Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] stable branches maintenance

2017-06-15 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 03:48:00PM +0300, Denis Meltsaykin wrote: > Greetings everyone! > > Since the development of fuel-related projects is currently not so active > as it used to be, I want to propose a change in how we maintain stable > branches. > > -Motivation- > As for now to commit

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominating Alexander Kislitsky for fuel-web-core

2017-02-27 Thread Alexander Kislitsky
Thank you! On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Ihor Kalnytskyi wrote: > I'm pleased to welcome Alexander to the fuel-web core team! > > https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/664,members > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Fedor Zhadaev > wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominating Alexander Kislitsky for fuel-web-core

2017-02-27 Thread Ihor Kalnytskyi
I'm pleased to welcome Alexander to the fuel-web core team! https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/664,members On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Fedor Zhadaev wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:36 AM Булат Гайфуллин > wrote: >> >> +1

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominating Alexander Kislitsky for fuel-web-core

2017-02-22 Thread Fedor Zhadaev
+1 On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 12:36 AM Булат Гайфуллин wrote: > +1 > > 2017-02-21 17:01 GMT+03:00 Alexey Shtokolov : > > Hey fellow fuelers, > > I'd like to nominate Alexander Kislitsky to the fuel-web-core team. > He's doing thorough review [1],

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominating Alexander Kislitsky for fuel-web-core

2017-02-21 Thread Булат Гайфуллин
+1 2017-02-21 17:01 GMT+03:00 Alexey Shtokolov : > Hey fellow fuelers, > > I'd like to nominate Alexander Kislitsky to the fuel-web-core team. > He's doing thorough review [1], participate in feature developments > (e.g. Config-DB enhancements, network-manager

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominating Alexander Kislitsky for fuel-web-core

2017-02-21 Thread Julia Aranovich
+1 On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:32 PM Aleksey Kasatkin wrote: > +1 > > > Aleksey Kasatkin > > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Ihor Kalnytskyi > wrote: > > Hey fellow fuelers, > > I'd like to nominate Alexander Kislitsky to the fuel-web-core team. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominating Alexander Kislitsky for fuel-web-core

2017-02-21 Thread Aleksey Kasatkin
+1 Aleksey Kasatkin On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Ihor Kalnytskyi wrote: > Hey fellow fuelers, > > I'd like to nominate Alexander Kislitsky to the fuel-web-core team. > He's doing thorough review [1], participate in feature developments > (e.g. Config-DB enhancements,

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][kolla][kuryr][openstack-ansible][openstack-helm] OpenStack on containers leaveraging kuryr

2017-02-13 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
Flavio, Somehow the fuel project and openstack-ansible project got left off the taglines. I’m not sure if the fuel peeps saw this thread, but I know the openstack-ansible peeps didn’t see the thread. As a result, I’ve added those taglines. Hopefully we can include the broader deployment

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][release] Opting out of Ocata?

2017-02-08 Thread Vladimir Kuklin
Dims Thank you for keeping the hand on the pulse. I am going to take over the PTL duties and we are going to produce releases according to the wiki . We are going to have RC1 next week (around Feb 15). After that we are going to proceed as

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][tripleo] Fuel and TripleO Cross-Project Integration

2016-11-10 Thread Aleksandr Didenko
Hi, > 3. Consider integration of Fuel provisioning, network configuration and disk partitioning with Ironic and TripleO As a part of this, I'd like to propose "l23network" puppet module [0] separation from fuel-library. This would allow anyone to reuse it for software-defined network

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Plugins] Contributing a new fuel-plugin

2016-10-19 Thread Vladimir Kuklin
Hi Omar You might want to follow basic OpenStack documentation here: http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/creators.html if you want to create a new project. For fuel plugins just put it into fuel namespace and call it something like 'fuel-plugin-'. If you want to contribute to the existing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Glance][Vsphere][Datastore]

2016-10-05 Thread Sabari Murugesan
This means that the glance store driver failed to lookup the datacenter configured in the vmware_datastores option of glance-api.conf . >From the official documentation for that option :- *vmware_datastores allows administrators to* *configure multiple datastores to save glance image in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

2016-09-19 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
Ruijing, In a nutshell, the guide would be 0) install vanilla Centos 7 1) install fuel-release package (it configures necessary yum repos) wget

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel][plugin] Is there a way to change plugin html dynamically?

2016-09-19 Thread Stanislaw Bogatkin
Hi Peter, there are two ways I see today to have done what you want to: First, you can change [0] and add some fields to store second netapp device. In this case you'll need to change puppet manifests logic to use new fields - according to current state, it's a bunch of code double or you'll

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

2016-09-19 Thread Guo, Ruijing
Hi, Vladimir Any guide to install from rpm? Thanks, -Ruijing From: Vladimir Kozhukalov [mailto:vkozhuka...@mirantis.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:58 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Fuel]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] PTL non candidacy

2016-09-16 Thread Igor Marnat
Vladimir, fuelers, very impressive list of achievements for 1 release cycle. Good work, folks! Regards, Igor Marnat On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov < vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > Newton cycle is getting to its end and it is time to look at what

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-virtualbox] Nominate Serhii Ovsianikov to fuel-virtualbox core

2016-09-15 Thread Maksim Malchuk
As there are no objections so, please welcome Serhii as he's just joined fuel-virtualbox Core Team! On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Sergey Kulanov wrote: > +1 > > 2016-09-08 11:12 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Kozhukalov : > >> +1 >> >> Vladimir Kozhukalov

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-library] Nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core

2016-09-15 Thread Maksim Malchuk
As there are no objections so, please welcome Stanislaw as he's just joined fuel-library Core Team! On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Aleksey Kasatkin wrote: > +1 > > > Aleksey Kasatkin > > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Ilya Kutukov for fuel-plugins-core

2016-09-15 Thread Igor Kalnitsky
Sorry for being late on this. I've added Ilya to fuel-plugins-core group. Congrats, Ilya! On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Alexey Shtokolov wrote: > My strong +1 > > Ilya made and keeps making a great contribution to the development of Fuel > Plugins Framework > on both

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-library] Nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core

2016-09-13 Thread Aleksey Kasatkin
+1 Aleksey Kasatkin On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Maksim Malchuk > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I would like to nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core due to > his > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-library] Nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core

2016-09-12 Thread Alex Schultz
+1 On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Maksim Malchuk wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core due to his > significant contribution to the project [1] and [2]. He is one of the top > reviewers and contributors in the project. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-library] Nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core

2016-09-12 Thread Anastasia Urlapova
+1 On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 3:00 AM, Matthew Mosesohn wrote: > +1 > > On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Alexey Shtokolov > wrote: > > +1 > > > > Stanislaw made a great contribution! > > I would like to mention SSL-support, YAQL expressions for

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-library] Nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core

2016-09-11 Thread Matthew Mosesohn
+1 On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Alexey Shtokolov wrote: > +1 > > Stanislaw made a great contribution! > I would like to mention SSL-support, YAQL expressions for data-driven > orchestration > and his awesome live YAQL evaluator for Fuel Master node [0] > > [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-library] Nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core

2016-09-11 Thread Alexey Shtokolov
+1 Stanislaw made a great contribution! I would like to mention SSL-support, YAQL expressions for data-driven orchestration and his awesome live YAQL evaluator for Fuel Master node [0] [0] https://github.com/sorrowless/fuyaql --- WBR, Alexey Shtokolov Fuel Development Lead On Thu, Sep 8, 2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Ilya Kutukov for fuel-plugins-core

2016-09-11 Thread Alexey Shtokolov
My strong +1 Ilya made and keeps making a great contribution to the development of Fuel Plugins Framework on both sides (nailgun and plugins) especially during the Newton release cycle! --- WBR, Alexey Shtokolov Fuel Development Lead On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Aleksey Kasatkin

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Ilya Kutukov for fuel-plugins-core

2016-09-11 Thread Aleksey Kasatkin
+1 Aleksey Kasatkin On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Sergey Vasilenko wrote: > +1 > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Ilya Kutukov for fuel-plugins-core

2016-09-10 Thread Sergey Vasilenko
+1 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Ilya Kutukov for fuel-plugins-core

2016-09-09 Thread Maksim Malchuk
+1 On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: > Hey Fuelers, > > I'd like to nominate Ilya for joining fuel-plugins-core group. He's a > top contributor by both reviews [1] and commits [2] over the past > release cycle. Fuel cores, please share your votes. > > -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Ilya Kutukov for fuel-plugins-core

