Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode
FYI. We are going to disable Multi-node mode on UI even in experimental mode. And we will remove related code from nailgun in 7.0. https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1428054 On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com wrote: What do you guys think about switching CentOS CI job [1] to HA with single controller (1 controller + 1 or 2 computes)? Just to verify that our replacement of Simple mode works fine. [1] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/ On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote: Thanks Igor for the quick turn over, excellent! On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Igor Belikov ibeli...@mirantis.com wrote: Folks, Changes in CI jobs have been made, for master branch of fuel-library we are running CentOS HA + Nova VLAN and Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN . Job naming schema has also been changed, so now it includes actual testgroup. Current links for master branch CI jobs are [1] and [2], all other jobs can be found here[3] or will show up in your gerrit reviews. ISO and environments have been updated to the latest ones. [1] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/ [2] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.ubuntu.ha_neutron_vlan/ [3]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com -- Igor Belikov Fuel DevOps ibeli...@mirantis.com On 29 Jan 2015, at 13:42, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com wrote: Mike, Any objections / additional suggestions? no objections from me, and it's already covered by LP 1415116 bug [1] [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1415116 On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote: Folks, one of the things we should not forget about - is out Fuel CI gating jobs/tests. [1], [2]. One of them is actually runs simple mode. Unfortunately, I don't see details about tests ran for [1], [2], but I'm pretty sure it's same set as [3], [4]. I suggest to change tests. First of all, we need to get rid of simple runs (since we are deprecating it), and second - I'd like us to run Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN for one of the tests. Any objections / additional suggestions? [1] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_centos/ [2] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/ [3] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_centos/ [4] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/ On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Vasilenko svasile...@mirantis.com wrote: +1 to replace simple to HA with one controller /sv __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org ?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode
Do you mean single node? On 15 Apr 2015, at 17:04, Dmitry Pyzhov dpyz...@mirantis.com wrote: FYI. We are going to disable Multi-node mode on UI even in experimental mode. And we will remove related code from nailgun in 7.0. https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1428054 On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com wrote: What do you guys think about switching CentOS CI job [1] to HA with single controller (1 controller + 1 or 2 computes)? Just to verify that our replacement of Simple mode works fine. [1] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/ On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote: Thanks Igor for the quick turn over, excellent! On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Igor Belikov ibeli...@mirantis.com wrote: Folks, Changes in CI jobs have been made, for master branch of fuel-library we are running CentOS HA + Nova VLAN and Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN . Job naming schema has also been changed, so now it includes actual testgroup. Current links for master branch CI jobs are [1] and [2], all other jobs can be found here[3] or will show up in your gerrit reviews. ISO and environments have been updated to the latest ones. [1]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/ [2]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.ubuntu.ha_neutron_vlan/ [3]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com -- Igor Belikov Fuel DevOps ibeli...@mirantis.com On 29 Jan 2015, at 13:42, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com wrote: Mike, Any objections / additional suggestions? no objections from me, and it's already covered by LP 1415116 bug [1] [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1415116 On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote: Folks, one of the things we should not forget about - is out Fuel CI gating jobs/tests. [1], [2]. One of them is actually runs simple mode. Unfortunately, I don't see details about tests ran for [1], [2], but I'm pretty sure it's same set as [3], [4]. I suggest to change tests. First of all, we need to get rid of simple runs (since we are deprecating it), and second - I'd like us to run Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN for one of the tests. Any objections / additional suggestions? [1] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_centos/ [2] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/ [3] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_centos/ [4] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/ On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Vasilenko svasile...@mirantis.com wrote: +1 to replace simple to HA with one controller /sv __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Tomasz 'Zen' Napierala Product Engineering - Poland
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode
Tomasz, multi-node mode is a legacy non-HA mode with only 1 controller. Currently, our so-called HA mode support deployment with 1 controller, so it makes no sense to support both modes. On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Tomasz Napierala tnapier...@mirantis.com wrote: Do you mean single node? On 15 Apr 2015, at 17:04, Dmitry Pyzhov dpyz...@mirantis.com wrote: FYI. We are going to disable Multi-node mode on UI even in experimental mode. And we will remove related code from nailgun in 7.0. https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1428054 On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com wrote: What do you guys think about switching CentOS CI job [1] to HA with single controller (1 controller + 1 or 2 computes)? Just to verify that our replacement of Simple mode works fine. [1] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/ On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote: Thanks Igor for the quick turn over, excellent! On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Igor Belikov ibeli...@mirantis.com wrote: Folks, Changes in CI jobs have been made, for master branch of fuel-library we are running CentOS HA + Nova VLAN and Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN . Job naming schema has also been changed, so now it includes actual testgroup. Current links for master branch CI jobs are [1] and [2], all other jobs can be found here[3] or will show up in your gerrit reviews. ISO and environments have been updated to the latest ones. [1]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/ [2]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.ubuntu.ha_neutron_vlan/ [3]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com -- Igor Belikov Fuel DevOps ibeli...@mirantis.com On 29 Jan 2015, at 13:42, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com wrote: Mike, Any objections / additional suggestions? no objections from me, and it's already covered by LP 1415116 bug [1] [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1415116 On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote: Folks, one of the things we should not forget about - is out Fuel CI gating jobs/tests. [1], [2]. One of them is actually runs simple mode. Unfortunately, I don't see details about tests ran for [1], [2], but I'm pretty sure it's same set as [3], [4]. I suggest to change tests. First of all, we need to get rid of simple runs (since we are deprecating it), and second - I'd like us to run Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN for one of the tests. Any objections / additional suggestions? [1] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_centos/ [2] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/ [3] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_centos/ [4] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/ On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Vasilenko svasile...@mirantis.com wrote: +1 to replace simple to HA with one controller /sv __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode
Sorry, I just mixed the names ;) On 15 Apr 2015, at 18:25, Igor Kalnitsky ikalnit...@mirantis.com wrote: Tomasz, multi-node mode is a legacy non-HA mode with only 1 controller. Currently, our so-called HA mode support deployment with 1 controller, so it makes no sense to support both modes. On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Tomasz Napierala tnapier...@mirantis.com wrote: Do you mean single node? On 15 Apr 2015, at 17:04, Dmitry Pyzhov dpyz...@mirantis.com wrote: FYI. We are going to disable Multi-node mode on UI even in experimental mode. And we will remove related code from nailgun in 7.0. https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1428054 On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com wrote: What do you guys think about switching CentOS CI job [1] to HA with single controller (1 controller + 1 or 2 computes)? Just to verify that our replacement of Simple mode works fine. [1] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/ On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote: Thanks Igor for the quick turn over, excellent! On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Igor Belikov ibeli...@mirantis.com wrote: Folks, Changes in CI jobs have been made, for master branch of fuel-library we are running CentOS HA + Nova VLAN and Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN . Job naming schema has also been changed, so now it includes actual testgroup. Current links for master branch CI jobs are [1] and [2], all other jobs can be found here[3] or will show up in your gerrit reviews. ISO and environments have been updated to the latest ones. [1]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/ [2]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.ubuntu.ha_neutron_vlan/ [3]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com -- Igor Belikov Fuel DevOps ibeli...@mirantis.com On 29 Jan 2015, at 13:42, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com wrote: Mike, Any objections / additional suggestions? no objections from me, and it's already covered by LP 1415116 bug [1] [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1415116 On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote: Folks, one of the things we should not forget about - is out Fuel CI gating jobs/tests. [1], [2]. One of them is actually runs simple mode. Unfortunately, I don't see details about tests ran for [1], [2], but I'm pretty sure it's same set as [3], [4]. I suggest to change tests. First of all, we need to get rid of simple runs (since we are deprecating it), and second - I'd like us to run Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN for one of the tests. Any objections / additional suggestions? [1] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_centos/ [2] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/ [3] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_centos/ [4] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/ On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Vasilenko svasile...@mirantis.com wrote: +1 to replace simple to HA with one controller /sv __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode
What do you guys think about switching CentOS CI job [1] to HA with single controller (1 controller + 1 or 2 computes)? Just to verify that our replacement of Simple mode works fine. [1] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/ On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote: Thanks Igor for the quick turn over, excellent! On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Igor Belikov ibeli...@mirantis.com wrote: Folks, Changes in CI jobs have been made, for master branch of fuel-library we are running CentOS HA + Nova VLAN and Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN . Job naming schema has also been changed, so now it includes actual testgroup. Current links for master branch CI jobs are [1] and [2], all other jobs can be found here[3] or will show up in your gerrit reviews. ISO and environments have been updated to the latest ones. [1] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/ [2] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.ubuntu.ha_neutron_vlan/ [3]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com -- Igor Belikov Fuel DevOps ibeli...@mirantis.com On 29 Jan 2015, at 13:42, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com wrote: Mike, Any objections / additional suggestions? no objections from me, and it's already covered by LP 1415116 bug [1] [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1415116 On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote: Folks, one of the things we should not forget about - is out Fuel CI gating jobs/tests. [1], [2]. One of them is actually runs simple mode. Unfortunately, I don't see details about tests ran for [1], [2], but I'm pretty sure it's same set as [3], [4]. I suggest to change tests. First of all, we need to get rid of simple runs (since we are deprecating it), and second - I'd like us to run Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN for one of the tests. Any objections / additional suggestions? [1] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_centos/ [2] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/ [3] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_centos/ [4] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/ On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Vasilenko svasile...@mirantis.com wrote: +1 to replace simple to HA with one controller /sv __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org ?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode
Thanks Igor for the quick turn over, excellent! On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Igor Belikov ibeli...@mirantis.com wrote: Folks, Changes in CI jobs have been made, for master branch of fuel-library we are running CentOS HA + Nova VLAN and Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN . Job naming schema has also been changed, so now it includes actual testgroup. Current links for master branch CI jobs are [1] and [2], all other jobs can be found here[3] or will show up in your gerrit reviews. ISO and environments have been updated to the latest ones. [1] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/ [2] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.ubuntu.ha_neutron_vlan/ [3]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com -- Igor Belikov Fuel DevOps ibeli...@mirantis.com On 29 Jan 2015, at 13:42, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com wrote: Mike, Any objections / additional suggestions? no objections from me, and it's already covered by LP 1415116 bug [1] [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1415116 On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote: Folks, one of the things we should not forget about - is out Fuel CI gating jobs/tests. [1], [2]. One of them is actually runs simple mode. Unfortunately, I don't see details about tests ran for [1], [2], but I'm pretty sure it's same set as [3], [4]. I suggest to change tests. First of all, we need to get rid of simple runs (since we are deprecating it), and second - I'd like us to run Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN for one of the tests. Any objections / additional suggestions? [1] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_centos/ [2] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/ [3] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_centos/ [4] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/ On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Vasilenko svasile...@mirantis.com wrote: +1 to replace simple to HA with one controller /sv __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode
Mike, Any objections / additional suggestions? no objections from me, and it's already covered by LP 1415116 bug [1] [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1415116 On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote: Folks, one of the things we should not forget about - is out Fuel CI gating jobs/tests. [1], [2]. One of them is actually runs simple mode. Unfortunately, I don't see details about tests ran for [1], [2], but I'm pretty sure it's same set as [3], [4]. I suggest to change tests. First of all, we need to get rid of simple runs (since we are deprecating it), and second - I'd like us to run Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN for one of the tests. Any objections / additional suggestions? [1] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_centos/ [2] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/ [3] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_centos/ [4] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/ On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Vasilenko svasile...@mirantis.com wrote: +1 to replace simple to HA with one controller /sv __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode
Folks, Changes in CI jobs have been made, for master branch of fuel-library we are running CentOS HA + Nova VLAN and Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN . Job naming schema has also been changed, so now it includes actual testgroup. Current links for master branch CI jobs are [1] and [2], all other jobs can be found here[3] or will show up in your gerrit reviews. ISO and environments have been updated to the latest ones. [1]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/ https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.centos.ha_nova_vlan/ [2]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.ubuntu.ha_neutron_vlan/ https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master.fuel-library.ubuntu.ha_neutron_vlan/ [3]https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/ -- Igor Belikov Fuel DevOps ibeli...@mirantis.com On 29 Jan 2015, at 13:42, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com wrote: Mike, Any objections / additional suggestions? no objections from me, and it's already covered by LP 1415116 bug [1] [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1415116 https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1415116 On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com mailto:mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote: Folks, one of the things we should not forget about - is out Fuel CI gating jobs/tests. [1], [2]. One of them is actually runs simple mode. Unfortunately, I don't see details about tests ran for [1], [2], but I'm pretty sure it's same set as [3], [4]. I suggest to change tests. First of all, we need to get rid of simple runs (since we are deprecating it), and second - I'd like us to run Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN for one of the tests. Any objections / additional suggestions? [1] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_centos/ https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_centos/ [2] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/ https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/ [3] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_centos/ https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_centos/ [4] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/ https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/ On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Vasilenko svasile...@mirantis.com mailto:svasile...@mirantis.com wrote: +1 to replace simple to HA with one controller /sv __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode
+1 to replace simple to HA with one controller /sv __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode
Folks, one of the things we should not forget about - is out Fuel CI gating jobs/tests. [1], [2]. One of them is actually runs simple mode. Unfortunately, I don't see details about tests ran for [1], [2], but I'm pretty sure it's same set as [3], [4]. I suggest to change tests. First of all, we need to get rid of simple runs (since we are deprecating it), and second - I'd like us to run Ubuntu HA + Neutron VLAN for one of the tests. Any objections / additional suggestions? [1] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_centos/ [2] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/master_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/ [3] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_centos/ [4] https://fuel-jenkins.mirantis.com/job/6_0_fuellib_review_systest_ubuntu/ On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Sergey Vasilenko svasile...@mirantis.com wrote: +1 to replace simple to HA with one controller /sv __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode
+1 On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, After starting implementing granular deployment we've faced a bunch of issues that would make further development of this feature much more complicated if we have to support both Simple and HA deployment modes. For example: simple mode does not require cluster (corosync, pacemaker, vips, etc), so we had to skip this task for Simple mode somehow - we can use conditional tasks, or conditional manifests in our tasks, or create separate task graphs for different deployment modes, etc - either way it's pretty much doubling the amount of work for some parts of Fuel and our development cycle. At the moment, CI blocks us from further development of fuel-library modularization BP [2] because we still use Simple mode in CI. So in order to proceed with this BP we have two options: 1) remove Simple mode from CI/QA and thus drop it completely from Fuel 2) double our efforts to support both Simple and HA modes in granular deployment We have a BP about single-controller HA [1]. HA with single controller works just fine at the moment. So if you want to test Fuel on a minimum set of nodes, you can do this on 3 nodes (Fuel master, controller, compute), just like with Simple mode before. I suppose, it's time to finally drop support for Simple mode in Fuel :) [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/single-controller-ha [2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/fuel-library-modularization -- Regards, Aleksandr Didenko On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote: Definitely fuel spec is needed :) On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Evgeniy L e...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi Andrew, I have some comments regarding to you action items 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli We shouldn't do it, because nailgun should handle both versions of cluster. What we have to do here is to use openstack.yaml to keep all possible modes. For new release there will be only ha, to manage previous releases we have to create data migrations in nailgun to create the filed with modes i.e. multinode and ha. Also fixes for ui are required too, I think it mostly related to wizard, 'mode' tab where use can chose ha or non ha cluster in case of new release there should be only ha, and in case of old releases there should be ha and multinode. Thanks, On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Andrew Woodward xar...@gmail.com wrote: Started a new thread so that we don't hijack the older thread. as Andrew, will you work on it in 6.0? What are remaining items there? Also, it might affect our tests - simple mode runs faster so we use it for smoke ISO test. Anastasia, please confirm that we can switch smoke to one-ha-controller model, or even drop smoke at all and use BVT only (running CentOS 3 HA controllers and same with Ubuntu). The primary reason that we haven't disabled single yet is was due to [0] where we where having problems adding additional controllers. With the changes to galera and rabbit clustering it appears that we ended up fixing it already. The remaining issues are: 1) Ensuring we have good test coverage for the cases we expect to support [1] 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli 4) Updating documentation [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266 [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266/comments/7 -- Andrew Mirantis Ceph community ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode
not to prolong single mode, I'd like to see it die. However we will need to be able to add, change, remove, or noop portions of the tasks graph in the future. Many of the plugins that cant currently be built would rely on being able to sub out parts of the graph. How is that going to factor into granular deployments? On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, After starting implementing granular deployment we've faced a bunch of issues that would make further development of this feature much more complicated if we have to support both Simple and HA deployment modes. For example: simple mode does not require cluster (corosync, pacemaker, vips, etc), so we had to skip this task for Simple mode somehow - we can use conditional tasks, or conditional manifests in our tasks, or create separate task graphs for different deployment modes, etc - either way it's pretty much doubling the amount of work for some parts of Fuel and our development cycle. At the moment, CI blocks us from further development of fuel-library modularization BP [2] because we still use Simple mode in CI. So in order to proceed with this BP we have two options: 1) remove Simple mode from CI/QA and thus drop it completely from Fuel 2) double our efforts to support both Simple and HA modes in granular deployment We have a BP about single-controller HA [1]. HA with single controller works just fine at the moment. So if you want to test Fuel on a minimum set of nodes, you can do this on 3 nodes (Fuel master, controller, compute), just like with Simple mode before. I suppose, it's time to finally drop support for Simple mode in Fuel :) [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/single-controller-ha [2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/fuel-library-modularization -- Regards, Aleksandr Didenko On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote: Definitely fuel spec is needed :) On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Evgeniy L e...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi Andrew, I have some comments regarding to you action items 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli We shouldn't do it, because nailgun should handle both versions of cluster. What we have to do here is to use openstack.yaml to keep all possible modes. For new release there will be only ha, to manage previous releases we have to create data migrations in nailgun to create the filed with modes i.e. multinode and ha. Also fixes for ui are required too, I think it mostly related to wizard, 'mode' tab where use can chose ha or non ha cluster in case of new release there should be only ha, and in case of old releases there should be ha and multinode. Thanks, On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Andrew Woodward xar...@gmail.com wrote: Started a new thread so that we don't hijack the older thread. as Andrew, will you work on it in 6.0? What are remaining items there? Also, it might affect our tests - simple mode runs faster so we use it for smoke ISO test. Anastasia, please confirm that we can switch smoke to one-ha-controller model, or even drop smoke at all and use BVT only (running CentOS 3 HA controllers and same with Ubuntu). The primary reason that we haven't disabled single yet is was due to [0] where we where having problems adding additional controllers. With the changes to galera and rabbit clustering it appears that we ended up fixing it already. The remaining issues are: 1) Ensuring we have good test coverage for the cases we expect to support [1] 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli 4) Updating documentation [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266 [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266/comments/7 -- Andrew Mirantis Ceph community ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Andrew Mirantis Fuel community ambassador Ceph community __ OpenStack Development
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode
not to prolong single mode, I'd like to see it die. However we will need to be able to add, change, remove, or noop portions of the tasks graph in the future. Many of the plugins that cant currently be built would rely on being able to sub out parts of the graph. How is that going to factor into granular deployments? There is several ways to achieve noop task: 1. By condition on task itself (same expression parser that is used for UI validation). Right now we are able to add condtion like, cluster:mode != multinode, but the problem is additional complexity to support different chains of tasks, and additional refactoring in library. 2. Skip particular task in deployment API call As for plugins and add/stubout/change - all of this is possible, there is no plugins API for that stuff, and we will need to think what exactly we want to expose, but from granular deployment perspective it is just a matter of changing data for particular task in graph __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode
+1 -- Best regards, Sergii Golovatiuk, Skype #golserge IRC #holser On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Stanislaw Bogatkin sbogat...@mirantis.com wrote: +1 On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, After starting implementing granular deployment we've faced a bunch of issues that would make further development of this feature much more complicated if we have to support both Simple and HA deployment modes. For example: simple mode does not require cluster (corosync, pacemaker, vips, etc), so we had to skip this task for Simple mode somehow - we can use conditional tasks, or conditional manifests in our tasks, or create separate task graphs for different deployment modes, etc - either way it's pretty much doubling the amount of work for some parts of Fuel and our development cycle. At the moment, CI blocks us from further development of fuel-library modularization BP [2] because we still use Simple mode in CI. So in order to proceed with this BP we have two options: 1) remove Simple mode from CI/QA and thus drop it completely from Fuel 2) double our efforts to support both Simple and HA modes in granular deployment We have a BP about single-controller HA [1]. HA with single controller works just fine at the moment. So if you want to test Fuel on a minimum set of nodes, you can do this on 3 nodes (Fuel master, controller, compute), just like with Simple mode before. I suppose, it's time to finally drop support for Simple mode in Fuel :) [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/single-controller-ha [2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/fuel-library-modularization -- Regards, Aleksandr Didenko On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote: Definitely fuel spec is needed :) On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Evgeniy L e...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi Andrew, I have some comments regarding to you action items 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli We shouldn't do it, because nailgun should handle both versions of cluster. What we have to do here is to use openstack.yaml to keep all possible modes. For new release there will be only ha, to manage previous releases we have to create data migrations in nailgun to create the filed with modes i.e. multinode and ha. Also fixes for ui are required too, I think it mostly related to wizard, 'mode' tab where use can chose ha or non ha cluster in case of new release there should be only ha, and in case of old releases there should be ha and multinode. Thanks, On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Andrew Woodward xar...@gmail.com wrote: Started a new thread so that we don't hijack the older thread. as Andrew, will you work on it in 6.0? What are remaining items there? Also, it might affect our tests - simple mode runs faster so we use it for smoke ISO test. Anastasia, please confirm that we can switch smoke to one-ha-controller model, or even drop smoke at all and use BVT only (running CentOS 3 HA controllers and same with Ubuntu). The primary reason that we haven't disabled single yet is was due to [0] where we where having problems adding additional controllers. With the changes to galera and rabbit clustering it appears that we ended up fixing it already. The remaining issues are: 1) Ensuring we have good test coverage for the cases we expect to support [1] 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli 4) Updating documentation [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266 [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266/comments/7 -- Andrew Mirantis Ceph community ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode
+1 to simple mode removal On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Stanislaw Bogatkin sbogat...@mirantis.com wrote: +1 On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, After starting implementing granular deployment we've faced a bunch of issues that would make further development of this feature much more complicated if we have to support both Simple and HA deployment modes. For example: simple mode does not require cluster (corosync, pacemaker, vips, etc), so we had to skip this task for Simple mode somehow - we can use conditional tasks, or conditional manifests in our tasks, or create separate task graphs for different deployment modes, etc - either way it's pretty much doubling the amount of work for some parts of Fuel and our development cycle. At the moment, CI blocks us from further development of fuel-library modularization BP [2] because we still use Simple mode in CI. So in order to proceed with this BP we have two options: 1) remove Simple mode from CI/QA and thus drop it completely from Fuel 2) double our efforts to support both Simple and HA modes in granular deployment We have a BP about single-controller HA [1]. HA with single controller works just fine at the moment. So if you want to test Fuel on a minimum set of nodes, you can do this on 3 nodes (Fuel master, controller, compute), just like with Simple mode before. I suppose, it's time to finally drop support for Simple mode in Fuel :) [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/single-controller-ha [2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/fuel-library-modularization -- Regards, Aleksandr Didenko On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote: Definitely fuel spec is needed :) On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Evgeniy L e...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi Andrew, I have some comments regarding to you action items 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli We shouldn't do it, because nailgun should handle both versions of cluster. What we have to do here is to use openstack.yaml to keep all possible modes. For new release there will be only ha, to manage previous releases we have to create data migrations in nailgun to create the filed with modes i.e. multinode and ha. Also fixes for ui are required too, I think it mostly related to wizard, 'mode' tab where use can chose ha or non ha cluster in case of new release there should be only ha, and in case of old releases there should be ha and multinode. Thanks, On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Andrew Woodward xar...@gmail.com wrote: Started a new thread so that we don't hijack the older thread. as Andrew, will you work on it in 6.0? What are remaining items there? Also, it might affect our tests - simple mode runs faster so we use it for smoke ISO test. Anastasia, please confirm that we can switch smoke to one-ha-controller model, or even drop smoke at all and use BVT only (running CentOS 3 HA controllers and same with Ubuntu). The primary reason that we haven't disabled single yet is was due to [0] where we where having problems adding additional controllers. With the changes to galera and rabbit clustering it appears that we ended up fixing it already. The remaining issues are: 1) Ensuring we have good test coverage for the cases we expect to support [1] 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli 4) Updating documentation [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266 [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266/comments/7 -- Andrew Mirantis Ceph community ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Yours Faithfully, Vladimir Kuklin, Fuel Library Tech Lead, Mirantis,
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode
Hi, After starting implementing granular deployment we've faced a bunch of issues that would make further development of this feature much more complicated if we have to support both Simple and HA deployment modes. For example: simple mode does not require cluster (corosync, pacemaker, vips, etc), so we had to skip this task for Simple mode somehow - we can use conditional tasks, or conditional manifests in our tasks, or create separate task graphs for different deployment modes, etc - either way it's pretty much doubling the amount of work for some parts of Fuel and our development cycle. At the moment, CI blocks us from further development of fuel-library modularization BP [2] because we still use Simple mode in CI. So in order to proceed with this BP we have two options: 1) remove Simple mode from CI/QA and thus drop it completely from Fuel 2) double our efforts to support both Simple and HA modes in granular deployment We have a BP about single-controller HA [1]. HA with single controller works just fine at the moment. So if you want to test Fuel on a minimum set of nodes, you can do this on 3 nodes (Fuel master, controller, compute), just like with Simple mode before. I suppose, it's time to finally drop support for Simple mode in Fuel :) [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/single-controller-ha [2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/fuel-library-modularization -- Regards, Aleksandr Didenko On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote: Definitely fuel spec is needed :) On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Evgeniy L e...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi Andrew, I have some comments regarding to you action items 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli We shouldn't do it, because nailgun should handle both versions of cluster. What we have to do here is to use openstack.yaml to keep all possible modes. For new release there will be only ha, to manage previous releases we have to create data migrations in nailgun to create the filed with modes i.e. multinode and ha. Also fixes for ui are required too, I think it mostly related to wizard, 'mode' tab where use can chose ha or non ha cluster in case of new release there should be only ha, and in case of old releases there should be ha and multinode. Thanks, On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Andrew Woodward xar...@gmail.com wrote: Started a new thread so that we don't hijack the older thread. as Andrew, will you work on it in 6.0? What are remaining items there? Also, it might affect our tests - simple mode runs faster so we use it for smoke ISO test. Anastasia, please confirm that we can switch smoke to one-ha-controller model, or even drop smoke at all and use BVT only (running CentOS 3 HA controllers and same with Ubuntu). The primary reason that we haven't disabled single yet is was due to [0] where we where having problems adding additional controllers. With the changes to galera and rabbit clustering it appears that we ended up fixing it already. The remaining issues are: 1) Ensuring we have good test coverage for the cases we expect to support [1] 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli 4) Updating documentation [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266 [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266/comments/7 -- Andrew Mirantis Ceph community ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode
+1, long awaited On 27 Jan 2015, at 14:05, Aleksandr Didenko adide...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, After starting implementing granular deployment we've faced a bunch of issues that would make further development of this feature much more complicated if we have to support both Simple and HA deployment modes. For example: simple mode does not require cluster (corosync, pacemaker, vips, etc), so we had to skip this task for Simple mode somehow - we can use conditional tasks, or conditional manifests in our tasks, or create separate task graphs for different deployment modes, etc - either way it's pretty much doubling the amount of work for some parts of Fuel and our development cycle. At the moment, CI blocks us from further development of fuel-library modularization BP [2] because we still use Simple mode in CI. So in order to proceed with this BP we have two options: 1) remove Simple mode from CI/QA and thus drop it completely from Fuel 2) double our efforts to support both Simple and HA modes in granular deployment We have a BP about single-controller HA [1]. HA with single controller works just fine at the moment. So if you want to test Fuel on a minimum set of nodes, you can do this on 3 nodes (Fuel master, controller, compute), just like with Simple mode before. I suppose, it's time to finally drop support for Simple mode in Fuel :) [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/single-controller-ha [2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/fuel-library-modularization -- Regards, Aleksandr Didenko On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote: Definitely fuel spec is needed :) On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Evgeniy L e...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi Andrew, I have some comments regarding to you action items 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli We shouldn't do it, because nailgun should handle both versions of cluster. What we have to do here is to use openstack.yaml to keep all possible modes. For new release there will be only ha, to manage previous releases we have to create data migrations in nailgun to create the filed with modes i.e. multinode and ha. Also fixes for ui are required too, I think it mostly related to wizard, 'mode' tab where use can chose ha or non ha cluster in case of new release there should be only ha, and in case of old releases there should be ha and multinode. Thanks, On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Andrew Woodward xar...