened to some of the user stories we
>> proposed, specifically https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290060/ and
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290347/? Neither shows up in
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/openstack-user-stories
> 
> This query includes status:open, and those two reviews were merged already so 
> they don't show up.
> 
>> but there is a https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290991/ which seems to be a
>> copy of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290060/ with the template help text
>> added back in and no mention of the original?
> 
> From Shamail's comment in 290991:
> 
>This change should be used to discuss and refine the concept. Can the user 
> story owner please make a minor change to show ownership?
> 
> Basically they opened new reviews with a minor change to trigger further 
> discussion. I'm not in love with this approach versus just discussing it on 
> the original move request but it is the way it is being done for now. W.r.t. 
> 290060 I believe you probably meant to include another link but I imagine the 
> situation is the same.
Yeah, unfortunately, this approach was needed when we changed the workflow.  A 
minor change would be recommended for now.  

The template recently changed and you could update the story to the new 
template (if it isn't already updated) and that would suffice.
> 
> -Steve

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Telco Working Group meeting for Wednesday April 6th CANCELLED

2016-04-12 Thread Steve Gordon 


- Original Message -
> From: "Calum Loudon" <calum.lou...@metaswitch.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>,
> "openstack-operators" <openstack-operat...@lists.openstack.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 6:09:16 AM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Telco Working Group meeting for Wednesday April  
> 6th CANCELLED
> 
> Thanks Steve
> 
> I agree with moving to the PWG.
> 
> On that topic, do you know what's happened to some of the user stories we
> proposed, specifically https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290060/ and
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290347/?  Neither shows up in
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/openstack-user-stories

This query includes status:open, and those two reviews were merged already so 
they don't show up.

> but there is a https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290991/ which seems to be a
> copy of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290060/ with the template help text
> added back in and no mention of the original?

>From Shamail's comment in 290991:

This change should be used to discuss and refine the concept. Can the user 
story owner please make a minor change to show ownership?

Basically they opened new reviews with a minor change to trigger further 
discussion. I'm not in love with this approach versus just discussing it on the 
original move request but it is the way it is being done for now. W.r.t. 290060 
I believe you probably meant to include another link but I imagine the 
situation is the same.

-Steve

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Telco Working Group meeting for Wednesday April 6th CANCELLED

2016-04-06 Thread Calum Loudon 
Thanks Steve

I agree with moving to the PWG.

On that topic, do you know what's happened to some of the user stories we 
proposed, specifically https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290060/ and 
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290347/?  Neither shows up in 
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/openstack-user-stories,
 but there is a https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290991/ which seems to be a 
copy of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/290060/ with the template help text 
added back in and no mention of the original?

Calum


Calum Loudon 
Director, Architecture
+44 (0)208 366 1177
 
METASWITCH NETWORKS 
THE BRAINS OF THE NEW GLOBAL NETWORK
www.metaswitch.com



-Original Message-
From: Steve Gordon [mailto:sgor...@redhat.com] 
Sent: 04 April 2016 23:21
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
; openstack-operators 

Subject: [openstack-dev] [NFV][Telco] Telco Working Group meeting for Wednesday 
April 6th CANCELLED

Hi all,

I will be on a flight during the meeting slot for Wednesday April 6th and have 
been unable to source someone else to run the meeting, as a result it is 
canceled. I would also like to highlight that at this point I believe all of 
the active Telco Working Group use cases have been submitted/moved to the 
Product Working Group repository. The Product Working Group also now has an 
alternative [1][2] timeslot available for those who were unable to make the 
PDT/EDT friendly time used for the Monday session. Product Working Group 
meetings are now at:

  Weekly on Monday at 2100 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt (IRC webclient)
  Weekly on Tuesday at 0200 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt (IRC webclient) 

Going forward I would like to suggest suspending the weekly Telco Working Group 
meetings (or having them on a less frequent basis) with a view to concentrating 
on attending the Product Working Group calls to assist with prioritization 
discussions, gap analysis, and next steps.

Thanks,

Steve

[1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/product-wg/2016-April/001056.html
[2] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#OpenStack_Product_WG

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev