On 03/21/2014 05:11 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
On 03/20/2014 06:18 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Alexei Kornienko
alexei.kornie...@gmail.com
On 03/20/2014 06:18 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Alexei Kornienko
alexei.kornie...@gmail.com mailto:alexei.kornie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
We've done some profiling and results are quite interesting:
during 1,5 hour ceilometer inserted 59755
Sean,
Absolutely agree with you.
It's not the same to execute query and get plain text, and execute query
and get hierarchy of python objects.
Plus I disagree when I hear that SQLAlchemy is slow. It's slow when you are
using it wrong.
Like in Nova Scheduler [1] we were fetching full 3 tables
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 03/20/2014 06:18 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Alexei Kornienko
alexei.kornie...@gmail.com mailto:alexei.kornie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
We've done some profiling and results
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 03/20/2014 06:18 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Alexei Kornienko
alexei.kornie...@gmail.com mailto:alexei.kornie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
We've done some profiling and results
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.comwrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 03/20/2014 06:18 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Alexei Kornienko
alexei.kornie...@gmail.com
Hello,
Please see some comments inline.
Best Regards,
Alexei Kornienko
On 03/21/2014 11:11 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
On 03/20/2014 06:18 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 03/20/2014 06:18 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Thu, Mar
Hi all,
First of all, thanks for your suggestions!
To summarize the discussions here:
1. We are not going to install Mongo (because is's wrong ?)
2. Idea about spawning several collectors is suspicious (btw there is a
patch that run several collectors: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79962/.)
On 03/20/2014 05:49 AM, Nadya Privalova wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, thanks for your suggestions!
To summarize the discussions here:
1. We are not going to install Mongo (because is's wrong ?)
We are not going to install Mongo not from base distribution, because
we don't do that for things
Sean, thank for analysis.
JFYI, I did some initial profiling, it's described here
https://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org/msg19030.html.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 03/20/2014 05:49 AM, Nadya Privalova wrote:
Hi all,
First of
March 2014 11:16
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer
tempest testing in gate
...
While I agree that Tempest's job is not to test performance, we do have to
give some basic sanity checking
)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer
tempest testing in gate
...
While I agree that Tempest's job is not to test performance, we do have
to give some basic sanity checking here that the software is running in some
performance profile that we believe
On 03/20/2014 01:27 PM, Nadya Privalova wrote:
Tim, yep. If you use one db for Ceilometer and Nova then nova's
performance may be affected.
If I understood it correctly the problem is not the higher load produced
directly by Ceilometer on the database. The problem is that the
Ceilometer compute
]
Sent: 20 March 2014 11:16
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer
tempest testing in gate
...
While I agree that Tempest's job is not to test performance, we do have to
give some basic sanity
On 03/20/2014 06:15 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/20/2014 05:49 AM, Nadya Privalova wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, thanks for your suggestions!
To summarize the discussions here:
1. We are not going to install Mongo (because is's wrong ?)
We are not going to install Mongo not from base
On 03/20/2014 11:35 AM, David Kranz wrote:
On 03/20/2014 06:15 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/20/2014 05:49 AM, Nadya Privalova wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, thanks for your suggestions!
To summarize the discussions here:
1. We are not going to install Mongo (because is's wrong ?)
We are not
On 03/20/2014 12:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/20/2014 11:35 AM, David Kranz wrote:
On 03/20/2014 06:15 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/20/2014 05:49 AM, Nadya Privalova wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, thanks for your suggestions!
To summarize the discussions here:
1. We are not going to install
On 03/20/2014 01:01 PM, David Kranz wrote:
On 03/20/2014 12:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/20/2014 11:35 AM, David Kranz wrote:
On 03/20/2014 06:15 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 03/20/2014 05:49 AM, Nadya Privalova wrote:
Hi all,
First of all, thanks for your suggestions!
To summarize the
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 00:03 +0200, Alexei Kornienko wrote:
Hello,
We've done some profiling and results are quite interesting:
during 1,5 hour ceilometer inserted 59755 events (59755 calls to
record_metering_data)
this calls resulted in total 2591573 SQL queries.
