Re: [openstack-dev] sqlalchemy-migrate call for reviews

2014-12-02 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

It's weird: we run python33 job for gate but not checks. Adding Cyril
Roelandt who ported the library to py3 to CC.

On 01/12/14 23:40, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 12/01/2014 06:19 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>> Indeed, the review queue is non-responsive. There are other
>> patches in the queue that bit rot there:
>> 
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/sqlalchemy-migrate,n,z
>
>> 
> I did +2 some of the patches which I thought were totally
> unharmful, but none passed the gate. Now, it looks like the Python
> 3.3 gate for it is broken... :( Where are those "module not found"
> issues from?
> 
> Thomas
> 
> ___ OpenStack-dev
> mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org 
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUfY4VAAoJEC5aWaUY1u57HmsIAJku4Zt/QK2HsV8RwGfgSRSW
+WpET+Kqlhcx4WJEqaUApF/+N40NwMYrOEP4Tj1R1RAtT38ABQexvi3uvbQTEb71
XIVL+fzVP99GHqHKROYDWplXZCWfxlQJN2d43c0/JgEWWExZwlGNZbjA70vuCjjt
eW3IpjcwKXvmeUTqHfQXTqttzDRePh9tuHxTooZAZ+hm+HOd0WUrtHI44KnxXGt2
1LAynY848I2bxxUrD3PgZWb/N9vwQ5+gZWv4KMRHtDvZJaTa1Oyycflqn+55HBn5
VShaWyVR9zvAKKL6FxIrtnO59EZdtb12YyDecskmIYCg07ywYZGQAUxKuIZK9oI=
=bULf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] sqlalchemy-migrate call for reviews

2014-12-01 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 12/01/2014 06:19 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Indeed, the review queue is non-responsive. There are other patches in
> the queue that bit rot there:
> 
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/sqlalchemy-migrate,n,z

I did +2 some of the patches which I thought were totally unharmful, but
none passed the gate. Now, it looks like the Python 3.3 gate for it is
broken... :( Where are those "module not found" issues from?

Thomas

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] sqlalchemy-migrate call for reviews

2014-12-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-12-01 13:24:43 -0500 (-0500), Mike Bayer wrote:
[...]
> for users on the outside of immediate Openstack use cases I’d
> prefer if they can continue working towards moving to Alembic; the
> major features I’ve introduced in Alembic including the SQLite
> support are intended to make transition much more feasible.

Agreed, perhaps the documentation for sqlalchemy-migrate needs to
make that statement visible (if it doesn't already). That's also a
reasonable message for someone to pass along to those other
non-OpenStack users discussing it in external forums... "this is
deprecated, on limited life support until OpenStack can complete its
transition to Alembic, and other developers using it should look
hard at performing similar updates to their software."
-- 
Jeremy Stanley

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] sqlalchemy-migrate call for reviews

2014-12-01 Thread Mike Bayer

I can +2 whichever patches are needed by Openstack projects, or that are 
critically needed in general, that you can point me towards directly.
Overall I’m not the “maintainer” of sqlalchemy-migrate, I’ve only volunteered 
to have a +2 role for critically needed issues, so in the absence of someone 
willing to take on a real maintainer role (bug triage, etc.), for users on the 
outside of immediate Openstack use cases I’d prefer if they can continue 
working towards moving to Alembic; the major features I’ve introduced in 
Alembic including the SQLite support are intended to make transition much more 
feasible.


> On Dec 1, 2014, at 5:19 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka  wrote:
> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> Indeed, the review queue is non-responsive. There are other patches in
> the queue that bit rot there:
> 
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/sqlalchemy-migrate,n,z
> 
> I guess since no one with a +2 hammer systematically monitors patches
> there, users are on their own and better fork if blocked. Sad but true.
> 
> (btw technically monitoring is not that difficult: gerrit allows to
> subscribe to specific projects, and this one does not look like time
> consuming from reviewer perspective.)
> 
> /Ihar
> 
> On 30/11/14 00:28, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>> To anyone who reviews sqlalchemy-migrate changes, there are people 
>> talking to themselves on GitHub about long-overdue bug fixes
>> because the Gerrit review queue for it is sluggish and they
>> apparently don't realize the SQLAM reviewers don't look at Google
>> Code issues[1] and GitHub pull request comments[2].
>> 
>> [1]
>> https://code.google.com/p/sqlalchemy-migrate/issues/detail?id=171 
>> [2] https://github.com/stackforge/sqlalchemy-migrate/pull/5
>> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
> 
> iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUfECeAAoJEC5aWaUY1u57cx8H/2d8urszdd3RIsU+3JyrnVg6
> I92WtoCS84HdOEE7DjM5m/tgFGjIp9Gh4lovEft5JYDcnHACfd4gdhUunt+PAvVO
> 2usFuPdR9IJvbKc28FJAqZeXJpvMc0KSMN4j8t1dtgu6Cv4TaFZEN77G6vrV9jem
> b56npPlmpIaDpGP49XtFBHMcbU0pVJ0AQCWUd0wOX+NQl4EfF0stlvxd/1LWn9xf
> rZCzatEqyRItlAB+ATpI0TlGSgvVv0PKqrV+TnoZ4OU/TZINNoCjZELB7NkmfDMz
> 9rJgviCmCHRyWs+VwsbEeGKDI3nBLjX7UEk5K2f93VsZQWYpW3q6Z2rrpmH977Y=
> =gT/r
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] sqlalchemy-migrate call for reviews