2016-09-09 Thread Dmitry Guryanov
+1 On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Alexey Stepanov wrote: > +1 > Best regards, > Alexey Stepanov. > > чт, 8 сент. 2016 г., 12:19 Bulat Gaifullin : > >> +1 >> >> Regards, >> Bulat Gaifullin >> Mirantis Inc. >> >> >> >> On 08 Sep 2016, at 12:05,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Ilya Kutukov for fuel-plugins-core

2016-09-08 Thread Alexey Stepanov
+1 Best regards, Alexey Stepanov. чт, 8 сент. 2016 г., 12:19 Bulat Gaifullin : > +1 > > Regards, > Bulat Gaifullin > Mirantis Inc. > > > > On 08 Sep 2016, at 12:05, Georgy Kibardin wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Igor Kalnitsky

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-library] Nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core

2016-09-08 Thread Denis Egorenko
+1 2016-09-08 13:06 GMT+03:00 Aleksandr Didenko : > +1 > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Sergey Vasilenko > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> >> >> __ >> OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-library] Nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core

2016-09-08 Thread Aleksandr Didenko
+1 On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Sergey Vasilenko wrote: > +1 > > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Ilya Kutukov for fuel-plugins-core

2016-09-08 Thread Bulat Gaifullin
+1 Regards, Bulat Gaifullin Mirantis Inc. > On 08 Sep 2016, at 12:05, Georgy Kibardin wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Igor Kalnitsky > wrote: > Hey Fuelers, > > I'd like to nominate Ilya for

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-library] Nominate Stanislaw Bogatkin to fuel-library core

2016-09-08 Thread Sergey Vasilenko
+1 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Ilya Kutukov for fuel-plugins-core

2016-09-08 Thread Georgy Kibardin
+1 On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: > Hey Fuelers, > > I'd like to nominate Ilya for joining fuel-plugins-core group. He's a > top contributor by both reviews [1] and commits [2] over the past > release cycle. Fuel cores, please share your votes. > > -

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-virtualbox] Nominate Serhii Ovsianikov to fuel-virtualbox core

2016-09-08 Thread Sergey Kulanov
+1 2016-09-08 11:12 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Kozhukalov : > +1 > > Vladimir Kozhukalov > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Maksim Malchuk > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I would like to nominate Serhii Ovsianikov to fuel-virtualbox core due to >> his

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-virtualbox] Nominate Serhii Ovsianikov to fuel-virtualbox core

2016-09-08 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
+1 Vladimir Kozhukalov On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Maksim Malchuk wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to nominate Serhii Ovsianikov to fuel-virtualbox core due to > his significant contribution to the project [1] and [2]. He is the second > reviewer and for the last

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

2016-09-07 Thread Guo, Ruijing
Congratuations. any plan to have fuel docker image? From: Oleg Gelbukh [mailto:ogelb...@mirantis.com] Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2016 4:28 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getti

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

2016-09-07 Thread Oleg Gelbukh
Congratulations, Vladimir, that's a huge step in a right direction for Fuel. -- Best regards, Oleg Gelbukh On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov < vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > I'm glad to announce that we have working BVT jobs on Fuel CI that do not >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

2016-09-07 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
Dear colleagues, I'm glad to announce that we have working BVT jobs on Fuel CI that do not use ISO but instead deploy Fuel admin node from packages onto vanilla Centos 7. Please take a look at [1]. There are jobs '10.0.repos.*' [2], [3], [4]. We continue to work on re-implementing review jobs

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

2016-09-06 Thread Aleksey Kasatkin
Hi, -1 to the proposal. We have the ability (and we use it) to add guys to several core groups. So, AFAIC, Vladimir's pros point #1 is covered. IMO, pros point #2 looks questionable and not so important. Cons could be worse (agree with Lukasz). Thanks, Aleksey Kasatkin On Tue, Sep 6, 2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

2016-09-06 Thread Sergii Golovatiuk
Hi, Fuel repositories include several languages/technologies (puppet, python, ruby, make ...) Core engineer nominated for achievements in one project may have average skills in another language/technology. So, I give '-1' the suggestion. However, we may have one group for python project, one

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

2016-09-06 Thread Aleksandr Didenko
Hi, -1 for the proposal Regards, Alex On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Alexey Stepanov wrote: > Guys, I have one serious question: WHO will be global core? > Example: > I'm core reviewer in 2 repos, but I'm absolutely could not be core > reviewer in puppet! > > On

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

2016-09-06 Thread Alexey Stepanov
Guys, I have one serious question: WHO will be global core? Example: I'm core reviewer in 2 repos, but I'm absolutely could not be core reviewer in puppet! On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: > -1 for the proposal. I see no problems to add guys who're

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

2016-09-06 Thread Igor Kalnitsky
-1 for the proposal. I see no problems to add guys who're familiar with various sub-projects to multiple core groups. On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Evgeniy L wrote: > +1 to Lukasz. > -1 to the proposal, we had it this way for a quite some time, and it was not > good for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

2016-09-06 Thread Evgeniy L
+1 to Lukasz. -1 to the proposal, we had it this way for a quite some time, and it was not good for the project (as Lukasz pointed out), why should a person who merges the code to the library have an access to merge the code to Nailgun/Astute without proper expertise. Those are different areas

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

2016-09-06 Thread Lukasz Oles
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Andrew Maksimov wrote: > +1 > This is a good proposal, I also think we should have single fuel-core group > for all repos. In real life core reviewers won't set +2 or merge to repos > with which they are not familiar with. Actually one of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

2016-09-06 Thread Bulat Gaifullin
+1, I think it is good idea. Regards, Bulat Gaifullin Mirantis Inc. > On 05 Sep 2016, at 20:17, Maksim Malchuk wrote: > > I want to clarify my previous reply > +1 > but the new fuel-core would be a small group of the cores who are fully > involved in the whole Fuel

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

2016-09-05 Thread Maksim Malchuk
I want to clarify my previous reply +1 but the new fuel-core would be a small group of the cores who are fully involved in the whole Fuel project. On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Alexey Stepanov wrote: > -1 > This is seriously dangerous idea: core-reviewer in fuel-qa

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

2016-09-05 Thread Alexey Stepanov
-1 This is seriously dangerous idea: core-reviewer in fuel-qa does not mean exact skills for +2/W on fuel-octane, for example. Sometimes, because of limited time, reviewer will press +W without understanding patch detail. In repo, which he knows, he can fix issue later by itself, but only of he

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

2016-09-05 Thread Maksim Malchuk
-1 My vision - we should have something like super-core group with a smaller number of the current core guys. This is because a lot of current core guys were switched to the other projects and already out of the scope. Such guys still can be cores in their former projects and can help sometimes,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

2016-09-05 Thread Andrew Maksimov
+1 This is a good proposal, I also think we should have single fuel-core group for all repos. In real life core reviewers won't set +2 or merge to repos with which they are not familiar with. Regards, Andrey Maximov On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov < vkozhuka...@mirantis.com>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

2016-09-05 Thread Bartlomiej Piotrowski
Vladimir, as you most likely remember, we've been there already. The previous fuel-core group has been split especially due to low number of core reviewers, too big load on them and inflexibility in promoting valuable contributors into the group. Worth noting that it was very welcome change. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

2016-09-05 Thread Stanislaw Bogatkin
Hi Vladimir, I see one big problem here - people who have expert skills in one area (for example, in fuel-library puppet manifests and their logic) will have ability to set +2 and workflow +1 to reviews in other areas (for example, in fuel-astute) where they don't have good expertise. It can lead

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][FFE] FF exception for Role Decomposition patch

2016-09-02 Thread Dmitry Klenov
Thanks, Vladimir! -Dmitry. On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov < vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Thanks for you efforts, FFE is granted, please go ahead. I hope we'll get > it merged by 09/09/2016. > > Vladimir Kozhukalov > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Dmitry Klenov

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][FFE] FF exception for Role Decomposition patch

2016-09-02 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
Thanks for you efforts, FFE is granted, please go ahead. I hope we'll get it merged by 09/09/2016. Vladimir Kozhukalov On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Dmitry Klenov wrote: > Hi Fuelers, > > I would like to ask for a FFE for "Role Decomposition" feature. The spec > is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

2016-09-01 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko
This is so awesome! Thanks! On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:30 PM Jay Pipes wrote: > On 08/16/2016 04:58 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > > > We finally have working custom deployment job that deploys Fuel admin > > node using online RPM repositories (not

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

2016-08-29 Thread Denis Egorenko
Thank you all! I will do my best! :) 2016-08-29 15:21 GMT+03:00 Maksim Malchuk : > Although today is not the 31 Aug and we have a lack of core-reviewers in > the fuel-library I would like to speed up the process a little. > > And as there are no objections so, please

