--
From: Dan Smith d...@danplanet.commailto:d...@danplanet.com
Date: 9 October 2014 17:40
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] object field naming question
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 01:45:43PM +, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote:
Hi All,
The following question relates to this change:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/125091/
This change adds a field to the ComputeNode object called
supported_instances. It also adds an object called
On 10/09/2014 10:16 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 01:45:43PM +, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote:
Hi All,
The following question relates to this change:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/125091/
This change adds a field to the ComputeNode object called
On 10/09/2014 09:45 AM, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote:
Hi All,
The following question relates to this change:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/125091/
This change adds a field to the ComputeNode object called
“supported_instances”. It also adds an object called “SupportedInstance”
that has
The value it adds (and that an underscore would add in hvtype -
hv_type) is that the name would match the naming style for the vast
majority of everything else in OpenStack. See, for examples:
Agreed.
As mentioned in the review, I disagree on this point, since doing a
cleanup afterwards