2014-12-01 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Indeed, the review queue is non-responsive. There are other patches in
the queue that bit rot there:

https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/sqlalchemy-migrate,n,z

I guess since no one with a +2 hammer systematically monitors patches
there, users are on their own and better fork if blocked. Sad but true.

(btw technically monitoring is not that difficult: gerrit allows to
subscribe to specific projects, and this one does not look like time
consuming from reviewer perspective.)

/Ihar

On 30/11/14 00:28, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> To anyone who reviews sqlalchemy-migrate changes, there are people 
> talking to themselves on GitHub about long-overdue bug fixes
> because the Gerrit review queue for it is sluggish and they
> apparently don't realize the SQLAM reviewers don't look at Google
> Code issues[1] and GitHub pull request comments[2].
> 
> [1]
> https://code.google.com/p/sqlalchemy-migrate/issues/detail?id=171 
> [2] https://github.com/stackforge/sqlalchemy-migrate/pull/5
> 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUfECeAAoJEC5aWaUY1u57cx8H/2d8urszdd3RIsU+3JyrnVg6
I92WtoCS84HdOEE7DjM5m/tgFGjIp9Gh4lovEft5JYDcnHACfd4gdhUunt+PAvVO
2usFuPdR9IJvbKc28FJAqZeXJpvMc0KSMN4j8t1dtgu6Cv4TaFZEN77G6vrV9jem
b56npPlmpIaDpGP49XtFBHMcbU0pVJ0AQCWUd0wOX+NQl4EfF0stlvxd/1LWn9xf
rZCzatEqyRItlAB+ATpI0TlGSgvVv0PKqrV+TnoZ4OU/TZINNoCjZELB7NkmfDMz
9rJgviCmCHRyWs+VwsbEeGKDI3nBLjX7UEk5K2f93VsZQWYpW3q6Z2rrpmH977Y=
=gT/r
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] sqlalchemy-migrate call for reviews

2014-11-30 Thread Mike Bayer
I’ve +2’ed it, it was caused by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/81955/.


> On Nov 29, 2014, at 9:54 PM, Davanum Srinivas  wrote:
> 
> Looks like there is a review in the queue -
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111485/
> 
> -- dims
> 
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Jeremy Stanley  wrote:
>> To anyone who reviews sqlalchemy-migrate changes, there are people
>> talking to themselves on GitHub about long-overdue bug fixes because
>> the Gerrit review queue for it is sluggish and they apparently don't
>> realize the SQLAM reviewers don't look at Google Code issues[1] and
>> GitHub pull request comments[2].
>> 
>> [1] https://code.google.com/p/sqlalchemy-migrate/issues/detail?id=171
>> [2] https://github.com/stackforge/sqlalchemy-migrate/pull/5
>> 
>> --
>> Jeremy Stanley
>> 
>> ___
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
> 
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


Re: [openstack-dev] sqlalchemy-migrate call for reviews

2014-11-29 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Looks like there is a review in the queue -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111485/

-- dims

On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Jeremy Stanley  wrote:
> To anyone who reviews sqlalchemy-migrate changes, there are people
> talking to themselves on GitHub about long-overdue bug fixes because
> the Gerrit review queue for it is sluggish and they apparently don't
> realize the SQLAM reviewers don't look at Google Code issues[1] and
> GitHub pull request comments[2].
>
> [1] https://code.google.com/p/sqlalchemy-migrate/issues/detail?id=171
> [2] https://github.com/stackforge/sqlalchemy-migrate/pull/5
>
> --
> Jeremy Stanley
>
> ___
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


[openstack-dev] sqlalchemy-migrate call for reviews

2014-11-29 Thread Jeremy Stanley
To anyone who reviews sqlalchemy-migrate changes, there are people
talking to themselves on GitHub about long-overdue bug fixes because
the Gerrit review queue for it is sluggish and they apparently don't
realize the SQLAM reviewers don't look at Google Code issues[1] and
GitHub pull request comments[2].

[1] https://code.google.com/p/sqlalchemy-migrate/issues/detail?id=171
[2] https://github.com/stackforge/sqlalchemy-migrate/pull/5

-- 
Jeremy Stanley

___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev