Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Continuing on Calling driver interface on every API request

2014-08-12 Thread Avishay Balderman
:58 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Continuing on Calling driver interface on every API request Hi, Validations such as timeout delay should be performed on the API level before it reaches the driver

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Continuing on Calling driver interface on every API request

2014-08-12 Thread Eichberger, German
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Continuing on Calling driver interface on every API request Well, that exactly what we've tried to solve with tags in the flavor. Considering your example with whole configuration being

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Continuing on Calling driver interface on every API request

2014-08-11 Thread Samuel Bercovici
Hi, Validations such as timeout delay should be performed on the API level before it reaches the driver. For a configuration tree (lb, listeners, pools, etc.), there should be one provider. Having provider defined in multiple places does not make sense. -San. From: Vijay Venkatachalam

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Continuing on Calling driver interface on every API request

2014-08-11 Thread Brandon Logan
Yeah what I meant was the only solution I could come up with so that the driver gets passed every call is to have the every entity have a provider. I do believe this is a bit cumbersome for a user, and extra validation would be needed to verify that two entities linked together cannot have

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Continuing on Calling driver interface on every API request

2014-08-11 Thread Doug Wiegley
Hi all, Validations such as ³timeout delay² should be performed on the API level before it reaches the driver. For a configuration tree (lb, listeners, pools, etc.), there should be one provider. You¹re right, but I think the point of Vijay¹s example was to highlight the combo error problem

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Continuing on Calling driver interface on every API request

2014-08-11 Thread Samuel Bercovici
(not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Continuing on Calling driver interface on every API request Hi all, Validations such as ³timeout delay² should be performed on the API level before it reaches the driver. For a configuration tree (lb, listeners, pools, etc

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Continuing on Calling driver interface on every API request

2014-08-11 Thread Doug Wiegley
- From: Doug Wiegley [mailto:do...@a10networks.com] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 6:55 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Continuing on Calling driver interface on every API request Hi all, Validations such as ³timeout

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Continuing on Calling driver interface on every API request

2014-08-11 Thread Vijay Venkatachalam
: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Continuing on Calling driver interface on every API request Hi Sam, Very true. I think that Vijay’s objection is that we are currently imposing a logical structure on the driver, when it should be a driver decision. Certainly, it goes both ways. And I also

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Continuing on Calling driver interface on every API request

2014-08-11 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Wiegley [mailto:do...@a10networks.com] Sent: 11 August 2014 22:02 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Continuing on Calling driver interface on every API request Hi Sam, Very true. I think that Vijay’s objection

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Continuing on Calling driver interface on every API request

2014-08-11 Thread Brandon Logan
: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Continuing on Calling driver interface on every API request Hi all, Validations such as ³timeout delay² should be performed on the API level before it reaches the driver

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Continuing on Calling driver interface on every API request

2014-08-11 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Continuing on Calling driver interface on every API request Hi Sam, Very true. I think that Vijay’s objection is that we are currently imposing a logical