@gmail.com wrote: Started a new thread so that we don't hijack the older thread. as Andrew, will you work on it in 6.0? What are remaining items there? Also, it might affect our tests - simple mode runs faster so we use it for smoke ISO test. Anastasia, please confirm that we can switch smoke to one-ha-controller model, or even drop smoke at all and use BVT only (running CentOS 3 HA controllers and same with Ubuntu). The primary reason that we haven't disabled single yet is was due to [0] where we where having problems adding additional controllers. With the changes to galera and rabbit clustering it appears that we ended up fixing it already. The remaining issues are: 1) Ensuring we have good test coverage for the cases we expect to support [1] 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli 4) Updating documentation [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266 [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266/comments/7 -- Andrew Mirantis Ceph community ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Tomasz 'Zen' Napierala Sr. OpenStack Engineer tnapier...@mirantis.com __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode
Definitely fuel spec is needed :) On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Evgeniy L e...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi Andrew, I have some comments regarding to you action items 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli We shouldn't do it, because nailgun should handle both versions of cluster. What we have to do here is to use openstack.yaml to keep all possible modes. For new release there will be only ha, to manage previous releases we have to create data migrations in nailgun to create the filed with modes i.e. multinode and ha. Also fixes for ui are required too, I think it mostly related to wizard, 'mode' tab where use can chose ha or non ha cluster in case of new release there should be only ha, and in case of old releases there should be ha and multinode. Thanks, On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Andrew Woodward xar...@gmail.com wrote: Started a new thread so that we don't hijack the older thread. as Andrew, will you work on it in 6.0? What are remaining items there? Also, it might affect our tests - simple mode runs faster so we use it for smoke ISO test. Anastasia, please confirm that we can switch smoke to one-ha-controller model, or even drop smoke at all and use BVT only (running CentOS 3 HA controllers and same with Ubuntu). The primary reason that we haven't disabled single yet is was due to [0] where we where having problems adding additional controllers. With the changes to galera and rabbit clustering it appears that we ended up fixing it already. The remaining issues are: 1) Ensuring we have good test coverage for the cases we expect to support [1] 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli 4) Updating documentation [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266 [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266/comments/7 -- Andrew Mirantis Ceph community ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode
Thanks, Andrew. I think it's worth to track as a normal feature with formal fuel-specs, as it touches too many things (docs and a number of tests). Should be short spec though. On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Andrew Woodward xar...@gmail.com wrote: Started a new thread so that we don't hijack the older thread. as Andrew, will you work on it in 6.0? What are remaining items there? Also, it might affect our tests - simple mode runs faster so we use it for smoke ISO test. Anastasia, please confirm that we can switch smoke to one-ha-controller model, or even drop smoke at all and use BVT only (running CentOS 3 HA controllers and same with Ubuntu). The primary reason that we haven't disabled single yet is was due to [0] where we where having problems adding additional controllers. With the changes to galera and rabbit clustering it appears that we ended up fixing it already. The remaining issues are: 1) Ensuring we have good test coverage for the cases we expect to support [1] 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli 4) Updating documentation [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266 [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266/comments/7 -- Andrew Mirantis Ceph community ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Mike Scherbakov #mihgen ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] removing single mode
Hi Andrew, I have some comments regarding to you action items 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli We shouldn't do it, because nailgun should handle both versions of cluster. What we have to do here is to use openstack.yaml to keep all possible modes. For new release there will be only ha, to manage previous releases we have to create data migrations in nailgun to create the filed with modes i.e. multinode and ha. Also fixes for ui are required too, I think it mostly related to wizard, 'mode' tab where use can chose ha or non ha cluster in case of new release there should be only ha, and in case of old releases there should be ha and multinode. Thanks, On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Andrew Woodward xar...@gmail.com wrote: Started a new thread so that we don't hijack the older thread. as Andrew, will you work on it in 6.0? What are remaining items there? Also, it might affect our tests - simple mode runs faster so we use it for smoke ISO test. Anastasia, please confirm that we can switch smoke to one-ha-controller model, or even drop smoke at all and use BVT only (running CentOS 3 HA controllers and same with Ubuntu). The primary reason that we haven't disabled single yet is was due to [0] where we where having problems adding additional controllers. With the changes to galera and rabbit clustering it appears that we ended up fixing it already. The remaining issues are: 1) Ensuring we have good test coverage for the cases we expect to support [1] 2) Removing simple mode from the ui and tests 3) Removing simple mode support from nailgun (maybe we leave it) and cli 4) Updating documentation [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266 [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1350266/comments/7 -- Andrew Mirantis Ceph community ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
