-operators] [openstack-dev] [TripleO] consistency vs
packages in TripleO
On 15 February 2014 08:42, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com wrote:
Let me restate the options the way I see it:
Option A is we do our job... by making it possible to install OpenStack
using various distributions
Hi
Assuming I am interpreting your mail correctly, I think option A makes
vastly more sense, with one very specific provision I'd add. More on that
in a moment.
Option B, the idea that we would mangle a package-installed environment to
suit our desired layout, is not going to work out well for
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 11:12:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-dev] [TripleO] consistency vs
packages in TripleO
Currently we have two options for upgrading images. A) /mnt/state, B)
a SAN + cinder. We haven't tested B), and I expect for many installs B
Hi Robert,
So far:
- some packages use different usernames
- some put things in different places (and all of them use different
places to the bare metal ephemeral device layout which requires
/mnt/).
- possibly more in future.
Somehow I miss between your suggestions of option #A and #B
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
So progressing with the 'and folk that want to use packages can' arc,
we're running into some friction.
I've copied -operators in on this because its very relevant IMO to operators
:)
So far:
- some packages use different
