Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Separate code freeze for repos

2014-11-26 Thread Aleksandra Fedorova
Mike, from DevOps point of view it doesn't really matter when we do branching. This is the process we need to perform anyway and this partial branching doesn't change too much for us. Although there might be several technical questions like: 1) When we create /6.1 mirror? 2) Should we create

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Separate code freeze for repos

2014-11-26 Thread Mike Scherbakov
I envision it in the following way: 1. stable/6.0 is created for fuel-main along with stable branch for other repo, which is under consideration, like fuel-web 2. In stable/6.0 of fuel-main, config.mk should be changed to refer to stable/6.0 for one of the repos, like fuel-web. master

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Separate code freeze for repos

2014-11-23 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
1. We discussed splitting fuel-web, I think we should do that before relaxing code freeze rules for it. 2. If there are high or critical priority bugs in a component during soft code freeze, all developers of that component should be writing, reviewing, or testing fixes for these bugs. 3. If we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Separate code freeze for repos

2014-11-17 Thread Mike Scherbakov
I believe that we need to do this, and agree with Vitaly. Basically, when we are getting low amount of review requests, it's easy enough to do backports to stable branch. So criteria should be based on this, and I believe it can be even more soft, than what Vitaly suggests. I suggest the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Separate code freeze for repos

2014-11-14 Thread Evgeniy L
Hi, There was an idea to make a separate code freeze for repos Could you please clarify what do you mean? I think we should have a way to merge patches for the next release event if it's code freeze for the current. Thanks, On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Vitaly Kramskikh

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Separate code freeze for repos

2014-11-14 Thread Vitaly Kramskikh
Evgeniy, That means that the stable branch can be created for some repos earlier. For example, fuel-web repo seems not to have critical issues for now and I'd like master branch of that repo to be opened for merging various stuff which shouldn't go to 6.0 and do not wait until all other repos

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Separate code freeze for repos

2014-11-14 Thread Igor Kalnitsky
Guys, The idea of separate unfreezing is cool itself, but we have to define some rules how to define that fuel-web is stable. I mean, in fuel-web we have different projects, so when Fuel UI is stable, the fuel_upgrade or Nailgun may be not. - Igor On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Vitaly

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Separate code freeze for repos

2014-11-14 Thread Vitaly Kramskikh
There is a proposal to consider a repo as stable if there are no high/critical bugs and there were no such new bugs with this priority for the last 3 days. I'm ok with it. 2014-11-14 17:16 GMT+03:00 Igor Kalnitsky ikalnit...@mirantis.com: Guys, The idea of separate unfreezing is cool itself,