Yes, this matches my own
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Alexei Kornienko
alexei.kornie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
We've done some profiling and results are quite interesting:
during 1,5 hour ceilometer inserted 59755 events (59755 calls to
record_metering_data)
this calls resulted in total 2591573 SQL queries.
On 03/21/2014 12:15 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 00:03 +0200, Alexei Kornienko wrote:
Hello,
We've done some profiling and results are quite interesting:
during 1,5 hour ceilometer inserted 59755 events (59755 calls to
record_metering_data)
this calls resulted in total 2591573
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 00:32 +0200, Alexei Kornienko wrote:
On 03/21/2014 12:15 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 00:03 +0200, Alexei Kornienko wrote:
Hello,
We've done some profiling and results are quite interesting:
during 1,5 hour ceilometer inserted 59755 events (59755
On 03/21/2014 12:53 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 00:32 +0200, Alexei Kornienko wrote:
On 03/21/2014 12:15 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 00:03 +0200, Alexei Kornienko wrote:
Hello,
We've done some profiling and results are quite interesting:
during 1,5 hour
Alexei, awesome work.
Rollbacks are caused not by retry logic but by create_or_update logic:
We first try to do INSERT in sub-transaction when it fails we rollback
this transaction and do update instead.
if you take a look at my patch addressing deadlocks(
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 01:02 +0200, Alexei Kornienko wrote:
On 03/21/2014 12:53 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 00:32 +0200, Alexei Kornienko wrote:
On 03/21/2014 12:15 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 00:03 +0200, Alexei Kornienko wrote:
Hello,
We've done some
: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra]
Ceilometer tempest testing in gate
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
So I'm still -1 at the point in making UCA our default run environment
until it's provably functional for a period of time. Because
things running at all times) ?
Tim
*From:* Chmouel Boudjnah [mailto:chmo...@enovance.com]
*Sent:* 18 March 2014 17:58
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
*Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra]
Ceilometer tempest testing in gate
The ceilometer collector is meant to scale horizontally. Have you tried
configuring the test environment to run more than one copy, to process the
notifications more quickly?
Doug
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Nadya Privalova nprival...@mirantis.comwrote:
Hi folks,
I'd like to discuss
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.comwrote:
The ceilometer collector is meant to scale horizontally. Have you tried
configuring the test environment to run more than one copy, to process the
notifications more quickly?
FYI:
On 03/19/2014 06:09 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
The ceilometer collector is meant to scale horizontally. Have you tried
configuring the test environment to run more than one copy, to process
the notifications more quickly?
The ceilometer collector is already one of the top running processes on
On 03/18/2014 08:09 AM, Nadya Privalova wrote:
Hi folks,
I'd like to discuss Ceilometer's tempest situation with you.
Now we have several patch sets on review that test core functionality of
Ceilometer: notificaton and pollstering (topic
On Tue, Mar 18 2014, Sean Dague wrote:
There is a fundamental problem here that the Ceilometer team requires a
version of Mongo that's not provided by the distro. We've taken a pretty
hard line on not requiring newer versions of non python stuff than the
distros we support actually have.
On 03/18/2014 09:02 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18 2014, Sean Dague wrote:
There is a fundamental problem here that the Ceilometer team requires a
version of Mongo that's not provided by the distro. We've taken a pretty
hard line on not requiring newer versions of non python stuff
On Tue, Mar 18 2014, Sean Dague wrote:
We've not required UCA for any other project to pass the gate. So what
is the issue with Mongo 2.0.4 that makes it unsupportable in ceilometer?
We require features not present in MongoDB 2.2.
--
Julien Danjou
-- Free Software hacker
--
On 03/18/2014 12:09 PM, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
We've not required UCA for any other project to pass the gate.
Is it that bad to have UCA in default devstack, as far as I know UCA is
the
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
So I'm still -1 at the point in making UCA our default run environment
until it's provably functional for a period of time. Because working
around upstream distro breaks is no fun.
I agree, if UCA is not very stable ATM, this
[mailto:chmo...@enovance.com]
Sent: 18 March 2014 17:58
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][QA][Tempest][Infra] Ceilometer
tempest testing in gate
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Sean Dague
s...@dague.netmailto:s...@dague.net
38 matches
Mail list logo