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

2016-08-29 Thread Maksim Malchuk
Although today is not the 31 Aug and we have a lack of core-reviewers in the fuel-library I would like to speed up the process a little. And as there are no objections so, please welcome Denis as he's just joined fuel-library Core Team! On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

2016-08-29 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
Although I am not a core in fuel-library, I am voting +1. Vladimir Kozhukalov On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Ivan Berezovskiy wrote: > +1, great job! > > 2016-08-26 10:33 GMT+03:00 Bogdan Dobrelya : > >> +1 >> >> On 25.08.2016 21:08,

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

2016-08-26 Thread Ivan Berezovskiy
+1, great job! 2016-08-26 10:33 GMT+03:00 Bogdan Dobrelya : > +1 > > On 25.08.2016 21:08, Stanislaw Bogatkin wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Aleksandr Didenko > > > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

2016-08-26 Thread Bogdan Dobrelya
+1 On 25.08.2016 21:08, Stanislaw Bogatkin wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Aleksandr Didenko > > wrote: > > +1 > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Sergey Vasilenko >

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

2016-08-25 Thread Stanislaw Bogatkin
+1 On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Aleksandr Didenko wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Sergey Vasilenko > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> /sv >> >> >> >> __ >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

2016-08-25 Thread Aleksandr Didenko
+1 On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Sergey Vasilenko wrote: > +1 > > > /sv > > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

2016-08-25 Thread Sergey Vasilenko
+1 /sv __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

2016-08-25 Thread Maksim Malchuk
My big +1 On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 4:13 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > I'm surprised Denis was not core before. > He has been a tremendous core reviewer for the Puppet OpenStack modules. > > My vote doesn't count but I'm still encouraging this effort. Congrats > Denis, it's well

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

2016-08-24 Thread Emilien Macchi
I'm surprised Denis was not core before. He has been a tremendous core reviewer for the Puppet OpenStack modules. My vote doesn't count but I'm still encouraging this effort. Congrats Denis, it's well deserved! On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Sergii Golovatiuk wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

2016-08-24 Thread Sergii Golovatiuk
+1 -- Best regards, Sergii Golovatiuk, Skype #golserge IRC #holser On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Matthew Mosesohn wrote: > +1 Denis is excellent at reviews and spotting CI failure root causes. > I definitely support him. > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Alex

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core

2016-08-24 Thread Matthew Mosesohn
+1 Denis is excellent at reviews and spotting CI failure root causes. I definitely support him. On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > Ahoy Fuel Cores, > > I would like to propose Denis Egorenko for fuel-library core. Denis is > always providing great

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Need Help in adding multiple External networks in Fuel 9.0

2016-08-23 Thread Sergey Vasilenko
> > eth0 : Admin ( PXE), Management (101), Storage (102), Internal (1000-1030) > eth1 : External ( Public ) > eth2 : None > > I am using *fuel 9.0* and i want to use provider network / Multiple > external networks with fuel. i had vlan networks on *eth1* as below > > *eth1 : 192.168.200.0/24

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of ISO

2016-08-16 Thread Jay Pipes
On 08/16/2016 04:58 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote: Dear colleagues, We finally have working custom deployment job that deploys Fuel admin node using online RPM repositories (not ISO) on vanilla Centos 7.0. Bravo! :) Currently all Fuel system and deployment tests use ISO and we are planning

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] mcollective configuration on slaves

2016-08-16 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
Currently we use /etc/nailgun-agent/nodiscover file to prevent early run of nailgun-agent (and thus its conflict with cloud-init). We put this file when we build an image [0] and then we remove this file at the late stage of system start process when cloud-init is done [1]. Anyway this does not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Patches for python-fuelclient are blocked by broken master.python-fuelclient.pkgs.ubuntu.review_fuel_client

2016-08-09 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko
Folks, It’s been several days when the entire python-fuelclient team is blocked by a broken CI job. Please make it non-voting ASAP. - romcheg > 8 серп. 2016 р. о 12:19 Roman Prykhodchenko написав(ла): > > Vladimir, > > Thanks you for the update on this. Is there any ETA

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Patches for python-fuelclient are blocked by broken master.python-fuelclient.pkgs.ubuntu.review_fuel_client

2016-08-08 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko
Vladimir, Thanks you for the update on this. Is there any ETA available? On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:09 PM Vladimir Kozhukalov < vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote: > We are working on this. Will fix soon. > > Vladimir Kozhukalov > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Patches for python-fuelclient are blocked by broken master.python-fuelclient.pkgs.ubuntu.review_fuel_client

2016-08-08 Thread Vladimir Kozhukalov
We are working on this. Will fix soon. Vladimir Kozhukalov On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko wrote: > If it’s not possible to fix this job during next few hours, let’s mark in > as non-voting until the bug(s) are fixed. > > > 8 серп. 2016 р. о 11:48 Roman

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Patches for python-fuelclient are blocked by broken master.python-fuelclient.pkgs.ubuntu.review_fuel_client

2016-08-08 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko
If it’s not possible to fix this job during next few hours, let’s mark in as non-voting until the bug(s) are fixed. > 8 серп. 2016 р. о 11:48 Roman Prykhodchenko написав(ла): > > Folks, > > Since the end of last week > master.python-fuelclient.pkgs.ubuntu.review_fuel_client

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel]Nominating Vitalii Kulanov for python-fuelclient-core

2016-08-01 Thread Sergii Golovatiuk
Congratulations Vitalii! -- Best regards, Sergii Golovatiuk, Skype #golserge IRC #holser On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Roman Prykhodchenko wrote: > The entire core team has voted for the nomination so I’m putting it to > power. Let’s all welcome Vitalii as a new core

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel]Nominating Vitalii Kulanov for python-fuelclient-core

2016-08-01 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko
The entire core team has voted for the nomination so I’m putting it to power. Let’s all welcome Vitalii as a new core reviewer. Congratulations! > 1 серп. 2016 р. о 08:55 Aleksey Kasatkin написав(ла): > > +1 > > > Aleksey Kasatkin > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 7:46

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel]Nominating Vitalii Kulanov for python-fuelclient-core

2016-08-01 Thread Aleksey Kasatkin
+1 Aleksey Kasatkin On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: > Vitaly's doing a great job. +2, no doubts! > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Tatyana Leontovich > wrote: > > A huge +1 > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:33 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Capacity table

2016-07-27 Thread Vitaly Kramskikh
If "new design" is the design you've proposed in the original email, then no - we'll have to reopen the bug and then revert the change again. 2016-07-27 11:36 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Dmitriev : > Hello Vitaly, > > Thank you for this answer. > The main question here is the

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Capacity table

2016-07-27 Thread Dmitry Dmitriev
Hello Vitaly, Thank you for this answer. The main question here is the business logic. Do we have to use new design or don’t. With best regards, Dmitry > On 26 Jul 2016, at 17:47, Vitaly Kramskikh wrote: > > Hi, Dmitry, > > Your design seems to be similar to one of

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] Capacity table

2016-07-26 Thread Vitaly Kramskikh
Hi, Dmitry, Your design seems to be similar to one of our attempts to fix this bug: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/280737/. Though this fix was reverted, because it led to the bug with a higher priority: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1556909. So your proposed design would lead to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel]Nominating Vitalii Kulanov for python-fuelclient-core

2016-07-25 Thread Igor Kalnitsky
Vitaly's doing a great job. +2, no doubts! On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Tatyana Leontovich wrote: > A huge +1 > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Yegor Kotko wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel]Nominating Vitalii Kulanov for python-fuelclient-core

2016-07-25 Thread Tatyana Leontovich
A huge +1 On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Yegor Kotko wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko > wrote: > >> Hi Fuelers, >> >> Vitalii has been providing great code reviews and patches for some time. >> His recent commitment to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel]Nominating Vitalii Kulanov for python-fuelclient-core

2016-07-25 Thread Yegor Kotko
+1 On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko wrote: > Hi Fuelers, > > Vitalii has been providing great code reviews and patches for some time. > His recent commitment to help consolidating both old and new fuel clients > and his bug-squashing activities show his

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa and fuel-devops core

2016-07-21 Thread Tatyana Leontovich
Alexey, Congrats! On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Dennis Dmitriev wrote: > +1 > > > On 07/21/2016 01:56 PM, Alexander Kurenyshev wrote: > > +1 > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Vladimir Khlyunev < > vkhlyu...@mirantis.com> wrote: > >> +1

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa and fuel-devops core

2016-07-21 Thread Dennis Dmitriev
+1 On 07/21/2016 01:56 PM, Alexander Kurenyshev wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Vladimir Khlyunev > > wrote: > > +1 > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Dmitry Tyzhnenko >

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-octane] Nominate Sergey Abramov to fuel-octane core

2016-07-21 Thread Yuriy Taraday
+1 We need more cores anyway ;) On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:56 AM Oleg Gelbukh wrote: > +1 here > > Sergey's performance and quality of the code he submitted are impressive. > Please, keep going. > > -- > Best regards, > Oleg Gelbukh > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:21 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa and fuel-devops core

2016-07-21 Thread Alexander Kurenyshev
+1 On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Vladimir Khlyunev wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Dmitry Tyzhnenko > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Artem Panchenko > > wrote: >> >>> +1 >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-octane] Nominate Sergey Abramov to fuel-octane core

2016-07-21 Thread Oleg Gelbukh
+1 here Sergey's performance and quality of the code he submitted are impressive. Please, keep going. -- Best regards, Oleg Gelbukh On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Artur Svechnikov wrote: > +1 > > Best regards, > Svechnikov Artur > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:10

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel-octane] Nominate Sergey Abramov to fuel-octane core

2016-07-21 Thread Artur Svechnikov
+1 Best regards, Svechnikov Artur On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Ilya Kharin wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to nominate Sergey Abramov to fuel-octane core due to his > significant contribution to the project [1] and [2]. > > Best regards, > Ilya Kharin. > > [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa and fuel-devops core

2016-07-20 Thread Vladimir Khlyunev
+1 On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Dmitry Tyzhnenko wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Artem Panchenko > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> On 15.07.16 16:25, Tatyana Leontovich wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:08 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa and fuel-devops core

2016-07-18 Thread Dmitry Tyzhnenko
+1 On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Artem Panchenko wrote: > +1 > > > On 15.07.16 16:25, Tatyana Leontovich wrote: > > +1 > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Anastasia Urlapova < > aurlap...@mirantis.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Jul 15,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa and fuel-devops core

2016-07-15 Thread Artem Panchenko
+1 On 15.07.16 16:25, Tatyana Leontovich wrote: +1 On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Anastasia Urlapova > wrote: +1 On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Andrey Sledzinskiy

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa and fuel-devops core

2016-07-15 Thread Tatyana Leontovich
+1 On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Anastasia Urlapova wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Andrey Sledzinskiy < > asledzins...@mirantis.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> I'd like to nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa [0] and fuel-devops [1] >> core. >> >> Alexey is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa and fuel-devops core

2016-07-15 Thread Bulat Gaifullin
+1 Regards, Bulat Gaifullin Mirantis Inc. > On 15 Jul 2016, at 16:08, Anastasia Urlapova wrote: > > +1 > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Andrey Sledzinskiy > > wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to nominate Alexey

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa and fuel-devops core

2016-07-15 Thread Anastasia Urlapova
+1 On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Andrey Sledzinskiy < asledzins...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to nominate Alexey Stepanov for fuel-qa [0] and fuel-devops [1] > core. > > Alexey is doing great job improving fuel-qa and fuel-devops projects. > He's become an expert in code base in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Mitaka stable branch

2016-07-13 Thread Vladimir Kuklin
Bogdan, Vladimir *Regarding upgrades of Fuel Master Node and environments. * First, regarding Fuel Master Node upgrades and enablement of usage of 9.0 LCM features with older clusters. It is assumed that we test usability of Fuel Mitaka code with already deployed clusters, e.g. 8.0, 7.0 and so

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] New version of fuel-devops (2.9.21)

2016-07-13 Thread Dennis Dmitriev
Hi Bogdan, thanks for the question! On 07/12/2016 10:26 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > On 07/12/2016 09:24 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: >> Thank you for a hard work, that's a really great tool. >> >> Anyone who is interested, please note that fuel-devops, despite of the >> name, may be used outside

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Mitaka stable branch

2016-07-13 Thread Bogdan Dobrelya
On 07/13/2016 11:08 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote: > > > Few Q: > - Is the stable/mitaka the only stable branch in the scope of the > changes? > > ​Yes, this announce is only about Mitaka branch. All other stable > branches are to be treated as usual, i.e. no feature backports, bug

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >