I am absolutely -1 for using Cobbler for that. Lastly, Ironic guys became
much more open for adopting new features (at least if they are implemented
in terms of Ironic drivers). Currently, it looks like we are probably able
to deliver zero step Fuel Ironic driver by 6.1. Ironic already has
On 19 Nov 2014, at 16:10, Vladimir Kozhukalov vkozhuka...@mirantis.com
wrote:
I am absolutely -1 for using Cobbler for that. Lastly, Ironic guys became
much more open for adopting new features (at least if they are implemented in
terms of Ironic drivers). Currently, it looks like we are
Tomasz, Vladimir, others,
The way I see it is we need a way to discover the corresponding IPMI
address for a given node for out-of-band power management. The
ultimate ipmitool command is going to be exactly the same whether it
comes from Cobbler or Ironic, and all we need to do is feed
(not for usage questions)
Cc: Bogdan Dobrelya
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Power management in Cobbler
Tomasz, Vladimir, others,
The way I see it is we need a way to discover the corresponding IPMI
address for a given node for out-of-band power management. The
ultimate ipmitool command
On 19 Nov 2014, at 17:56, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov wrote:
Would net booting a minimal discovery image work? You usually can dump ipmi
network information from the host.
To boot from minimal iso (which is waht we do now) you still need to tell the
host to do it. This is where IPMI
...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 9:28 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Bogdan Dobrelya
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Power management in Cobbler
On 19 Nov 2014, at 17:56, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov wrote:
Would net booting
I am +1 for using cobbler as power management before we merge Ironic-based
stuff. It is essential part also for our HA and stop
provisioning/deployment mechanism.
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Dmitriy Shulyak dshul...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Not long time ago we discussed necessity of power
