Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Resources owned by a project/tenant are not cleaned up after that project is deleted from keystone

2015-02-25 Thread Zane Bitter
On 25/02/15 19:15, Dolph Mathews wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Zane Bitter mailto:zbit...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 25/02/15 15:37, Joe Gordon wrote: On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Tim Bell mailto:tim.b...@cern.ch>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Resources owned by a project/tenant are not cleaned up after that project is deleted from keystone

2015-02-25 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 25/02/15 15:37, Joe Gordon wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Tim Bell > > wrote: >> >> >> A few inline comments and a general point >> >> How do we handle scenarios like volumes when we have

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Resources owned by a project/tenant are not cleaned up after that project is deleted from keystone

2015-02-25 Thread Zane Bitter
On 25/02/15 15:37, Joe Gordon wrote: On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Tim Bell mailto:tim.b...@cern.ch>> wrote: A few inline comments and a general point How do we handle scenarios like volumes when we have a per-component janitor rather than a single co-ordinator ? To be cl

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Resources owned by a project/tenant are not cleaned up after that project is deleted from keystone

2015-02-25 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Matt Joyce wrote: > Wondering if heat should be performing this orchestration. > I wouldn't expect heat to have access to everything that needs to be cleaned up. > > Would provide for a more pluggable front end to the action set. > > -matt > > On Feb 25, 2015 2

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Resources owned by a project/tenant are not cleaned up after that project is deleted from keystone

2015-02-25 Thread Matt Joyce
Wondering if heat should be performing this orchestration. Would provide for a more pluggable front end to the action set. -matt On Feb 25, 2015 2:37 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Tim Bell wrote: >> >> >> A few inline comments and a general point >> >> How do w

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Resources owned by a project/tenant are not cleaned up after that project is deleted from keystone

2015-02-25 Thread Joe Gordon
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Tim Bell wrote: > > A few inline comments and a general point > > How do we handle scenarios like volumes when we have a per-component > janitor rather than a single co-ordinator ? > > To be clean, > > 1. nova should shutdown the instance > 2. nova should then ask

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Resources owned by a project/tenant are not cleaned up after that project is deleted from keystone

2015-02-21 Thread Tim Bell
A few inline comments and a general point How do we handle scenarios like volumes when we have a per-component janitor rather than a single co-ordinator ? To be clean, 1. nova should shutdown the instance 2. nova should then ask the volume to be detached 3. cinder could then perform the 'proje

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Resources owned by a project/tenant are not cleaned up after that project is deleted from keystone

2015-02-19 Thread Ian Cordasco
On 2/2/15, 15:41, "Morgan Fainberg" wrote: > >On February 2, 2015 at 1:31:14 PM, Joe Gordon (joe.gord...@gmail.com) >wrote: > > > >On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Morgan Fainberg > wrote: > >I think the simple answer is "yes". We (keystone) should emit >notifications. And yes other projects sh

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Resources owned by a project/tenant are not cleaned up after that project is deleted from keystone

2015-02-02 Thread Morgan Fainberg
On February 2, 2015 at 1:31:14 PM, Joe Gordon (joe.gord...@gmail.com) wrote: On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: I think the simple answer is "yes". We (keystone) should emit notifications. And yes other projects should listen. The only thing really in discussion should be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Resources owned by a project/tenant are not cleaned up after that project is deleted from keystone

2015-02-02 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > I think the simple answer is "yes". We (keystone) should emit > notifications. And yes other projects should listen. > > The only thing really in discussion should be: > > 1: soft delete or hard delete? Does the service mark it as orphaned

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Resources owned by a project/tenant are not cleaned up after that project is deleted from keystone

2015-02-02 Thread Morgan Fainberg
I think the simple answer is "yes". We (keystone) should emit notifications. And yes other projects should listen. The only thing really in discussion should be: 1: soft delete or hard delete? Does the service mark it as orphaned, or just delete (leave this to nova, cinder, etc to discuss) 2: