Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] Question about where to render
haproxy configurations
Hi German,
Responses in-line:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Eichberger, German
german.eichber...@hp.com wrote:
Hi Stephen
Hi German and Brandon,
Responses in-line:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Brandon Logan brandon.lo...@rackspace.com
wrote:
Hi German,
Comments in-line
On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 04:49 +, Eichberger, German wrote:
Hi Steven,
Thanks for taking the time to lay out the components
] Question about where to render haproxy
configurations
Hi German,
Responses in-line:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Eichberger, German
german.eichber...@hp.commailto:german.eichber...@hp.com wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I think this is a good discussion to have and will make it more clear why we
chose
Hi German,
Thanks for your reply! My responses are in-line below, and of course you
should feel free to counter my counter-points. :)
For anyone else paying attention and interested in expressing a voice here,
we'll probably be voting on this subject at next week's Octavia meeting.
On Thu, Sep
.
Thanks,
German
From: Stephen Balukoff [mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 10:44 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] Question about where to render haproxy
configurations
Hi German,
Thanks
Hi German,
Responses in-line:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Eichberger, German german.eichber...@hp.com
wrote:
Hi Stephen,
I think this is a good discussion to have and will make it more clear why
we chose a specific design. I also believe by having this discussion we
will make the
@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] Question about where to render haproxy
configurations
Hi,
Stephen visited us today (the joy of spending some days in Seattle☺) and we
discussed that further (and sorry for using VM – not sure what won):
1. We will only support one
